Re: [leaf-devel] Managing branches with git

2012-07-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Yves; I've looked into the links you've send and start to get it. Though I dislike the graphs that try to explain something which is IMHO pretty clear, *once* one understood it, and less helpful before. (Not your fault!) Am 31.07.2012 09:36, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 30/07/2012 19:46, KP

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

2012-07-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 29.07.2012 22:13, schrieb david M brooke: On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:00 +0300, Andrew wrote: I finished merge; it seems that there is no troubles - but I haven't time to re-check this. So anybody pls update to new master and try to compile all. Completely new clone of master builds OK

Re: [leaf-devel] Managing branches with git

2012-07-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 30.07.2012 19:09, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, is it possible to avoid merge workflow to have a linear history of commits and avoid the conflicts on the repository ? Here are some articles that explain why Merge Workflow is bad: http://www.randyfay.com/node/89

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

2012-07-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew: Hi all. What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h). I do not see showstoppers (based on a version build two weeks ago). Current git sources build

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

2012-07-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 28.07.2012 18:50, schrieb Andrew: Hi. 27.07.2012 13:50, david M brooke пишет: Also I planned to add zram support (I think that using it in usual way - as swap - should be optimal) - but it isn't showstopper for alpha release, this will be a minor change (mostly - kernel config will be

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC v5

2012-07-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am 28.07.2012 19:07, schrieb Andrew: 28.07.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew: Hi all. What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h). I do

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Hosted apps retirement

2012-07-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 21.07.2012 15:13, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 07/21/2012 06:05 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Mike; Am 20.07.2012 20:56, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Somewhat important: I've managed to make the current packages page to fail and can't access it any longer to add somethin that works. Can you please

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Hosted apps retirement

2012-07-20 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 19.07.2012 21:00, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 07/19/2012 11:22 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 23.06.2012 20:16, schrieb Mike Noyes: -snip- Tentative plan based on input: 1. Wait for SF to implement OpenID for project web. 2. Wait for SF to resolve Mediawiki issues on project web. 3. Migrate

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Hosted apps retirement

2012-07-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 23.06.2012 20:16, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 10:26 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hello Mike; Am 23.06.2012 19:00, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 23.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 05:58 AM, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, I

[leaf-devel] busybox update

2012-07-06 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; do you think it's a good idea to update busybox just right before a final version? I'm afraid it may break things and like'd to have more time to test and more who have tested it before adding it yet... kp --

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 5.x - Raspberry Pi Proof of Concept is Working

2012-07-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; Am 02.07.2012 20:35, schrieb david M brooke: On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 21:27 +0300, Andrew wrote: 02.07.2012 21:01, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am 01.07.2012 23:43, schrieb david M brooke: Hi all, My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a few hours of work

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 5.x - Raspberry Pi Proof of Concept is Working

2012-07-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 01.07.2012 23:43, schrieb david M brooke: Hi all, My Raspberry Pi Model B, on order since April, arrived yesterday. After a few hours of work I have it running BuC 5.x very nicely. Only a Proof of Concept at this stage, but it shows that it can be done. Screen, keyboard and network

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Hosted apps retirement

2012-06-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 23.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 05:58 AM, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, I will migrate Mediawiki and use it to replace our aging website. Hosted apps retirement *Hosted Apps will go offline permanently on September 1, 2012*

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Hosted apps retirement

2012-06-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hello Mike; Am 23.06.2012 19:00, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 23.06.2012 16:45, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 06/23/2012 05:58 AM, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, I will migrate Mediawiki and use it to replace our aging website. Hosted apps retirement

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-22 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am 17.06.2012 20:53, schrieb Andrew: 11.06.2012 22:02, KP Kirchdoerfer написал: I talked with David it may be worth a test to update uClibc to 0.9.33.x instead of 0.9.32 for 5.x. Hi. At weekend I have some time to work on LEAF, so I upgraded uClibc to 0.9.33.x - it seems

[leaf-devel] librpcsecgss fail in next branch

2012-06-20 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; librpcsecgss fails to build in fresh build in the next branch. include/rpcsecgss/rpc/auth_gss.h:41:27: fatal error: gssapi/gssapi.h: No such file or directory It builds fine after the build went trough in a second try. A guess is that krb5 is a dependency...but I'm not shure and haven't

[leaf-user] [announcement] LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.3-beta1

2012-06-13 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi all; we usually don't make announcements on this list, but this time I think it's worth to make an exception. Today 4.3-beta1 has been made available in the File Release System on sourceforge.net. (https://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf/files/Bering-uClibc/4.3-beta1/) Bering-uClibc-4.3-beta1

Re: [leaf-devel] Update shorewall to version 4.5.x

2012-06-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 05.06.2012 10:40, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 04/06/2012 20:04, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit : Hi Yves, Am 04.06.2012 19:33, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, i find a bug in the management of proxy NDP in shorewall 4.4.27.3 package. So do you think it's possible to merge the modifications done

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.06.2012 17:38, schrieb Andrew: Hi. This is bad idea, it can break all userland that was compiled for older uClibc - so mixing different versions of base libs/compilers/kernels isn't good idea for minor releases. You can include new package into 5.x branch (I think we'll have first

Re: [leaf-devel] Update shorewall to version 4.5.x

2012-06-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Yves, Am 04.06.2012 19:33, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, i find a bug in the management of proxy NDP in shorewall 4.4.27.3 package. So do you think it's possible to merge the modifications done in the 'next' branch into the 'master' banch so we can have a shorewall 4.5.x package for

Re: [leaf-user] 4.21 wget

2012-05-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.05.2012 02:54, schrieb Kenneth Meyer: On 5/16/2012 6:54 PM, Kenneth Meyer wrote: I upgraded my router from 4.2.1-beta1 to the final version. I have one problem. When I attempt to use wget in a script or command line I get the error wget: can't load library 'libiconv.so.2' I didn't see

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Project Logo - Time for an update?

2012-05-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 15.05.2012 23:05, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 22:25 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 15.05.2012 21:20, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 12:12 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: No response from Rich (yet) so I've kicked off a project at freelancer.co.uk and I'll pick

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Project Logo - Time for an update?

2012-05-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.05.2012 22:55, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 22:05 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 15.05.2012 23:05, schrieb davidMbrooke: As a comparison I have updated the Wiki sidebar logo with just the graphic, which seems a little bare by comparison to the version

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Project Logo - Time for an update?

2012-05-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.05.2012 23:21, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:03 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi David, sorry, a misunderstanding on which side ever... I meant to add Linux Embedded Appliance Framework below the logo. kp As in: ** LOGO ** Linux

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Project Logo - Time for an update?

2012-05-15 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 15.05.2012 21:20, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 12:12 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: No response from Rich (yet) so I've kicked off a project at freelancer.co.uk and I'll pick one of the bidders to see what they come up with. david My commission for a new logo at

Re: [leaf-devel] commands in /etc/networking/interfaces?

2012-05-10 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 08.05.2012 21:19, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:35 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi; I see a problem with hostapd and ipv6 addresses. (To summarize: hostapd started from /etc/init.d/ destroys ipv6 addresses from managed interfaces - the bug has been reported in 2010

[leaf-devel] commands in /etc/networking/interfaces?

2012-05-08 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I see a problem with hostapd and ipv6 addresses. (To summarize: hostapd started from /etc/init.d/ destroys ipv6 addresses from managed interfaces - the bug has been reported in 2010 to hostapd, and is (also) described also here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536630) While

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Project Logo - Time for an update?

2012-04-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 22.04.2012 13:45, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, I've added a Software Infobox to our Wikipedia page (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/LEAF_Project). I was going to upload the LEAF Project Logo but Wikipedia asks *lots* of questions about Copyright for image uploads and I'm

[leaf-devel] saving modules broken?

2012-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I've updated my test environment to linux 3.2.16 and updated as usual kernel, initrd.lrp and moddb.lrp. All went well, but if I add a module later and save modules from 'lrcfg', most of the modules get lost: Creating moddb.lrp Please wait: / New Package: -rw-r--r--1 root root

Re: [leaf-user] Seeking tor.lrp Update (and sugg'n re 4.2+ pkg requirements notice)

2012-04-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.04.2012 06:51, schrieb groups, freeman: On 12/04/16 13:06, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: [Tor version]0.2.2.35 has been committed to git and will available soon. Thx KP! Done, pls. see: https://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf/files/Bering-uClibc/ Generally the packages are for 4.x

Re: [leaf-user] dmesg overrun by 'asb100' debug msgs

2012-04-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.04.2012 07:09, schrieb groups, freeman: I'm using BuC 4.2 beta 1, on an ASUS P4E mobo, using the sensors pkg. My dmesg log is getting overrun with repetitions, every 7-8 secs, of this pair of debug lines: [ 687.583914] asb100 0-002d: starting device update... [ 687.777041] asb100

Re: [leaf-user] Seeking tor.lrp Update (and sugg'n re 4.2+ pkg requirements notice)

2012-04-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.04.2012 17:46, schrieb groups, freeman: My tor client (running on BuC 4.2b1) is warning me that the server version I'm using is needing an update: [warn] Please upgrade! This version of Tor (0.2.2.33) is not recommended, according to the directory authorities. Recommended versions

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Successful build of ARM toolchain

2012-04-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 01.04.2012 00:14, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, I *finally* got my ARM toolchain to compile! Seems there are some issues with NPTL on ARM (both for uClibc 0.9.32.1 and 0.9.33) so I have reverted to the new pthread implementation for now (only for armv6; i486 still uses NPTL). A couple of

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - automatic genration for package description files.

2012-04-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 30.03.2012 21:25, schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Today I realized my idea of automation of package definition for initrd and moddb for each arch. It looks for me tiny and clear for understanding/modifying. Now there are template file with ##ARCH## tag and other files except kernel modules,

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - All building OK on x86_64

2012-03-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 25.03.2012 00:15, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 20:37 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Another issue is shorewall. Latest version 4.5 improved install section for BUILD and HOST system. I'm not shure if I got it right. So can you pls do me a favour and chekc if works

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - uClibc 0.9.33 is available - Should we upgrade?

2012-03-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 25.03.2012 14:51, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, I am getting build errors for my highly experimental ARM11 toolchain - a conflict between GCC and uClibc 0.9.32.1 NPTL code. Looks like there are some relevant fixes included in uClibc 0.9.33 which was released 01 Feb 2012. Could we

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - All building OK on x86_64

2012-03-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 24.03.2012 18:36, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, Following another batch of cross-compilation fixes (mawk, linux-atm, dhcpd and radius) I am again seeing an all green report from buildall.sh My build platform is Fedora 15 x86_64, so this is a *slightly* better test of cross-compilation

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Logic for choosing the right value for ARCH

2012-03-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 22.03.2012 21:36, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 22:21 +, davidMbrooke wrote: By the way, I know that buildimage.pl is now broken because of these and my other changes. Maybe I can fix that tomorrow... david buildimage.pl should now be fixed too - at least for i486

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Logic for choosing the right value for ARCH

2012-03-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 23.03.2012 21:49, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:02 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 22.03.2012 21:36, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 22:21 +, davidMbrooke wrote: I do seem to have re-introduced a number of build failures (mawk, linux-atm, dhcpd) Hi

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Logic for choosing the right value for ARCH

2012-03-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 20.03.2012 21:57, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:56 +, davidMbrooke wrote: On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 23:59 +0200, Andrew wrote: 18.03.2012 19:44, davidMbrooke пишет: I'm also thinking about what the ARCH arguments to buildtool.pl and buildpacket.pl should look like.

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - dhcpd build fixed

2012-03-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 18.03.2012 17:18, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Really good news ! Thanks a lot david an kp ! Don't forget Andrew! When do you think you will merge the 'next' branch onto 'master' ? Speaking for myself, support for other CPU's than x86 is one of our major targets for the 5.x series. So the

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Are we agreed that 'next' will be released as Bering-uClibc 5.x ?

2012-03-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; just a few words about my reasons to talk about 5.x in trac. 'next' is always good for new branch to develop the forthcoming major version, but what will call the version after 'next', if next shoud be the stable name? Overnext? This is meaningless IMHO :) Another option is choose a

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - dhcpd build fixed

2012-03-18 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.03.2012 22:04, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, I believe I have fixed the build failure for dhcpcd on 'next'. It's the usual story - several hours' work for just a couple of lines in buildtool.mk :-) I managed to turn up a reference to setting CC for Solaris (in dhcp-4.2.2/README)

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Confirmation of /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 symlink requirements

2012-03-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.03.2012 18:43, schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:58 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 13.03.2012 23:33, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, Now that Andrew and kp have done all the hard work on next I have finally found time to try to build it. I'm getting a few build errors

Re: [leaf-devel] Shorewall Package

2012-03-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 08.03.2012 23:34, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, i resend my email because it's seems that it has not been deliver properly to the mailing list: i see that shorewall update it's stable version to 4.5.0.3. Do you think to upgrade the leaf package to this version ? Another note,

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next - Confirmation of /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 symlink requirements

2012-03-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 13.03.2012 23:33, schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi all, Now that Andrew and kp have done all the hard work on next I have finally found time to try to build it. I'm getting a few build errors (on Fedora 15, x86_64). From previous mails to this list I can see that some of these errors are

Re: [leaf-devel] git merge mybranch with next?

2012-03-05 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 05.03.2012 12:22, schrieb Andrew: 04.03.2012 17:28, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am 04.03.2012 16:09, schrieb Andrew: 04.03.2012 16:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I know, how I can merge a branch with master. But how do I merge a branch with another one, next in my case? thx kp Just do

[leaf-devel] git merge mybranch with next?

2012-03-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I know, how I can merge a branch with master. But how do I merge a branch with another one, next in my case? thx kp -- Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of

Re: [leaf-devel] git merge mybranch with next?

2012-03-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 04.03.2012 16:09, schrieb Andrew: 04.03.2012 16:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I know, how I can merge a branch with master. But how do I merge a branch with another one, next in my case? thx kp Just do 'git merge object' - object can be branch, tag, commit, and your current branch

[leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next

2012-03-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; FYI: gatekeeper# uname -a Linux gatekeeper 3.2.6-geode #1 Wed Feb 29 17:22:09 CET 2012 i586 GNU/Linux gatekeeper# w 16:49:09 up 1 day, 21:31, 1 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.04 rootttyS0 00:00 Mar 2 20:16:03 It runs everything I need for daily use: WLAN with

Re: [leaf-devel] New member

2012-02-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Yves; Hi all, i'm a new LEAF project member. My name is (i'm french so sorry for my bad english :) ) You're welcome - esp. with a sense of humour as shown above :) I'm a linux system administrator in real life. I'm using LEAF Bering since 2001, at first on a soekris

Re: [leaf-devel] New member

2012-02-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 24.02.2012 23:56, schrieb Martin Hejl: Dear I wonder how is pronounced (either in French, or in English, or German, if you prefer). I don't speak for anybody but myself - but if you want to be part of a team, don't hide behind a throw away email address

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc 4.x and Avahi

2012-02-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 20.02.2012 22:28, schrieb david M brooke: Hi Yves, Compile is fine for me - I did a complete re-build from scratch (tools/buildall.sh) to check my changes and everything was green. Maybe I have missed something which affects your build environment but not mine (I build on 64-bit

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and disabled CVS. Revision *1.4* - (*show annotations*

[leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. So will there be two next branches in the near future, or will one(next-experimental) replace the other(next)? And if so shouldn't we remove the old one, just one get not confused? kp

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. So will there be two next branches in the near future, or will one(next-experimental) replace the other

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF 4.0 Packages - D/L problems

2012-02-13 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 12.02.2012 20:39, schrieb groups, freeman: 1) The 4.0 packages now download as files named '4_0_pkgname.lrp' instead of the traditional 'pkgname.lrp' - I suspect this is unintentional. 2) The EasyRSA package that downloads as a singular package is not the newest (i.e. it doesn't

Re: [leaf-user] Bering 4.2-beta2 geode: squid package requires libltdl.so.7

2012-02-12 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.02.2012 23:26, schrieb Northe, Juergen: It's me again ;-) I thought having installed all dependencies for squid package but it complains missing 'libltdl.so.7' which I can not find in the list of modules. Debian calles it libltdl-dev' - I can't find any appropriate to it. And by

Re: [leaf-user] Bering 4.2-beta2 geode: squid package requires libltdl.so.7

2012-02-12 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 12.02.2012 02:52, schrieb Northe, Juergen: I got it now. It is libtool.lrp package which provides libltdl.so.7 and is required by squid. Perhaps someone can add it on the website of the listed packages. Has already been done a week ago. Just in case you missed it - the information about

Re: [leaf-devel] Git repositories

2012-02-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 10.02.2012 17:08, schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, Does anyone object to me reintializing (--bare) our git 'leaf' repository? All of that content is in 'bering-uclibc' and 'packages'. Mike; I don't see any pb reinitilazing leaf - it was a mistake made in the hurry moving from ( at that

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next - kernel 3.2

2012-02-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 07.02.2012 18:40, schrieb Andrew: 07.02.2012 19:30, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; hi all, I've updated on my local host the Linux kernel to 3.2.4 for the Bering-uClibc next branch. The configs are more or less the same as with our current production release and requires definitly

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next - kernel 3.2

2012-02-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.02.2012 18:46, schrieb Andrew: 11.02.2012 19:28, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am 07.02.2012 18:40, schrieb Andrew: 07.02.2012 19:30, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; hi all, I've updated on my local host the Linux kernel to 3.2.4 for the Bering-uClibc next branch. The configs are more

[leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next - kernel 3.2

2012-02-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; hi all, I've updated on my local host the Linux kernel to 3.2.4 for the Bering-uClibc next branch. The configs are more or less the same as with our current production release and requires definitly further review. To get it build changes to buildpacket.pl and Mastermakefile are

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: ipsec

2012-02-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 02.02.2012 23:50, schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP on 02.02.2012 17:52, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 01.02.2012 23:24, schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP rerouted to leaf-devel Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Env: Re: Fwd: Re: ipsec Datum: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:58

[leaf-devel] git repository

2012-02-03 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; Anyone with an idea what may have happened with our repository? http://leaf.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=leaf/bering-uclibc;a=summary is empty and trying to connect from CLI gives an error: fatal: bad config file line 10 in ./config fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly kp

Re: [leaf-user] Kernel module via-velocity.ko for 4.2beta1

2012-02-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 31.01.2012 02:35, schrieb Dillabough, Dave: Hi All, I'm trying to do some testing on the 4.2beta1 release but am missing a kernel module needed for 1 of my network interfaces. Any idea where I would find the via-velocity.ko module for this release? I've tried unpacking the modules.tgz

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: ipsec

2012-02-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 01.02.2012 23:24, schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP rerouted to leaf-devel Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Env: Re: Fwd: Re: ipsec Datum: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:58:03 +0100 Von: KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net Organisation: none An: Erich

[leaf-devel] buc-next build from git

2012-01-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; just completed a rebuild of the next-branch. xtables-addon build without any problem. Only a three packages fail to build: djbdns, openssh and dhcpd (which is a know issue). The buildtool log snippets below... kp djbdns: make -j4 -C djbdns-1.05 make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [leaf-devel] buc-next build from git

2012-01-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 28.01.2012 20:14, schrieb Andrew: 28.01.2012 21:04, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; just completed a rebuild of the next-branch. xtables-addon build without any problem. Only a three packages fail to build: djbdns, openssh and dhcpd (which is a know issue). The buildtool log snippets

[leaf-devel] xtables-addon

2012-01-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; just tried to compile xtables-addon, but it failed with the error: checking for i486-pc-linux-uclibc-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for libxtables... no configure: error: Package

Re: [leaf-user] libtool is required for package squid - V4.x

2012-01-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 23.01.2012 00:01, schrieb Juergen Northe: Hello, I just want to inform, that squid requires the packages libm.lrp, libcxx.lrp and also libtool.lrp which is not mentioned on the Packages 4.x page which can be found here:

Re: [leaf-user] Missing /usr/bin files in v4 EasyRSA

2012-01-22 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 22.01.2012 16:28, schrieb groups, freeman: There appear to be missing, from the current (v4) EasyRSA package, a handful of files from the /usr/bin dir ... at least when compared to the v3 EasyRSA package. e.g. clean-all, build-ca, build-key-server, etc FWIW I'm trying to follow the

Re: [leaf-user] Manually unpacking mounting initrd.lrp

2012-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 19.01.2012 15:13, schrieb groups, freeman: Hi, I'm testing with 4.2b1 and want to examine the uncompressed-then-mounted contents of the initrd.lrp file. On my running 3.1.1b3 I'd gunzip the lrp file via: gunzip -c initrd.lrp /tmp/initrd.minix and then loop-mount the output as a minix

Re: [leaf-devel] Packages Requires (Re: libpthread)

2012-01-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.01.2012 08:40, schrieb Per Sjoholm: Thanks I tried libpt never occurred in my mind to check for lpt... Coming from leaf 2.0 I really like 4.2. Usually I load the package with apkg and use the text via mhttpds as a guide. Suggestion It seems that it should be possible to to

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Env: Re: Fwd: Re: ipsec

2012-01-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 10.01.2012 23:34, schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP maybe Pablo is right and we should use OpenSwan 2.6.37, it may be worth a try. I've tried that recently, but packaging it failed due to a missing file. I'll probably look into it over the weekend, if none else solve it before :) kp

[leaf-devel] Long term kernel

2012-01-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; according to the recent news we will have the choice for two LTS kernels for the next major version of Bering-uClibc. 3.0 for two more years: http://lwn.net/Articles/474872/ and 3,2 for five years: http://lwn.net/Articles/474873/ kp

Re: [leaf-devel] SF podcast

2012-01-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi David; Am 07.01.2012 14:27, schrieb david M brooke: On 6 Jan 2012, at 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am 06.01.2012 18:39, schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, SF staff interview regarding LEAF. http://sourceforge.net/blog/podcast-leaf/ David and others that helped, Thanks

Re: [leaf-devel] SF podcast

2012-01-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Mike; Am 07.01.2012 18:13, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 01/07/2012 09:00 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: -snip- It would be ideal to have a script that could check for new upstream versions and automatically alert us to changes, but since there doesn't seem to be a standard way to check the latest

[leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc-next

2012-01-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew, Hi all, I've manged today to boot a spare Alix box with the next major version of Bering-uClibc, also known as buc-next. I've been able to establish a ppp connection and to access the Net from my LAN - so the basics works with my setup copied from the production machine. I've yet not

Re: [leaf-user] DNS

2012-01-05 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 05.01.2012 15:40, schrieb dummyc: Hello. I have change providers from DSL to cable and I've updated my Bering box to version 4.1.1. Should be the easiest setup all defaults usually work. I get internet access but DNS doesn't work. Once I put Google DNS servers on single boxes everything

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 18.12.2011 14:10, schrieb david M brooke: On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN support? Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I haven't checked). Otherwise it may

Re: [leaf-user] /dev/net/tun Device Missing - Leaf V4.1.1

2011-12-20 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 20.12.2011 01:24, schrieb n22e113: Hi, I enabled the following line in /etc/mdev.conf but openvpnz didn't work? # activate for openvpn tun 0:0 660 @ mkdir /dev/net; ln -s /dev/tun /dev/net/tun I can manually create the soft link and openvpnz would work. I try the following using the

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.12.2011 17:06, schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I made some changes into kernel config today (I replaced cache allocator from slab to slob on non-SMP embedded targets - slob seems to have less resource consumption due to it's simplicity, and is targeted for small systems); also I enabled heap

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls have a look at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1) kernel size linux-2.6.35.14-geode 1,2MB - 937kb linux-2.6.35.14-i486 1,3MB -

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.12.2011 20:39, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Hi; results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls have a look at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1) kernel size linux

Re: [leaf-user] BuC 4.1 woes

2011-12-05 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 04.12.2011 23:49, schrieb Erich Titl: Hi folks I wanted to update my gateway to BuC 4.1 and ran into a few issues. - Bridging I could well bridge the two interfaces eth1 and eth2 and access the gateway from both ends using the bridge address, but the bridge would not forward packets

Re: [leaf-user] request: enable watch in busybox?

2011-11-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Eric; Am 28.11.2011 05:18, schrieb Eric House: Any chance the maintainer of busybox could be persuaded to turn on the 'watch' applet? I find it awfully useful -- and it's also very small. Yes it's small, we may probably add it. Or: is 'watch' available in some other way? You can also help

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Screen captures

2011-11-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 15.11.2011 18:27, schrieb Mike Noyes: On 11/14/2011 09:44 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: I got some screen captures forwarded to me by Rich Bowen of SourceForge. I'm not sure if anyone wants to do anything with these, or if you'd like me to post them to the site somewhere. Charles, I

Re: [leaf-user] hostapd issues

2011-11-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 27.11.2011 13:17, schrieb Casper Pedersen: Hi, I'm trying to upgrade my wireless AP to 4.1.1 RC1 (pcengines wrapborad, with an Atheros WL). But I'm getting: PA: 00:23:6c:91:e0:18 WPA_PTK entering state PTKINITDONE wpa_driver_nl80211_set_key: ifindex=5 alg=3 addr=0x80a9d58 key_idx=0

[leaf-devel] buc next build errors

2011-11-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; A build report for next. bind fails, looks like you missed to commit the patches introduced two days ago (install-includes, makefile-fix). initrd can not packaged because: Could not open file /opt/buildtool-next/source/initrd/files.i686 radius packaging fails rlm_ldap-2.1.12.so is

[leaf-user] LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.1.1-rc

2011-11-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi, jus a short note that today the first, and hopefully last, release candidate for LEAF Bering-uClicb 4.1.1 has been released. DavidMBrooke has comitted asterisk packages, another step to get the packages in par with Bering-uClibc 3.x, and added sshblacklist, a utility to handle ssh attacks on

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next

2011-11-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; You've done an oustanding job; thx very much! I've just updated my machine to ubuntu 11.10 and the pb's I've had (and reported) are gone - it's possible to build the packages again on the host, without the need for an older VM guest, very convenient. I'm currently in the process to

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC next

2011-11-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 26.11.2011 19:40, schrieb Andrew: 26.11.2011 20:32, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; You've done an oustanding job; thx very much! I've just updated my machine to ubuntu 11.10 and the pb's I've had (and reported) are gone - it's possible to build the packages again on the host, without

Re: [leaf-devel] git commits

2011-11-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 21.11.2011 19:25, schrieb Andrew: 21.11.2011 20:18, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 19. November 2011, 21:50:29 schrieb Andrew: P.S. squid 3.2 requires libdb installed to be compiled (helpers/external_acl/session/helpers/external_acl/session requires db.h) - so we need to pull BerkleyDB

Re: [leaf-devel] git commits

2011-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011, 21:35:55 schrieb Andrew: 19.11.2011 21:04, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; I'm still hard trying to have more commits today in master, than you push to into next :) I hope my/your work won't be lost, once you merge master with next...? kp Hi

Re: [leaf-devel] git commits

2011-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 19. November 2011, 21:50:29 schrieb Andrew: P.S. squid 3.2 requires libdb installed to be compiled (helpers/external_acl/session/helpers/external_acl/session requires db.h) - so we need to pull BerkleyDB with it. Hi Andrew; I saw that BerkleyDB was required for this and it was

[leaf-devel] git commits

2011-11-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; I'm still hard trying to have more commits today in master, than you push to into next :) I hope my/your work won't be lost, once you merge master with next...? kp -- All the data continuously generated in

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Screen captures

2011-11-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 14. November 2011, 18:44:13 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: I got some screen captures forwarded to me by Rich Bowen of SourceForge. I'm not sure if anyone wants to do anything with these, or if you'd like me to post them to the site somewhere. If they show anything meaningful, Mike

Re: [leaf-devel] Additional Perl Modules from CPAN - Add to perl.lrp ?

2011-11-03 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2011, 18:50:47 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but which are: - Not included in the standard Perl distribution - Available

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC-next branch

2011-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: Hi all again. Now I finished porting of basic package set to new toolchain - all that are needed for building kernel, root.lrp, initrd and moddb, to look how it's working into VM. Minimal system booted OK; also I saw that syslog-ng in

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >