[gentoo-user] Problem with kworld usb dvb-t stick not working

2013-03-23 Thread William Kenworthy
I have been using a kworld dvb usb stick for some time, and after a disk
crash decided to move it to a new system, but cant get it to work.  I am
not sure if I am looking at an eudev, or a kernel 3.8.3 problem.

 [ 5080.420044] usb 4-1: new high-speed USB device number 8 using ehci-pci
 [ 5080.574646] usb 4-1: New USB device found, idVendor=15a4, idProduct=9016
 [ 5080.574650] usb 4-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
 SerialNumber=3
 [ 5080.574652] usb 4-1: Product: DVB-T 2
 [ 5080.574653] usb 4-1: Manufacturer: Afatech
 [ 5080.574655] usb 4-1: SerialNumber: 01010101061
 [ 5080.577795] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9015 reference design' 
 in cold state
 [ 5080.577852] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: downloading firmware from file 
 'dvb-usb-af9015.fw'
 [ 5080.577863] Afatech DVB-T 2: Fixing fullspeed to highspeed interval: 10 - 
 7
 [ 5080.578115] input: Afatech DVB-T 2 as 
 /devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb4/4-1/4-1:1.1/input/input11
 [ 5080.578268] hid-generic 0003:15A4:9016.000A: input,hidraw2: USB HID v1.01 
 Keyboard [Afatech DVB-T 2] on usb-:00:1d.7-1/input1
 [ 5080.645771] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9015 reference design' 
 in warm state
 [ 5081.019572] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: will pass the complete MPEG2 transport 
 stream to the software demuxer
 [ 5081.019642] DVB: registering new adapter (Afatech AF9015 reference design)
 [ 5081.026145] i2c i2c-5: af9013: firmware version 4.95.0.0
 [ 5081.029019] usb 4-1: DVB: registering adapter 0 frontend 0 (Afatech 
 AF9013)...
 [ 5081.035600] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_af9015: command failed=2
 [ 5081.035603] i2c i2c-5: tda18218: i2c rd failed=-5 reg=00 len=1
 [ 5081.035680] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: 'Afatech AF9015 reference design' error 
 while loading driver (-19)
 [ 5081.035939] usb 4-1: dvb_usb_v2: 'Afatech AF9015 reference design' 
 successfully deinitialized and disconnected
 olympus ~ # 


No /dev/dvb or /dev/video0 nodes are created, but that could be because
of the tuner error (tda18218).  The same now occurs on the old system
(which I dont trust as a lot is broken with it), and I suspect it
started when I moved to eudev ... but of course cant prove it :(

Any suggestions welcome.

BillK




[gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with kworld usb dvb-t stick not working

2013-03-23 Thread the guard
 error while loading driver (-19)
must be a kernel problem


[gentoo-user] Output of sensor k10temp-pci-00c3

2013-03-23 Thread Sascha Cunz
In the recent thread system freezes during compiles, Carlos Henderson showed 
the output of $(sensors), among them the output of the k10temp-pci-00c3.

I stopped trusting that sensor. After some hours of idle, it shows me:

k10temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:+16.8°C  (high = +70.0°C)
   (crit = +70.0°C, hyst = +67.0°C)

16.8°C is roughly 4°C _below_ the room temperature. If I'd boot to Windows 
right now, the mainboard-manufacturer's system utility shows a CPU temperature 
of 25°C (which is more or less the usual value it shows for Windows when 
idle).

My CPU is:

processor   : 5
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 21
model   : 1
model name  : AMD FX(tm)-6200 Six-Core Processor 
stepping: 2
microcode   : 0x6000626

running on an Asrock mainboard (Kernel is a gentoo-3.8.1-r1).

My question to the list is: Could this strange temperature be realistic? Does 
anyone have similar observations with AMD-Bulldozers?

Sascha



[gentoo-user] netqmail fails to do CNAME lookup for lists.gentoo.org

2013-03-23 Thread Sascha Cunz
Hi list,

I'm glad to see that my mail from yesterday did finally leave the queue
of my netqmail install. 

I'm recently having trouble to send mail to lists.gentoo.org via my
netqmail. It says that it is _temporarily_ unable to do a CNAME lookup.
But mails stay in queue until they eventually bounce. I have now configured
a static smtp route to pigeon.gentoo.org and mails seem to go through.

I'm currently using google's DNS in /etc/resolv.conf (But the results from
the DNS server of my ISP are the same):

I think that the real problem is, that $(dig @8.8.8.8 lists.gentoo.org any) [1]
doesn't give me a MX-Record at all. Also, directly asking for a MX-Record
doesn't seem to report one[2].

I'm not too deep into DNS, so I'm asking for any clues on how to really
solve this issue?

Sascha

[1]
$ dig @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org any  


 



   
;  DiG 9.9.2  @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org any  


   
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 4294
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 6, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;list.gentoo.org.   IN  ANY

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
gentoo.org. 1389IN  SOA ns1.gentoo.org. 
hostmaster.gentoo.org. 1363715159 3600 3602 604800 3600
gentoo.org. 1389IN  RRSIG   SOA 5 2 86400 20130915164614 
20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
jWJE78zdR5x+B/N7H21C76vAW7RptfAaxb5fcXayB5Vx2zwhdCKWpcNa 
oGwF0lNrJz+7d48FsY3YQpg6+HwEHVLUa+wSe3jZZeQr6qTWwskL4BsY 
7xQIvo6CcbXr+q+Rdpjuae6Gi9BZ1wrj2r1VQCijYjKwX32qq+kiqyK+ 
ibevmHpI1tFydk5DYlYtDMoLD7dPyW46TH/Wtj4yEGHAyQ==
gentoo.org. 3189IN  NSEC_include.gentoo.org. A NS SOA 
MX TXT RRSIG NSEC DNSKEY
gentoo.org. 3189IN  RRSIG   NSEC 5 2 3600 20130915164614 
20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
OlIMzTIsTuwQqg2Jh/i7kCPCBl72gDz2zb33DLloua7LMJU9zs+3Fy52 
AFIJ2BouWg0cIKouBXaVPX7DInly61KZ7WE8BBe1eXdq5ExCsyybE3F9 
nYzM/3oPEdQ1sQoMyefsIG/JB8+9kbvKbhfpLercMVpSjLTSOWztvEBA 
HHZee0E4mH/EcviPCkjR/4BWAvlYWTeiVb6xT2CXA5WmxA==
ldap5.gentoo.org.   3189IN  NSEClists.gentoo.org. CNAME RRSIG 
NSEC
ldap5.gentoo.org.   3189IN  RRSIG   NSEC 5 3 3600 20130915164614 
20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
cIzfv2GF4UTkZaTkkvadlLNyG6oZ4IRb30AXZGfmMeA+PoohDJtHF23q 
m8NOGjxa1z2y0ytb83PZFb6SCckpj9xE5C0oSIeMRsg51Vhb6pR0u2We 
IyWRfHBArkCVHEVbuys1IdDnQrPjODhW5epdEjpjKUn6+Zzao82uBCfv 
LyA/0sAqs0+qYrw+mVdZIAeuJKdywehKnnXVN05ndkuuRA==

;; Query time: 64 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Sat Mar 23 12:56:33 2013
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 787

[2]
$ dig @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org mx

;  DiG 9.9.2  @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org mx
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 54012
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;list.gentoo.org.   IN  MX

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
gentoo.org. 959 IN  SOA ns1.gentoo.org. 
hostmaster.gentoo.org. 1363715159 3600 3602 604800 3600

;; Query time: 60 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Sat Mar 23 13:12:34 2013
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95





[gentoo-user] Re: [Bulk] Re: Back to openrc from systemd

2013-03-23 Thread nunojsilva
On 2013-03-22, Kevin Chadwick wrote:

  If you don't need user session monitoring for anything (which is what
  ConsoleKit and logind provides), nor interactive privilege granting
  (which is what polkit provides), then I believe you will have no  
 
 Thanks. Now *that* is what I call explaining something in a nutshell :-)
 
  problems switching OpenRC and systemd withouth needing to recompile
  anything. However, that means no upower and no udisks at least; GNOME
  cannot run without any of those. XFCE needs them if the udev USE flag
  is enabled, which is enabled by default in Gentoo desktop profiles,
  and in KDE the three of them are optional dependencies turned on by
  default. You can turn them of in XFCE and KDE, but you kinda lose
  functionality without them.  
 
 I do indeed remember having to fight the KDE use flags so that I could
 pull kdelibs without pulling the whole set of u* things someone decided
 that were required for a desktop environment (the fun thing being that I
 wasn't even using KDE as a DE).
 
 But I hope you don't mean the GNOME *libs* will be requiring
 logind/Consolekit/... in the near future? That would cause me some
 trouble, as I rely on evince a lot.

 A good overview though I don't agree with If you don't 'need'

 Did your desktop really fail to run at all?

I don't need any of this u* or other things for my desktop computer to
work. Maybe this is related to the fact that I don't run a desktop
environment, even if I use linux for desktop computing and run X.

 Why are dependencies suddenly getting a lot worse (ignoring konquerorFM
 without kde) when for so long dependencies were understood to be a big
 problem that must be fixed. It can only be bad design if a desktop does
 not work at all because  1% of the functionality is missing and may
 well have been replaced in every case above by alternative and in some
 cases superior (permissions) that may override others (sessions you
 don't use), choices of functionality.

Bad design, bad choices by developers, people who don't want to accept
binary distros aren't the only thing around, and people who don't have a
taste for simplicity.

 Is it really a freedesktop when almost all the rest are free-er?

freedesktop seems to be doing a good job at creating standards where
there were no standards, the problem is that (IMHO) they seem to be
coming up with bad standards to fill the gap (see clipboard/selection
handling), and sometimes it is actually good to have things done in
different ways.

-- 
Nuno Silva (aka njsg)
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/




Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail fails to do CNAME lookup for lists.gentoo.org

2013-03-23 Thread staticsafe
On 3/23/2013 8:17, Sascha Cunz wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 I'm glad to see that my mail from yesterday did finally leave the queue
 of my netqmail install. 
 
 I'm recently having trouble to send mail to lists.gentoo.org via my
 netqmail. It says that it is _temporarily_ unable to do a CNAME lookup.
 But mails stay in queue until they eventually bounce. I have now configured
 a static smtp route to pigeon.gentoo.org and mails seem to go through.
 
 I'm currently using google's DNS in /etc/resolv.conf (But the results from
 the DNS server of my ISP are the same):
 
 I think that the real problem is, that $(dig @8.8.8.8 lists.gentoo.org any) 
 [1]
 doesn't give me a MX-Record at all. Also, directly asking for a MX-Record
 doesn't seem to report one[2].
 
 I'm not too deep into DNS, so I'm asking for any clues on how to really
 solve this issue?
 
 Sascha
 
 [1]
 $ dig @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org any
   
   

   
   
   
  
 ;  DiG 9.9.2  @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org any
   
   
  
 ; (1 server found)
 ;; global options: +cmd
 ;; Got answer:
 ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 4294
 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 6, ADDITIONAL: 1
 
 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
 ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
 ;; QUESTION SECTION:
 ;list.gentoo.org.   IN  ANY
 
 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
 gentoo.org. 1389IN  SOA ns1.gentoo.org. 
 hostmaster.gentoo.org. 1363715159 3600 3602 604800 3600
 gentoo.org. 1389IN  RRSIG   SOA 5 2 86400 20130915164614 
 20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
 jWJE78zdR5x+B/N7H21C76vAW7RptfAaxb5fcXayB5Vx2zwhdCKWpcNa 
 oGwF0lNrJz+7d48FsY3YQpg6+HwEHVLUa+wSe3jZZeQr6qTWwskL4BsY 
 7xQIvo6CcbXr+q+Rdpjuae6Gi9BZ1wrj2r1VQCijYjKwX32qq+kiqyK+ 
 ibevmHpI1tFydk5DYlYtDMoLD7dPyW46TH/Wtj4yEGHAyQ==
 gentoo.org. 3189IN  NSEC_include.gentoo.org. A NS SOA 
 MX TXT RRSIG NSEC DNSKEY
 gentoo.org. 3189IN  RRSIG   NSEC 5 2 3600 20130915164614 
 20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
 OlIMzTIsTuwQqg2Jh/i7kCPCBl72gDz2zb33DLloua7LMJU9zs+3Fy52 
 AFIJ2BouWg0cIKouBXaVPX7DInly61KZ7WE8BBe1eXdq5ExCsyybE3F9 
 nYzM/3oPEdQ1sQoMyefsIG/JB8+9kbvKbhfpLercMVpSjLTSOWztvEBA 
 HHZee0E4mH/EcviPCkjR/4BWAvlYWTeiVb6xT2CXA5WmxA==
 ldap5.gentoo.org.   3189IN  NSEClists.gentoo.org. CNAME RRSIG 
 NSEC
 ldap5.gentoo.org.   3189IN  RRSIG   NSEC 5 3 3600 20130915164614 
 20130319164614 52980 gentoo.org. 
 cIzfv2GF4UTkZaTkkvadlLNyG6oZ4IRb30AXZGfmMeA+PoohDJtHF23q 
 m8NOGjxa1z2y0ytb83PZFb6SCckpj9xE5C0oSIeMRsg51Vhb6pR0u2We 
 IyWRfHBArkCVHEVbuys1IdDnQrPjODhW5epdEjpjKUn6+Zzao82uBCfv 
 LyA/0sAqs0+qYrw+mVdZIAeuJKdywehKnnXVN05ndkuuRA==
 
 ;; Query time: 64 msec
 ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
 ;; WHEN: Sat Mar 23 12:56:33 2013
 ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 787
 
 [2]
 $ dig @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org mx
 
 ;  DiG 9.9.2  @8.8.8.8 list.gentoo.org mx
 ; (1 server found)
 ;; global options: +cmd
 ;; Got answer:
 ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 54012
 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
 
 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
 ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
 ;; QUESTION SECTION:
 ;list.gentoo.org.   IN  MX
 
 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
 gentoo.org. 959 IN  SOA ns1.gentoo.org. 
 hostmaster.gentoo.org. 1363715159 3600 3602 604800 3600
 
 ;; Query time: 60 msec
 ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
 ;; WHEN: Sat Mar 23 13:12:34 2013
 ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95
 
 
 
In your DNS queries you did list.gentoo.org, the actual FQDN is
lists.gentoo.org

root@hellhound ~ # dig MX lists.gentoo.org

;  DiG 9.7.3  MX lists.gentoo.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53706
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 6

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;lists.gentoo.org.  IN  MX

;; ANSWER SECTION:
lists.gentoo.org.   43200   IN  MX  10 lists.gentoo.org.

-- 
staticsafe
O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Please don't top post - http://goo.gl/YrmAb
Don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on.



Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: [Bulk] Re: Back to openrc from systemd

2013-03-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:54:23 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno Silva) wrote:

  A good overview though I don't agree with If you don't 'need'
 
  Did your desktop really fail to run at all?  
 
 I don't need any of this u* or other things for my desktop computer to
 work. Maybe this is related to the fact that I don't run a desktop
 environment, even if I use linux for desktop computing and run X.

I'd be interested in what happens if all the consolekit and logind
files are removed. Perhaps the reverse, systemd breaking and
Openrc working?



[gentoo-user] portage insists in pulling in sys-apps/kmod

2013-03-23 Thread Dan Johansson
Hello,

Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when 
compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel (as it should).
Doing an equery d sys-apps/kmod I can see that the following two packages 
depends on sy-apps/kmod:
sys-fs/udev-197-r8 (kmod ? =sys-apps/kmod-12)
virtual/modutils-0 (sys-apps/kmod[tools])

sys-fs/udev has -kmod in its USE-flags, so that should not be an issue).
# emerge --verbose --pretend sys-fs/udev 
[ebuild   R] sys-fs/udev-197-r8  USE=acl openrc -doc -gudev -hwdb 
-introspection -keymap -kmod (-selinux) -static-libs 0 kB  



With virtual/modutils its an other thing, here we have a circular dependency 
between virtual/modutils and sys-apps/kmod if the tools USE-flag is set.

So trying to resolve this a unmreged  virtual/modutils and sys-apps/kmod and 
tried the following:

# USE=-tools emerge --update --deep --verbose --reinstall changed-use 
--with-bdeps y world --pretend --tree

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N ] virtual/modutils-0  0 kB
[ebuild  N ]  sys-apps/modutils-2.4.27-r1  230 kB

Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 230 kB


# equery d sys-apps/modutils
 * These packages depend on sys-apps/modutils:

# equery d virtual/modutils
 * These packages depend on virtual/modutils:


Can someone explain to me why these two are getting re-emerged (nothing seems 
to depend on them and I have previously unmerged them)?

Regards,
-- 
Dan Johansson, http://www.dmj.nu
***
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!
***



Re: [gentoo-user] portage insists in pulling in sys-apps/kmod

2013-03-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
 Hello,

 Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
 On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when 
 compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel (as it should).
 Doing an equery d sys-apps/kmod I can see that the following two packages 
 depends on sy-apps/kmod:
 sys-fs/udev-197-r8 (kmod ? =sys-apps/kmod-12)
 virtual/modutils-0 (sys-apps/kmod[tools])

 sys-fs/udev has -kmod in its USE-flags, so that should not be an issue).
 # emerge --verbose --pretend sys-fs/udev
 [ebuild   R] sys-fs/udev-197-r8  USE=acl openrc -doc -gudev -hwdb 
 -introspection -keymap -kmod (-selinux) -static-libs 0 kB

 With virtual/modutils its an other thing, here we have a circular dependency 
 between virtual/modutils and sys-apps/kmod if the tools USE-flag is set.

That circular dep is interesting; sys-apps/kmod only depends on
virtual/modutils because it inherits linux-mod.eclass.

Could you file about about the circular dependency please?



Re: [gentoo-user] portage insists in pulling in sys-apps/kmod

2013-03-23 Thread Felix Kuperjans
Mike Gilbert:
 On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
 Hello,

 Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
 On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when 
 compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel (as it 
 should).
 Doing an equery d sys-apps/kmod I can see that the following two packages 
 depends on sy-apps/kmod:
 sys-fs/udev-197-r8 (kmod ? =sys-apps/kmod-12)
 virtual/modutils-0 (sys-apps/kmod[tools])

 sys-fs/udev has -kmod in its USE-flags, so that should not be an issue).
 # emerge --verbose --pretend sys-fs/udev
 [ebuild   R] sys-fs/udev-197-r8  USE=acl openrc -doc -gudev -hwdb 
 -introspection -keymap -kmod (-selinux) -static-libs 0 kB

 With virtual/modutils its an other thing, here we have a circular dependency 
 between virtual/modutils and sys-apps/kmod if the tools USE-flag is set.
 That circular dep is interesting; sys-apps/kmod only depends on
 virtual/modutils because it inherits linux-mod.eclass.

 Could you file about about the circular dependency please?
I recognized another issue possibly caused by inheriting linux-mod.eclass:
kmod is pulling in virtual/linux-sources as a dependency, which actually
is not necessary at all (and maybe even annoying, it's at least some
hundred megabytes).



Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail fails to do CNAME lookup for lists.gentoo.org

2013-03-23 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Samstag, 23. März 2013, 11:59:57 schrieb staticsafe:
 On 3/23/2013 8:17, Sascha Cunz wrote:
  Hi list,
  
  I'm glad to see that my mail from yesterday did finally leave the queue
  of my netqmail install.
  
  I'm recently having trouble to send mail to lists.gentoo.org via my
  netqmail. It says that it is _temporarily_ unable to do a CNAME lookup.
  But mails stay in queue until they eventually bounce. I have now
  configured
  a static smtp route to pigeon.gentoo.org and mails seem to go through.
  
  I'm currently using google's DNS in /etc/resolv.conf (But the results from
  the DNS server of my ISP are the same):
  
  I think that the real problem is, that $(dig @8.8.8.8 lists.gentoo.org
  any) [1] doesn't give me a MX-Record at all. Also, directly asking for a
  MX-Record doesn't seem to report one[2].
  
  I'm not too deep into DNS, so I'm asking for any clues on how to really
  solve this issue?
  
  Sascha
[...]

 In your DNS queries you did list.gentoo.org, the actual FQDN is
 lists.gentoo.org
 
 root@hellhound ~ # dig MX lists.gentoo.org
 
 ;  DiG 9.7.3  MX lists.gentoo.org
 ;; global options: +cmd
 ;; Got answer:
 ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53706
 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 6
 
 ;; QUESTION SECTION:
 ;lists.gentoo.org.  IN  MX
 
 ;; ANSWER SECTION:
 lists.gentoo.org.   43200   IN  MX  10 lists.gentoo.org.

Oh, I see, you're right of course that was a typo in my testing - and indeed 
with the typo fixed I get correct looking MX-Records via dig from both google 
and my ISP. However, that makes me just a bit more curious on what's going 
wrong here.

I'll remove my smtproute before sending this mail. Just in case it was really 
some temporary thing for approximately the last two weeks.

Sascha



Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail fails to do CNAME lookup for lists.gentoo.org

2013-03-23 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 00:46:56 schrieb Sascha Cunz:
[...]
 Oh, I see, you're right of course that was a typo in my testing - and indeed
 with the typo fixed I get correct looking MX-Records via dig from both
 google and my ISP. However, that makes me just a bit more curious on what's
 going wrong here.
 
 I'll remove my smtproute before sending this mail. Just in case it was
 really some temporary thing for approximately the last two weeks.
 
 Sascha
2013-03-24 00:48:31.812873500 info msg 2581202: bytes 2730 from 
sascha...@babbelbox.org qp 31645 uid 201
2013-03-24 00:48:31.815451500 starting delivery 532: msg 2581202 to remote 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
2013-03-24 00:48:31.815453500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
2013-03-24 00:48:32.378490500 delivery 532: deferral: 
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/
2013-03-24 00:48:32.378492500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20

Doesn't look so... :-[

I've meanwhile found out that it might be related to a DNS lookup bug inside 
qmail and
found an old patch that should addresses this issue. The patch is short and 
looking
innocent to me, so I've now setup a local overlay and am trying to send this out
without the smtproute, once again.

Sascha