Tomek CEDRO wrote: > Still I would like to listen for arguments against this approach first- if > current developers did not choose that path, there must be something about > it.. :-) :-)
Oh dear. OpenOCD needs amazing developers to clean up all the crappy code. OpenOCD does NOT need a rewrite in C++. Please don't waste time on this frankly ridiculous idea, but if you have time to contribute, then please help clean up the mess instead. Or you can of course start a new project. That's really what it will be, if you want to accomplish the same thing as OpenOCD does, but with all new internal structure and in a new programming language. If you want to do that I think you should, but I think it's important to recognize that it is a new, separate, project. It will take you a hell of a lot more than a few months to finish that project. I guess three to five years, full time. If you have any time to contribute to open source embedded debugging, please don't waste it on a rewrite. You write that the SWD work is done. I didn't follow the patch situation in Gerrit. I suspect that careful review could find many things which could be improved in your commits to already in those commits work toward your goal of better internal structure. Maybe others have pointed them out already and you've done lots of such changes - I didn't look at all. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512 _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
