Wilfred,

I have a smattering of classical Greek, maybe enough to provide you with 
a little information.

Aristotle apparently coined the term, and didn't define it, so one has 
to figure out its meaning from context. (There is no listing for it in 
Liddell and Scott's Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon, which is the 
only Greek dictionary i have at hand.) J.A. Smith's translation of De 
Anima renders it as "actuality."

It is sometimes transliterated "entelechia" and sometimes "entelecheia" 
(the latter is closer to the actual Greek), so an Internet search on 
either of those spellings will bring up some useful items.

As for Peirce, the term plays a prominent role in his "New Elements" 
essay, which you'll find in EP2 and online at Arisbe. Another 
illuminating passage is CP 6.356: [[[ It must not be forgotten that 
Aristotle was an Asclepiad, that is, that he belonged to a family which 
for generation after generation, from prehistoric times, had had their 
attention turned to vital phenomena; and he is almost as remarkable for 
his capacity as a naturalist as he is for his incapacity in physics and 
mathematics. He must have had prominently before his mind the fact that 
all eggs are very much alike, and all seeds are very much alike, while 
the animals that grow out of the one, the plants that grow out of the 
other, are as different as possible. Accordingly, his dunamis is 
germinal being, not amounting to existence; while his entelechy is the 
perfect thing that ought to grow out of that germ. ]]]

Another term he gives as equivalent to it is "perfection of being" (CP 
6.341).

I hope this is of some help, though the more accomplished Peircean and 
Aristotelian scholars can probably provide more.

        gary F.

}The revelation of the Divine Reality hath everlastingly been identical 
with its concealment and its concealment identical with its revelation. 
[The Bab]{

gnusystems }{ Pam Jackson & Gary Fuhrman }{ Manitoulin Island, Canada
         }{ [EMAIL PROTECTED] }{ http://users.vianet.ca/gnox/ }{



---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to