[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages

2007-06-16 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
 about '[gentoo-user]  Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 But maybe dialup might be good. But that's details.
 
 Yes, much easier to understand.

Well, fine. Details, details :)

  I mean, what's the advantage of the kde*-meta packages over the kde
  package, when the kde*-meta require just as much junk, as the
  kde package does? Hm, really, what's the use of the kde*-meta package
  anyway?
 
  The kde-meta package is meant to replace the kde package.  The is no
  advantage (and without a workable confcache, at least one
  disadvantage) to running split ebuilds.  The advantage of split ebilds
  is that you have the choice to install only the kde applications you
  want, by using the individual ebaulds, without dragging in all of kde
  (which is what old style kde packages pulled in as a dependency.)

 But with using the kde*-meta package, this advantage doesn't
 exist.
 
 Right, because kde*-meta is supposed to replace, and act as much as 
 possible like the monolithic kde* package.  If you don't want all of 
 kdenetwork you don't install kdenetwork-meta, you install individual 
 applications from kdenetwork.

Well, but as kdenetwork-meta is a dependency of kde-meta, this
solution means, that about 300 packages should be manually
listed, just because one package is not wanted. Because of that,
this is not really a solution - at least not a good one.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Judges, as a class, display, in the matter of arranging alimony, that
reckless generosity which is found only in men who are giving away
someone else's cash.
-- P.G. Wodehouse, Louder and Funnier


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages

2007-06-16 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 16 June 2007, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote about '[gentoo-user]  Re: Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
 · Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  Right, because kde*-meta is supposed to replace, and act as much as
  possible like the monolithic kde* package.  If you don't want all of
  kdenetwork you don't install kdenetwork-meta, you install individual
  applications from kdenetwork.

 Well, but as kdenetwork-meta is a dependency of kde-meta, this
 solution means, that about 300 packages should be manually
 listed, just because one package is not wanted.

No, because as I covered in my other reply, you can still use kdebase-meta, 
kdepim-meta, etc. to pull is all the packages from those parts of kde and 
only list individual applications from the parts you don't want everything 
from (in your case you should be able to use every kdefoo-meta 'cept for 
kdenetwork-meta).  For your particular use case it's still  30 packages, 
not 300.

Sure, maybe that's still too many.  Perhaps a recommends/suggests 
dependency type (all recommends would be post-dependencies) to allow a 
package to install even if all of the packages that satisfy one of it's 
recommend atoms are masked would be better, but you'll have to take that 
up with the developers responsible for specifying the EAPI levels.  
Careful how you phrase any suggestion though or you'll just get shouted 
down by Gentoo isn't Debian replies.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/  \_/ 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Make portage assume, that a package is installed

2007-06-16 Thread Jan Seeger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sorry for being late, but have you tried to add the offending packages
to package.provided and then emerging the meta packages? Not exactly
clean, but cleaner than editing the ebuild, and it works...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGc9USMmLQdC6jvocRAuR1AKCg6iaXJQN0lsbx/NGNZQs5oZge5QCgm9YE
/tv2oDIgGf3X1zgxkmdCjbQ=
=Y+2y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Florian Philipp
Hi!

I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on traditional 
partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't want to 
use initrd and still be able to boot.

I think it's safe to move /home but what do I do with /var, /usr, /tmp 
and /opt?

Thanks in advance!

Florian Philipp



pgp6Np58wEw7q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 16 June 2007, Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about '[gentoo-user] lvm without initrd':
 I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on traditional
 partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't want
 to use initrd and still be able to boot.

Anything 'cept / (and /boot of course) can live on LVM without the need for 
an initrd.  Of course, /lib and /etc can't be on separate block devices 
from /.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/  \_/ 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
 On Saturday 16 June 2007, Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

 about '[gentoo-user] lvm without initrd':
  I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on traditional
  partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't want
  to use initrd and still be able to boot.

 Anything 'cept / (and /boot of course) can live on LVM without the need for
 an initrd.

Yep, and even swap can be a logical volume. So here is an example partition 
layout:

[hs]da1: /boot,64M,ext2 (a little bit larger than needed, 32M would also be 
sufficient.)
[hs]da2: /,256M,choose whatever fs you prefer
[hs]da3: LVM,everything else

Make sure to create LVs for at least /opt, /var, /usr. Regarding /home, I 
prefer one LV per user, mounted via automounter. I also add three more LVs 
for the Gentoo related stuff, also mounted via automounter:

/gentoo/overlays  (portage tree and other overlays, ~1G)
/gentoo/distfiles (~2G)
/gentoo/build (size depends, mine is currently ~5G to satisfy openoffice 
builds).

HTH...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 14:45 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
 I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on
 traditional 
 partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't
 want to 
 use initrd and still be able to boot.

Pretty much what everyone else has said.  The only reason you *need* an
initrd is to be able to mount the root partition.  Since usually the
init process starts the device mapper, finds your LVM volumes and sets
device nodes, etc, and init depends on / being mounted.  You have the
chicken and egg problem.  The initrd solves that problem by creating an
initial /, assembling the LVM volumes, and then mounting the real /.

Also you should make sure that /boot is either on / or on it's own
non-LVM partition as most boot loaders don't understand LVM either
(though I hear GRUB 2 will).

I've used setups with a 4GB non-LVM root and everything else on LVM
though YMMV.  Refer to the FHS for what should be contained in the root
fs.

--
Albert W. Hopkins

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi!
 
 I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on traditional 
 partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't want to 
 use initrd and still be able to boot.

If you don't want to use an initrd, / needs to stay traditional.
And as Grub cannot use LVM either, /boot also needs to stay traditional.

From the top level directories, thus the following need to stay
traditional/cannot be moved to LVM:

/
/boot
/bin
/lib
/sbin
/dev
/proc


 I think it's safe to move /home but what do I do with /var, /usr, /tmp 
 and /opt?

They can all be on LVM.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
You do not beg the sun for mercy.

  -- Maud'dib's Travail from The Stilgar Commentary


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Modelling software - free - preferably easy to install under Gentoo.

2007-06-16 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
I have some (say 100) discrete data sequences sampling a single analogue
system with time-stamp data.

I would like to do some analysis on these signals to see if there are
any interesting things that can be demonstrated - for example, if I
could show a strong correlation in the signals between two times, but
none at other times, I might be able to conclude that there was
communication of some description, but only for a fixed duration.

At the moment I'm open minded about what kind of software I'd want to
employ - and also about what I'd like to prove.  Essentially, I'd like
to analyse the data for features - then ask if they correspond with
system events I'm already broadly aware about (rather than vice-versa.)

Can anyone point me in the right direction, please?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] make oldconfig behaviour

2007-06-16 Thread Galevsky

Hi all,

I faced an ethernet driver miss during my kernel configuration,
because I had a wrong idea of what 'make oldconfig' did. I thought the
oldconfig target build up a new .config file starting from the
/proc/config.gz one then asking for new options.

But It was not the case here:

sd-4421 linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r8 # gunzip -c /proc/config.gz | grep VIA
CONFIG_MVIAC3_2=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y
CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_VIA=y
CONFIG_VIA_RHINE=y
# CONFIG_VIA_RHINE_MMIO is not set
# CONFIG_VIA_RHINE_NAPI is not set
CONFIG_VIA_VELOCITY=y
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA=y
CONFIG_I2C_VIA=m
CONFIG_I2C_VIAPRO=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A is not set

sd-4421 linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r8 # make mrproper oldconfig
[snip]

sd-4421 linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r8 # grep VIA .config
# CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
CONFIG_SATA_VIA=y
# CONFIG_PATA_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_VIA_RHINE is not set
# CONFIG_VIA_VELOCITY is not set
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA=y
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_SOUND_VIA82CXXX is not set

So, I did not build up the VIA RHINE and VELOCITY drivers.
Now I have to build my conf again since the whole configuration may
not suit what I was looking for.

Anyone to tell me what oldconfig target does ?


Many thanks for your support,

Gal'
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Modelling software - free - preferably easy to install under Gentoo.

2007-06-16 Thread Kent Fredric

On 6/17/07, Steve [Gentoo] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have some (say 100) discrete data sequences sampling a single analogue
system with time-stamp data.

I would like to do some analysis on these signals to see if there are
any interesting things that can be demonstrated - for example, if I
could show a strong correlation in the signals between two times, but
none at other times, I might be able to conclude that there was
communication of some description, but only for a fixed duration.

At the moment I'm open minded about what kind of software I'd want to
employ - and also about what I'd like to prove.  Essentially, I'd like
to analyse the data for features - then ask if they correspond with
system events I'm already broadly aware about (rather than vice-versa.)

Can anyone point me in the right direction, please?



Not exactly sure what your asking for, but if the data can be
represented as an audio stream of some description you may want to
look at baudline, its a great tool,  but not in portage.

Basicaly an  FFT time/frequency analysis tool

http://www.baudline.com/

If its of no use to  you, It will probably still have the 'oh thats so
cool'  attributes :)
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED][(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: make oldconfig behaviour

2007-06-16 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Galevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Now I have to build my conf again since the whole configuration may
 not suit what I was looking for.

Take your old .config as a base.

 Anyone to tell me what oldconfig target does ?

It takes the .config it finds in the source directory and
builds the config from there. If there are new selections
in the new kernel, you'll be asked for the value they should
get.

In short: Before running make oldconfig, copy the .config
from your old kernel to your new kernel tree and then run
make oldconfig.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Linux!  Guerrilla UNIX Development Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus.
-- Mark A. Horton KA4YBR, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Modelling software - free - preferably easy to install under Gentoo.

2007-06-16 Thread James
Steve [Gentoo] gentoo_steve at shic.co.uk writes:

 
 I have some (say 100) discrete data sequences sampling a single analogue
 system with time-stamp data.
 
It's unclear what you are after. Advice on which mathematical approaches
will work or which software contains those mathematical approaches?

Matlab is the standard for mathematical analysis of all sorts of
phenomenon, from a mathematical perspective.

 I would like to do some analysis on these signals to see if there are
 any interesting things that can be demonstrated - for example, if I
 could show a strong correlation in the signals between two times, but
 none at other times, I might be able to conclude that there was
 communication of some description, but only for a fixed duration.

Very unclear what you are saying. Are these signals related to events in
your network? More information will help.

 
 At the moment I'm open minded about what kind of software I'd want to
 employ - and also about what I'd like to prove.  Essentially, I'd like
 to analyse the data for features - then ask if they correspond with
 system events I'm already broadly aware about (rather than vice-versa.)

 Can anyone point me in the right direction, please?

You might want to
'cd /usr/portage' and then pick a dir...

'cd sci-mathematics'   and emerge some software who's description
you find potentially interesting

for example

'exi octave' reveals:

* sci-mathematics/koctave
 Available versions:  0.65-r1
 Homepage:http://athlone.ath.cx/~matti/kde/koctave/
 Description: A KDE GUI for Octave numerical computing system

* sci-mathematics/octave
 Available versions:  2.1.57-r1 2.1.69 ~2.1.71-r2 ~2.1.72 2.1.73 ~2.1.73-r1
~2.1.73-r2
 Homepage:http://www.octave.org/
 Description: GNU Octave is a high-level language (MatLab
compatible) intended for numerical computations

* sci-mathematics/octave-forge
 Available versions:  ~2004.11.16-r1 2004.11.16-r2 ~2005.06.13
~2005.06.13-r1 ~2006.01.28 2006.03.17 ~2006.03.17-r1
 Homepage:http://octave.sourceforge.net/
 Description: A collection of custom scripts, functions and
extensions for GNU Octave



hth,


James




-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make oldconfig behaviour

2007-06-16 Thread Galevsky

Many thanks Alexander, I misunderstood what oldconfig means. just
any existing .config file into ... into the src dir. LOL. Thanks
again.

Gal'


2007/6/16, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

· Galevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Now I have to build my conf again since the whole configuration may
 not suit what I was looking for.

Take your old .config as a base.

 Anyone to tell me what oldconfig target does ?

It takes the .config it finds in the source directory and
builds the config from there. If there are new selections
in the new kernel, you'll be asked for the value they should
get.

In short: Before running make oldconfig, copy the .config
from your old kernel to your new kernel tree and then run
make oldconfig.

Alexander Skwar
--
Linux!  Guerrilla UNIX Development Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus.
-- Mark A. Horton KA4YBR, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



z���(��j)b�   b�

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 schrieb Alexander Skwar:

  I think it's safe to move /home but what do I do with /var, /usr, /tmp
  and /opt?

 They can all be on LVM.

Yep. But if you have enough RAM, you could also put /tmp on tmpfs.

Bye...

Dirk



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] network trouble

2007-06-16 Thread Thierry de Coulon
hello,

I'm trying to install on a Gigabyte M61PM-S2. that card works well, but uses 
some chipsets that are only supported in the latest kernels.

Network is such a chipset, it's an nvidia nForce 430 chipset that uses a 
Realtek RTL8211 PHY that, apparently, does not require drivers (if I 
understand it rignt it's the nvidia part that has drivers.

Now the problem I don't understand:

I've installed from the 2007.0 minimal install CD, using a stage 3. net-setup 
finds the card and configures it. It says it uses the forcedeth module. And 
it works perfectly, with fast downloads.

After compiling a kernel (I've used genkernel) and a succesful reboot I have 
the following situation:

the forcedeth module is loaded
revolv.conf and /etc/conf.d/net seem to be OK. They look just the same as 
those on my other machine running Sabayon.
If I ping the local IP there is no problem
but I can't ping any computer on my network, nor can I ping my gateway

It can't be the crad itself, as it works when I  use the install CD. So where 
should I look to find the answer?

Thierry

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] lvm without initrd

2007-06-16 Thread Florian Philipp
Am Samstag 16 Juni 2007 14:45 schrieb Florian Philipp:
 Hi!

 I'd like to know which parts of my system need to stay on traditional
 partitions and which directories can be moved to an lvm if I don't want to
 use initrd and still be able to boot.

 I think it's safe to move /home but what do I do with /var, /usr, /tmp
 and /opt?

 Thanks in advance!

 Florian Philipp

Thanks everyone for your answers!



pgp26VZ5sdg0y.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] network trouble

2007-06-16 Thread Xavier Parizet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On Sat, June 16, 2007 19:57, Thierry de Coulon wrote:
 hello,

 I'm trying to install on a Gigabyte M61PM-S2. that card works well, but
 uses
 some chipsets that are only supported in the latest kernels.

 Network is such a chipset, it's an nvidia nForce 430 chipset that uses a
 Realtek RTL8211 PHY that, apparently, does not require drivers (if I
 understand it rignt it's the nvidia part that has drivers.

 Now the problem I don't understand:

 I've installed from the 2007.0 minimal install CD, using a stage 3.
 net-setup
 finds the card and configures it. It says it uses the forcedeth module.
 And
 it works perfectly, with fast downloads.

 After compiling a kernel (I've used genkernel) and a succesful reboot I
 have
 the following situation:

 the forcedeth module is loaded
 revolv.conf and /etc/conf.d/net seem to be OK. They look just the same as
 those on my other machine running Sabayon.
 If I ping the local IP there is no problem
 but I can't ping any computer on my network, nor can I ping my gateway

Coud you provide us the output of dmesg according forcedeth module (dmesg
|grep forcedeth), route -n, ifconfig ethX and /etc/conf.d/net ...
 It can't be the crad itself, as it works when I  use the install CD. So
 where
 should I look to find the answer?

 Thierry

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




- --
http://www.linuxant.fr/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGdE44mSNaOeTZvg0RAriVAJ9zd1rPmxVak58jfpHuPMjV7ABT4QCeKx73
lRfGByM/27cmstAlNWc4zOw=
=R4R2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] network trouble

2007-06-16 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 16 June 2007, Thierry de Coulon wrote:
 hello,

 I'm trying to install on a Gigabyte M61PM-S2. that card works well, but
 uses some chipsets that are only supported in the latest kernels.

 Network is such a chipset, it's an nvidia nForce 430 chipset that uses a
 Realtek RTL8211 PHY that, apparently, does not require drivers (if I
 understand it rignt it's the nvidia part that has drivers.

 Now the problem I don't understand:

 I've installed from the 2007.0 minimal install CD, using a stage 3.
 net-setup finds the card and configures it. It says it uses the forcedeth
 module. And it works perfectly, with fast downloads.

 After compiling a kernel (I've used genkernel) and a succesful reboot I
 have the following situation:

 the forcedeth module is loaded
 revolv.conf and /etc/conf.d/net seem to be OK. They look just the same as
 those on my other machine running Sabayon.

A guess from what I have read on another list: You have a conflict because 
both drivers (modules) are loaded, the RLT one and forcedeth. If you remove 
the RLT module, does is work?

Uwe

-- 
The Informal Linux Group Namibia:
http://www.linux.org.na
SysEx (Pty) Ltd.:
http://www.SysEx.com.na
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] network trouble (solved)

2007-06-16 Thread Thierry de Coulon
On Saturday 16 June 2007 22:55, Xavier Parizet wrote:
 Coud you provide us the output of dmesg according forcedeth module (dmesg
 |grep forcedeth), route -n, ifconfig ethX and /etc/conf.d/net ...

I could, but this is no more necessary

On Saturday 16 June 2007 23:20, Uwe Thiem wrote:

 A guess from what I have read on another list: You have a conflict because
 both drivers (modules) are loaded, the RLT one and forcedeth. If you remove
 the RLT module, does is work?

 Uwe


Your guess was wrong, Uwe, but it did help me get on the right track.
There is no RTL driver for that chip but... looking another time at the output 
of lsmod and getting the ansers to Xavier's demands I realized that I the 
system said that eth0 did not exists - but gave it an IP anyway. SO I 
wondered who could be stealing my eth0 and sure enough, it was eth1394!

So although I did configure the ethernet card as eth0 during install, after 
reboot the firewire port took eth0 and the nforce card became eth1...

So now I have put a (useless) config for eth0 in /etc/conf.d/net (perhaps I 
could remove it, but I don't know) and tranfered my settings on eth1, and I 
got my network back.

Thanks you both for your help! Now is time to start emerge kde and go to bed!

Thierry

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Getting ctrl-left/ctrl-right to jump backward/forward by word in non-x console

2007-06-16 Thread Tim Garton

I just noticed that on all my Gentoo boxes, you can't jump around by word
using ctrl-arrow_key in the non-x console.  It works fine in
xterm/Eterm/etc. while running X, but doesn't directly on the console.  I
haven't had a chance yet to try it on another distro.  Does anyone know how
to get this to work?  Here's the backward-word/forward-word lines from my
/etc/inputrc:

# gnome-terminal (escape + arrow key)
\e[5C: forward-word
\e[5D: backward-word
# konsole / xterm / rxvt (escape + arrow key)
\e\e[C: forward-word
\e\e[D: backward-word
# konsole (alt + arrow key)
\e[1;3C: forward-word
\e[1;3D: backward-word
# aterm / eterm (control + arrow key)
\eOc: forward-word
\eOd: backward-word
# xterm
\e[1;5C: forward-word
\e[1;5D: backward-word