Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Rudi Gaelzer]

Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.

Thank you.

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guenter Milde wrote:

  On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
  On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
   This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
   package from  Jindrich Novy
   jn...@redhat.com
  
   checking for a Latex2e program...
   +checking for latex...  yes
 
  texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
 1.6.8
  versions. I have debian lenny.
 
  Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
  version.
 
  Can you please tell me if you have:
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
 
  Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
 
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
 
 
  Günter

 My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.

 One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
 not
 what I wanted (usually would use okular).




-- 
Rudi Gaelzer
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Física e Matemática
Fundação Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Caixa Postal 354 - Campus UFPel
96001-970 Pelotas - RS
BRAZIL
Phone: +55-53-275-7468
FAX: +55-53-275-7343

Registered Linux user # 153741

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Neal Becker]

[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0


On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
 Can you please tell me what did you do?
 Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
 and then force the installation of 2010?
 Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
 
 How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
 reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.
 
 Thank you.
 
 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
  Guenter Milde wrote:
   On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
   On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from  Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com

checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex...  yes
   
   texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
  
  1.6.8
  
   versions. I have debian lenny.
   
   Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
   version.
   
   Can you please tell me if you have:
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
   
   Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
   
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
   
   
   Günter
  
  My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.
  
  One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
  not
  what I wanted (usually would use okular).

is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Joel Schwartz]

Let's say I create a list in Enumerate mode. Then I write some text in
Standard mode. Now I want to Enumerate a few more items. I select Enumerate
again, and it starts this new list at #1. However, I want the numbering to
continue where the previous Enumerate left off. For example, if my previous
list ended with item #2, I want the next enumeration to start with #3. Below
is an example of what Lyx actually does, followed by what I want Lyx to do.
Is there a way to make Lyx do what I want it to do? I checked the User Guide
and the Additional Lyx Features, but didn't see a way to do it.
 
Thanks for your help.
Joel
 
WHAT Lyx DOES
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
1. Item three
2. Item four
 
 
WHAT I WANT Lyx TO DO
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
3. Item three
4. Item four
 
 

Re: Multi-column layout for multilingual documents (translations)

[Carlos Franke]

I believe the following message did not get through to the list. Sorry,  
should you receive it twice.


Am 01.03.2011 17:04:08 schrieb(en) Carlos Franke:
Thanks, John and Ingar!

I will try the parallel and parcolums packages first (of which  
parcolumns seems much more mature at the first glance). They appear to  
provide just what I need, while ledmac/ledpar seem to be overkill for  
me. Yet another package, paracol, was mentioned somewhere, though the  
link there was dead and I could not find anything else about it on the  
web.

Lyx integration would be nice, but I do not think I can do this anytime  
soon. Maybe someone else will: I just noticed that ledmac/ledpar  
support is on the feature poll in the wiki:  
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/FeaturePoll2 (under Package support).

Carlos


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

SV: is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Ingar Pareliussen]

Hi

have a look at:
http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Numbering#toc14

hth
Ingar

Re: Issues concerning theorem modules.

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 07:33 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm having some trouble using the theorem modules when writing a text 
with a
master-child structure in Brazilian Portuguese.  I guess some (or all) 
of my
issues have already been considered in other messages.  If this is the 
case,

please do indulge me...
I'm using the lyx 2.0.0beta3 version that is being currently 
distributed by

the fedora 14 repository.

1) Although internationalization is assumed implemented in 2.0, I've 
found a
case where this is not (apparently) the case.  I attached the files 
theo1.*
and theo2.* which contain exactly the same text, but use different 
modules.


The file theo1.lyx uses the Theorems (AMS) and Theorems (AMS-Extended)
modules.  As you can also verify in theo1.pdf, both the lyx window and 
the
output are correctly translated to Portuguese (Theorem - Teorema, 
Corollary
- Corolário, ...).  Looking into the LaTeX source (theo1.tex), we can 
verify
that the babel package was automatically invoked and the translations 
were

provided.

The file theo2.lyx, on the other hand, uses the Theorems (AMS, 
Numbered by
Type) and Theorems (AMS-Extended, Numbered by Type) modules.  In this 
case,
the translation is not performed anywhere and the source does not 
invoke the

babel package.

Unfortunately, I need the numbered by type modules.  Seems to me that 
there is

still a bug there.

I would guess that these simply haven't been translated, though I don't 
know enough about how to do translation work to find out myself. That 
said, it isn't unusual for that sort of work not to have been finished 
in beta releases.


2) In a master-child structure, is it necessary to load the same 
modules in

all document parts?  If I load different modules, LyX will complain when
processing the text.

Yes, unfortunately, you do need to load the modules in each part. I know 
this is a problem, but we are not sure exactly what to do here. The 
problem is the LyX does not really consider child documents as parts of 
larger documents, but as standalone documents that happen to be included 
in other documents.


3) Where are the config files for the translations of the theorem 
modules?  If
you verify the theo1.tex source, you notice that no translation is 
provided
for the Proof environment through babel.  Concomitantly, on the LyX 
window you can observe
one translation and on the pdf output another.  I'm not completely 
satisfied

with the translation for the assumption environment either.

Here again, the translations may not be finished, but you can ask on the 
devel list, or contact the person doing the Portuguese translation 
directly. See

http://www.lyx.org/I18n

rh

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
 [texlive]
 name=TeX Live
 baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
 enabled=0
 metadata_expire=1d
 gpgcheck=0

If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.

-- 
José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
 Can you please tell me what did you do?
 Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
 and then force the installation of 2010?
 Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work normally 
using the new system latex. There is no need to change lyx.

Eventually, just to be sure that any new package is detected by lyx, you can 
run Reconfigure and that is it. :-)

-- 
José Abílio

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.9

[Uwe Stöhr]

Hello LyXers,

the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.9 is now available. (I'm 
abroad and far away from my home PC, so that it took some time. I'll 
also be only sporadically available the next month.)


This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing 
LyX 1.6.8 installation to LyX
1.6.9. NOTE: To be able to use this update installer, LyX 1.6.7 must 
have been installed with the

alternative Windows installer.

-

The installer for this version can be downloaded from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=18354
and
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.9/

(General infos about the installer can be found here:
 http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller )

Installer Changelog:
-
- LyX 1.6.9
- updated to eLyXer 1.1.2
- fix bug that a detected installed Python 3.x was used for LyX (LyX bug 
7143)

  (LyX only works properly with Python 2.x)
- improved support for Adobe Reader/Acrobat 10.x (ported from the 
official installer - thanks Joost Verburg)

- support to set Swedish as LyX menu language (new feature in LyX 1.6.9)
-

happy LyXing
Uwe

XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also make
exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access to MS
Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through open/Libre
office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both
oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what  read online,
this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly
obvious and would appreciate any help.


Cheers,

Stefano

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access 
to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through 
open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions 
of both oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain 
ascii files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what 
 read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing 
something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any help.


It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you remove 
it, it will open OK.


rh

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:

 On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
  Dear All,
 
  I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
  make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
  access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
  going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
  10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
  tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
  tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
  case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
  would appreciate any help.
 
 It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
 remove it, it will open OK.

Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 rh
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Well,

Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as Richard
suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration), then ooffice opens
the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the first line. See pdf below.
I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx and the xhtml with the first line
removed that produced the garbage line. Can anyone try on their systems?

Cheers,

Stefano


On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:

  On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
   Dear All,
  
   I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also
   make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
   access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
   going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
   10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
   tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
   tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
   case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
   would appreciate any help.
  
  It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
  remove it, it will open OK.

 Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.

 Cheers,
 Alan

 
  rh
 


 --
 Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
 Tel:  04 2748 6206




test.lyx
Description: Binary data


test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


test.xhtml
Description: application/xhtml

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?
 

OK, I stand corrected. Abiword didn't crash for me, but reported that
it was unable to open the file. It appears to be an invalid document.

HOWEVER, if I rename the file test.html, then Abiword opens it. Very
strange.

Debian Squeeze; Abiword 2.8.2

 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Correction

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?

This is a bit of a correction on my previous email. I don't understand
what is happening.

Abiword *can't* open test.xhtml, nor can it open the renamed test.html.

HOWEVER, I opened the file in emacs and deleted the first line, saved,
then reinserted the first line. Now it opens in Abiword. Running an
ediff on the two files shows no differences.

I suspect that we are seeing some sort of coding problem, but I don't
know enough to track it down. *Something* gets changed (perhaps by
emacs) in the delete and reinsertion, but I don't know what it is.

Sorry about the misleading previous post. I had done the deletion and
reinsertion but had forgotten about it.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Tidy

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?

OK. I ran tidy on the test.xhtml file and got the following:

alant@stormy:~$ tidy -m -asxhtml test.xhtml 
line 1 column 1 - Warning: specified input encoding (iso-8859-1) does
not match actual input encoding (utf-8) 
Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Strict 
No warnings or errors were found.


After that, the document would open in Abiword. Perhaps someone who
knows more than I can do something with this.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Rudi Gaelzer]

Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.

Thank you.

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guenter Milde wrote:

  On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
  On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
   This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
   package from  Jindrich Novy
   jn...@redhat.com
  
   checking for a Latex2e program...
   +checking for latex...  yes
 
  texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
 1.6.8
  versions. I have debian lenny.
 
  Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
  version.
 
  Can you please tell me if you have:
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
 
  Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
 
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
 
 
  Günter

 My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.

 One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
 not
 what I wanted (usually would use okular).




-- 
Rudi Gaelzer
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Física e Matemática
Fundação Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Caixa Postal 354 - Campus UFPel
96001-970 Pelotas - RS
BRAZIL
Phone: +55-53-275-7468
FAX: +55-53-275-7343

Registered Linux user # 153741

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Neal Becker]

[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0


On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
 Can you please tell me what did you do?
 Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
 and then force the installation of 2010?
 Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
 
 How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
 reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.
 
 Thank you.
 
 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
  Guenter Milde wrote:
   On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
   On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
package from  Jindrich Novy
jn...@redhat.com

checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex...  yes
   
   texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
  
  1.6.8
  
   versions. I have debian lenny.
   
   Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
   version.
   
   Can you please tell me if you have:
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
   
   Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
   
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex - pdftex
   
   
   Günter
  
  My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.
  
  One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
  not
  what I wanted (usually would use okular).

is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Joel Schwartz]

Let's say I create a list in Enumerate mode. Then I write some text in
Standard mode. Now I want to Enumerate a few more items. I select Enumerate
again, and it starts this new list at #1. However, I want the numbering to
continue where the previous Enumerate left off. For example, if my previous
list ended with item #2, I want the next enumeration to start with #3. Below
is an example of what Lyx actually does, followed by what I want Lyx to do.
Is there a way to make Lyx do what I want it to do? I checked the User Guide
and the Additional Lyx Features, but didn't see a way to do it.
 
Thanks for your help.
Joel
 
WHAT Lyx DOES
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
1. Item three
2. Item four
 
 
WHAT I WANT Lyx TO DO
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
3. Item three
4. Item four
 
 

Re: Multi-column layout for multilingual documents (translations)

[Carlos Franke]

I believe the following message did not get through to the list. Sorry,  
should you receive it twice.


Am 01.03.2011 17:04:08 schrieb(en) Carlos Franke:
Thanks, John and Ingar!

I will try the parallel and parcolums packages first (of which  
parcolumns seems much more mature at the first glance). They appear to  
provide just what I need, while ledmac/ledpar seem to be overkill for  
me. Yet another package, paracol, was mentioned somewhere, though the  
link there was dead and I could not find anything else about it on the  
web.

Lyx integration would be nice, but I do not think I can do this anytime  
soon. Maybe someone else will: I just noticed that ledmac/ledpar  
support is on the feature poll in the wiki:  
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/FeaturePoll2 (under Package support).

Carlos


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

SV: is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Ingar Pareliussen]

Hi

have a look at:
http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Numbering#toc14

hth
Ingar

Re: Issues concerning theorem modules.

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 07:33 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm having some trouble using the theorem modules when writing a text 
with a
master-child structure in Brazilian Portuguese.  I guess some (or all) 
of my
issues have already been considered in other messages.  If this is the 
case,

please do indulge me...
I'm using the lyx 2.0.0beta3 version that is being currently 
distributed by

the fedora 14 repository.

1) Although internationalization is assumed implemented in 2.0, I've 
found a
case where this is not (apparently) the case.  I attached the files 
theo1.*
and theo2.* which contain exactly the same text, but use different 
modules.


The file theo1.lyx uses the Theorems (AMS) and Theorems (AMS-Extended)
modules.  As you can also verify in theo1.pdf, both the lyx window and 
the
output are correctly translated to Portuguese (Theorem - Teorema, 
Corollary
- Corolário, ...).  Looking into the LaTeX source (theo1.tex), we can 
verify
that the babel package was automatically invoked and the translations 
were

provided.

The file theo2.lyx, on the other hand, uses the Theorems (AMS, 
Numbered by
Type) and Theorems (AMS-Extended, Numbered by Type) modules.  In this 
case,
the translation is not performed anywhere and the source does not 
invoke the

babel package.

Unfortunately, I need the numbered by type modules.  Seems to me that 
there is

still a bug there.

I would guess that these simply haven't been translated, though I don't 
know enough about how to do translation work to find out myself. That 
said, it isn't unusual for that sort of work not to have been finished 
in beta releases.


2) In a master-child structure, is it necessary to load the same 
modules in

all document parts?  If I load different modules, LyX will complain when
processing the text.

Yes, unfortunately, you do need to load the modules in each part. I know 
this is a problem, but we are not sure exactly what to do here. The 
problem is the LyX does not really consider child documents as parts of 
larger documents, but as standalone documents that happen to be included 
in other documents.


3) Where are the config files for the translations of the theorem 
modules?  If
you verify the theo1.tex source, you notice that no translation is 
provided
for the Proof environment through babel.  Concomitantly, on the LyX 
window you can observe
one translation and on the pdf output another.  I'm not completely 
satisfied

with the translation for the assumption environment either.

Here again, the translations may not be finished, but you can ask on the 
devel list, or contact the person doing the Portuguese translation 
directly. See

http://www.lyx.org/I18n

rh

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
 [texlive]
 name=TeX Live
 baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
 enabled=0
 metadata_expire=1d
 gpgcheck=0

If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.

-- 
José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
 Can you please tell me what did you do?
 Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
 and then force the installation of 2010?
 Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work normally 
using the new system latex. There is no need to change lyx.

Eventually, just to be sure that any new package is detected by lyx, you can 
run Reconfigure and that is it. :-)

-- 
José Abílio

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.9

[Uwe Stöhr]

Hello LyXers,

the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.9 is now available. (I'm 
abroad and far away from my home PC, so that it took some time. I'll 
also be only sporadically available the next month.)


This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing 
LyX 1.6.8 installation to LyX
1.6.9. NOTE: To be able to use this update installer, LyX 1.6.7 must 
have been installed with the

alternative Windows installer.

-

The installer for this version can be downloaded from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=18354
and
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.9/

(General infos about the installer can be found here:
 http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller )

Installer Changelog:
-
- LyX 1.6.9
- updated to eLyXer 1.1.2
- fix bug that a detected installed Python 3.x was used for LyX (LyX bug 
7143)

  (LyX only works properly with Python 2.x)
- improved support for Adobe Reader/Acrobat 10.x (ported from the 
official installer - thanks Joost Verburg)

- support to set Swedish as LyX menu language (new feature in LyX 1.6.9)
-

happy LyXing
Uwe

XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also make
exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access to MS
Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through open/Libre
office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both
oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what  read online,
this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly
obvious and would appreciate any help.


Cheers,

Stefano

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access 
to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through 
open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions 
of both oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain 
ascii files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what 
 read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing 
something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any help.


It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you remove 
it, it will open OK.


rh

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:

 On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
  Dear All,
 
  I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
  make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
  access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
  going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
  10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
  tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
  tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
  case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
  would appreciate any help.
 
 It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
 remove it, it will open OK.

Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 rh
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Well,

Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as Richard
suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration), then ooffice opens
the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the first line. See pdf below.
I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx and the xhtml with the first line
removed that produced the garbage line. Can anyone try on their systems?

Cheers,

Stefano


On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:

  On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
   Dear All,
  
   I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also
   make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
   access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
   going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
   10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
   tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
   tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
   case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
   would appreciate any help.
  
  It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
  remove it, it will open OK.

 Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.

 Cheers,
 Alan

 
  rh
 


 --
 Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
 Tel:  04 2748 6206




test.lyx
Description: Binary data


test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


test.xhtml
Description: application/xhtml

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?
 

OK, I stand corrected. Abiword didn't crash for me, but reported that
it was unable to open the file. It appears to be an invalid document.

HOWEVER, if I rename the file test.html, then Abiword opens it. Very
strange.

Debian Squeeze; Abiword 2.8.2

 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Correction

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?

This is a bit of a correction on my previous email. I don't understand
what is happening.

Abiword *can't* open test.xhtml, nor can it open the renamed test.html.

HOWEVER, I opened the file in emacs and deleted the first line, saved,
then reinserted the first line. Now it opens in Abiword. Running an
ediff on the two files shows no differences.

I suspect that we are seeing some sort of coding problem, but I don't
know enough to track it down. *Something* gets changed (perhaps by
emacs) in the delete and reinsertion, but I don't know what it is.

Sorry about the misleading previous post. I had done the deletion and
reinsertion but had forgotten about it.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Tidy

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well,
 
 Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
 Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
 then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
 first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
 and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
 line. Can anyone try on their systems?

OK. I ran tidy on the test.xhtml file and got the following:

alant@stormy:~$ tidy -m -asxhtml test.xhtml 
line 1 column 1 - Warning: specified input encoding (iso-8859-1) does
not match actual input encoding (utf-8) 
Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Strict 
No warnings or errors were found.


After that, the document would open in Abiword. Perhaps someone who
knows more than I can do something with this.

Cheers,
Alan

 
 Cheers,
 
 Stefano
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree alanty...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
  Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
 
   On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Dear All,
   
I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
help.
   
   It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial xml... line. If you
   remove it, it will open OK.
 
  Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
  Squeeze.
 
  Cheers,
  Alan
 
  
   rh
  
 
 
  --
  Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
  Tel:  04 2748 6206
 
 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Rudi Gaelzer]

Can you please tell me what did you do?
Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and
then force the installation of 2010?
Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.

Thank you.

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker  wrote:

> Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> > On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
> >>> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
> >>> > package from  Jindrich Novy
> >>> > 
> >>> >
> >>> > checking for a Latex2e program...
> >>> > +checking for "latex"...  yes
> >
> >>> texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
> 1.6.8
> >>> versions. I have debian lenny.
> >
> > Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
> > version.
> >
> >> Can you please tell me if you have:
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex -> pdftex
> >
> > Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
> >
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex -> pdftex
> >
> >
> > Günter
>
> My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.
>
> One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
> not
> what I wanted (usually would use okular).
>
>


-- 
Rudi Gaelzer
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Física e Matemática
Fundação Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Caixa Postal 354 - Campus UFPel
96001-970 Pelotas - RS
BRAZIL
Phone: +55-53-275-7468
FAX: +55-53-275-7343

Registered Linux user # 153741

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[Neal Becker]

[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
enabled=0
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0


On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Can you please tell me what did you do?
> Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
> and then force the installation of 2010?
> Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?
> 
> How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007?  I'm mainly interested in the
> reverse search capabilities offered by the most recent releases.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker  wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote:
> > >> On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
> > >>> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010
> > >>> > package from  Jindrich Novy
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > checking for a Latex2e program...
> > >>> > +checking for "latex"...  yes
> > >>> 
> > >>> texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and
> > 
> > 1.6.8
> > 
> > >>> versions. I have debian lenny.
> > > 
> > > Do you run a local TeXLive? Debian comes with texlive 2009 as newest
> > > version.
> > > 
> > >> Can you please tell me if you have:
> > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jan 16 11:17 /usr/bin/latex -> pdftex
> > > 
> > > Yes, this is the Debian setup. With a recent Debian/testing, it is
> > > 
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 18. Okt 11:05 /usr/bin/latex -> pdftex
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Günter
> > 
> > My texlive was corrupt.  Cleaned out and reinstalled, now it's working.
> > 
> > One surprise.  Choosing to view my document opened up firefox.  Probably
> > not
> > what I wanted (usually would use okular).

is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Joel Schwartz]

Let's say I create a list in Enumerate mode. Then I write some text in
Standard mode. Now I want to Enumerate a few more items. I select Enumerate
again, and it starts this new list at #1. However, I want the numbering to
continue where the previous Enumerate left off. For example, if my previous
list ended with item #2, I want the next enumeration to start with #3. Below
is an example of what Lyx actually does, followed by what I want Lyx to do.
Is there a way to make Lyx do what I want it to do? I checked the User Guide
and the Additional Lyx Features, but didn't see a way to do it.
 
Thanks for your help.
Joel
 
WHAT Lyx DOES
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
1. Item three
2. Item four
 
 
WHAT I WANT Lyx TO DO
 
Here's some text in standard mode.
1. Item one
2. Item two
Here's some more text in standard mode.
3. Item three
4. Item four
 
 

Re: Multi-column layout for multilingual documents (translations)

[Carlos Franke]

I believe the following message did not get through to the list. Sorry,  
should you receive it twice.


Am 01.03.2011 17:04:08 schrieb(en) Carlos Franke:
Thanks, John and Ingar!

I will try the "parallel" and "parcolums" packages first (of which  
parcolumns seems much more mature at the first glance). They appear to  
provide just what I need, while ledmac/ledpar seem to be overkill for  
me. Yet another package, "paracol", was mentioned somewhere, though the  
link there was dead and I could not find anything else about it on the  
web.

Lyx integration would be nice, but I do not think I can do this anytime  
soon. Maybe someone else will: I just noticed that ledmac/ledpar  
support is on the feature poll in the wiki:  
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/FeaturePoll2 (under "Package support").

Carlos


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

SV: is there a way to get Enumerate to continue numbering between separate Enumerations?

[Ingar Pareliussen]

Hi

have a look at:
http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Numbering#toc14

hth
Ingar

Re: Issues concerning theorem modules.

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 07:33 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm having some trouble using the theorem modules when writing a text 
with a
master-child structure in Brazilian Portuguese.  I guess some (or all) 
of my
issues have already been considered in other messages.  If this is the 
case,

please do indulge me...
I'm using the lyx 2.0.0beta3 version that is being currently 
distributed by

the fedora 14 repository.

1) Although internationalization is assumed implemented in 2.0, I've 
found a
case where this is not (apparently) the case.  I attached the files 
theo1.*
and theo2.* which contain exactly the same text, but use different 
modules.


The file theo1.lyx uses the Theorems (AMS) and Theorems (AMS-Extended)
modules.  As you can also verify in theo1.pdf, both the lyx window and 
the
output are correctly translated to Portuguese (Theorem -> Teorema, 
Corollary
-> Corolário, ...).  Looking into the LaTeX source (theo1.tex), we can 
verify
that the babel package was automatically invoked and the translations 
were

provided.

The file theo2.lyx, on the other hand, uses the Theorems (AMS, 
Numbered by
Type) and Theorems (AMS-Extended, Numbered by Type) modules.  In this 
case,
the translation is not performed anywhere and the source does not 
invoke the

babel package.

Unfortunately, I need the numbered by type modules.  Seems to me that 
there is

still a bug there.

I would guess that these simply haven't been translated, though I don't 
know enough about how to do translation work to find out myself. That 
said, it isn't unusual for that sort of work not to have been finished 
in beta releases.


2) In a master-child structure, is it necessary to load the same 
modules in

all document parts?  If I load different modules, LyX will complain when
processing the text.

Yes, unfortunately, you do need to load the modules in each part. I know 
this is a problem, but we are not sure exactly what to do here. The 
problem is the LyX does not really consider child documents as parts of 
larger documents, but as standalone documents that happen to be included 
in other documents.


3) Where are the config files for the translations of the theorem 
modules?  If
you verify the theo1.tex source, you notice that no translation is 
provided
for the Proof environment through babel.  Concomitantly, on the LyX 
window you can observe
one translation and on the pdf output another.  I'm not completely 
satisfied

with the translation for the assumption environment either.

Here again, the translations may not be finished, but you can ask on the 
devel list, or contact the person doing the Portuguese translation 
directly. See

http://www.lyx.org/I18n

rh

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote:
> [texlive]
> name=TeX Live
> baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/
> enabled=0
> metadata_expire=1d
> gpgcheck=0

If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file.

-- 
José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

[José Matos]

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Can you please tell me what did you do?
> Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14
> and then force the installation of 2010?
> Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process?

After installing the repo file and updating the system lyx will work normally 
using the new system latex. There is no need to change lyx.

Eventually, just to be sure that any new package is detected by lyx, you can 
run Reconfigure and that is it. :-)

-- 
José Abílio

[announce] LyXWinInstaller for LyX 1.6.9

[Uwe Stöhr]

Hello LyXers,

the alternative Windows installer for LyX 1.6.9 is now available. (I'm 
abroad and far away from my home PC, so that it took some time. I'll 
also be only sporadically available the next month.)


This installer comes again with an update installer to update existing 
LyX 1.6.8 installation to LyX
1.6.9. NOTE: To be able to use this update installer, LyX 1.6.7 must 
have been installed with the

alternative Windows installer.

-

The installer for this version can be downloaded from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=18354
and
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.9/

(General infos about the installer can be found here:
 http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller )

Installer Changelog:
-
- LyX 1.6.9
- updated to eLyXer 1.1.2
- fix bug that a detected installed Python 3.x was used for LyX (LyX bug 
7143)

  (LyX only works properly with Python 2.x)
- improved support for Adobe Reader/Acrobat 10.x (ported from the 
official installer - thanks Joost Verburg)

- support to set Swedish as LyX menu language (new feature in LyX 1.6.9)
-

happy LyXing
Uwe

XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also make
exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access to MS
Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through open/Libre
office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both
oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what  read online,
this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly
obvious and would appreciate any help.


Cheers,

Stefano

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Richard Heck]

On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:

Dear All,

I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have access 
to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in going through 
open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions 
of both oopen/libre), the few files I have tried are open as a plain 
ascii files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what 
 read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not seeing 
something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any help.


It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you remove 
it, it will open OK.


rh

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
Richard Heck  wrote:

> On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also 
> > make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
> > access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
> > going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
> > 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
> > tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
> > tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
> > case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
> > would appreciate any help.
> >
> It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you
> remove it, it will open OK.

Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.

Cheers,
Alan

> 
> rh
> 


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[stefano franchi]

Well,

Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as Richard
suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration), then ooffice opens
the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the first line. See pdf below.
I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx and the xhtml with the first line
removed that produced the garbage line. Can anyone try on their systems?

Cheers,

Stefano


On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree  wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
> Richard Heck  wrote:
>
> > On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should also
> > > make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not have
> > > access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has succeeded in
> > > going through open/Libre office instead. On my system (Ubuntu
> > > 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the few files I have
> > > tried are open as a plain ascii files---text-editor style, with
> > > tags and everything. From what read online, this should not be the
> > > case. I am sure I am not seeing something blatantly obvious and
> > > would appreciate any help.
> > >
> > It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you
> > remove it, it will open OK.
>
> Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian Squeeze.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> >
> > rh
> >
>
>
> --
> Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
> Tel:  04 2748 6206
>
>


test.lyx
Description: Binary data


test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


test.xhtml
Description: application/xhtml

Re: XHTML format and ooffice?

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi  wrote:

> Well,
> 
> Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
> Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
> then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
> first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
> and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
> line. Can anyone try on their systems?
> 

OK, I stand corrected. Abiword didn't crash for me, but reported that
it was unable to open the file. "It appears to be an invalid document".

HOWEVER, if I rename the file test.html, then Abiword opens it. Very
strange.

Debian Squeeze; Abiword 2.8.2

> Cheers,
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
> > Richard Heck  wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
> > > > also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
> > > > have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
> > > > succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
> > > > system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
> > > > few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
> > > > files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
> > > > read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
> > > > seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
> > > > help.
> > > >
> > > It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you
> > > remove it, it will open OK.
> >
> > Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
> > Squeeze.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> >
> > >
> > > rh
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
> > Tel:  04 2748 6206
> >
> >


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Correction

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi  wrote:

> Well,
> 
> Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
> Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
> then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
> first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
> and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
> line. Can anyone try on their systems?

This is a bit of a correction on my previous email. I don't understand
what is happening.

Abiword *can't* open test.xhtml, nor can it open the renamed test.html.

HOWEVER, I opened the file in emacs and deleted the first line, saved,
then reinserted the first line. Now it opens in Abiword. Running an
ediff on the two files shows no differences.

I suspect that we are seeing some sort of coding problem, but I don't
know enough to track it down. *Something* gets changed (perhaps by
emacs) in the delete and reinsertion, but I don't know what it is.

Sorry about the misleading previous post. I had done the deletion and
reinsertion but had forgotten about it.

Cheers,
Alan

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
> > Richard Heck  wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
> > > > also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
> > > > have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
> > > > succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
> > > > system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
> > > > few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
> > > > files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
> > > > read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
> > > > seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
> > > > help.
> > > >
> > > It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you
> > > remove it, it will open OK.
> >
> > Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
> > Squeeze.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> >
> > >
> > > rh
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
> > Tel:  04 2748 6206
> >
> >


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206

Re: XHTML format and ooffice? - Tidy

[Alan L Tyree]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:51:10 -0600
stefano franchi  wrote:

> Well,
> 
> Abiword crashes on me when I try to open lyx´s xhtml files. If, as
> Richard suggested, I remove the first line (the XML declaration),
> then ooffice opens the file correctly, but puts some garbage on the
> first line. See pdf below. I am enclosing a simple test file in lyx
> and the xhtml with the first line removed that produced the garbage
> line. Can anyone try on their systems?

OK. I ran tidy on the test.xhtml file and got the following:

alant@stormy:~$ tidy -m -asxhtml test.xhtml 
line 1 column 1 - Warning: specified input encoding (iso-8859-1) does
not match actual input encoding (utf-8) 
Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Strict 
No warnings or errors were found.


After that, the document would open in Abiword. Perhaps someone who
knows more than I can do something with this.

Cheers,
Alan

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stefano
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Alan L Tyree 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:37:52 -0500
> > Richard Heck  wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/02/2011 03:38 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > I love the new xhtml export! Great addition to Lyx. It should
> > > > also make exporting to Word relatively painless. Since I do not
> > > > have access to MS Word, though, I wonder if anyone has
> > > > succeeded in going through open/Libre office instead. On my
> > > > system (Ubuntu 10.10. latest versions of both oopen/libre), the
> > > > few files I have tried are open as a plain ascii
> > > > files---text-editor style, with tags and everything. From what
> > > > read online, this should not be the case. I am sure I am not
> > > > seeing something blatantly obvious and would appreciate any
> > > > help.
> > > >
> > > It looks as if OOo doesn't like the initial  line. If you
> > > remove it, it will open OK.
> >
> > Or you can open them directly in Abiword - at least on Debian
> > Squeeze.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> >
> > >
> > > rh
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
> > Tel:  04 2748 6206
> >
> >


-- 
Alan L Tyreehttp://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206