[Vo]:
I got this email below. Could someone verify that this is legit and not spam? thanks, Tom WEB TEAM webmas...@webteam.com via eskimo.com 06:17 (2 hours ago) to vortex-l Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright © 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
Re: [Vo]:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Tom Barnett thjbarn...@googlemail.com wrote: I got this email below. Could someone verify that this is legit and not spam? 100% scam, no questions about it. Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright © 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
Re: [Vo]:
I also received it, definitely looks like a scam! Don't trust it! Is someone launching a phishing attempt on the Vort collective? On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Tom Barnett thjbarn...@googlemail.comwrote: I got this email below. Could someone verify that this is legit and not spam? thanks, Tom WEB TEAM webmas...@webteam.com via eskimo.com 06:17 (2 hours ago) to vortex-l Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright © 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
RE: [Vo]:
It is most likely a phishing expedition! I've been in the Collective for several years and have *never* seen that kind of msg from eskimo.com (the domain where this mail-list is hosted). Any emails asking for username/password should be ignored! Legit companies will never ask you to supply that kind of info in an email. -mark From: Drowning Trout [mailto:drowningtro...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: I also received it, definitely looks like a scam! Don't trust it! Is someone launching a phishing attempt on the Vort collective? On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Tom Barnett thjbarn...@googlemail.com wrote: I got this email below. Could someone verify that this is legit and not spam? thanks, Tom WEB TEAM webmas...@webteam.com via eskimo.com http://eskimo.com/ 06:17 (2 hours ago) to vortex-l Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright C 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
Re: [Vo]:The power generator that runs by water
Just fwding this from zt. it went to my personal email but could be of interest to the Collective. -mark http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=vitl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fvatl yvietnam.org%2Fforum%2Fshowpost.php%3F%26p%3D83599%26postcount%3D6 sl=vitl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fvatlyvietnam.org%2Fforum%2Fshowpost.php%3F%26p%3 D83599%26postcount%3D6 Quite an extensive link but this is the best analysis i have found so far
Re: [Vo]:Miley obtains 350W from Pd nanoparticle cell at room temp
the agenda is here http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/program.pdf The interesting seesion is on Friday March 23 3:30 pm titled Advanced concenpts: LENR, Anti-Matter and new Physics http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf Yeong E. Kim is also speaking. Moab On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:14 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf To be presented March 22, at The Woodslands, TX at NETS (Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space meeting) http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess301.pdf EXCERPT: Excess heat generation from our gas-loading LENR power cell (Figure 1) has been verified, confirming nuc-lear reactions provide output energy. While there are similarities between ours and the Rossi E-Cat gas-loaded kW-MW LENR cells that have attracted inter-national attention, there are important differences in nanoparticle composition and cell construction. Our experiment has established a remarkable proof-of-principle power unit at ca. 350W/kg under room tem-perature when using deuterium (D2) gas (H2 can also be employed) with Pd rich nanoparticles, producing 1479J heat, well above the maximum exothermal ener-gy (690J) possible from all conceivable chemical reac-tions (Figure 2). Neglecting unlikely chemical reaction contributions, the energy gain is virtually unlimited due to negligible power input with gas loading! ...
Re: [Vo]:
Run away! Run away! T
RE: [Vo]:
At 08:10 AM 3/3/2012, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: It is most likely a phishing expedition! Mostly likely? No is. Or just trolling from someone out for the lulz. In this day and age, if you don't know how to recognize this blatant a phishing expedition, just send me all your money. I'll take better care of it than you would. Or, if you don't trust me, just walk down the street in a very bad neighborhood with your wallet hanging out and visible cash in it. The list moderator will, I assume, nuke the subscriptoin from which this came. For all of my mailing lists, I've gone to moderation of subscriptions, and demand some kind of statement from the subscriber that they have a clue as to what the list is about, I don't accept generic comments like Nice list! Please subscribe me! It does introduce a small delay, and a small amount of work. But almost no spam in many years. What there is comes from subscribers' computers being hacked. Not a lot. I have multiple moderators on my lists, usually, so mostly I don't even have to personally approve subscriptions. One problem here is that the spammer/phisher gets the direct email address of all of us who have posted to this list during the spammer subscription period. That will increase spam and risk to all of us, a little. I already get about 500 spams per day, so it's not a big issue for me, but for some
Re: [Vo]:OT: $35 computer sells out on first day of launch
2012/3/2 Bastiaan Bergman bastiaan.berg...@gmail.com more
Re: [Vo]:OT: $35 computer sells out on first day of launch
2012/3/2 Bastiaan Bergman bastiaan.berg...@gmail.com J There are reactions thinkable that do comply with conservation laws for energy/mass/momentum yet emit their energy in the form of phonons (lattice vibrations) and have no neutrons left over. just a detail, because this argument is sometime used that neutrons are seldom detected, and not at the level matching the power does not mean that there are no neutron detected. it only mean that they are absorbed before detection, or not enough energetic to be detected. this is the basic of widom-larsen arguments. about gamma, the heavy electrons could absorbs them (they exists in som non-LENR, mainstream, experiments- cited by larsen in his slides) anyway D+D fusion does not work as an explanation for reason near what you say. DD will emit fast neutrons, to be detected, and hard gamma, that heavy electrons cannot convert to UV/IR/phonons and branching ration have no convincing reason to change from known values. moreover transmutation are the best proof that very slow neutrons are behind LENR... created like WL says or not, it seems ultra-slow neutrons or similar are requireds
RE: [Vo]:
Looks like the offender is using Microsoft's server in Redmond. They probably got hold an administrative password. Domain ID:D162474987-LROR Domain Name:WSS-ID.ORG Created On:08-Jun-2011 14:30:27 UTC Last Updated On:22-Oct-2011 00:25:53 UTC Expiration Date:08-Jun-2013 14:30:27 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. (R24-LROR) Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Registrant ID:29199646149db936 Registrant Name:Domain Administrator Registrant Organization:Microsoft Corporation Registrant Street1:One Microsoft Way Registrant Street2: Registrant Street3: Registrant City:Redmond Registrant State/Province:WA Registrant Postal Code:98052 Registrant Country:US Registrant Phone:+1.4258828080 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX:+1.4259367329 Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email:doma...@microsoft.com Admin ID:09997846146d4421 Admin Name:Domain Administrator Admin Organization:Microsoft Corporation
[Vo]:Requesting recommendations on Web Authoring tools animation generation packages
For more than five years now I have occasionally spent highly focused periods of time exploring a personal interest of mine, an interest that has involved exploring computer algorithms often used to simulate the physics associated with celestial mechanics. Actually, the scope of my on-going research is much broader than categorizing it as work specific only to the field of Celestial Mechanics. Much of the research eventually ended up exploring various aspects associated with chaos theory. In my research I think I've occasionally stumbled across interesting characteristics (or artifacts) that, as best as I can tell, may have been routinely dismissed and/or ignored by others, perhaps as nothing more than unimportant side-effects of little value and not worth exploring. If that's an accurate assessment, I beg to differ! Some of what I have been exploring appears eccentric enough that it would not surprise me if most simply discarded the results. Meanwhile, the only way to determine if what I've uncovered merits further research is to publish the results. The most expedient (and cheapest) way to publish in today's society is to place one's work on-line. In my own case, this would involve either creating a new subdirectory out on my current OrionWorks.com web site - or by securing a new domain name, such as OrionWorks.org. The latter idea actually sounds better to me since the subject material would focus on scholarly research, not just artistic pursuits. This leads me to ask the Collective for advice on what others might recommend as simple easy-to-use web authoring tools. I must confess the fact that my current OrionWorks.com website has been stuck in the ancient past. I still use Microsoft's antiquated FrontPage 2003 package to sporadically update certain links. Because I have not needed to update the website frequently it has not been a high priority to explore new web authoring tools. However, if I'm going to start putting together a collection of research papers that include lots of graphics (Charts and Graphs), and possibly a few animated simulations as well... well then, it's time to explore what's available, and also what's affordable! I want to employ the KISS approach. At present I have little interest in building a sophisticated website that possibly ends up incorporating fancy database search features employing SQL. However, if someone can convince me that to do so would not be too difficult...I might reconsider. My primary goal is to publish personal articles and research papers that allows others easy access. I want to give users the ability to download papers and articles in popular formats, like PDF. One of the goals would be to give everyone the ability download articles onto tablets. BTW, as hinted at, some of my computer simulations have produced extensive animated graphics. Technically speaking, it would be more accurate to say that my some of computer simulations generate individual graphic files that in turn need to be assembled into a video file in order to comprehend what's happening. Can anyone recommend economical software packages that allow one to assemble batches of individual/still graphics into an animated video clip? Thank you for letting me bend your Collective ears. I'm am now all ears! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
RE: [Vo]:Dear Subscriber
Please - everyone on vortex - immediately alert your own ISP about the offending server: webt...@wss-id.org Which is owned Microsoft. The typical way to do this is forward the message to your own server's ABUSE address. For instance, forward it to ab...@att.net if your ISP server is ATT. Whenever any ISP gets hit like this, they will quarantine the offending server, alerting Microsoft that they have been compromised - which usually eliminates the problem in a day or two. Of course they always try to do it on Friday night. Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright C 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
Re: [Vo]:
Thanks all- My suspicions are usually excellent on this front but it was the 'via eskimo.com' combined with the fact that I had no further posting at the time of writing from anyone on Vortex-l that made me hesitate. Carry on!
Re: [Vo]:
I got this email from snip lo. Your email account can be found at www.senate.gov - for this reason you are included in this newsletter. /snip It was obscene in it working and implications. I fwd it to homeland security, it was that bad. I wonder were does the limit of free speech end and who, in there right mind, would hack into senate.gov and send out such trash? Frank Z
Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
the reference of higher than background are scarce and this have been a strong arguments against LENR. from what I've read, there are some moments when the reaction seems to produce some gamma, some neutrons, but not at all at a level compatible with the excess heat, nor dangerous or even alarming... some experiments seems to make the experimentators to think that the radiation happens when the reaction is not correct... like soot for a gaz stove. note that radiation is a key subject for LENr. there is a strong coalition of lobbies that have no other possibilities that spread the FUD abour radiations. the big corp (various energetic groups, like oil or nuke, electric companies, wanabee big corp) who wan't to captur this technology to their sole benefit, by forbidding use by small independent businesses and end-users. LENR can be run at a very small or big size, with no strong limit. unlike oil-refinery or nuke, there is no need for big installation. not even to build the reactor. For di-esther for example the oil-company probably convinced the governments to use di-esther instead of simple filtered vegetable oil, that work too... di-esther need big-corp to be produced, but only farmers are enough for filtered oil. the second group of lobby are the malthusiannists/gaïaists/anti-technology/regressived green lobbies that flourish those days and catch the media and the subsidies ... for them the horror will be the end of scarcity, without the cost on environments... technology have to be bad to force us to stop it... LENR is like the pill or the preservative... it allow orgy of fun withour moral or risk. both those lobbies will try to counvice the basic people, and first the stupid as usual media, that LENr is dangerous, ... as usual they will spread lies. the green lobbies are very efficiant. energetic lobbies will just wait avoiding dangerous lies, for the politicians to block LENR at home, like they do for GMO. then they will propose their service for half price energy, with only 80% of the margin in their pocket.
Re: [Vo]:Requesting recommendations on Web Authoring tools animation generation packages
Steven, Start here: http://scottjarvis.com/page81.htm Then burn linux puppy 431 to a CD to create live CD. Run in old computer and boot up the Jarvis URL. Right click any place on page and left click View Page Source. Do the same with http://pupweb.org/desktop/ . Then download LIT.zip using live CD from here: http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=490722#490722 unzip and boot. Examine Script files within by right click then left click Open as test. Enjoy the KISS world. Warm Regards, Reality OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: For more than five years now I have occasionally spent highly focused periods of time exploring a personal interest of mine, an interest that has involved Snip
Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
*IMHO, we have been correctly told by DGT that their LENR process is a complex one comprised of many related and interconnected but separable sub-processes which when combined together produce heat without the production of intense and long lasting radiation.* * * *I believe that their cold fusion process includes one sub-process that removes or greatly lowers the coulomb barrier to allow various neighboring nucleons to come together in a wide assortment of ways to form new types of nuclei. This process not only produces radiation from the nuclear fusion process but also from resulting newly created isotopes.* * * *The other major sub-process is one that overlays this fusion process and thermalizes this radiation production. This process involves the establishment and maintenance of a quantum mechanical coherent environment within in the nuclear active population of nuclei.* * * *What I am saying is that a large amount of radiation will be generated in a fusion system that is not coherent. * * * *A example of such a system that produces radiation and transmutation is the NanoSpire system. This system is not quantum mechanically coherent and as a result it will generated intense radiation from its intense fusion process. * * * *Rossi’s major concern was to eliminate or at least greatly mitigate any radiation produced by his system. He has pulled this off and this is a major accomplishment of both Rossi and DGT in they mostly produce heat and have suppressed radiation from there systems.* * * *Without this radiation suppression mechanism in place and operating AT ALL TIMES, a cold fusion system is of little use.* * * * * * * On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Joseph Hao jth...@hotmail.com wrote: ** Hey Vortex Gang, My primary question motivating this post/query is to get a consensus on whether the presence of radiation is a necessary prerequisite for LENR/Cold Fusion Effects. IOW, is radiation ALWAYS present when an LENR/Cold Fusion effect occurs. On one hand, there appears to be copious evidence that radiation of some form or another is present during an LENR process. On the other hand, many people, including many here in Vortex appears to brush aside the evidence of radiation as circumstantial and unverified. What is the consensus? Is Radiation always present? Is Radiation a foolproof indication of an LENR process? This question is prompted after mulling over what Axil suggested to me a few post back. In his suggestion to my experimental protocols, he suggested I consider integrating a Cloud Chamber into my experiments. Well, after thinking about it for a while and trying to come up with a suitable way of integrating a HOT reactor inside a COLD cloud chamber; I have come to the conclusion that it might be beyond my technical and financial ability to do so. So, instead, I have come up with the second best thing. I have been thinking of integrating my reactor, not into a Cloud Chamber, but rather into an Ion Chamber design. Integrating a hot reactor into an Ion chamber appears to be straightforward and simple. So, instead of using flow calorimetry to detect excess heat in an LENR process, I will be using the Ion chamber to detect radiation. As far as I know, there is no known chemical process that releases radiation, if the reactants start from non-radioactive elements. So, if I detect radiation, high enough to be detectable in a DIY Ion chamber, then that excess radiation must be way above ambient, which means that there is only one possible conclusion - that my reactor inside the Ion chamber is releasing radiation. And since the reactor walls would be thick(er), most of the detected radiation would not be Alphas and Betas, but rather higher energy gammas. And if I am detecting copious gammas, then an LENR reaction must be the source. I'm thinking this might be a more straightforward way of detecting LENR reactions, rather than Heat calorimetry. What do you guys? Is this a good way to hunt for the LENR/Rossi process and catalysts?
Re: [Vo]:Requesting recommendations on Web Authoring tools animation generation packages
I know nothing about video files, but for web authoring, I have been assimilated by the Borg and I have just about finished transferring everything to WordPress. I am using a minimalist, ultra-clean version: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/ This should be finished in a few days. I am going to cut out the the black plane and make it full-width. I need to fix a few glitches. The images that click to expand keep showing up in different formats, and the lists of papers keep changing format. This is based on: http://www.studiopress.com/themes/genesis It is clean and well written compared to other Themes. Be sure you follow instructions and use the sample blank child theme. This company has several populated themes as well. With modern software you have work to keep it simple. You have to ruthlessly prune out options, mainly by remarking out stuff in the parameter file (syle.css). Rococo complexity is the norm. For example, this Theme came with quoted text in a strange font, with the text in grey shown in an off-white background, making it impossible to read. Who does that?! Why? Add a few of these /* */ to style.css and bingo, that's gone. The thing about WordPress is that there are a zillion group-sourced add-on utilities for it: the plugins and widgets. Some are free, some at minimal cost. You find one for just about any purpose. Most of the ones I have found are not comprehensive or of good quality, but they cover a broader range of applications than any single-source software could provide, even from a company as big as Microsoft. Look for video related plug-ins here, or with Google: http://wordpress.org/ See if you find something suitable. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:
I have forwarded it to the list owner requesting that he nuke 'em. T On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Tom Barnett thjbarn...@googlemail.com wrote: I got this email below. Could someone verify that this is legit and not spam? thanks, Tom WEB TEAM webmas...@webteam.com via eskimo.com 06:17 (2 hours ago) to vortex-l Dear Subscriber, We are experiencing some serious technical problems with our servers. Therefore, we would be shutting down all unused and unverified accounts. So to avoid deactivation of your account, you will have to re-confirm your e-mail address by replying with your login information's below. Username : Password : This is a very simple and easy to do. Just click the reply button and forward your login details to us. once we receive the requested information you will be able to continue using your account without interruption. Customer Care Case number: 8941624 Property: Account Security Copyright © 2011 Web team Inc. Thank you.
[Vo]:Google spreadsheet publishing to the web
Here is a neat feature I did not know about. With Google spreadsheets you can instantly make a spreadsheet or graph available on the web for others to see. Here is an example: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AqqvuFUMAp9HdDJDSTFhS3BQMVlydHhjZEpQVGswVXcoutput=html Anyone can see this, but no one can change it but me. This is in HTML format. You cannot use it as a spreadsheet, but you can copy the columns and insert them into your own spreadsheet. I just tried that. I cannot figure out how to make the y-axis start at zero. Anyway, this capability should be useful in discussions here. In the upcoming version of the LENR-CANR.org webpage, I plan to make the Monthly Totals a spreadsheet with a couple of graphs at the bottom, like this. So I can just add in the totals every month without making images of the graphs to upload them. In the WordPress blog group discussion it says you can easily include one of these graphs in a WordPress page. Failing that, you could just make a link to this page, using the same technique I use to link to the new Library relational database screens. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
Von: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 18:21 Samstag, 3.März 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate ...their LENR process is a complex one comprised of many related and interconnected but separable sub-processes which when combined together ... Your conclusion is similar to mine. It is the intuition of the experimentalist, who brings those sub-processes together, so that new things happen. In contrast to that, established physics follows a different path: spotting ONE missing link in the theory, and singlemindedly throw billions onto the problem. The Higgs-Boson being a prominent example. Orthodoxy likes ONE problem at a time, and not a can of worms. Do'nt know if this a side-effect of Occam. Current Nuclear Physics seems to be in need to evaluate their axioms. Eg, as I stressed earlier, the axiom of the 'identity' of all atoms of the same type, which to me clearly stands in contradiction to the phenomenon of radioactive decay, where not all atoms are created equal, so to say. Which is my irrefutable private pet-theory. It is basically the mathematicians, who insist eg in 'identity', but are rarely in contact with matter. On the other hand, if the axiom(s) never existed in the first place, physics and a lot of other sciences would not have started in the first place. So there is a riddle here. OK? ...A example of such a system that produces radiation and transmutation is the NanoSpire system. This system is not quantum mechanically coherent and as a result it will generated intense radiation from its intense fusion process. ... The nanospire findings -if true- are even more disturbing than the other -friendly, nonradiating - LENR effects.
Re: [Vo]:Google spreadsheet publishing to the web
Here is an example of a Google spreadsheet embedded in a page with an iframe: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/11/major-update-in-google-spreadsheets.html This is from 2006. I am late to the party. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Google spreadsheet publishing to the web
Here is a test of two iframes, with the spreadsheet and library index: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=907 The code in this Page is: Here is an iframe with a Google spreadsheet: iframe src= https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AqqvuFUMAp9HdDJDSTFhS3BQMVlydHhjZEpQVGswVXcamp;output=html; frameborder=0 scrolling=auto width=100% height=600/iframe Here is the library index: iframe src=http://lenr-canr.org/index/; frameborder=0 scrolling=auto width=100% height=600/iframe - Jed
[Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
Does anyone know of any indication of Neutron radiation in any LENR/Cold Fusion experiment. If I remeber Levi correctly, he seems to have said that neutrons were absent in Rossi's E-Cat. Focardi also indicated that he has not measured neutrons at all. I don't recall Celani saying he measured Neutrons when he measured the burst of gammas in one of the Rossi demonstration. Can anyone recall either Focardi, Piantilli, Rossi or Defkalion (or any other) saying that they haved conclusively measured neutrons? I am trying to decide whether I want to sinter elemental Boron onto my Ion Chamber walls to increase sensitivity to Neutrons.
Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
There are reports of low but significant levels of fast neutrons above background. Charles Beaudette describes a 1992 experiment by Akito Takahashi, for example, that found neutrons being emitted from a Pd-D system. In general, however, the level of neutron emission is well below that which would be expected for a nuclear reaction. This is one of the primary obstacles to nuclear physicists giving LENR research their serious attention. If you're interested in specifics, you might take a look at one of the books that provides an overview of the experimental research on LENR. Eric On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote: ** Does anyone know of any indication of Neutron radiation in any LENR/Cold Fusion experiment. If I remeber Levi correctly, he seems to have said that neutrons were absent in Rossi's E-Cat. Focardi also indicated that he has not measured neutrons at all. I don't recall Celani saying he measured Neutrons when he measured the burst of gammas in one of the Rossi demonstration. Can anyone recall either Focardi, Piantilli, Rossi or Defkalion (or any other) saying that they haved conclusively measured neutrons? I am trying to decide whether I want to sinter elemental Boron onto my Ion Chamber walls to increase sensitivity to Neutrons.
[Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY No. 497
Dear Friends, please read the issue 497 of my newsletter http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/03/informavores-sunday-no-497.html dedicated to real and relevant information. During the next days, I will initiate on my blog, realist and relevant discussions re. the present and the future of LENR. Not so much about its past that became much too long- 23 years at March 23. Let's focus on what works. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
