I've done a bit of tracing through the code and I can't seem to find where the http server in OpenSimulator uses threadpool threads. I did find them used in the LLUDP server and in asyncronous requests from the asset service, but I have yet to find any other uses. is it possible that the http server is still using system threads, bypassing the threadpool? I'm rather curious as I use the built-in http server in a few personal applications and I'm concerned about performance.
On another note, I believe part of the impetus behind LL designing the texture fetch capability was to allow a separate service from the simulator to supply assets to viewers, thereby reducing load on the individual simulator processes. Perhaps this is something OpenSimulator can take advantage of? Probably some kind of asset proxy cache could do a much better job of serving textures and other assets to viewers than the existing monolithic process? I believe it could even be moved to a separate server with a different IP address. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Justin Clark-Casey < jjusti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Akira. I have now updated the "show threads" method to show threadpool > statistics for the main threadpool. Please note that each XEngine script > engine will also have it's own threadpool (which can be seen using the > "xengine status" command). Might need to improve this further. > > "show threads" will also show all in-use threads. However, at least on > mono 2.6.7 this isn't reported by the VM so won't be shown. > > I'm not sure whether this will help you or not in tracking down > performance issues. In some situations it could help (e.g. if threads are > encountering deadlock the number of 'in use' threads will leap up, though > you've probably already noticed deadlock by the long-running threads > reporting monitoring failures and the sim locking up). > > So I'd be happy to hear suggestions for additional data and I'll implement > them if I can, since I think this is going to be a growing area of concern. > Unfortunately pinning down performance issues with a system as complex as > OpenSimulator (with massive numbers of threads and user generated scripts) > is likely to remain a significant challenge for the forseeable future. > > > On 11/03/12 19:15, Akira Sonoda wrote: > >> Am 10. März 2012 03:25 schrieb Justin Clark-Casey < >> jjusti...@googlemail.com >> <mailto:jjustincc@googlemail.**com<jjusti...@googlemail.com> >> >>: >> >> >> I'm sorry to say that you'll have to take the ThreadPool numbers with >> a very very very large pinch of salt. I >> believe they only refer to the built-in mono thread pool and not the >> SmartThreadPool which is the one actually used >> (and beyond that the core simulator and xengine use separate pools). >> I will try and improve this situation soon. >> >> >> Thank you Justin! >> >> Would be nice to have some meaningful statistics for all those >> ThreadPools! Maybe there is a possibility to write those >> statistics to the log from time to time ( e.g. every 30 seconds). >> Together with some documented "best practices" from >> those who operate Sims, with lots of avatars on it - I'm thinking mainly >> the OSgrid Plazas are good references - this >> could be highly valuable information for those who operate Sims for >> similar purposes ( meeting points, parties, concerts >> etc. ) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Opensim-dev mailing list >> Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de >> https://lists.berlios.de/**mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev<https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> >> > > > -- > Justin Clark-Casey (justincc) > http://justincc.org/blog > http://twitter.com/justincc > ______________________________**_________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/**mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev<https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev> >
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
