Hi Mark,

I was just thinking about you and your Subaru CVT a few time in the past week. (We are looking for a car right now.)

I am glad to hear that good news. I'd say that's probably an indicator of Subaru being one of the better manufacturers (behavior-wise). (Even though they should've admitted their problems much earlier.) And your local dealership is also among the better once since they've covered 50% even before this event.

Nissan gave us all sort of problems with our CVT (on Rogue) over the past 9 year, starting from the 1st year. And both, our dealership and the corporate office were very bad to address these problems. They were refusing to admit the problems despite the symptoms, until the transmission failed completely. And for the 2nd time, they were delaying admitting the problem it until the mileage was beyond the limit.

After almost 20 years of owning Nissans (not exclusively), I am too afraid to buy any Nissan at this point: all models I would be potentially interested in have CVTs, and Nissan CVTs are plagued with problems, and Nissan is bad addressing them.

Speaking of "impressive" warranties (mentioned by Alan), - I've just learned that the "best industry warranty" advertised by Hyundai is to a large extent a gimmick: Only the 1st owner is eligible for the 10 yrs/100k miles (powertrain) warranty, for the subsequent owners it is 5yrs/60K. (Additionally, there is practically no "bumper-to-bumper", large portion of the coverage of the "limited" warranty ends within the 1st year.)
Kia's "industry-best" warranty is a similar gimmick.

Anyway, - I am glad Mark for you. Despite the headache, at least you didn't suffer as much of the financial hit...

And the most intriguing question (for this list):
Are you going to buy some new lens with the unexpected ~$4K?
;-)


Igor


Mark C Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:46:26 -0700 wrote:

Just over a year ago I posted about the failure of my Subaru CVT transmission, and appreciated the advice I got here.


Yesterday I received a notice from Subaru that they have retroactively extended the warranty on the CVT's to 10 years / 100K. The letter included a claim form to get reimbursement for out of pocket repair costs for those of us who had their CVT fail. Subaru picked up 50% of the cost to replace my transmission but I was still out of pocket about $4000 - good on Subaru to step and cover this problem.


Mark

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to