Le 14.01.2013 19:42, CeDeROM a écrit :
> Hello Laurent :-)
>
> Thank you for your input and good words :-) Glad we agree here, also
> that this is a lot of work to be done, this is why I prefer to ask and
> plan first :-)
great point.
> We can use simple name "Core" no problem :-)
>
> Regarding the C++ there should be a bigger discussion and maybe some
> analysis of what are the advantages of C over C++ and vice versa and
> we can choose better solution... C is simple and fast, and the work
> can be done with C, there are some people that want it done in C, so
> we would have to present very strong arguments to use C++ I guess...
> what are the real code size and speed differences?
If we want an elegant solution and more robust the way is C++ !

Code size differences between C or C++ ? ... The C++ will give us a bit 
larger binary but the gap will be really small. But why this question in 
2013 ?
Speed differences between C or C++ ? ... The real speed gain will be in 
the concept and not the language used, except if you use a script langage !

Laurent
http://www.amontec.com


> I dont think there is any problem with numbering as most people know
> why they use OpenOCD :-) But I like the user convenience approach :-)
> Maybe it is time to bump the current version to 1.0.0 and start new
> work as 2.0.0? It can cause some mess however, so I guess I can work
> on 1.0.0 as development release available only via git and when its
> ready we can make a release to the public...
>
> Best regards! :-)
> Tomek
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to