Thomas said:
>One could choose the optional omission and supply the element Note on
>Statement of Responsibility (RDA 2.20.3) -- "... a note providing
>information on a person, family or corporate body not named in the
>statement of responsibility ..."
SLC has been doing that for years for such things as conference
proceedings and continuing education workshops. We don't need a new
set of rules to cover such a situation.
It seems to me most of the advantages touted for RDA could have been
more cheaply and simply done by AACR2/MARC21 revisions.
When/if we actually do have WEMI records, or W/I records, that might
change. If we are to have Bibframe W/I records, RDA needs to be
rearranged to reflect what we would then doing.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
