Well if they are not using any client, application or session vars or any
of the other features then I guess they do not need one.
In which case a non unique app name is not really needed either as there is
nothing in the application of any interest to anyone.
Altho a site that simple usually
I would assume the specific issues would be the crux of the matter. Without
them, it is difficult to speculate.
In regards to performance, the scopes you mention are often used to
increase performance in well designed applications. If the server doesn't
have enough resources to accommodate their
Your admins might be referring to the idea that some OTHER application.cfm/c
is being called when none is in the root of the site. These are issues that
can generally be resolved but they have to be understood. I'd get more info.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Mann [mailto:byronos
application.cfm. Which a good number
of customer sites still use, and would result in many broken customer sites
out of the box.
I'm correct in thinking it just searches up the file system structure to
the system root right? No CF mappings or any other craziness occurs? I
think in 10 you can even set
that
application.cfc takes precedence over application.cfm. Which a good number
of customer sites still use, and would result in many broken customer sites
out of the box.
I'm correct in thinking it just searches up the file system structure to
the system root right? No CF mappings or any other
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Nando d.na...@gmail.com wrote:
The question to ponder here is what an *empty* default Application.cfc file
is going to achieve? Not much, I believe.
I've totally ignored the whole rest of the thread, so pardon me if this is
dumb. But an empty App.cfc
*On CF10, application and session scope seem to work without an
Application.cf* file in a parent directory*
I haven't been able to produce that. I can set session and application
variables, but it's not really a session or application, just a simple
structure. Example below the timestamps keep
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Byron Mann wrote:
Our admins are telling me that we run into issues with customers on our
shared platform not having one. (they didn't specify the issues in the
email).
It has been a while since I last set up a server for shared hosting, but I
used to put an
That is an excellent suggestion. I think we could probably do this for new
servers going forward.
Thanks
~Byron
Byron Mann
Lead Engineer Architect
HostMySite.com
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jochem van Dieten joch...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Byron Mann wrote:
Trying to wrap my head around any implications around not using an
application file.
Our admins are telling me that we run into issues with customers on our
shared platform not having one. (they didn't specify the issues in the
email).
I can see how non-unique application names might be an
-ID:
CAKa5oqLv2tFXLzyc2zS=mmu=D3TzGXLE9vEprxisKiOet+S=z...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: Loss of variables after switch from application.cfm to
application.cfc in FB 3 application
References: 355f13cb$34d4cb1f$54e8dc90$@com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:24:28 -0600
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cf-talk
[64.118.74.225] by
mail67.safesecureweb.com with SMTP;
Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:25:03 -0500
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Message-ID:
CAKa5oqLv2tFXLzyc2zS=mmu=D3TzGXLE9vEprxisKiOet+S=z...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: Loss of variables after switch from application.cfm to
application.cfc in FB 3
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Message-ID:
CAKa5oqLv2tFXLzyc2zS=mmu=D3TzGXLE9vEprxisKiOet+S=z...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: Loss of variables after switch from application.cfm to
application.cfc in FB 3 application
References: 355f13cb$34d4cb1f$54e8dc90$@com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:24:28
Hi folks,
Bit of a head scratcher here which I'm hoping may be obvious to you all.
We've got a Fusebox 3 application which we have recently converted from
application.cfm to application.cfc.
One puzzling result has been that during a single page request, an
attributes variable that is set
of a head scratcher here which I'm hoping may be obvious to you all.
We've got a Fusebox 3 application which we have recently converted from
application.cfm to application.cfc.
One puzzling result has been that during a single page request, an
attributes variable that is set in a file called from
Yeah, it said Application.cfm...
I'm working on a legacy app, (on CF 9) that uses an Application.cfm,
which I cant rebuild right now.
inside of the file, there is a custom structure set called CFA., it's
part of a home grown framework.
Would it automatically be dropped into the application
I'm pretty sure it's living and dying by the request.
In application.cfm:
cfset x = 1
...is:
cfset variables.x = 1
...and not:
cfset application.x = 1
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.comwrote:
Yeah, it said Application.cfm...
I'm working
Yeah, it said Application.cfm...
I'm working on a legacy app, (on CF 9) that uses an Application.cfm,
which I cant rebuild right now.
inside of the file, there is a custom structure set called CFA., it's
part of a home grown framework.
Would it automatically be dropped
Thats what cfthrow and cfrethrow are for.
No.
This is to trigger an execution error in the system.
This kind of errors are not to be reported to the user.
If all you want is to warn the user he has done something wrong, you just need
to display some message in the returned page and that's
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 11:02 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use cfabort. Sorry but you not
going to ever convince me that cfabort is a good thing in any way shape or
form, except for debugging purposes. I can show you many ways to rewrite it
and be more efficient without using cfabort.
If you want to stop
template again. Enough said..
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 12:52 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use
,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 12:52 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use cfabort. Sorry but
you not going
What does efficiency have to do with it?
You tell me:
I can show you many ways to rewrite it and be more efficient without
using cfabort.
You will not change my mind on the use of cfabort, pure and simple.
I'm not really interested in changing your mind. I am interested in
disagreeing with
your HTML will not get rendered correctly if
you simply abort a page, which may result in your friendly error message not
being displayed properly, if at all.
Yet another grtuitous statement...
Your HTML will not get rendered correctly if you do not write it correctly,
period. ;-)
Ex: do not
incorrect blanket statements
I think this is exactly what I was looking for when I wrote gratuitous
statement, I hope this is correct too ;-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
If your not going to cfabort until after the final HTML tag, than doesn't
that rather defeat the point.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:26 PM, wrote:
incorrect blanket statements
I think this is exactly what I was looking for when I wrote gratuitous
statement, I hope this is correct too ;-)
and then rewrite
the code again later when you requirements change?
Have a think about that.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 1:04 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Yes
No Dave, I look at what the next developer or I might be doing in 6-12months
time. I think that people should look at the problem at hand now and the
future, and foresee maybe things might change. Would it no be better to
write something properly now, rather than scratch your head and then
: application.cfm
No Dave, I look at what the next developer or I might be doing in
6-12months time. I think that people should look at the problem at
hand now and the future, and foresee maybe things might change. Would
it no be better to write something properly now, rather than scratch
your head
Or you may simply not want to waste time processing code that's
unnecessary for a specific request.
... and you might even use no onRequestEnd at all ;-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
processing after displaying an
error message in application.cfm.
This is not debugging, but HTTP request validation.
I have plenty of validation done in application.cfm.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http
June 2011 11:06 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Actually cfabort was introduced as a debugging tag.
Really?
Note that I use CFABORT because I was not sure CFCONTENT will cause
processing to stop.
It is not specified in the docs, but it does, so I could remove the
CFABORT
execution of an
application.cfm.
Once this template is executed, the true pdf file is returned to the requester,
there is no need to execute any other template, especialy a pdf file, then it
aborts.
The customer asked to have times every document was requested to be traced.
I know there plenty of other
it is indeed included, I
don't why it could not be the same
for the HTTP requested template ie: not being compiled before application.cfm
passes control to it.
It just happens it is not the way it works, but it is certainly not for any
kind of logical or efficiency reason
the code, but you also have to put that together
with the fact that the code is invoked when a user directly requests
one of his PDFs:
http://claudes_server/somefile.pdf.cfm
So, the compiler attempts to compile somefile.pdf.cfm before running
the code he posted in Application.cfm.
Dave Watts, CTO
1) Why are you using application/octet-stream instead of the PDF one? Are
you going to be using other file types here?
My guess is that his application doesn't keep track of the MIME types
for individual files.
2) Why do you have cfabort in your code, this screams bad coding. Cfabort
means
/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:39 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I did Claude (But I stated a possible bug), because I still am
struggling because you don't share the code, to how you are including
: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:40 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
2) Why do you have cfabort in your code, this screams bad coding.
Cfabort means that you no longer want ColdFusion to continue on any
more processing.
Personally I would
somefile.pdf.cfm.
Then it is compiled BEFORE application.cfm is run and can CFCONTENT the file.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http
just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit
method=exittemplate / which is better as you know that the application
will eventually fall down to onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
When you use CFCONTENT to deliver content, there is nothing else needed to be
done, except terminate the
The part that I am struggling with is the actual PDF itself, regardless of
whether it is called via a cfml template or not. I strongly believe that if
you are using cfcontent to deliver a file with the extension of PDF then it
*SHOULD* not compile that file, only the template it is being
No there isn't, just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit
method=exittemplate / which is better as you know that the application
will eventually fall down to onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
In many cases you might not want onRequestEnd.cfm to execute.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
[mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:39 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I did Claude (But I stated a possible bug), because I still am
struggling because you don't share the code, to how you are including
or loading the PDF. In other words I think
Actually I can't think of one.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 2:42 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
No there isn't, just weird seeing cfabort rather than
: Monday, 27 June 2011 2:27 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit method=exittemplate /
which is better as you know that the application will eventually fall down
to
onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
When you use CFCONTENT
://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 5:45 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Andew, it has been said several times that the problem was caused by a
user
link to the file directly, it is not caused
Actually I can't think of one.
Well, I can think of a couple offhand. For example, you might have
some code that generates HTML output in onRequestEnd.cfm, and you
might have some scripts that generate something other than HTML. Or
you may simply not want to waste time processing code that's
Actually cfabort was introduced as a debugging tag.
No, it wasn't. It was introduced to allow the programmer to halt the
current program. While it can be useful for debugging, it's not
specific to debugging. I'm pretty sure that CFABORT has been around
since the very beginning of CFML.
Dave
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
Yes I am.
Here is a summary of the code in application.cfm:
You can see that the requested file is never executed nor intended to.
The only purpose of the .cfm extension is to force the execution
My guess is that the compiler takes lots of extra time and resources, so it
does all its work before getting into the execution process.
May be, however it will also compile some files for nothing, ie: included
files actually not included at execution... which represents an extra
Until we see the code that delivers the PDF, you have to look at what is
causing the compile error. It has nothing to do with when one is compiled or
not, or what order it is compiled in. ColdFusion will always compile
application.cfm/application.cfc and then the template you are trying
order it is compiled in. ColdFusion will always compile
application.cfm/application.cfc and then the template you are trying to
run,
and onRequestEnd.cfm if you have it. It can't do it any other way,
because
it has to know what variables might be defined in the application.cfm.
No, in fact
hasn't this all been said several times already ?
It doesn't appear to have been said simply and clearly, no.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the
CF will attempt to compile it.
My assumption was it was not compiled if not executed, but from my very first
post I know it is not the case.
My question was is it possible to get around this.
I got about 50 answers to explain what I already knew, but none to my question.
So I conclude that
My assumption was it was not compiled if not executed, but from my very first
post I know it is not the case.
My question was is it possible to get around this.
I got about 50 answers to explain what I already knew, but none to my
question.
So I conclude that there is probably no way to
://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Sunday, 26 June 2011 9:19 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
CF
No.
Happy now?
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 26 June 2011 07:19, wrote:
My question was is it possible to get around this.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
because you don't share the code
I did sent all the code, you probably missed it.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
Yes you did but I also asked for the PDF in question so that I could run
some tests as well, maybe you missed that:-)
Anyway I have a couple of questions.
1) Why are you using application/octet-stream instead of the PDF one? Are
you going to be using other file types here?
2) Why do you have
CF should not be compiling anything that is not CFML, if it is this actually
happening then it sounds like a bug in CF.
If you give a file a .cfm extension and invoke that file in an HTTP
request on a server configured to run CF, for all intents and purposes
that file is CFML, whether it
...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 4:56 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
CF should not be compiling anything that is not CFML, if it is this
actually happening then it sounds like a bug in CF.
If you give a file a .cfm extension and invoke that file in an HTTP
request
Dave, I realise that. In this case he is claiming to use cfcontent, any
content that is used in this manner should not be compiled into the CFML
template.
That was my point.
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed
I think he admitted to it a bit later.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 6:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Dave, I realise that. In this case he
mean secured login via an admin
panel to edit ths?
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 5:15 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
It is pretty simple
the file, nor compile it.
Yhe file is actually a pdf file under .cfm extension.
This is to force execution of an application.cfm first in which I check if
the user is authorized to open the file.
If yes, the application.cfm returns the document with the correct name and
headers
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
Yes I am.
Here is a summary of the code in application.cfm:
You can see that the requested file is never executed nor intended to.
The only purpose of the .cfm extension is to force the execution of the
application.cfm
Here
will be honest you have far too much going on in the Application.cfm,
why not put that in the cfml template that pulls up the PDF in the first
place?
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory of the
template in question, or are you relying on the one in the root
bytes that look like a CF tag, then it causes a compile error
and the application.cfm is not even executed.
This is the first time it happens in about 10 years I've bee using this method.
I thought the template would never be compiled because of CFABORT in
application.cfm, now I see
with your application.cfm and the template in
question and the PDF and I will have a look at it for you. And tell me which
version of ColdFusion you are trying to run this against.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really need to work out why it is trying to compile the PDF as a
CFML template,
Again, since application.cfm
application.cfm
2. execute application.cfm... and eventually abort here.
3. compile the requested template
4. execute it
It is rather
1. compile application.cfm AND the requested template
2. execute application.cfm... and eventually abort here.
4. execute the requested template
There may be a good reason
This is the first time it happens in about 10 years I've bee using this
method.
I thought the template would never be compiled because of CFABORT in
application.cfm, now I see it is not the case.
Since the problem has happened once in 10 years, I would try to open the PDF in
Acrobat Pro
?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory
of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really need to work out why it is trying
?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory
of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really
it is compiled in. ColdFusion will always compile
application.cfm/application.cfc and then the template you are trying to run,
and onRequestEnd.cfm if you have it. It can't do it any other way, because
it has to know what variables might be defined in the application.cfm.
The problem that you can't
I think you don't understand,
I think you don't understand that I perfectly understand what's hapening:
Although I assumed the template (pdf file) should not be compiled since never
executed,
it IS compiled. This causes the syntax error and stops execution.
You are not taking into
I believe you are correct that the answer is no and that process seems
perfectly logical and correct.
Here is how I see the process running... By the way this is not actual
knowledge of the process, but how I've always assumed that the process occurred.
1) Request is received by web server
My guess is that the compiler takes lots of extra time and resources, so it
does all its work before getting into the execution process.
May be, however it will also compile some files for nothing, ie: included files
actually not included at execution... which represents an extra overhead.
the application.cfm is
executed first or not.
So the only way to avoid this is to make sure the .pdf.cfm file cannot be
linked to directly, and you have been given several ways to achieve this.
Russ
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
Hi,
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed run before the template called in
the url, but the template itself is compiled BEFORE application.cfm is called.
I need to have the ability in application.cfm to run some code and NOT compile
the template.
Is it possible ?
CF 9
that application.cfm is indeed run before the template called
in the url, but the template itself is compiled BEFORE application.cfm is
called.
I need to have the ability in application.cfm to run some code and NOT
compile the template.
Is it possible ?
CF 9
to not compile is weird, strange, odd. I can't think of a logical case for
this, and would love to hear it if you have one.
That said, you should be able to do this with an Application.cfc file
instead of Application.cfm. Make an onRequest method, which will compile and
run that function, then from
The CFML must be compiled in order for Java to execute it
Sure, but actually I don't want to execute the file, nor compile it.
Yhe file is actually a pdf file under .cfm extension.
This is to force execution of an application.cfm first in which I check if the
user is authorized to open
?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 12:33 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: application.cfm
Hi,
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed run before the template called
in
the url, but the template itself is compiled BEFORE application.cfm is
called.
I need to have
by some code in application.cfm
I never want to have the document compiled.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http
/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 12:33 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: application.cfm
Hi,
I've noticed
Actually I disagree with what you are saying here, first I would not be
putting the authentication in the Application.cfm and instead look at
securing it some other way. But that is not your issue.
The issue is that you are trying to run a template that will throw an error,
nothing that I can
executing application.cfm
In my mind, application.cfm was called first, then the template compiled and
run.
Apparently, both application.cfm and the template are compiled first, then
executed.
This means that if application.cfm does not let the template to be executed, it
is compiled for nothing
A better way to achieve what you want is to password protect certain folders
on your site
I never use authentication on the server.
Only through CF, since the administrators of my CMS can add/edit their own
users, sometime 1000s of members.
=3E?=]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
But I am at a loss to explain how a PDF is going to throw a CF Exception
error, when using cfcontent to deliver the file it should not be trying to
compile that content.
The error is not thrown using
?Claude_Schn=E9egans wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed run before the template called in
the url, but the template itself is compiled BEFORE application.cfm is called.
I need to have the ability in application.cfm to run some code and NOT
compile the template
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:43 PM, wrote:
A better way to achieve what you want is to password protect certain
folders
on your site
I never use authentication on the server.
Only through CF, since the administrators of my CMS can add/edit
it the name of the pdf
file, which checks user's access rights to requested pdf and serves the
file or shows an error.
Azadi
On 22/06/2011 22:33 , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed run before the template called
in the url
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
Which admin? Window's or CF?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
be
executed.
At best, the file will be sent as a pdf file by CFCONTENT then application.cfm
CFABORTs
Furthermore, only the customer, who has paid for his system, is able to upload
files.
I doubt he ever attemps to sabotage his own system
the admin of your CMS
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
Which admin? Window's or CF?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
the admin of your CMS
Of course, this is the way it works, but you were talking about password
protect certain folders.
I don't see how this can be done by CF code when files other than .cfm or .cfc
are requested by HTTP and the CF server is not even invoked.
It is pretty simple.
use CFFILE to read the .htaccess file
add a new user
use CFFILE to write the .htaccess file
User logs in, when he is authenticated, his credentials are available in the
CGI scope for you to use via CFML.
As I said, on Apache this is native, on IIS you can use Helicon APE
=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 1:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
But I am at a loss to explain how a PDF is going to throw a CF
Exception
error, when using cfcontent to deliver the file it should not be trying
1 - 100 of 1047 matches
Mail list logo
