On Nov 5, 5:44 am, chrism <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > > I feel should consider whether it's time for me to step back to > > django .. I always hated zope (useless ?) complexity and I love simple > > way of thinking > > I've spent ten years using Zope. Pyramid is not Zope. It does use > several packages in the zope namespace, but end users never use or > need to care about those packages. They're a framework implementation > detail.
And by the way: Pyramid is 5,000 lines of non-test code. Django is about 60,000 (of non-test code). If Django is simpler than Pyramid, then we better check the laws of physics for loopholes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
