DJ Lucas wrote:
Do what the book tells
you and execute '/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables start' else you are calling
the iptables binary in /sbin, and start is an invalid argument.
Once-apon-a-time the firewall script was called 'firewall' and IMO this
was a better name for it. Iptables (the
mlij wrote:
Hi everyone!
There was not any error to install it.
When the BLFS 6.0 asks to run firefox in the /usr/bin, there is a failure:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin# firefox
*** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure, catching
exception so finalize window can close
Declan Moriarty wrote:
Right now the time is close to 20:00, the BIOS says 20:00 but the lfs
installations say 21:00. I'm on GMT about half of the year (to be
precise, 2/5ths to 3/5ths). The time command is for somebody else -
somebody who can dial up on pppd directly - that sort of guy.
Randy McMurchy wrote:
[cc'd to BLFS-Support as it appears it should be directed there]
William Harrington wrote these words on 08/21/05 11:28 CST:
Has anyone experienced the problem where the dynamic loader
library is not included in the list of LIBS?
I am not seeing this
Andrew Benton wrote:
Dan Osterrath wrote:
Hi,
I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3?
Yes, gcc-3.3.6 in the BLFS svn.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Richard Snow wrote:
Санаторий «Морска звезда» wrote:
[...]
Can someone translate this?
It's spam. Set your filters to reject character sets you can't read,
then you won't see it.
Ken
A hint on message filtering would be good, one day :-)
Randy McMurchy wrote:
David Fix wrote these words on 08/31/05 14:12 CST:
Just kidding. :P I actually have no idea, I'm just hoping to at least put
a smile onto your face. I've thought of doing some kind of package
management myself, but seeing stuff like this always makes me cringe...
Archaic wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:50:46PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
On the line xterm -g 80x40+0+0 , what is -g for? TIA
This question troubles me. In your massive bombardment of the lfs and
blfs support lists for several weeks, has no one mentioned the use of
man for reading
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Alternatively, you may want to use the stock Adobe PostScript driver
(although I don't know any reason for such preference). In such case,
...
Hey, now that (all your post) MUST become a hint, at the very least!
Ideally a page in the
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Hey, now that (all your post) MUST become a hint, at the very least!
Ideally a page in the BLFS book - it's vital information.
I thought I understood it, but clearly I didn't, since I didn't know
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
True, but strangely the linux-2.6.14-rc4/README says
COMPILING the kernel:
- Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available.
Serves me right for looking. I haven't installed gcc-2.95 for a long time
Andrew, you do realise that us LFSers know
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 10/11/05 15:52 CST:
Take tongue out of cheek. We are FAR better at keeping our
documentation up to date than the Kernel Developers who would rather
introduce a 'really neat bit of new code' than document the bloody
important stuff
David Fix wrote:
You know, I know this is late for a comment... But I just thought of
something... Could it be as simple as doing something like this:
kill `pgrep nfsd`
That's just an inelegant equivalent of:
rpc.nfsd -- 0
I think Tor Olav is trying to confirm that the kernel threads
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:24:06 -
IraqiGeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to start BLFS now ... We are in confusion from whr we have
to start ..
Where to start with BLFS is totally up to. It depends on what extra
features you want to have on your LFS box.
Whether we have to do
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:58:04 -0800
Craig Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, I must've missed that one too. I guess I will be unprivileged
as much as I can from now on. I never read the BLFS book straight
through like I did with LFS. Does this have to do with security or
does it actually
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:34:37 -0200
Rebelde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I am trying to understand the Hotplug System, but I can not see
where are the files that run when I plug a usb device for example.
Can anyone help me?
I recollect a fairly good explanation of advanced udev in an email by
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:47:39 -0600
Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 01/19/06 11:40 CST:
On 1/19/06, Tor Olav Stava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any plans to upgrade the SVN book to include this
version? It supposedly contains a few
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:36:44 -0600
DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
An editor, probably DJ Lucas, will assign this bug to himself
Thanks for putting me on the spot Richard! :-)
I had the opposite intention. I would say, 'take your time and make it
good
I built Tbird-1.5 according to the book, on a recent LFS-by-jhalfs-svn
system. The spellchecker underlines EVERY word as I type.
I installed the English(British) dictiionary, no change. If I 'ignore'
a word that doesn't take the underline off. If I 'ignore-all' a word it
doesn't change the
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 02/09/06 01:34 CST:
The spellchecker underlines EVERY word as I type.
I installed the English(British) dictiionary, no change. If I 'ignore'
a word that doesn't take the underline off. If I 'ignore-all' a word it
doesn't change
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 02/09/06 11:19 CST:
chmod 666 /usr/lib/thunderbird-1.5/components/myspell/*
I'd appreciate knowing what perms you have on those files, Randy?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build ls -l /usr/lib/thunderbird-1.5/components/myspell
total
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 2/9/06, Richard A Downing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, for the record:
chmod 644 /usr/lib/thunderbird-1.5/components/myspell/*
somehow this fixes it. The perms were apparently screwed by installing
the extension: spell-en-GB.xpi.
This makes sense to me. If you
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/09/06 15:20 CST:
Randy, what do you think about adding info about spellcheck
dictionaries to Thunderbird/Mozilla? FYI, I don't know if the
spellcheck is implemented the same way in Mozilla-1.7.x.
I'm not sure that doing anything
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
Does anyone know how to set up such a system for gphoto2 (not
usb-storage)? Any hints would be very welcome. Udevmonitor output
below.
I have no digital camera, and thus can't provide the information you
need immediately. Please
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Matthias Berndt wrote these words on 03/25/06 05:14 CST:
is there anyone interested in adding IPsec-tools, Squid and/or Privoxy
to the book?
I believe standard protocol is to first submit a hint (one for each
package), and then request that the hint(s) be
tom wrote:
I think the book should mention you need to add this --with-kio-smtp to
kdebase in order for kmail to authenticate otherwise smtp wont work.
I suggest you offer to pay the editors to put your bug on the front of
the queue. About $1000 should do it, and I'll happily collect it for
Richard A Downing FBCS CITP wrote:
Henry,
You are a dirty Top Poster :-) Please use our netiquet when
contributing on the LFS list. See FAQ. Gmail can be so configured.
Sorry about that, I see you are already a reformed character.
Blessed are the sinners come to repentance. :-)
R
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/30/06, Richard A Downing FBCS CITP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gmail can be so configured.
Really? I completely missed that. Please enlighten me how to get
bottom-posting.by default.
--
Dan
My mistake, it can't. I am absolutely damn sure it could when I last
Archaic wrote:
As fellow Hoosiers probably know, our fine government has again decided
to change timezone laws. With a glorious history of changes being made
not just at the state level, but on a county-by-county level, and with
the addition of several changes that were implemented, reverted,
John Gay wrote:
On Sunday 02 April 2006 08:12, Eric Stout wrote:
As fellow Hoosiers probably know, our fine government has again decided
SNIP
I think we should all go back to the good old days before Railroad
Timetables (the original excuse), when every village had it's own time
zone. The
Alberto Hernando wrote:
As a part of my
transition to LFS, I want to use it too, but there are no suitable packages
for me, and they refuse to provide more packages.
It isn't possible to relink a dynamically linked executable as a static.
And if it were a static you would not have a problem.
31 matches
Mail list logo
