That's because wifi is symmetric. Same speed in both directions.
It's likely in many cases that there's an asymmetric link in the route
-- certainly HIGHLY likely that there will be something slower. Wifi
is unlikely to be your slowest link, so I really don't see any value
in checking this.
Even
Websense is evil.
I suggest getting a laptop, going down to the local coffee shop,
updating the SDK, and then copying it to whatever system you want.
I also suggest getting a job somewhere that doesn't use websense.
Seriously. I would never take a job without a proper internet
connection. I
I haven't written any code myself yet, though I've worked a bit with
code written by others:
http://restlet.org
There's specifically an Android edition. I'm not sure what
distinguishes the different editions.
On Aug 10, 7:32 am, SAMPATH KUMAR sampat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any
Typically, overflowing a buffer that's allocated on the stack.
2.1 may be better at detecting them than 1.5, or there could be other
differences behind the difference in behavior.
You might also get it by mis-declaring the number of arguments -- that
is, the function takes N arguments but you
If you have to ask, you probably don't need it. It's used by other
parts of the toolkit, such as the UI thread. That covers the vast
majority of the times you'd want to use it. There are cases when
doing your own threading when you need to know about its existence,
but those are rare.
Certainly,
This has been discussed a fair bit in the past, if you want to try to
look for more details, but the basic issue is that there's a cascade
effect...
(This was a couple releases ago; it's possible it has been improved
since).
You call System.gc(). Some finalizers run. This enables other stuff to
://...; to get an SDK update to work.
Surely there is a process at your company for requesting websense
exceptions for genuine work purposes.
On Aug 10, 1:32 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Websense is evil.
I suggest getting a laptop, going down to the local coffee shop,
updating the SDK
The UI framework is in Java. You can't bypass that.
But once your UI framework calls out to C++, you can do everything
that you can do. Given that the UI framework is in Java, I don't see
that bypassing Java/JNI buys you anything.
Just why do you think you want to eliminate JNI -- as opposed to
Better than using replaceregexp, I'd suggest the following XSLT
script, using Ant's xslt task.
(Mine is much more complex -- tweaks metadata, removes unneeded
broadcast listeners in different versions, etc. Once you get this
basic script in place, it's easy to add additional modifications).
?xml
They are NOT two different situations. That's the source of your
confusion.
They are both a different app being in front of your activity. You
mention the call screen and the launcher, but others are possible as
well.
Once your activity is no longer visible, onStop() is called. If it
later
9, 12:25 am, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
But what you COULD do is write your own launcher, if you really wanted
to know if the home key was pressed for some reason. I'm not sure you
could find out about it until later, though. Maybe. But what would you
do with that information? You're being
perini.dav...@dpsoftware.org wrote:
so no news about obfuscating with Proguard?
On Aug 2, 11:53 am, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Anyway -- it looks to me like your problems stem from not starting
from a working ant build and then adding obfuscation.
If you follow the documented
And I'd like to fulfill his second one: what you're doing is asking
for trouble.
Sad, but true. One could also argue that releasing a calendar a
supported API was asking for trouble.
As for the nice error message -- you want to change one or the other -
either set allDay to false, or set the all
Also, it will greatly help both your communication and understanding,
if you carefully learn and use the correct terms for things.
For example, don't use the word app. It's not a technical term, and
you could mean either the .apk or Application object.
And don't use run. I have no idea what you
As much as I hate the DCMA, and its abuses, this is not an abuse, but
the sort of case it should be used for.
(I'm not a fan of GPL, either, but I support your right to choose it
and enforce it.)
But one thing you can do -- is post a comment, and regularly modify it
(even a trivial mod) to keep
Kostya and Mark answered your main question; I'll address your ps.
Applications are indeed 'other' in the permissions you list below, but
applications do have their own uids, so an Application's directory
will be owned by its uid.
An application with the right permission I'm guessing is put into
I recommend you display a great big message saying do not disturb!
while the restore occurs. You can't actually block the user, for
example, from the home key, or the power key...
So I'd suggest transactionalizing things as much as possible. Read a
set of related files (e.g. for one app) all at
Has this (https) ever worked for anyone, ever?
On Aug 9, 4:05 pm, Kwan Cheng yukwanch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you can fix it by turning force http its on the getting started
page
On Aug 9, 2010 4:46 PM, izzet.ulas izzet.u...@gmail.com wrote: I've been
taking Failed to fetch URL
:44, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
OK, this is good information. You are, in fact, running out of memory
-- somehow.
I've see this, but seldom as performance starts to suck for me long
before.
How exactly are you allocating memory for Java? How are you starting
Eclipse?
And when
Activities can be destroyed to free memory.
Check out the left side of the activity lifecycle diagram here:
http://developer.android.com/intl/de/guide/topics/fundamentals.html#actlife
On Aug 4, 10:50 pm, Pent tas...@dinglisch.net wrote:
The order is:
A: startActivityForResult( B )
B:
guidance. Will definitely follow the
instructions.
Best Regards
Amit
On Aug 2, 10:44 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
1) I don't think you REALLY want All to reply to you. :=)
2) I would like to encourage you to learn to use the search function
on the SDK documentation site
parameters into the JVM), but
it was an artificial configuration.
On Aug 3, 9:12 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Well, perhaps this illustrates your second point, but:
http://tinyurl.com/sun-concurrent-gc
Or it may be that they're not concurrent enough for you. Concurrency
isn't
There are other uses besides logging, or at least the kind of logging
you're thinking of.
For example, let's say you have a large complex server with large
complex datastructures with long lifetimes, and a high server
availability requirement.
Let's say you experience a problem in production,
On Aug 3, 10:46 pm, DanH danhi...@ieee.org wrote:
Just a few bullet points:
-- I've always thought that C #include processing sucked. Why did
they never introduce an #includeonce directive that would have
eliminated all the #ifndef stuff to prevent double includes??
Even better, go one
On Aug 4, 6:56 am, Leigh McRae leigh.mc...@lonedwarfgames.com wrote:
On 8/3/2010 11:23 PM, Bob Kerns wrote: You have a very limited view of the
techniques available.
For Java that could be true but my C/C++ fu is just fine thank you.
I can't see that I said anything about your C/C++ fu
Your initial googling has led you astray. Ignore any reference you
find that is discussing stub classes in the context of remote objects;
that is a specialized use of the term, and not relevant to your
search.
It's not a Java term, BTW. The technique can be used in any language
with classes. I've
OK, this is good information. You are, in fact, running out of memory
-- somehow.
I've see this, but seldom as performance starts to suck for me long
before.
How exactly are you allocating memory for Java? How are you starting
Eclipse?
And when you were checking how much memory Eclipse was
Because the browser's processing is asynchronous.
You could stick in a big wait (like you do earlier), and hope it's
enough, or check-wait-loop - but a better way is to trigger whatever
processing you want to happen on that value, from inside your
Value(String) method.
Better and more relevant
.
On Aug 3, 1:48 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
I agree.
My experience with this sort of thing is that frequently, if you don't
start out with a SQL database, you ultimately end up having to convert
it later. So often it's better to start there.
Here's why. Using a database scales
It's long been my opinion that the minimum development environment
should be 8 GB, quad core. And, ideally, solid-state disks.
Definitely *NOT* a 5200 RPM or slower hard drive! Ever!
I run on a 4GB, dual core laptop, SATA 7200 RPM hard drive. But I've
also run on 8 GB, quad core, and know what a
:
On 8/2/2010 10:49 PM, Bob Kerns wrote: First of all -- if you want to list
the faults of the C language, the
preprocessor is very near the top.
Just your opinion.
That's why C++ went to great lengths to mostly remove the need for
using it, with inline functions, constants
with Sun's GC scheme is the vast number of
parameters -- no one understands them, or how to set them for a given
set of circumstances (especially if those circumstances vary
dynamically).
On Aug 2, 9:57 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
OT, but I'll bite.
What do you consider a really
You have a very limited view of the techniques available.
On Aug 3, 10:39 am, Leigh McRae leigh.mc...@lonedwarfgames.com
wrote:
On 8/2/2010 10:49 PM, Bob Kerns wrote: First of all -- if you want to list
the faults of the C language, the
preprocessor is very near the top.
Just your opinion
Also, you meant, unless it is rooted. Though I haven't reviewed your
list in detail, many at least DO work on a rooted device.
On Aug 3, 5:12 pm, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:58 PM, fadden fad...@android.com wrote:
On Aug 3, 3:27 pm, Mark Murphy
You missed my point, so let me try to make it more clearly.
I wasn't absolving the IDE of blame. I'm saying it interacts with the
other offenders, if you have them.
So if you have a bloated Firefox, for example, the IDE will start to
flail much earlier. In that case, you can buy some time (but
On Aug 2, 1:18 pm, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Unpublished, undocumented, unsupported intents are part of the sin.
The more you nail down an API, the more expensive innovation becomes,
because the legacy API
On Aug 2, 10:30 pm, Frank Weiss fewe...@gmail.com wrote:
This thread is a little like schadenfreude to me. A lot of it is about
taste - of which arguing about is of little use. I just saw some Java
code where every closing brace is commented with // end of if, //
end of for, // end of
.
On Aug 3, 2:23 am, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
How are device manufacturers increasing their costs by NOT DELETING
the core Google app? Is it a matter of license fees to Google?
Ah, I see where you're going.
This rolls
I agree.
My experience with this sort of thing is that frequently, if you don't
start out with a SQL database, you ultimately end up having to convert
it later. So often it's better to start there.
Here's why. Using a database scales better. If you end up with a large
quiz, you'll have to load
1) No.
2) No.
3) Don't know.
4) Don't know.
...and I'm not yet convinced I care about backing up my data to
Android's cloud.
Happy?
This is not a customer support forum. You do not get to demand
responses. If you don't get a response, try the documentation, or
google searches. (Of course, that's
Everything -- both the positions and the image widget size -- will be
in pixel coordinates. Actually, you don't need to know that -- just
that they're the same. Hell, I could even be wrong; I'm not going to
take out a microscope and check.
If you have different coordinates for your image data (or
I have found that setting the theme needs to happen before the
super.onCreate() call.
Otherwise, I put it first -- there definitely many things that need to
happen later.
I've complained before that this isn't well-specified. It really,
really should be.
On Aug 3, 8:09 am, TreKing
I quite agree, it IS a deep dirty hack.
And I don't really disagree with your advice, but I have a slightly
more nuanced view on deep dirty hacks.
I view it as a trade-off -- one that has to be made very objectively
and carefully. One must be very careful to exclude showcasing one's
hax0r sk1llz
I'd also like to make a completely separate point -- not addressed at
{ Devdroid }.
I would argue that third-party vendors who replace one app with
another that responds to the same intents WITHOUT DUPLICATING THE
CONTRACT EXACTLY are committing a very grave sin, and should be
reviled throughout
I disagree. It's off topic.
Except for the point about it being harder to decompile Dalvik byte
codes, but that's just a matter of some tool development work.
And my experience (non-Dalvik, to be sure) is that Class loading time
goes up, execution efficiency is reduced is incorrect, that the
My thought was, why don't you show us exactly HOW you draw these
lines?
I do take note of your point about some of the lines having endpoints
near the edge of the range. Edge cases are more likely to demonstrate
bugs.
So assuming you aren't doing something confused, you may have some
good test
What Ed is telling you (and the other people trying to help) is that
what you are seeing is NOT the format that the server is ending.
In fact, it would be somewhat difficult for you to actually see that
data in your program and also parse it.
What you are seeing is the result of (implicitly)
Or the developer could simply exclude non-market Chinese phones.
But I do think that if a user has a Market phone, he's relatively
unlikely to subsequently purchase a non-market phone. It can happen --
due to moving to a different country, for example -- but it's unlikely
to be a willing choice.
1) I don't think you REALLY want All to reply to you. :=)
2) I would like to encourage you to learn to use the search function
on the SDK documentation site. This will be far more helpful to you
for this sort of question than asking here. For one thing, you'll get
much quicker answers.
3) For you
Good point, but my opinion is that this problem is self-limiting. I
don't expect the Archos to be successful without the Market. Even if
most users do have access to the market through their phones.
On Aug 2, 10:56 am, Mark Carter mjc1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2010 19:36, Bob Kerns r
Robert Green's reply gives some specific points I couldn't because I'm
not really an OpenGL person myself, and definitely illustrates how
rendering can vary.
But while I certainly would NOT expect identical results from
different rendering engines, it does sound to me like the differences
you
We're really not so far apart, though we don't completely agree,
either.
On Aug 2, 9:57 am, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
If they violate the CDD, I agree. IMHO, there is a gray area between
honoring the CDD
I suspect the answer is no, but I think it's clearly a best
practice.
The only problem I see is that the market text size available (as of
the last time I updated anyway) is so pathetic, it is really hard to
communicate both what your app does, and details like this.
But yeah, it's important to
Also -- have you tried using the debugger to debug your problem?
It doesn't sound like it. Had you done this basic step, I think:
1) You might have found the solution to your problem yourself
2) If not, you would be able to ask a much more specific question.
On Aug 2, 11:50 am, TreKing
First of all -- if you want to list the faults of the C language, the
preprocessor is very near the top.
That's why C++ went to great lengths to mostly remove the need for
using it, with inline functions, constants, and the like.
It's too bad they didn't remove it. It causes all kinds of
I claim this is a good thing. You compile it once, you know it will
compile and run everywhere.
Introspection and/or moving code to platform-specific subclasses (and
often into platform-specific jars compiled only on that platform)
handle the undefined symbols problem quite nicely. They also
OT, but I'll bite.
What do you consider a really good GC setup?
Sun's GC is good enough that I would hesitate to make blanket
statements that it is better than X or worse than X. (Though I will
say that the newer Sun GC implementations are clearly better than the
older ones). There are a lot of
Yes, I've seen a few cases like this. There are ways to cache the
runtime call, which can be a bit expensive, but they rely a bit much
on convention and are a bit more verbose than you'd like.
On Aug 2, 7:02 pm, DanH danhi...@ieee.org wrote:
Lots of times it would be nice for logging. Sometimes
Note that you don't need a preprocessor to do this! Just a bit of
language support.
On Aug 2, 8:01 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Yes, I've seen a few cases like this. There are ways to cache the
runtime call, which can be a bit expensive, but they rely a bit much
on convention
I don't normally do this but
+1
On Aug 2, 12:46 pm, DanH danhi...@ieee.org wrote:
Preprocessing for j2me is supported by SUN via NetBeans. It's pretty
clear that SUN fully backs preprocessing for j2me if you look at all
the
support provided.
If it were really supported and fully
I've often wondered whether there were some reasons behind this, like
pressure from some carriers.
On the other hand, the iPhone allows this. I wish it were smart enough
to figure out which network actually connects to the Internet, though.
I just spent some time in the hospital, where the Cisco
VVMClientApplication is the class where I need to access the VVMService
class instance.
You don't say why. Are we to assume that VMClientApplication is a
subclass of Application? Apparently not:
dont I have to extend Application in any class ?
So why did you call it VMClientApplication? Are
.
On Jul 26, 3:49 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Um, no. For Qt to do what you claim, it would have to traverse all the
application data -- including data owned by non-Qt code -- to discover
what application objects are still in use. In other words, it would
have to implement a GC
as you view it as the language in question. (It's perfectly reasonable
to view it as a sub-language embedded within a host language).
On Jul 27, 2:29 am, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Not even remotely similar. Note carefully your phrase increments a
reference count in the addressed object
Well, OtherApp can't directly start the MapApp service, but it can
wake up MyApp, which can then start it itself.
In most cases, the ideal approach would be for OtherApp to start an
activity in MyApp, which can then provide the user-interface to inform
the user about what they've just installed,
Um, slightly too strong a statement.
As soon as it's not used outside the cache, it's ELIGIBLE for garbage
collection, which is likely to happen soon.
There are times this is appropriate for a cache. If the objects you're
likely to look up again, are also likely to still be live, but
expensive
Actually, I would disagree with this characterization.
In many cases, it's completely infeasible to maintain the information
you'd need. For example, if you provide an API that accepts objects,
and you maintain some internal information about them -- you have no
opportunity to track the client's
Um, no. For Qt to do what you claim, it would have to traverse all the
application data -- including data owned by non-Qt code -- to discover
what application objects are still in use. In other words, it would
have to implement a GC.
Unless your definition of almost exactly the same stuff is a
Your problem statement is too vague to be useful. I don't mean so much
useful to us, as useful to you.
You really need to be a great deal more specific about what you want
to sense. The term electromagnetic radiation covers a range from
signals with wavelengths many orders of magnitude larger
Ah, you mean special as in an additional step, rather than
special case. Sorry -- yes, in that sense.
And, of course, with PHP hardwired to do null padding, the other end
must conform.
On Jul 19, 9:26 am, Raymond C. Rodgers raym...@badlucksoft.com
wrote:
Well, I'm not talking security wise,
A good rule to follow is that you should never, ever, call the
getBytes() method, nor any method or constructor in the SDK that has a
variant that takes a character encoding. I've fixed an incredible
number of bugs from this cause.
You almost always want to supply UTF-8 as that encoding, too.
On
Sorry for the delay in responding -- I haven't been able to keep up
with the volume lately -- and I'm amazed at how well you do.
On Jul 6, 12:47 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Actually, they CAN return different
That's not something special. That's actually what the algorithms are
specified to require, and the APIs reflect that. They're not even
Android-specific APIs, they're Java APIs, and the algorithms are
standards and not tied to language or platform.
Ideally, you'd pad with random bytes, instead of
Your analysis is correct, up to the point where you say so it can
perhaps start a separate thread, where you get it exactly backwards.
It could start a new thread right then and there.
Instead, you should say so it can handle it IN THE SAME THREAD. The
thread involved is called the UI thread.
Why? Cyclic references aren't bad. They are only a problem for
languages which use reference counting rather than garbage collection.
If you're trying to avoid wasting memory, what you want to look for
are objects which are referenced when they're no longer needed. MAT
can help you with that,
If you have copy protection turned on, your app actually DOES take 2x
the .apk size when installed.
This is just one of many drawbacks to the copy protection feature.
On Jul 16, 7:27 am, H9kDroid htc@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 4:47 am, Stephen Lebed srle...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just
If that doesn't work, replacing your phone will probably fix it. :=)
Seriously, I've seen this happen. I did restart my phone along the
way. And it did eventually start working. I'm not sure the two events
were connected, or if it were some external problem.
On Jul 12, 12:39 pm, TreKing
Actually, they CAN return different Application objects, and are
actually documented to do so, if you read it carefully.
I don't think it's exactly a bug that they do -- but I do think the
platform would be improved by removing getApplicationContext() from
the public API somehow. Perhaps by
Dianne, I really don't feel that Android's solution here is as
complete and universal and helpful as you appear to describe.
(I carefully say appear to describe, because I think a good part of
the issue is that it is HARD to describe).
The assumption you are making appears to be that UI should
I'm a little puzzled by this behavior. This is supposed to be
controlled by this:
http://developer.android.com/intl/de/reference/javax/xml/parsers/DocumentBuilderFactory.html#setExpandEntityReferences(boolean)
which is supposed to default to true.
On Jul 2, 8:06 pm, Julius Spencer
Not necessarily. If you need what amounts logically to a reliable
connection, simulating it yourself with UDP may not help your
scalability, unless you're bpassing a flawed kernel implementation.
I can think of a few high traffic sites that use TCP connections
exclusively, scaled up beyond your
be very expensive to switch, but
someday...)
On Jun 30, 9:33 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Congratulations on a very cute and clever idea. I really hope it
catches on -- and that it makes you a lot of money!
I can't quite see myself using it until I get Android phones for the
family, but I
Check the documentation, or the calendar. It's not an int, it's a
long.
On Jul 2, 6:41 am, Zookie i...@zachidev.com wrote:
I'm pulling the call log and trying to convert the date of the call to
something we can read but the int being returned is a negative number.
int dateColumn =
Send me your coding sheets, and I'll have them keypunched for you and
ship the cards back to you the next day.
(And that, my friends, was the state of the art when I began
programming).
Seriously, you can use whatever tools you want to create the files,
and then build them using the ant scripts
First, don't rush to learn about threads and threading. There's a lot
to learn, it's subtle, mistakes are easy to make but hard to detect
and analyze.
That's why so many frameworks, including Android, go out of their way
to make directly working with threads unnecessary for most people and
May I suggest that customer support for the phone might be a better
place to direct this question?
I'm not sure whether your problem is with the unlock code or with your
google account information. You don't really give enough information,
and I don't think that is a translation issue. I suggest
user Inputs from this dynamically created widgets?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Abhishek
On Jul 1, 9:51 am, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Don't put it in the xml/ directory. That does indeed get compiled into
a binary format, and you'd need to use the corresponding API for
reading
No idea off the top of my head, other than that something you think is
true probably isn't. Not exactly a helpful observation...
But why not try HTML/ instead of HTML/HTML, and verify that
you're getting that. They're equivalent, but going to even simpler XML
may lead you to discover the problem
That's a good thing to do, but he'll have to rewrite his code. It
would be wise to test that his existing code is working as a baseline,
and check it in to revision control, and write a few unit tests,
before doing that.
Unless his code is trivial, of course. Or his head gets too bloody
from
Actually, I would argue that your answer is simple, correct, and THE
answer to his question, which is likewise simple!
If it's not documented as part of the API docs, then it is not part of
the MOST of the functionality... referred to in that statement.
If it's not documented there, then it's
I would be extremely surprised if they do anything other than send the
market URL. To do otherwise would be more work, and a worse user
experience.
My own app, in an upcoming version, will send a link to itself. It was
trivial to implement, and I think it's a great marketing tool. I think
we'd
If you're doing what I think you're doing -- do not use a new class
for each activity.
Instead, use a single wrapper class, that instantiates and invokes
your dynamic class. Pass the name of the class to load and run as an
extra value in your intent -- or possibly include it in the getData()
Yes, Open Source != Open Process.
Moving to an open process wouldn't mean that Google would have to give
up control; they'd just have to make their incomplete work more
visible, and deal somehow with the extra comments and such that
result.
But it could mean a lot more and better and earlier
Congratulations on a very cute and clever idea. I really hope it
catches on -- and that it makes you a lot of money!
I can't quite see myself using it until I get Android phones for the
family, but I think it will be wildly successful among teens! And we
all benefit as a result.
On Jun 30, 10:50
There are several possible editors to use to edit these files. I'd
suggest trying a different one.
First, close the editor that's giving you problems.
Right click on the file in the Project Explorer, and choose Open
With... Try Android Resource Editor first, as that's probably the
one you
There may not be; he may have the wrong editor. Even if he has the
right editor, a workaround may be to use a different one.
See my reply here for more detailed suggestions.
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_frm/thread/c8be17f1927932f0
On Jun 30, 6:31 pm, Frank Weiss
Don't put it in the xml/ directory. That does indeed get compiled into
a binary format, and you'd need to use the corresponding API for
reading it.
(Or you could recode to use that API, and gain efficiency and space --
but first, you'd like to test the code you've already written, right?)
So put
Both the Java and Bouncy Castle act as providers to the standard API.
I think really, your question is, how do you create a BKS keystore?
Answer:
1) If you don't already have them, extract the certificates and keys
you want from your JKS keystore using keytool.
2) Put them into a BKS keystore --
You can't, and you shouldn't. This would be a serious security hole.
What you can and should do, is let the user send the text to the
application of his choice.
For example, wrap an ACTION_SEND intent in a chooser, and run that
activity, and the user will be prompted with a choice of email, SMS,
If you are in onCreate(), then you HAVE NOT BOUND THE SERVICE.
The call to bindService() just *starts* the process of creating and
binding the service. It does not complete until after you return from
onCreate(), at which point the service will be actually created, it's
onCreate() and onStart()
301 - 400 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
