Never mind. I think I must have fallen asleep while typing that. Dave
On 3/15/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is it worse on digital than on film? > > The flare is in the central part of the frame when using it on a film > camera, as apposed to the edges on digital? > > If that is the case it must be total crap when used on a film camera. > > Dave > > On 3/15/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's about it. It also makes a decent lens hood. > > > > The fixed, built in hood was one of the things I really didn't like > > about the FA31. While it's likely adequate for film cameras, it is > > too little hood for the DSLRs and shows up with flare at the edges > > when shooting in low light which have hot spots near the edges of the > > frame ... something that an f/1.8 lens should be ideal for. > > > > Godfrey > > > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote: > > > > > Well, I just bought a Hoya RM 72 IR filter in 67 mm. size. I'd like > > > to use it on other lenses with step-up rings. I wish there was a > > > solution to fitting it onto my FA 31, but of course that shade is > > > in the way. I suppose I could knock the glass out of 5 or 6 58 mm > > > filtes, then screw them one on top of the other until I clear that > > > shade, then attach the step-up ring and the 67 mm. filter. Can > > > anyone think if another way? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > >
