Maybe there is something required for interaction that was in the buffer used
for the other binding studies, but not in your SEC buffer?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of David
Briggs
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:52 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Try looking into tetartohedral twinning as well--I think I may have such a
crystal, and it's tough going. And as Kay pointed out, try the various P3's.
Since I have not yet been successful in figuring my similar case out, what do
people on the list recommend as an approach to figuring this
Two more papers on twinning I found informative:
===
Acta Cryst. (2003). D59, 2004-2016[ doi:10.1107/S0907444903021085 ]
Twinned crystals and anomalous phasing
Z. Dauter
Abstract: Merohedral or pseudomerohedral twinning of crystals cannot be
I wonder whether flash-cooling from -10 degC would preserve those low mosaicity
values?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of mesters
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 8:40 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Room temperature data collection
Dear Crystallographers,
Where can I find the definition of the R vs batch reported in scaling?
Specifically I am wondering whether it is cumulative (each new frame versus all
previous ones pooled together) or something else, and also how this metric can
have any meaning on early frames when
What a nice idea this ITC dilution is--a great example of a wet lab technique
learned en passant on the ccp4bb.
I wonder what range of Kds could feasibly be measured with existing calorimeter
sensitivities?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board
If you need phases, you might change the salt ion(s) to something with
significant anomalous signal, i.e., Rb+, Cs+, Br-, I- instead of Na+ and Cl-.
With such high ion concentrations, you should get some really high-occupancy
sites. In any case it is sometimes handy to have experimental phases
It seems to me some of the images may have multiple lattices and/or
pseudomerohedral twinning. Are all the spots predicted during integration? What
do the various twinning tests indicate?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Chris Fage
Sent: Sunday,
(Off-list)
Dear Kay and Harry,
You mentioned difficult datasets being of interest for the ACA conference. I am
not coming, but do have some interesting datasets, viz., many datasets of a
particular crystal form of a calmodulin/peptide complex which have defied my
[not exhaustive] attempts to
considerations, or something else. Maybe this does not even matter in
most cases, but it might be important in others...
All the best,
Jacob Keller
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
You indicate that oxygen anomalous scattering could be used; whilst this is
applicable to chirality determination in small molecule organic
crystallography the oxygen anomalous signal is very small and to my knowledge
not used thus far in protein crystallography.
Perhaps I should have been
Not sure I understand why having statistical disorder makes for streaks--does
the crystal then have a whole range of unit cell constants, with the spot at
the most prevalent value, and the streaks are the tails of the distribution?
If so, doesn't having the streak imply a really wide range of
For any sample, crystalline or not, a generally valid description of
diffraction intensity is it being a Fourier transform of electron density
autocorrelation function.
I thought for non-crystalline samples diffraction intensity is simply the
Fourier transform of the electron density, not its
The Fourier transform of electron density is a complex scattering amplitude
that by the axiom of quantum mechanics is not a measurable quantity. What is
measurable is the module squared of it. In crystallography, it is called either
F^2 (formally equal F*Fbar) or somewhat informally diffraction
Unless you are interested in finding curious objects, what would you do with
protein quasicrystal? The practices of macromolecular crystallography is about
determining 3-dimensional structure of objects being crystallized. Protein
quasicrystal are really unlikely to diffract to high enough
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] twinning problem ?
On 03/13/2014 10:55 AM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
Unless you are interested in finding curious objects, what would you do with
protein quasicrystal? The practices of macromolecular crystallography is
about determining 3-dimensional structure of objects being
One can have microdomains without a significant increase in misorientation
e.g. shift dislocations between domains. However, some misorientation is bound
to occur. Not sure I understand your statement And as the blocks get
smaller, the distinction between changing unit cell parameters and
Can you post a better picture? Looks interesting
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Joshua
Stillwell
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 8:22 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] feedback on diffuse
Is the following being neglected?
In a crystal with these putative mosaic microdomains, there will be
interference between microdomains at their edges/borders (at least), but since
most microdomains are probably way smaller than the coherence length of 3-10
microns, presumably all unit cells
to time, and they're always of
course bad news. Anyone on the list have such a diffraction pattern handy?
JPK
On 04/25/2014 09:32 AM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
Is the following being neglected?
In a crystal with these putative mosaic microdomains, there will be
interference between
Thanks to all—I’ve got the paper now
JPK
From: Keller, Jacob
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 1:58 PM
To: 'Oliver Zeldin'
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: RE: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Twinning VS. Disorder
Does anyone know of a place where one can obtain this reference for free? I
would contact
,
are there particularly good ones? And if not, I wonder why proteases usually
require more sequence on the n-terminal side of the scissile bond?
All the best,
Jacob Keller
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA
Attenuate the beam and take many more frames such that you get a full dataset,
albeit at slightly lower resolution, before the metals go away. In other words,
reduce dose/degPhi.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Dean
Derbyshire
Sent: Wednesday, April
Dear Pilatus/Radiation Damage Cognoscenti,
I read a few years ago, before the advent of Pilatus detectors, that the best
strategy was a sort of compromise between number of images and detector readout
noise overhead. I have heard that Pilatus detectors, however, have
essentially no readout
I myself have never seen a separate peak that was a single sulfur atom.
I've seen, in a moderately-radiation-damaged dataset, little shards of
anomalous scattering density in Phaser-generated LLG maps. They were in the
interior of the protein, and the closest possible atoms were sulfurs. They
:%28630%29252-0665
Fax: (630)252-0667tel:%28630%29252-0667
rsanishv...@anl.govmailto:rsanishv...@anl.gov
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.ukmailto:CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk]
on behalf of Keller, Jacob
[kell...@janelia.hhmi.orgmailto:kell
Or space gRupps?
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jim
Pflugrath
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 8:36 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Confusion about space group nomenclature
After all this discussion, I think that Bernhard can now lay the claim
Dear Crystallographers (teleology-haters exempt here),
Does anyone know of any references discussing teleology of inverted repeats in
transporters, i.e., what design sense does it make to use this architecture,
why is it so common even in the absence of sequence similarity? Is there some
Dear Crystallographers,
In a former lab we had a script which would read DALI output, automatically
download the structurally-similar proteins, superimpose them, and color by
regions superimposed. That was in the days of O. Does anyone have a
similar-functioning script for CCP4MG, pymol, or
The b and c cell constants look remarkably similar
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Randy Read
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:41 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] stalled refinement after MR solution
Hi
Just a thought—is the reducing agent changing pH? Also, is your protein a
metal-binder?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of zhuqing
ouyang
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 12:33 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] off topic, complex precipitate in
Well, this is of only possible relevance, but in a previous lab, we used sf9
cells/media quite a bit, and there was always an issue similar to this, due to
[we thought] ferritin being secreted into the medium, and sucking up the
metals. Many, in fact, crystallized ferritin this way by mistake!
Did you look at the maps for extra density/molecules?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Matthew
Bratkowski
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:48 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with Molecules per Asymmetric Unit for Molecular
Dear Crystallographers,
I have a feeling that Moire finges are the real-space equivalent of the Laue
zones in reciprocal-space, and this seems like a very basic idea that must have
been explored--anyone know of a source connecting the mathematico-physical
dots? Or do the dots not connect?
JPK
Dear Crystallographers,
Is anyone aware of a relationship between H-bond distance and energy thereof,
maybe with a little geometry and +/- charge thrown in? I am looking at a
structure with many H-bonds to a ligand, and wondered about the relative
importance of each.
JPK
And yet halides--even iodide--permeate those same lysozyme crystals and
others entirely in 30--60 sec.
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Bernhard
Rupp
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 9:00 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject:
I have wanted for some time to search for catalytic-triad-like configurations
by defining three Ca-Cb bonds from known catalytic triads, then searching the
pdb for matches, but have not thought of a quick and/or easy way to do
this--can your software do this sort of thing, or is there some
I think the ref below may be exactly what I am looking for--thanks everyone for
your help. Even when the tips were not exactly what I needed, I learned about
many tools out there which I may use some day. Generally, I am always impressed
by the collegiality and readiness-to-help of all of those
… I manually attempted chlorine but the density said no.
How did the density say no? Too much, too little…? I guess the bonds are too
short anyway.
What about anomalous signal using the awesomely-sensitive LLG maps from Phaser?
Depending of course on resolution, Cl- can be quite visible, if
appreciated, and preferably it would be
without going into a glove box.
Jacob Keller
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
email: kell...@janelia.hhmi.org
***
Anyone ever tried a glob of paratone-n for this? I remember it being good for
keeping crystals happy during Xe derivatization, but that was for a relatively
short time. If this is at the synchrotron, the dataset would only take a few
minutes at most, so maybe it would work.
JPK
-Original
How about merging multiple crystals together a la Wayne Hendrickson's most
recent papers?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Boaz
Shaanan
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 6:34 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Heavy
A somewhat similar question, with a quick answer I hope: when programs output
CC's of 1/2 datasets, are several random halvings compared/averaged, and if
not, does this make a difference, or are the scores so similar there's no point?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board
Aren't the many chromatographies out there sufficient? Or ultrafiltration? Can
you be a bit more specific about your needs?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Reza
Khayat
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:55 AM
To:
I’ve chuckled at the “polish” nomenclature before, as I assumed this was a
reference to certain software developers, but if so, shouldn’t it be “Polish?”
Or does it mean polish, in the sense of shoe polish?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Harry
Powell
That is, the optimum noise filter is generally the same shape as the signal of
interest ...
Has this been proven, or it just common sense? And if the filter is the same
shape as the signal, why does one need the signal at all? I guess I don't know
precisely what you mean, but anyway, I like
Can you do this for structural biology?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of William
G. Scott
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 2:07 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] paper
On Sep 2, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Avisek
Since you mentioned EtOH, why not do this:
-Make a tray with the appropriate mother liquors
-Make a drop for each well containing mother liquor and high-concentration
ligand in EtOH (you could vary the ratios here as needed.)
-Equilibrate by vapor diffusion until EtOH all goes into the well soln
I would call everything else 'tabloid science'.
...which might be suitable for some journals?
JPK
Cheers,
Tim
On 10/24/2014 04:11 PM, Michal Jamroz wrote:
Dnia 2014-10-22, o godz. 15:43:18
Tommi Kajander tommi.kajan...@helsinki.fi napisał(a):
Would anyone know a software to model
Dear Crystallographers,
I thought that for reliable values for Rfree, one needs only to satisfy
counting statistics, and therefore using at most a couple thousand reflections
should always be sufficient. Almost always, however, some seemingly-arbitrary
percentage of reflections is used, say
Agree with all of this—but how does it reflect on the original question of
whether to use a percent or an absolute number?
JPK
From: Pavel Afonine [mailto:pafon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 11:02 AM
To: Keller, Jacob
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Free
Right about the 1000 in that case, but also Rfree with 5% would be
statistically poor. I guess one would be stuck in that case.
JPK
From: Pavel Afonine [mailto:pafon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 11:16 AM
To: Keller, Jacob
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Free
We just had a chance to read this most interesting discussion. We would agree
with Ian that jiggling or SA refinement may not be needed if refinement can in
fact be run to convergence. However, this will be difficult to achieve for large
structures, especially when only moderate to low resolution
Consider this one: Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. I
think it may have all the relevant terms? I've always liked to think of
scientists more as natural philosophers, although I think there should be
something with a connotation of art in there as well, since we do some of
This is where it’s customary to include a small image or two (or better, a link
thereto) which shows the density, and the masters here can tell you there best
guesses—seems to be a bit of a parlour game. Also include info on what is in
the crystallization condition and protein buffer if you
What do the twinning tests show? Those space groups can be suspicious, I
believe.
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of RHYS
GRINTER
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 4:40 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] P31 or P32
I would say try to get better crystals and data, and also do a MAD experiment.
But...perfect twins are really hard, I think. Maybe vary the crystallization
conditions a bit, additive screen, seeding, etc.
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK]
Yes, it gets complicated, doesn't it? This is why I generally recommend
trying to use a beam that matches your crystal size.
...or is bigger, right? Diffuse scattering, yes, but more even illumination
might be worth it?
Generally, James, I have a question: what is the nature of the intensity
No wikipedia link yet?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Keller,
Jacob
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:20 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Continuous-Single Versus Coarse-Multiple Sampling
Dear
, February 03, 2015 11:51 PM
To: Keller, Jacob; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Mosflm Error Msg
Is the old mosflm.lp open in an editor?
Some editors will put a lock on the file which would prevent mosflm from
overwriting or renaming it.
On 02/03/2015 11:38 PM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
Dear
Dear Crystallographers,
Has anyone come across this message before with imosflm in Win7? I think
restarting cures it, but I've got other jobs going...
JPK
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA
Dear Crystallographers,
Is there any software in CCP4 which can solve twinned structures? I have
several datasets which appear to be tetartohedrally twinned, with possible
spacegroup of p31/p32 masquerading as p6222/p6422. I think this is
approximately equivalent to 1/8-fold NCS?
The data
Dear Crystallographers,
I am trying to get MrBump to complete a partial solution, but on my windows7
machine, the CCP4i interface essentially freezes (cannot see logfiles therein,
nothing responds, although it does not completely die), and those log files
which I think are the correct ones
LLG=1043 RFZ=2.9 TFZ=9.1 PAK=5 LLG=1039
-Original Message-
From: dom.bell...@diamond.ac.uk [mailto:dom.bell...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:28 AM
To: Keller, Jacob; ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: RE: Resolve Domain Sequence Ambiguities
Dear Jacob
What about the bogey of Fourier truncation ripples--I have heard many have been
fooled by the into thinking they were seeing orbitals. How does one tell the
difference?
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Phil
Jeffrey
Sent:
Hi All,
I have 14 identical domains placed in my ASU with reasonable MR scores, but the
problem is that there should really be 7+7 or 8+8 of domains A and B (which are
structurally similar). Can anyone think of a great and easy way of resolving
the ambiguity?
I was thinking potentially:
be able to distinguish between the two sequences.
D
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UKmailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Keller, Jacob
Sent: 05 February 2015 15:49
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Resolve Domain Sequence Ambiguities
Sorry
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Dom
Bellini
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:25 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] X-ray Source Differences (WAS: RE: [ccp4bb] How far does
rad dam travel?)
Dear Jacob,
To add
at high intensity, for a given total dose!
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: James Holton [mailto:jmhol...@lbl.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:00 PM
To: Keller, Jacob; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] X-ray Source Differences (WAS: RE: [ccp4bb] How far does
rad dam
How about “whether the structure can be solved” as a criterion, i.e, maybe just
put it into your favorite software and see whether it works, trying various
parameters? Depends on your goals, I guess―most people just want to solve the
structure and move on.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board
Try each one, refine, compare resulting b-factors and bond lengths to
surrounding atoms. It’s a chloride though.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Zhijie Li
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:53 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] chloride
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] chloride or water
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Keller, Jacob
kell...@janelia.hhmi.orgmailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org wrote:
Not sure why there is this level of suspicion about the poor halide when waters
generally get assigned so haphazardly. I would say
No, I think I don't know is the most honest and scientifically robust answer.
It will impress at least with its solemn humility, but in this case, you *do*
know something, and that information makes the most likely answer that there is
indeed something in that blob, and that something is
I disagree with Nat—it is more likely that the blob is a chloride than a water,
and dramatically more likely than a “nothing.” And it’s certainly not “wildly
speculative,” considering that there is 200 mM Cl- in the crystallization
cocktail, and the type of contacts it makes. Not sure why there
If you do that then what chemical type you are going to put into that
rightmost column of ATOM record of PDB file? Note, that must be a valid
chemical element symbol so that you can use such PDB file to calculate
R-factors, maps and whatnot (Obviously, X would not work!).
Why, Cl- of course!
Maybe somehow do partial cys partial cme, refine occupancies—is this possible
in refmac?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of sreetama
das
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:11 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] additional density on
Dear Crystallographers,
This is more general than crystallography, but has applications therein,
particularly in understanding fine phi-slicing.
The general question is:
Given one needs to collect data to fit parameters for a known function, and
given a limited total number of measurements,
The question is, as I rephrased it, assuming we are able to measure the
diffraction pattern of a single molecule with acceptable accuracy and
precision (comparable to what we have now for the common crystals), is it
better than we measure the diffraction spots from a crystal, given that the
Phases can be deduced mathematically from a continuous transform, a la David
Sayre’s and others’ work. Compared to a crystallographic pattern, a continuous
pattern has huge amounts of information—every pixel (roxel?) would be
equivalent to a reflection, so instead of having ~10^4-5 data points
Check other Cl- in the pdb to see whether the bond lengths and VdW are an issue
(wouldn't H2O have the same VdW issues?). I am thinking (this happened to me
once by mistake) that maybe you are using the last updated mtz (output of
refinement) to refine against rather than the original one. This
Dear Crystallographers,
I've encountered this many times, and fixed it a different way each time, but
my molecules are all spread out into different ASU's and need to be collected
into their closest configuration. Is there some quick way to do this
automatically?
Thanks,
Jacob Keller
Dear Crystallographers,
I don't understand what the 1's are doing in space group names like P3212 or
P3112--can someone fill me in? Not easy to google this one.
JPK
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr,
seems to have dropped out from the lexicon. Who'd be a
crystallographer today!
Pierre Rizkallah
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Keller,
Jacob
Sent: 18 February 2015 16:42
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] P3212--1's
Set up your trays with N:1 ratio of protein:well sol'n, where N 1, up to,
say 5:1? That will tend to concentrate the protein in the drop above the
original concentration.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Mattiroli,Francesca
Sent: Monday, February 16,
to complete lucidity, thanks to all
who responded. I guess the summary is that the non-screw 1’s are essentially
place-holders.
All the best,
Jacob Keller
From: Ian Tickle [mailto:ianj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:45 AM
To: Keller, Jacob
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re
Well, I meant no harm to the poor 1 by calling it a placeholder, but that in
the case of P3212, the 1 is simply to tell you that there is no rotation about
the second axis but is instead about the third. Saying okay, nothing here
amounts to being a place-holder to avoid ambiguity in assigning
the top-hat profile is one of the reasons why inhouse machines produce better
quality data than synchrotrons. However, the often much increased resolution
you achieve at the synchrotron is generally worth more than the quality of the
data at restricted resolution.
Cheers,
Tim
Several
interesting--wonder what's the best way to confirm this for our home
source...?
JPK
Best,
Tim
On 01/12/2015 09:05 PM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
the top-hat profile is one of the reasons why inhouse machines produce
better quality data than synchrotrons. However, the often much increased
A while back Randy Read informed me of the capacity in Phaser for doing
log-likelihood anomalous maps, and I was very happy with the results.
Cys-sulfurs showed high peaks even though the incident x-rays were 1 Ang. I
could also see what seemed to be chlorides and maybe potassiums, and even
Or use copper staining—just add 300 mM copper chloride to your gels right after
running, see your results in ~5 min, when non-protein parts of the gel become
foggy white. Should be indifferent to the nature of the protein, and this
method is actually super-sensitive.
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin
Dear CCP4 programmers,
I am getting crashes in Buccaneer when I try to extend a current model, and
have the options on either of specify atoms from initial model or specify
heavy atom/MR model. In my case, these are sort of important options, since
the model needs to have calcium atoms in it
beam profiles (top-hats?) and lower-noise,
faster detectors (like Pilatus and the new ADSC).
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: James Holton [mailto:jmhol...@lbl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:57 PM
To: Keller, Jacob; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] How far does rad dam
, and have wondered these things for a long time in the
background of my mind...
Jacob Keller
***
Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
email: kell...@janelia.hhmi.org
***
in the crystal, and these
do not create an anomalous effect.
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Keller,
Jacob
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:58 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Basic Anomalous Scattering Theory
Dear
I believe the literature consensus is not to detwin until R values get below
~40%, and if you're still doing DM, I assume the R's are still pretty poor. If
you've placed a model with MR, you could just put it into Refmac with
detwinning.
Also, I had pretty good success in a twinned structure
to
represent the phase of the anomalous scattering?
All the best,
Jacob
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Keller, Jacob
[kell...@janelia.hhmi.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:57 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject
Note that this can lead to anomalous scattering of the incident soldiers.
But it would unfortunately not be imaginary—it would be altogether too real!
Ethan
But yes, it works for pianos too.
Ethan
--
Ethan A Merritt
Biomolecular Structure Center, K-428 Health Sciences Bldg
I disagree, due in part to my availability bias of a very similar phenomenon
with lyso-phosphatidylcholine (lpc) detergent. I concluded at the time that the
crystals were from divalents plus hydrolyzed headgroups, or perhaps even the
whole detergent molecule. I think this particular pattern is
What about 4deg data collection?
What about glutaraldehyde crosslinking?
JPK
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Ursula
Schulze-Gahmen
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 1:49 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] cryo protection for low salt crystallization
...And the cryoprotectant was simply the Li/NH4SO4 mother liquor. Also maybe
relevant: the crystals were pretty old, a year or so.
JPK
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Keller,
Jacob
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 12:21 PM
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo