On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Bill Traynor <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry to jump in late here, but OpenOCD is already written in C. Why would > we rewrite in C++? I can appreciate that the refactoring Tomek is proposing > is a large effort, but what benefit does doing it in C++ provide?
Well in fact after over year I got used to current C code, but the problem with that is the code readability, program flow, names, etc. Using C++ would give us objects and methods, that would dramatically increase readability, program flow and extensibility... understanding the code, clear organization and distinction of functionalities is a benefit here... Maybe doing some experiment like oOpenOCD (Objective OpenOCD) can simply show us if its worth trying..? I can try that and few months will show up if it was a right decission, if yes we can merge back the code into original OpenOCD :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
