And you could have sold it to one of the many folks keeping old
PDP-11's alive these days.

They really were art. They were hand-stitched and really cool looking objects.


On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Haha, when they dismantled a PDP-11 with 8K core at school, I was
> thinking: hmm I should take this core memory and keep it as a memento,
> but alas, I did not.  Now I wish I had.  It was art.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I find it's a Really Bad Idea to keep these vintage computing
>> anecdotes in mind, though. All that does is hamper you when you are
>> deciding how to accomplish many computing tasks. If you keep on
>> thinking that 400 megabytes is enormous, you will miss opportunities
>> like stacking multiple images.
>>
>> I remember how much getting a second 4K core plane (12 bit words!) did
>> for my PDP-8/e assembler programs. :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In the 80's, a company I worked for had the big room with raised
>>> floors for all the computing equipment.  One day, after we had been
>>> chronically short on disk space, a huge box came in.  It was a washing
>>> machine sized disk drive from Fujitsu, that came with the whopping
>>> capacity of 400Mbytes.  We were overjoyed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
>>>> On 2/23/2017 6:33 PM, Bill wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been doing a lot of focus stacked macros with pixel shift. The level
>>>>> of detail goes up quite a bit, and blown out reds seem to be a thing of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> past as well.
>>>>> The only downside is that a couple of dozen K1 pixel shift files stacked
>>>>> up in Photoshop take all 32 GB of memory and then some, so unless you 
>>>>> have a
>>>>> smokin' hot box, you may find yourself wanting to upgrade.
>>>>> I don't miss my 6x7 any more.
>>>>>
>>>>> bill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did the upgrade to 32 gb / 8 cores / SSD last year, so I should be
>>>> prepared. I use Zerene Stacker for larger stacks and it is more efficient
>>>> with memory than is PS, though I usually combine multiple ZS stacks in PS.
>>>> I'm sure things will feel a bit more sluggish working with K-1 files, but
>>>> 6x7 scans weigh in at 560 megs so they can be demanding as well.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Reduce your Government Footprint
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -bmw
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> -- Reduce your Government Footprint
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to