On 2/23/2017 6:33 PM, Bill wrote:
I've been doing a lot of focus stacked macros with pixel shift. The
level of detail goes up quite a bit, and blown out reds seem to be a
thing of the past as well.
The only downside is that a couple of dozen K1 pixel shift files
stacked up in Photoshop take all 32 GB of memory and then some, so
unless you have a smokin' hot box, you may find yourself wanting to
upgrade.
I don't miss my 6x7 any more.
bill
I did the upgrade to 32 gb / 8 cores / SSD last year, so I should be
prepared. I use Zerene Stacker for larger stacks and it is more
efficient with memory than is PS, though I usually combine multiple ZS
stacks in PS. I'm sure things will feel a bit more sluggish working with
K-1 files, but 6x7 scans weigh in at 560 megs so they can be demanding
as well.
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
