On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:52:06AM +0100, Roy Wood wrote: > >> This is surely not a problem because the technically advanced can have > >> the source code and do the fixes, pass these back to Richard and he can > >> get them into an 'official' UQLX SMSQ/E. > > > >that is the optimist view. However there is nothing in the license > >that would guarantee me that the source code would be continuously > >available in the future. > >There is nothing in the license that would guarantee me any of my > >changes will get back into official SMSQ. > >There is nothing in the license to guarantee me that official > >or inofficial binaries of SMSQ will be available. > There is also nothing in the licence that will guarantee that you will > not be run over by a bus - stop being silly.
Thanks for the hint, I will try other methods to minimise the risk of beeing run over by a bus. Unfortunately there is not much I could do to minimise the risks inherent to this license - silly or not I am simply not interested to put any effort into SMSQ under this conditions. > All of this continual bickering and hair splitting is getting needlessly > introspective You have easy to speak when you can change the license to your liking whenever you feel like that. Richard
