[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

["Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)"]

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:22:18 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I haven't answered on this thread until now mainly because (in the first
attempt...) I wasn't sure whether that kind of money would conceivably 
around
in this matter.

Now that Geoff has given more details, here's my 2 cents' worth.

I don't know whether offering something like 1000 pounds for software 
would
be a good idea.

The reason is that it is, in my mind, too much and too little.

Let me explain.

It is too little. If you want to finance a software author, 1000 pounds 
will
get you - what? A month' worth of work?

Look at what Peter has told us on this list - if he were offered 2000 
pounds
for his ongoing work, he wouldn't accept it, because it would be far from
what the software would be worth...
This is a point of view I can share.

<snip>

Regarding what Peter said (and to what Timothy and Bill added) I tend to 
believe that it is a reasonable idea to offer Tony a sum in the area of 
â1.000-2.000 (After all how many SMSQ/e's will be sold in the coming 
years?) with the provision that SMSQ/e could be placed under the GPL or 
some modified version of the GPL license (GPL would be ideal for reasons 
explained previously in length) as long as it is completely open and 
beyond any control. The modified GPL license would not prohibit payment of 
royalties when a dealer sells a copy of SMSQ/e (as it is now) as for 
Marcel and QPC, I believe they will still be covered under the previous 
pre-existent agreement (I believe Marcel has mentioned something like that 
or I could be wrong as usual ;-) .

In any case that would keep everybody happy and we could see QlwIP as part 
of the OS and even more developments further ahead.

In a solution like that, Tony retains his copyright, still gets royalties 
(plus he gets a lump sum in anticipation of future royalties that may -or 
may not- happen).
He has opened SMSQ/e (after a fashion) already anyway and from what I 
understand he even considered to open it completely (again I may be 
wrong), so what's the harm?

Phoebus (back from Florida... btw for anyone coming get a swimsuit ;-)



--
Visit the QL-FAQ at: <http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/faq/> (Still uploading 
stuff!)
Visit the uQLX-win32 homepage at: <http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/uqlx.html>
Visit the uQLX-mac home page at:<http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/uqlxmac.html>