Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-22 Thread Leo
On 2011-04-22 04:39 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: Oh, I see, you want to have a general record category and then filter on that category. Don't call it export-class though. It's just class or category I think. That should be trivial and we can even offer completion based on the categories

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:01:09 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote: * Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-21 13:21:42 -0500]: TZ I didn't think timestamp was updated every time you see a message from TZ someone, just when the record is modified. This one would explicitly TZ say I saw a

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-17 Thread Nix
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler spake thusly: On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook would

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-17 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: (Actually I went further and had it work for each message *for each function*, so if you put it on the hook a dozen times it still only got called once. But this is a useless and arguably confusing side-effect of the behaviour I really wanted. If you only want

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-17 Thread Nix
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler verbalised: On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: (Actually I went further and had it work for each message *for each function*, so if you put it on the hook a dozen times it still only got called once. But this is a useless and arguably confusing side-effect of the

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-16 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote: On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this: - Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation. I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely rely on:

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-16 Thread Nix
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this: On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote: (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if it doesn't.) I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB. It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't broken I'd be

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-16 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if it doesn't.) I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB. It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't broken I'd be astonished. :) If possible, I'd like to avoid

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-16 Thread Nix
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler stated: On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if it doesn't.) I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB. It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't broken I'd be

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-16 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote: We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook would only fire once per record per call to

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-15 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:43 +0200 Didier Verna did...@xemacs.org wrote: dvl Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote: First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should now use dvl For those of us who had write

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-14 Thread Didier Verna
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote: First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should now use For those of us who had write access to the old repo, is that still the case ? What are the changes in the latest

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-13 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: you might consider putting the todo list into the git repo It'll come soon. On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (from git) today and it does not look ready for prime time yet. Specifically, in gnus, when the address is marked with * (i.e., bbdb

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-13 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: here is an addition: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689 From: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org Subject: Make John an alternate for John Doe? (y or n) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.user Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:37:35 -0400 (5 years, 38

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-13 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-13 10:00:04 -0500]: On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: here is an addition: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689 From: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org Subject: Make John an alternate for John Doe? (y or n) Newsgroups:

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-13 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-13 09:54:15 -0500]: On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (from git) today and it does not look ready for prime time yet. Specifically, in gnus, when the address is marked with * (i.e., bbdb knows about it), *bbdb* buffer is not displayed; and when

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
small compilation warning fix: diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-com.el b/lisp/bbdb-com.el index 3c23b2b..d50be0a 100644 --- a/lisp/bbdb-com.el +++ b/lisp/bbdb-com.el @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ (require 'mailabbrev) (eval-and-compile + (autoload 'browse-url-url-at-point browse-url) (autoload

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: small compilation warning fix: diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-com.el b/lisp/bbdb-com.el index 3c23b2b..d50be0a 100644 --- a/lisp/bbdb-com.el +++ b/lisp/bbdb-com.el @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ (require 'mailabbrev) (eval-and-compile + (autoload

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:09:37 -0500 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote: RW I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB. RW First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been RW transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should RW now use RW git clone

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-11 10:04:28 -0500]: Thanks for the report, though I am surprised: with my GNU Emacs 23.3.1 browse-url-url-at-point is anyway an autoloaded function. Which version of emacs are you using? bzr tip; just bootstrapped. also, is there a guide for

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-10 21:09:37 -0500]: - I added support for anniversaries. My original idea was to do something very sophisticated based on note handlers. But this turned out to be too complicated to make it a robust scheme (Sorry guys, if anybody was looking

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: * Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-11 10:04:28 -0500]: Thanks for the report, though I am surprised: with my GNU Emacs 23.3.1 browse-url-url-at-point is anyway an autoloaded function. Which version of emacs are you using? bzr tip; just

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote: RW I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB. RW First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been RW transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should RW now use RW git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/bbdb.git

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a coworker from 10 years ago), so, on one hand, I do not want to remove the record (or its parts, like address,

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-11 11:49:49 -0500]: I'll think about this! It's on my list of feature requests for bbdb. Thanks! you might consider putting the todo list into the git repo (together with relevant references to the discussion on gmane). On a similar note, I tried the

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-11 11:37:53 -0500]: I've put this on my todo list! here is an addition: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689 From: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org Subject: Make John an alternate for John Doe? (y or n) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.user

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:18:18 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote: Sam I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large Sam .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a Sam coworker from 10 years ago), so, on one hand, I do not want to remove

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Nix
On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this: - Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation. I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely rely on: bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook, which is crucial

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-11 15:52:06 -0500]: On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:18:18 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote: Sam I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large Sam .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a Sam

Re: [BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Nix a...@rfcrev.bet.hx [2011-04-11 22:32:19 +0100]: I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely rely on: bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook, which is crucial to keep your database clean in the face of the

[BBDB] Changelog 2010-04-10

2011-04-10 Thread Roland Winkler
I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB. First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should now use git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/bbdb.git I am most grateful to Ted Zlatanov and Barak Pearlmutter who