[ATrpms-users] Re: libelf

2005-09-18 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:26, Axel Thimm wrote: Since it looks like the latter will just lead to a system with the same dependency issues, I'd opt for the first. OTOH smart fix will have fixed all dependency issues now ... I'm first trying to fix it via the rescue mode. It won't take that

[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics-switch and GLX

2005-09-18 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Today I reinstalled my FC4 box and using smart I must say that things worked out very well. I got everything up and running again and didn't loose any valuable stuff along the way. One thing I found during the install about the nvidia drivers. Although I use the nvidia-graphics-switch

[ATrpms-users] Re: nvidia-graphics-switch and GLX

2005-09-18 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 19 September 2005 00:32, Axel Thimm wrote: you need to use /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia as a template for /etc/X11/xorg.conf (or just copy it over). Didn't know that. I had a xorg.conf from my previous installation that worked for my dual head setup, so I used that one instead. I see

[ATrpms-users] smart, which repositories

2005-09-24 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Last week I reinstalled my box and installed smart to upgrade. At that time I had not all repositories enabled that came with the medley package. Now I want to install xmms-mp3 package which is in livna repository but when I do, smart wants to install lots of packages which I think is

[ATrpms-users] Re: smart, which repositories

2005-09-24 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 24 September 2005 16:07, Axel Thimm wrote: No, the medley-package is provided for you to decide which repos you want to use. There are no guarantees that it will work, some repos cooperate, others do not. That sounds fair regarding medley, but makes it hard for users to select the

[ATrpms-users] Re: smart, which repositories

2005-09-25 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:38, Axel Thimm wrote: Then something is broken in your setup. Does /usr/lib/smart/distro.py exist? What does rpm -V medley-package-config say? Well, it seems like things are gone from my system. I wonder how that happened. # rpm -V medley-package-config

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 11:45, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, I plan to upgrade my FC3 mythTV box to FC4 today and wonder if there are any issues I should care about that could make life easier. What I worry about is that after the upgrade my old ATrpms packages are not upgraded correctly

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 14:50, Marcel Janssen wrote: Well, I just upgraded and installed smart. The thing I was afraid of happened. Smart doesn't upgrade any of the FC3 packages to FC4 packages. It mentioned that No interesting upgrades are available but I have a lot of FC3 packages still

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 19:49, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Saturday 22 October 2005 18:24, Marcel Janssen wrote: I'm back to sorting out what went wrong.. It seems not so much went wrong after all. Just KDE didn't start because a wrong version of QT was installed (smart didn't solve

[ATrpms-users] Re: FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 19:56, Axel Thimm wrote: OK, that was a bad idea. How were you upgrading them? I just look in smartgui and look for packages with fc3 in their name and upgraded them allmanually to fc4 equivalent packages. I don't know how to do this automatically. I you use

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 20:16, Marcel Janssen wrote: I used smart fix at one time and it solved some issues. I have still a few things left though. One major problem : Mythfrontend doesn't start because of a wrong QT version, but if I install another QT version KDE won't start properly. I

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 20:35, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Saturday 22 October 2005 20:16, Marcel Janssen wrote: I used smart fix at one time and it solved some issues. I have still a few things left though. One major problem : Mythfrontend doesn't start because of a wrong QT version

[ATrpms-users] Re: FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 22 October 2005 21:52, Axel Thimm wrote: smart/apt-get/yum etc. should take care of this. Don't know why it doesn't work for you though :/ It seems that my local rpm repository is some how messed up. Is there any way I can rebuild this ? e.g. can I just delete the rpm database

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: FC3 -FC4 upgrade, any tips ?

2005-10-24 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 24 October 2005 08:33, Mark Wormgoor wrote: I've done this upgrade multiple times. I must say that each time I upgrade my distro using smart or apt, I always make a list of rpms before the upgrade. After the upgrade, I check the new list of rpms against the old one, in order to see

[ATrpms-users] Re: gmplayer not able to start

2005-11-01 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 11:36, Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:04:26PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote: I cannot reproduce it. Perhaps you have bits of other mplayer rpms or self-built mplayer around? I doubt it, it's a clean install of FC4. Anyway, can you tell which package

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: gmplayer not able to start

2005-11-01 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:52, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Tuesday 01 November 2005 11:36, Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:04:26PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote: I cannot reproduce it. Perhaps you have bits of other mplayer rpms or self-built mplayer around? I doubt it, it's

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: mplayer win32codecs or firefox flash plugin on x86_64?

2005-11-06 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 05 November 2005 15:31, Tako Schotanus wrote: Unless somebody in the future can tell me they have a working x86_64 that includes a working firefox+flash+java, mplayer+win32codecs and cedega without too many upgrade hassles I'll stick with i386 for now :-) I have both x86_64 and

Re: [ATrpms-users] Re: mplayer win32codecs or firefox flash plugin on x86_64?

2005-11-06 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 07 November 2005 00:42, Tako Schotanus wrote: Aha, so you added both the 32 _and_ the 64 bit repos to smart? And you installed the 32 bit version like Axel said in his last message, eg: smart install [EMAIL PROTECTED] About correct, only I used smart in graphical mode and just

Re: [ATrpms-users] sound stopped working after upgrade

2005-12-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 11 December 2005 00:37, Axel Thimm wrote: This was just recently discussed here. Your issue is most probably ainit, see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175255 I'm not sure whether I had the same issue. My sound applications all complained that the audio

[ATrpms-users] how to fix this

2006-01-03 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I've upgraded my laptop via smart yesterday and it sort of rendered it partially useless. The laptop hasn't been used for 2 months and the upgraded package list was quite large. Apparently I didn't check the list well enough because this morning I found that some parts which are crucial

Re: [ATrpms-users] how to fix this

2006-01-03 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 14:51, Axel Thimm wrote: Can you offer some more detail? Like output from rpm. You don't happen to have captured the upgrade output by smart? Unfortunately I closed down the laptop right after the upgrade and restarted it this morning, to find it in current state.

[ATrpms-users] no interesting upgrades available!

2006-01-07 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I have a box on which I'm getting this message for the past 4 weeks and I can see that there are a lot of updates available. I'm using smart (version 0.40). Any way I get my box to upgrade correctly again ? btw, when I update the channels I also get an error saying that

Re: [ATrpms-users] kino

2006-01-08 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi Axel, have you tried kino from kde-redhat? I'd also try the i386 packages if you find segfaults, as it may just be yet-another-64bits issue. I can't find any kino on kde-redhat. Are you sure it's there ? I'm currently using the one fro freshrpms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Regards, Marcel

Re: [ATrpms-users] latest mythTV

2006-01-08 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 08 January 2006 17:50, Marcel Janssen wrote: I'll ask on mythTV list about to 100% CPU usage in XV mode. This must be a known issue I guess. It has been solved by going back to an older kernel and the nvidia 7676 driver. Now CPU usage is normal again. I can try to find out if it's

Re: [ATrpms-users] lost some channels

2006-02-21 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:14, Marcel Janssen wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I use finetuning for all channels (have to), so this may well be the cause. I wanted to multiply by 62.5, but that makes no sense as the slider only goes to 300 and the previous finetuning value was 12. I

[ATrpms-users] FC5 upgrade

2006-03-21 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi Axel, I've seen you've already done a lot of work for FC5. Very nice ! I do have a question though: If I upgrade by using the FC5 DVD, can I afterwards just install smart for FC5 and have that process the other installed packages (as far as they are available) ? What is the preferred way

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC5 upgrade

2006-03-22 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:43, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi Axel, I've seen you've already done a lot of work for FC5. Very nice ! I do have a question though: If I upgrade by using the FC5 DVD, can I afterwards just install smart for FC5 and have that process the other installed packages

Re: [ATrpms-users] ipw-2.4-bss.fw load failed: Reason -2 (was: Problem with wpa_supplicant)

2006-03-27 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:53, Axel Thimm wrote: And BTW this post has nothing to do with wpa_suppicant, or did you forget part of the mail's body? Well, perhaps it's a coincidence, but since my upgrade to FC5 also my wifi stopped working and so far I'm making no progress at all. I get this

Re: [ATrpms-users] ipw-2.4-bss.fw load failed: Reason -2 (was: Problem with wpa_supplicant)

2006-03-27 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 01:21, Axel Thimm wrote: Just an idea, but could this have anything to do with ath_hal being a binary ? (same problem as with nvidia stuff now) Of course, but you hijacked a thread about ipw2200 and didn't even mention that you are using madwifi ... ;) Oops, sorry

[ATrpms-users] madwifi not working at all

2006-03-28 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I've installed madwifi and the 2.6.16 kernel from updates-testing and I get nowhere connecting to my AP. I've tried about every tool I could find and my old FC4 script doesn't work as well. After many hours of trying I think a bug is the only possible cause, so I wonder if anyone got it

Re: [ATrpms-users] madwifi not working at all

2006-03-28 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 23:58, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, I've installed madwifi and the 2.6.16 kernel from updates-testing and I get nowhere connecting to my AP. I've tried about every tool I could find and my old FC4 script doesn't work as well. After many hours of trying I think a bug

Re: [ATrpms-users] madwifi not working at all

2006-03-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 16:25, Axel Thimm wrote: Looks like some even made it with the broken kernel: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=776#c2 Well, that makes sort of sense. I get the same error reporting for both kernels so there are no additional issues I think. But, if the

Re: [ATrpms-users] madwifi not working at all -- sort of solved.

2006-03-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 16:25, Axel Thimm wrote: Looks like some even made it with the broken kernel: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=776#c2 But also some people are having trouble according to the fedora user list (but I'm not sure if they use ATrpms packages though). Perhaps

[ATrpms-users] adding channels

2006-03-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I'm trying to add a channel to smart with the Read channel description from URL. I'm trying to add : http://freshrpms.atrpms.net/fedora/linux/5/i386 Which URL do I need to provide to smart for this channel ? Regards, Marcel ___ atrpms-users

Re: [ATrpms-users] adding channels

2006-03-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 22:48, Axel Thimm wrote: # freshrpms # Fedora Core 5 - i386 - freshrpms # [freshrpms] name=Fedora Core 5 - i386 - freshrpms baseurl=http://freshrpms.atrpms.net/fedora/linux/5/i386 components=freshrpms type=apt-rpm OK, that works. Thanks, Marcel

[ATrpms-users] mythTV, kernel 2.6.16

2006-04-03 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I just upgraded to the latest kernel +nvidia drivers (8178) + ivtv driver and have some trouble which I'm not sure it is related to the nvidia driver. Mythtv live TV doesn't work (just returns to the main menu when I select it), but I can watch recorded shows (only when selecting the

Re: [ATrpms-users] [Fwd: Cant install on a toshiba m35x-s114]

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 09 April 2006 20:08, Facundo Barrera wrote: So it's obvious that the rpm madwifi-ng-kmdl-0.9.4.5-21.rhfc5.at it's missing, so i've search it , but i can't find it http://atrpms.net/dist/fc5/madwifi-ng/ Note that if you can't find a matching kernel module you may also need to

[ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I've just finished my upgrade to FC5 for today and although mostly successful, mythTV doesn't work any more. I did see some errors after I rebooted, but haven't recorded those (machine is a set-top setup and not easy to work with besides the mythTv menu, it's controlled by lirc only).

Re: [ATrpms-users] opengroupware

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
/show_bug.cgi?id=188411 So, it's still a can of worms^wbugs. :/ Auch, I wish I did know that before the upgrade. Now I'm stuck with a dead opengroupware and a dead mythTV. Anyway, I will monitor the progress on opengroupware if I can find the time. Thanks, Marcel Janssen

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 10 April 2006 00:11, Marcel Janssen wrote: It looks to me like it's pretty much dead. Anyone knows if I forgot anything obvious' during the upgrade or what the cause may be ? I find that mythbacked somehow dies. Regards, Marcel ___ atrpms

Re: [ATrpms-users] opengroupware

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 10 April 2006 00:33, Axel Thimm wrote: FWIW I think ogo has the same issues under FC4 as under FC5. I used rpms form opengroupware.org before. They worked well for me. Now they're still on my system, but they cause an error with apache. I'll look into that tomorrow. Perhaps there's a

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-09 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 10 April 2006 00:30, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 00:11, Marcel Janssen wrote: It looks to me like it's pretty much dead. Anyone knows if I forgot anything obvious' during the upgrade or what the cause may be ? I find that mythbacked somehow dies. After another

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-10 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hello Brendan, http://www.zen.org/?p=500 I don't think this is the cause for my problem. I've tried all inputs, but all give a black image. I got this from someone else and I'm looking into that now : http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/commits/195540#195540 Some more info on that

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-10 Thread Marcel Janssen
firmware (262144 bytes) ivtv0: loaded v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw firmware (262144 bytes) ivtv0: Encoder revision: 0x02040024 ivtv0: Decoder revision: 0x02020023 regards, Marcel Janssen ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-10 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 00:41, Marcel Janssen wrote: 3) Currently it doesn't do liveTV and gives the following error in dmesg: firmware_loading_store: unexpected value (0) ivtv0: unable to open firmware v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg ivtv0: did you put the firmware in the hotplug firmware directory

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
never saw that before when I had FC4 on the box. I'll test this for some time and in case I find something strange I'll report it back. Thanks, Marcel Janssen ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythTV died after upgrade.

2006-04-13 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 13 April 2006 22:27, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Tuesday 11 April 2006 19:10, Marcel Janssen wrote: I just tried what you mention above. I switched of the PC and waited for a long time to switch it on, than booted the box and liveTV works now. Very weird, I never saw that before

Re: [ATrpms-users] opengroupware FC5 working

2006-04-14 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Friday 14 April 2006 22:03, Axel Thimm wrote: The FC4 bits didn't work for me and when I checked the packages they were partly built with FC3 rpms (it isn't possible to use FC4's objc). I think there were also no x86_64 packages available. I decided to try to get it done properly. OK,

[ATrpms-users] nvidia 8756 issues FC5

2006-04-27 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I'm unable to load the GLX extension using the above. nvidia-graphics-switch doesn't fix the issue. Also, I noticed that libGLcore is in : /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-1.0-8756/libGLcore.so Why was it put there ? When I load the following in my xorg.conf, X won't start : RgbPath

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia 8756 issues FC5

2006-04-27 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 27 April 2006 21:30, Marcel Janssen wrote: When I load the following in my xorg.conf, X won't start : RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/nvidia ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions ModulePath

[ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Ever since I upgraded to FC5 (2nd week after it came out or so) I'm having issues with the IVTV driver. It takes about 5-10 reboots of my system before it actually works successful, but once it works it keeps working. It just means once in a while I miss a show because I'm in the process

Re: [ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 00:10, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, Ever since I upgraded to FC5 (2nd week after it came out or so) I'm having issues with the IVTV driver. It takes about 5-10 reboots of my system before it actually works successful, but once it works it keeps working. It just means once

Re: [ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-30 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 04:09, Axel Thimm wrote: A new firmware will be uploaded later (tomorrow), maybe that fixes your issue. I'll try that and report back if it solves anything. Thanks, Marcel ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net

Re: [ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-31 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 23:11, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Tuesday 30 May 2006 20:31, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Tuesday 30 May 2006 04:09, Axel Thimm wrote: A new firmware will be uploaded later (tomorrow), maybe that fixes your issue. I'll try that and report back if it solves anything

Re: [ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-31 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 01 June 2006 01:12, Axel Thimm wrote: Well, I hope the old firmware is still available. It is, but most people are happier with the new one. Well, my problems must be not firmware related than. It beats the hell out of me, but I'm near to giving up and buy me a hardware solution

Re: [ATrpms-users] IVTV driver still troublesome

2006-05-31 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 01 June 2006 01:38, Marcel Janssen wrote: Some data attached below (state = not working, black image in mythTV) If anything else is needed, please let me know. Well, I just had the first sucessful boot today and have live TV after 1.5 hours of rebooting. New data from

Re: [ATrpms-users] ivtv x86_64 and 2.6.17

2006-07-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 06:02, Matt Goebel wrote: I use this combo just fine. Video4linux definitely IS your problem if you've got the kernel modules for it installed. It conflicts with ivtv and you don't need it. After it's out you should then be able to get ivtv working. Why is there a

Re: [ATrpms-users] ivtv x86_64 and 2.6.17

2006-07-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:33, Marcel Janssen wrote: For me there's so far only ONE stable ivtv and that was ivtv-0.3 version. Ever since I run FC5 I haven't found a version that does work 100% well. I need a dozen reboots to get one successful boot and it's been like this for months now

Re: [ATrpms-users] ivtv x86_64 and 2.6.17

2006-07-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:35, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:33, Marcel Janssen wrote: For me there's so far only ONE stable ivtv and that was ivtv-0.3 version. Ever since I run FC5 I haven't found a version that does work 100% well. I need a dozen reboots to get one

Re: [ATrpms-users] ivtv 0.7.0 and 2.6.17

2006-07-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 01:21, Axel Thimm wrote: Axel, what is the difference between the 0.7 on http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/stable/ and the one on ATrpms ? There is no difference, I just checked the sources. That's odd. I checked smart for any problems before uninstalling the drivers.

[ATrpms-users] Alsa, did something change ?

2006-07-19 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Last week I upgraded my system and found today that my ac3 passthrough stopped working. When I play pcm files, sound is ok. When I play ac3, the application complains about an invalid device. Neither hardware nor configuration did change, so I think some upgrade broke the system. Does it

Re: [ATrpms-users] Alsa, did something change ?

2006-07-19 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 22:27, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, Last week I upgraded my system and found today that my ac3 passthrough stopped working. When I play pcm files, sound is ok. When I play ac3, the application complains about an invalid device. Neither hardware nor configuration did

Re: [ATrpms-users] Alsa, did something change ?

2006-07-20 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 20 July 2006 00:42, Axel Thimm wrote: Is that the same box where ivtv sometimes works and sometimes not? Maybe there is aaa hardware issue somewhere? I'm no hardware expert, but the next time you find alsa breaking, try powering off, removing the ivtv hardware and power on again.

[ATrpms-users] missing packages

2006-08-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade two machines, but get a message regarding missing packages on both : Box 1 : Failed to download packages: http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-i386/redhat/updates/krb5-libs-1.4.3-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found

Re: [ATrpms-users] missing packages

2006-08-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Friday 11 August 2006 21:02, Axel Thimm wrote: Sorry, the target machine which is the externally visible master server ran out of space and there was only a partial update. I'm making space as I write and recreate a new (smaller) repo. :( That explains. Can the mirrors also be included in

[ATrpms-users] invalid SHA ?

2006-08-25 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi Axel, I've got the following issue when upgrading using smart : Failed to download packages: http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-x86_64/redhat/updates/system-config-printer-0.6.151.8-1.x86_64.rpm: Invalid SHA (expected 933bcf5775f99b25181e3540928eae28da95023f, got

Re: [ATrpms-users] invalid SHA ?

2006-08-27 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 26 August 2006 20:27, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote: On Friday 25 August 2006 20:56, Axel Thimm wrote: The first file was replaced today by the second with exactly the same name which breaks the metadata. Please report

Re: [ATrpms-users] FC6 channels

2006-10-26 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 26 October 2006 23:59, Marcel Janssen wrote: Can anyone tell me how to add this channel to smart ? OK, I found the URL : http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/6/x86_64/freshrpms/ It was just difficult to find, or I may have been looking in the wrong places for about an hour

[ATrpms-users] problems using smart, rpm

2006-10-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
and also rpm shows problems. When I type rpm -qa for example it will just show two lines and stay there forever : = rpm -qa perl-XML-Encoding-1.01-27 faac-1.24-0.lvn.3.4 After I reboot I can update once more. Any ideas ? regards, Marcel Janssen

Re: [ATrpms-users] problems using smart, rpm

2006-10-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 29 October 2006 09:45, Axel Thimm wrote: Try rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__*, that's all what a reboot does. OK. I'm using smart of FC6 just fine, though. I'll keep an eye on what is happening. Last night also some cron jobs didn't start correctly. This seems totally unrelated to the smart

Re: [ATrpms-users] smart gtk python

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 14:47, Axel Thimm wrote: How did you upgrade? Upgrade via DVD. Than upgraded : atrpms-package-config medley-package-config 3rd-party-package-config smart smart-gui smart-update Than issued a smart update and smart upgrade. smart upgrade --update smart fix smart

Re: [ATrpms-users] smart gtk python

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:59, Marcel Janssen wrote: The something is fishy, try finding out why gtk and glib2 don't like each other, e.g. use rpm -V on the packages to see whether some packages were only half-upgraded. OK, I probably know what's wrong. Somehow all apps look for /etc

Re: [ATrpms-users] smart gtk python

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 16:24, Axel Thimm wrote: rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | grep i586 ouputs only : j2re-1.4.2_03-fcs.i586.rpm This I don't need so I'll remove it. to see whether you have some elements like the kernel that think you have an i586. Also

Re: [ATrpms-users] smart gtk python

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 16:51, Axel Thimm wrote: Hm, what about glibc and openssl? What arch are these? rpm -q --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' glibc openssl They should be i686. They are. I found a lot of old packages on my system, even some dating back to fc4. Smart

Re: [ATrpms-users] smart gtk python

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 16:59, Marcel Janssen wrote: I found a lot of old packages on my system, even some dating back to fc4. After removing the old packages and a smart fix I'm able to use smart gui without any problems. Also all gtk apps work correctly now. It seems everything

[ATrpms-users] starting opengroupware

2006-12-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Perhaps a silly question but after installing opengroupware I wonder how to start using it ? I had an older version which i started through a some ogo-webui and other services but these don't exist in the ATrpms opengroupware package. Regards, Marcel

[ATrpms-users] nvidia 96xx vs 97xx

2006-12-31 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I have a system with an older nvidia MX440 which is only supported by the 96xx drivers. When I upgrade using smart, smart will however upgrade to the 97xx series which I can't use. Is there a way to tell smart to stick to the 96xx driver (but still upgrade that in case a new version comes

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia 96xx vs 97xx

2006-12-31 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 31 December 2006 20:26, Axel Thimm wrote: Not really, the drivers are independent, *but* there is a convenience (empty) package called nvidia-graphics that always pulls in the latest driver. If you don't want that don't install that package. OK, that explains it. Thanks ! Marcel

[ATrpms-users] sound gone

2007-03-26 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I upgrades my boxes yesterday and unfortunately box boxes had some issues. Most have been solved by now, but my mythbox hasn't got sound any more. I get the following message when starting alsamixer : # alsamixer ALSA lib control.c:910:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL default alsamixer:

Re: [ATrpms-users] sound gone

2007-03-26 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 26 March 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: What related packages did you upgrade, kernel, alsa-driver-kmdl, alsa-lib, ..., all of them? There is one issue that bothers me though. I have an onboard soundcard which I have disabled in the BIOS and my PCI soundcard which I'm only using the spdif

Re: [ATrpms-users] sound gone

2007-03-26 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 26 March 2007, Preet Khalsa wrote: Drop back your alsa lib and utils to the previous version. I had exactly the same issue. Luckily that was the only thing I upgraded and determined that was the cause. Dropped back to version 1.0.13, rebooted and sound works again. So, it really

[ATrpms-users] Latest IVTV

2007-03-28 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Anyone having issues with the lastest IVTV regarding crashes ? My box just crashed when I tried to watch live TV in mythtv. Unfortunately the end result is a corrupt database, probably because at the time also mythfilldatabase was running. I though I was fine because I backup my database

Re: [ATrpms-users] Latest IVTV

2007-03-29 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 29 March 2007, john bray wrote: ivtv has been crashing my box for months now. i had a period in february when it worked fine, but it's back to crashing frequently now. i've tried to collect information on it for a good while, but the kernel seldom puts out any information before

[ATrpms-users] F7 mythtv issues

2007-07-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I upgraded my system from FC6 to F7 and have some issues with mythtv. 1) I have no sound anymore. I use SPDIF only and xine does play sound well. Using Mythtv and xmms I can't get any sound to play. I'm thinking of myth not being able to play 2 channel sound through my spdif any

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 mythtv issues

2007-07-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 02 July 2007, Marcel Janssen wrote: 1) I have no sound anymore. I use SPDIF only and xine does play sound well. Using Mythtv and xmms I can't get any sound to play. I'm thinking of myth not being able to play 2 channel sound through my spdif any longer. Fixed the sound

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 mythtv issues

2007-07-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 02 July 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Ideally ivtv would provide saa7127 for the kernels that either broke it or didn't build it. ok. Compiling from source didn't solve the issue yet. I'll check again in a couple of days on the issue since I haven't got much time left today to solve it.

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 mythtv issues

2007-07-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 02 July 2007, Marcel Janssen wrote: Compiling from source didn't solve the issue yet. I'll check again in a couple of days on the issue since I haven't got much time left today to solve it. I'll get back on the issue by the end of this week I think. Since it couldn't get worse, I

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 mythtv issues

2007-07-03 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: You reinstalled the latest packaged versions? Could you give a list for posterity? There have been some people occasionally complaining about the Helium issue and that could help them. This is what I have installed now :

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythfilldatabase segfaulting

2007-08-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:21:19AM +0200, wouter lists wrote: Perhaps a stupid question: mythfilldatabase is a commandline tool to enter the data of a xml file into a database. Why does it need QT, which is a graphical library? QT has more

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythfilldatabase segfaulting

2007-08-02 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Marcel Janssen wrote: Unfortunately I have a very strange issue now. Although my system time is 2nd of august, mythtv runs one day ahead. I can't find out what's wrong. The TV guide is fine but just the date in mythtv is one day ahead of schedule. output from

[ATrpms-users] mythstream dependencies

2007-09-04 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I tried to upgrade mythtv today and had some difficulties with mythstream : 23:54:09 : Error in Dependency Resolution 23:54:09 : Missing Dependency: libmyth-devel is needed by package mythstream Missing Dependency: is is needed by package mythstream Missing Dependency: not is needed by

[ATrpms-users] xmltv/mythfilldatabase issue after update

2007-09-04 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I updated my system and now mythfilldatabase won't work with any of the grabbers (tv_grab_nl, tv_grab_nl_wolf or any others I tried). I get this error when running mythfilldatabase : Grabbing XMLTV data using tv_grab_nl is not supported. You may need to upgrade to the latest version of

[ATrpms-users] problem with nvidia kmdl packages vs kernel upgrades

2007-09-08 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I'm having an issue upgrading my systems and found the following related to upgrading the kernel. Error: Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 is needed by package nvidia-graphics100.14.09-kmdl-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 Error: Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 is needed

[ATrpms-users] F7 to F8 upgrade

2007-11-10 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, Since the F8 DVD is completely broken regarding upgrading (tried 3 systems, all fail) I'm now trying to upgrade via yum. One of the issues I have is the enabled F7 ATrpms repository. I can disable that but I would prefer to enable the ATrpms F8 repository straight away when I'm upgrading.

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 to F8 upgrade

2007-11-10 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:00:20PM +0100, Marcel Janssen wrote: Hi, Since the F8 DVD is completely broken regarding upgrading (tried 3 systems, all fail) I'm now trying to upgrade via yum. One of the issues I have is the enabled F7

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 to F8 upgrade

2007-11-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Marcel Janssen wrote: Well, the upgrade by DVD fails because of a bug I think. The F8 dvd upgrade fails on all my systems and has already been reported my many to fail, it just spins forever at checking dependencies and seems to use 100% CPU time. Running

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 to F8 upgrade

2007-11-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: I would check that yum fails in the same way. I fit does file a bug against F8's yum, otherwise against F8's yumex. Yum does work correctly. I'm just not sure if it's just my systems or the current Fedora release which is bugging me. One of the

Re: [ATrpms-users] F7 to F8 upgrade

2007-11-11 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: yumex seems to be working fine here. I would try a plain yum check-update first. If it does not work I would clean the cache in /var/cache/yum/ I cleaned /var/cache/yum/ but the problem still exists. regards, Marcel

[ATrpms-users] kernel upgrades vs nvidia module

2007-11-19 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, When I try to upgrade my system, this doesn't work when there's a new kernel available. I get messages like these : Error in Dependency Resolution Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.23.1-42.fc8 is needed by package nvidia-graphics100.14.19-kmdl-2.6.23.1-42.fc8 However, when I deselect

Re: [ATrpms-users] kernel upgrades vs nvidia module

2007-11-19 Thread Marcel Janssen
On Monday 19 November 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Install yum-skip-broken (which perhaps is not strictly neccessary, but it fixes some general bad behaviour of yum) and then disable the installonly_XXX feature: installonly_limit Number of packages listed in installonlypkgs

  1   2   >