Cyphre wrote: <...> >>Core and View would be free for use and redistribution for >>commercial and noncommercial use; however, if more than five >>copies are in use at a single company, then purchasing would >>be required. Exception would be the use of REBOL for any >>educational purposes. >> >>This mean you can use REBOL for creating and selling your >>programs, for in-house servers, for small company clients, >>and for use in consulting solutions. <...>
> This licensing model seems to be quite better than the current one! I'd second that! > What > about View/Pro features? Would be great to free(only at the same conditions > you've written above) some (or even all?) of them...at least sound and > library access interface. I think this will help to spread Rebol into wide > area of applications and better compete with other free scripting > languages.What is your opinion on that? Ahh, yes, those people who always try to get the whole hand, if you give them your small finger. ;-D Well, actually, I think there are many people out there who won't take Rebol seriously, unless all versions have shell/library. I, myself, think that encryption is very immportant nowadays. Can live without sound, though. BTW, are there any docs about the system port? Kind regards, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
