Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Forrester S]

I think point is to stop harrassing dxers. Youve harrassed me on my dx
catches and i will NEVER forget that. Trust me.

Todd Skaine
Bloomington mn

On Sep 27, 2017 8:34 AM, "Zacharias Liangas via Hard-Core-DX" <
hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com> wrote:

> Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i  listen to my fav station(s)  as RTM
> Sarawak,  as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM
> outlets that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM
> from the nearby freqs
>
>  Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker
>  To: "Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com" <Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com>,
> "Zach" <sordidandsubl...@gmail.com>
>  Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM
>
>  And and on the subject of contact   Stations that interfere with one I
> like... what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and  other
>  stations and harming the Reception so I make an effort to have it
> rectified  when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be
>  harmed.  So what?  It didn’t take me
>  but an hour or so to contact the
>  authorities
>  in Cuba and India and right the emails.
>
>  DXers may not be a Stations target area but if
>  we don’t say something, we
>  never know what
>  the outcome could be.
>
>  We
>  should never just accept interference just because we are
>  “DX’ers” so I
>  am attempting to do
>  something about it
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09
>  AM WHO DARES WINS <broadwin...@msn.com>
>  wrote:
>
>  > Paul,
>  >
>  > I find it hilariously
>  funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
>  > the same "full time DXer" whom
>  you emulate daily with your style of
>  >
>  reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far
>  as telling us
>  > you've been
>  contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
>  > frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman,
>  which your referenced "full time
>  >
>  DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with
>  other stations
>  > causing QRM on the same
>  time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
>  > has had much success with stations taking
>  his observations seriously, and
>  > making
>  changes only because he does DX daily as his primary
>  occupation. I
>  > in the past also had many
>  battles with said DXer you mention with continued
>  > venom, but found even though his
>  corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
>  > he was correct in pointing out my wrong
>  logs. Perhaps you as I did can
>  > learn
>  from him and as I did became more careful in my logging
>  entries?
>  > Your continued proclamation of
>  logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
>  > you are and have been reported for years
>  by many others in the Hobby. I'm
>  >
>  not saying that it's not interesting your picking up
>  another NEW station
>  > for you, but for
>  even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
>  > catches. Living in the lower 48 makes
>  these stations the norm for most of
>  > us
>  and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from
>  other DX logger's.
>  > I know your a
>  member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
>  > weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has
>  had these same "NEW" stations
>  >
>  listed quite frequently by several part time and full time
>  log reporters
>  > myself included. The only
>  time I ever got responses on my logs were if I
>  > picked up truly new non reported or hard
>  to catch Shortwave stations.
>  >
>  >
>  > John C.
>  >
>  > _
>  > Hard-Core-DX mailing list
>  > Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
>  > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
>  > http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
>  >
>  ___
>  >
>  > THE INFORMATION IN
>  THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
>  > and/or modified under the conditions set
>  down in the Design Science License
>  >
>  published by Michael Stutz at
>  > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
>  >
>  _
>  Hard-Core-DX mailing list
>  Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
>  http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
>  ___
>
>  THE INFORMATION IN THIS
>  ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
>  and/or modified under the conditions set down
>  in the Design Science License
>  published by
>  Michael Stutz at
>  http://

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Stephen C Wood]

I concur Colin. There are so very few SW logs posted anywhere these days that 
anyone who is posting is truly helping to keep the hobby alive. So tallyho and 
onward Paul. Keep'em coming. Not quite sure what John's opposition is or why he 
is bringing Glenn Hauser into this but all I can say is chill and enjoy. 
73's to all 

Stephen Wood 
Harwich, Mass. 

- Original Message -

From: "R. Colin Newell" <coffeecan...@gmail.com> 
To: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> 
Cc: Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com, "Zach" <sordidandsubl...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:26:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker 

I say ignore the trolls and keep posting - it’s a slowly dying hobby with 
little new blood - we might as well enjoy the show while we can. 

Colin Newell - DXer.ca etc etc... 

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. 
> <walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> One post a day is harassing no one, I am simply doing what other dxers 
> 
_ 
Hard-Core-DX mailing list 
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx 
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ 
___ 

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed 
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License 
published by Michael Stutz at 
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html 

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Zacharias Liangas via Hard-Core-DX]

I  repeat my previous message with  two important corections for Todd and a new 
comment 
 that reminds me sometimes when i  listen to my fav station(s)  as RTM 
Sarawak,  as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard _fav QRG 
(freq)_ outlets that are __beyond__ the scope of this post...Luckily  9835 is 
now clear with limited QRM from the nearby freqs. For most of the time heard 
here in SKG between15 -20Z. 

-My new comment: I dont intend to haras anyone This is  just  a point of view 
if you are asking me personally  and sorry if you misunderstand me     . Think 
at as a passioate love with a  station  music or country . The other man here 
has a passion  with Oman.I know someone other with N Korea and another friend 
DXer with L America. I have passion with Malaysia and its music for  more than 
28 years and many DXers know that. Just  notice  that for many years I had 
cooperation with the  Malay counselor for my city! 
So what's the problem ??

>>>
 
  I think point is to  stop  harrassing dxers. Youve harrassed me on my dx 
catches   and i will NEVER forget that. Trust me.  
  Todd Skaine Bloomington
  mn
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[R. Colin Newell]

I say ignore the trolls and keep posting - it’s a slowly dying hobby with 
little new blood - we might as well enjoy the show while we can.

Colin Newell - DXer.ca etc etc...

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. 
>  wrote:
> 
> One post a day is harassing no one, I am simply doing what other dxers
> 
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

One post a day is harassing no one, I am simply doing what other dxers
do... they offer up monitoring reports/logs on multiple stations at once or
post about TP/TA logs... I do the same thing with one signal.

But since no one really seems to be as interested in this Station as me, I
won’t send them out anymore. Your voices have been heard lol

Not a big deal to me either was, I was enjoying monitoring and logging.

This is a hobby, I do it for fun... have I been harsh and needlessly rude
at times? Yeah. We get older and learn.

I have plenty of other stuff to do besides DXing, such as work... which is
why I don’t have the time to post multi station logs every day.  Takes too
long to type.



On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:35 PM Forrester S <amradio1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think point is to stop harrassing dxers. Youve harrassed me on my dx
> catches and i will NEVER forget that. Trust me.
>
> Todd Skaine
> Bloomington mn
>
> On Sep 27, 2017 8:34 AM, "Zacharias Liangas via Hard-Core-DX" <
> hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i  listen to my fav station(s)  as RTM
>> Sarawak,  as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM
>> outlets that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM
>> from the nearby freqs
>>
>>  Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker
>>  To: "Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com" <Hard-core-dx@hard-core-dx.com>,
>> "Zach" <sordidandsubl...@gmail.com>
>>  Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM
>>
>>  And and on the subject of contact   Stations that interfere with one I
>> like... what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and  other
>>  stations and harming the Reception so I make an effort to have it
>> rectified  when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be
>>  harmed.  So what?  It didn’t take me
>>  but an hour or so to contact the
>>  authorities
>>  in Cuba and India and right the emails.
>>
>>  DXers may not be a Stations target area but if
>>  we don’t say something, we
>>  never know what
>>  the outcome could be.
>>
>>  We
>>  should never just accept interference just because we are
>>  “DX’ers” so I
>>  am attempting to do
>>  something about it
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09
>>  AM WHO DARES WINS <broadwin...@msn.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  > Paul,
>>  >
>>  > I find it hilariously
>>  funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
>>  > the same "full time DXer" whom
>>  you emulate daily with your style of
>>  >
>>  reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far
>>  as telling us
>>  > you've been
>>  contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
>>  > frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman,
>>  which your referenced "full time
>>  >
>>  DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with
>>  other stations
>>  > causing QRM on the same
>>  time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
>>  > has had much success with stations taking
>>  his observations seriously, and
>>  > making
>>  changes only because he does DX daily as his primary
>>  occupation. I
>>  > in the past also had many
>>  battles with said DXer you mention with continued
>>  > venom, but found even though his
>>  corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
>>  > he was correct in pointing out my wrong
>>  logs. Perhaps you as I did can
>>  > learn
>>  from him and as I did became more careful in my logging
>>  entries?
>>  > Your continued proclamation of
>>  logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
>>  > you are and have been reported for years
>>  by many others in the Hobby. I'm
>>  >
>>  not saying that it's not interesting your picking up
>>  another NEW station
>>  > for you, but for
>>  even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
>>  > catches. Living in the lower 48 makes
>>  these stations the norm for most of
>>  > us
>>  and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from
>>  other DX logger's.
>>  > I know your a
>>  member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
>>  > weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has
>>  had these same "NEW" stations
>>  >
>>  listed quite frequently by several part time and full time
>>  log reporters
>>  > myself included. The only
>>  time I ever got responses on

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Zacharias Liangas via Hard-Core-DX]

Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i  listen to my fav station(s)  as RTM 
Sarawak,  as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM outlets 
that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM from the 
nearby freqs

 Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker
 To: "hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com" <hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com>, "Zach" 
<sordidandsubl...@gmail.com>
 Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM
 
 And and on the subject of contact   Stations that interfere with one I like... 
what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and  other
 stations and harming the Reception so I make an effort to have it  
rectified  when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be
 harmed.  So what?  It didn’t take me
 but an hour or so to contact the
 authorities
 in Cuba and India and right the emails.
 
 DXers may not be a Stations target area but if
 we don’t say something, we
 never know what
 the outcome could be.
 
 We
 should never just accept interference just because we are
 “DX’ers” so I
 am attempting to do
 something about it
 
 
 
 On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09
 AM WHO DARES WINS <broadwin...@msn.com>
 wrote:
 
 > Paul,
 >
 > I find it hilariously
 funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
 > the same "full time DXer" whom
 you emulate daily with your style of
 >
 reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far
 as telling us
 > you've been
 contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
 > frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman,
 which your referenced "full time
 >
 DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with
 other stations
 > causing QRM on the same
 time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
 > has had much success with stations taking
 his observations seriously, and
 > making
 changes only because he does DX daily as his primary
 occupation. I
 > in the past also had many
 battles with said DXer you mention with continued
 > venom, but found even though his
 corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
 > he was correct in pointing out my wrong
 logs. Perhaps you as I did can
 > learn
 from him and as I did became more careful in my logging
 entries?
 > Your continued proclamation of
 logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
 > you are and have been reported for years
 by many others in the Hobby. I'm
 >
 not saying that it's not interesting your picking up
 another NEW station
 > for you, but for
 even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
 > catches. Living in the lower 48 makes
 these stations the norm for most of
 > us
 and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from
 other DX logger's.
 > I know your a
 member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
 > weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has
 had these same "NEW" stations
 >
 listed quite frequently by several part time and full time
 log reporters
 > myself included. The only
 time I ever got responses on my logs were if I
 > picked up truly new non reported or hard
 to catch Shortwave stations.
 >
 >
 > John C.
 >
 > _
 > Hard-Core-DX mailing list
 > hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
 > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
 > http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
 >
 ___
 >
 > THE INFORMATION IN
 THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
 > and/or modified under the conditions set
 down in the Design Science License
 >
 published by Michael Stutz at
 > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
 >
 _
 Hard-Core-DX mailing list
 hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
 http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
 ___
 
 THE INFORMATION IN THIS
 ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
 and/or modified under the conditions set down
 in the Design Science License
 published by
 Michael Stutz at
 http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

And and on the subject of contact Stations that interfere with one I
like... what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and other
stations and harming the Reception so I make an effort to have it
rectified when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be
harmed.  So what?  It didn’t take me but an hour or so to contact the
authorities in Cuba and India and right the emails.

DXers may not be a Stations target area but if we don’t say something, we
never know what the outcome could be.

We should never just accept interference just because we are “DX’ers” so I
am attempting to do something about it



On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09 AM WHO DARES WINS  wrote:

> Paul,
>
> I find it hilariously funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
> the same "full time DXer" whom you emulate daily with your style of
> reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far as telling us
> you've been contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
> frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman, which your referenced "full time
> DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with other stations
> causing QRM on the same time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
> has had much success with stations taking his observations seriously, and
> making changes only because he does DX daily as his primary occupation. I
> in the past also had many battles with said DXer you mention with continued
> venom, but found even though his corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
> he was correct in pointing out my wrong logs. Perhaps you as I did can
> learn from him and as I did became more careful in my logging entries?
> Your continued proclamation of logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
> you are and have been reported for years by many others in the Hobby. I'm
> not saying that it's not interesting your picking up another NEW station
> for you, but for even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
> catches. Living in the lower 48 makes these stations the norm for most of
> us and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from other DX logger's.
> I know your a member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
> weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has had these same "NEW" stations
> listed quite frequently by several part time and full time log reporters
> myself included. The only time I ever got responses on my logs were if I
> picked up truly new non reported or hard to catch Shortwave stations.
>
>
> John C.
>
> _
> Hard-Core-DX mailing list
> hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
> ___
>
> THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
> and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
> published by Michael Stutz at
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
>
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

If I report a Station as NEW that’s bexause to the best of my memory, it’s
new to MY log book.

I am by no means emulating or copying another DXer on purpose. I observe
the way I observe and write the way I write

And obviously my daily observations about Oman really aren’t appreciated,
which I can really understand why they aren’t, so I probably stop doing
them soon.

Paul


On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09 AM WHO DARES WINS  wrote:

> Paul,
>
> I find it hilariously funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
> the same "full time DXer" whom you emulate daily with your style of
> reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far as telling us
> you've been contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
> frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman, which your referenced "full time
> DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with other stations
> causing QRM on the same time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
> has had much success with stations taking his observations seriously, and
> making changes only because he does DX daily as his primary occupation. I
> in the past also had many battles with said DXer you mention with continued
> venom, but found even though his corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
> he was correct in pointing out my wrong logs. Perhaps you as I did can
> learn from him and as I did became more careful in my logging entries?
> Your continued proclamation of logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
> you are and have been reported for years by many others in the Hobby. I'm
> not saying that it's not interesting your picking up another NEW station
> for you, but for even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
> catches. Living in the lower 48 makes these stations the norm for most of
> us and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from other DX logger's.
> I know your a member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
> weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has had these same "NEW" stations
> listed quite frequently by several part time and full time log reporters
> myself included. The only time I ever got responses on my logs were if I
> picked up truly new non reported or hard to catch Shortwave stations.
>
>
> John C.
>
> _
> Hard-Core-DX mailing list
> hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
> ___
>
> THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
> and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
> published by Michael Stutz at
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
>
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html

Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker

[WHO DARES WINS]

Paul,

I find it hilariously funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is the 
same "full time DXer" whom you emulate daily with your style of reporting logs, 
your logging language, and now going as far as telling us you've been 
contacting offending stations transmitting on the same frequency as your 
beloved 15140, Oman, which your referenced "full time DXer" has been doing with 
success daily for years with other stations causing QRM on the same time and 
frequency. Many times this "full time DXer has had much success with stations 
taking his observations seriously, and making changes only because he does DX 
daily as his primary occupation. I in the past also had many battles with said 
DXer you mention with continued venom, but found even though his corrective 
style at times rubbed me raw, he was correct in pointing out my wrong logs. 
Perhaps you as I did can learn from him and as I did became more careful in my 
logging entries? 
Your continued proclamation of logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for you 
are and have been reported for years by many others in the Hobby. I'm not 
saying that it's not interesting your picking up another NEW station for you, 
but for even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy catches. Living in 
the lower 48 makes these stations the norm for most of us and doesn't generate 
much in the form of replies from other DX logger's.  
I know your a member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their weekly SW 
Flash Sheet which for years has had these same "NEW" stations listed quite 
frequently by several part time and full time log reporters myself included. 
The only time I ever got responses on my logs were if I picked up truly new non 
reported or hard to catch Shortwave stations. 


John C.

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html