of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
mailto:aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New MOSP 3 250hr max Form 2 life
It is pretty obviously just another way of raising money. If the high use
gliders are getting 100 hour/3 month
...@lists.internode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Christopher
McDonnell
Sent: Monday, 3 August 2015 8:03 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New MOSP 3 250hr max Form 2 life
Well I got belittled Sean just because I am not very proficient with a PC. Once
was enough thanks.
From: Sean Jorgensen-Day
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 8:22 PM
To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New MOSP 3 250hr max Form 2 life
Mike
It is pretty obviously just another way of raising money. If the high
use gliders are getting 100 hour/3 month inspections there is
obviously no safety issue here. GFA just wants to charge for another
Form 2 pack.
It is just like the brilliant tug pilot tax. Forcing tug pilots to
belong
ASK13 Bergfalke just fly makers requirements are minimal. I can
remember in good old days at keepit Bergfalke would do up to 415hrs in a
year. Seems like oversee ice to me.
Ian Mc Phee
On 30 Jul 2015 8:40 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Justin,
I would like to see
Thanks Justin,
I would like to see some justification for this change, or even better, see
it reversed.
From my experience I can see no justification for such a change.
Lets put it to the test! Or see the change REVERSED.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Justin Couch jus...@vlc.com.au wrote:
The maintenance schedules that come with the A/C have always seemed quite
adequate to me without this form 2 ‘thing’.
From: Peter Champness
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:40 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] New MOSP 3 250hr max Form 2
