[cmake-developers] No next-master merge this week?

2012-03-01 Thread Eric Noulard
Hi guys, There was no next-master merge this week? Is there any issue? -- Erk Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie -- http://www.le-message.org -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please

Re: [cmake-developers] Two pull requests

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
On 2/29/2012 4:58 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Brad King wrote: Our style checker limits .h and .cxx files to 79 columns. Some of the updated comments exceed this limit. Please reformat them. Where can I find the style checker sources? I'll run it to pre-commit hook then. The

Re: [cmake-developers] Two pull requests

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
On 2/29/2012 5:34 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Our style checker limits .h and .cxx files to 79 columns. Some of the updated comments exceed this limit. Please Force-pushed. Thanks. It conflicts with the add-const-qualifiers topic in cmPropertyDefinition::IsChained. I merged that into

Re: [cmake-developers] Nightly Binary not building on windows

2012-03-01 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
The Linux nightly fails the same way: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:55 (message): ImageMagick_FOUND is set but no version number is defined Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:65 (check_version_string) I have removed the requirement for ImageMagick version string

Re: [cmake-developers] Two pull requests

2012-03-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2012/3/1 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com: On 3/1/2012 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote: Last time I tried to enable KWStyle hooks following this: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Git/Hooks#Setup That page is generic for many of Kitware's projects and is not specific to CMake.  The same hooks are also

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013008]: CFLAGs set in toolchain file are overwritten

2012-03-01 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13008 == Reported By:David Coles Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] How to include the generated header file?

2012-03-01 Thread Tan, Tom (Shanghai)
Thanks. Speaking of bugs, there's one more in the generated header file: #ifdef machine_side-msvc-32bit_EXPORTS /* We are building this library */ # define HostlinkPP_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport) #else /* We are using this library */ # define HostlinkPP_EXPORT

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread David Cole
Are you using CMake 2.8.7? If not, please upgrade and try with that version. If there's still a problem after that, let us know. On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Johannes Sasongko sason...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone having the problem where CMake creates VS10 project files with

[CMake] New platform which did not deserve upstream: how to avoid warning?

2012-03-01 Thread Eric Noulard
Hi, I'm working on a research platform for which I wrote a toolchain file. Let's say this platform is called Blah how do I avoid the System is unknown to cmake, create: Platform/Blah to use this system, please send your config file to cm...@www.cmake.org so it can be added to cmake Besides

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 3/1/2012 9:00 AM, David Cole wrote: Are you using CMake 2.8.7? If not, please upgrade and try with that version. If there's still a problem after that, let us know. It might also be flags that you are setting in your project or cache that is doing this. Do you set CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS? -Bill

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread Johannes Sasongko
Are you using CMake 2.8.7? If not, please upgrade and try with that version. If there's still a problem after that, let us know. Yes, I'm using 2.8.7. I've tested it on a very simple project (essentially just a Hello World with one lib and one exe), from an empty cache/build dir, and am

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread aaron . meadows
Can you attach that project? I'll test it out under similar conditions. Are you using the free version of visual studio? Aaron Meadows -Original Message- From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Johannes Sasongko Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:01 AM

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Johannes Sasongko sason...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using CMake 2.8.7? If not, please upgrade and try with that version. If there's still a problem after that, let us know. Yes, I'm using 2.8.7. I've tested it on a very simple project (essentially just a

[CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Matthew Schuchard
Hi, back converting another software distribution to a CMake-based build system. This one has a heavy reliance on Fortran 90 modules, and I noticed CMake has some issues with Fortran 90 modules. In particular, I have noticed that CMake cannot do module dependency scanning outside of the

Re: [CMake] Functions inherit parent variables?

2012-03-01 Thread Robert Dailey
No, the print statement is not missing. In fact it prints just fine (function test() is able to obtain the value for variable SOME_TEST). This isn't exactly the same as C++. In C++, a function does not have access to the calling function's local declarations. In order for the function to get

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
On 3/1/2012 11:21 AM, Matthew Schuchard wrote: In particular, I have noticed that CMake cannot do module dependency scanning outside of the current directory/subdirectories. For example, if /topdir/dir1/src/ has a Fortran file with a dependency on a module built in /topdir/dir2/mod/, CMake

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Matthew Schuchard
I did see those links on the bug report for Fortran 90 module dependency in subdirectories, but I am having some kind of XML schema error preventing me from viewing them in Firefox. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that to generate the module dependencies in my example case, I

Re: [CMake] New platform which did not deserve upstream: how to avoid warning?

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 01 March 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: Hi, I'm working on a research platform for which I wrote a toolchain file. Let's say this platform is called Blah how do I avoid the System is unknown to cmake, create: Platform/Blah to use this system, please send your config file to

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
On 3/1/2012 2:38 PM, Matthew Schuchard wrote: I did see those links on the bug report for Fortran 90 module dependency in subdirectories, but I am having some kind of XML schema error preventing me from viewing them in Firefox. To what bug report do you refer, and to what links? If I

Re: [CMake] New platform which did not deserve upstream: how to avoid warning?

2012-03-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2012/3/1 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Thursday 01 March 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: Hi, I'm working on a research platform for which  I wrote a toolchain file. Let's say this platform is called Blah how do I avoid the System is unknown to cmake, create: Platform/Blah to

[CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Matthew Schuchard
On 3/1/2012 2:38 PM, Matthew Schuchard wrote: / I did see those links on the bug report for Fortran 90 module dependency in subdirectories, // but I am having some kind of XML schema error preventing me from viewing them in Firefox. / To what bug report do you refer, and to what links?

Re: [CMake] Code and API review request for Qt5 CMake files

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 01 March 2012, Michael Hertling wrote: On 02/28/2012 10:03 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: ...will reply later in detail. Could you please go through the existing find-modules shipped with cmake which support COMPONENTS and make a summary of how they handle them ? At least

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 Module Issues in CMake

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
On 3/1/2012 3:50 PM, Matthew Schuchard wrote: I must not understand your example case correctly. Please post a sample source tree tarball to reproduce it with CMakeLists.txt files and the Fortran90 sources. Unfortunately, this software is also proprietary, Perhaps you can construct a

[CMake] Need help with X11 issue: Xxf86vm video mode extensions

2012-03-01 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, on my system X11 comes with the X video mode extensions, consisting of a header xf86vmode.h and a library libXxf86vm.so. Question is: are there (older, proprietary) systems, where this header exists, but there is no libXxf86vm.so ? To check, you can run cmake on the attached

Re: [CMake] Code and API review request for Qt5 CMake files

2012-03-01 Thread Michael Hertling
On 03/01/2012 10:08 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Thursday 01 March 2012, Michael Hertling wrote: On 02/28/2012 10:03 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: ...will reply later in detail. Could you please go through the existing find-modules shipped with cmake which support COMPONENTS and make a

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 10 - GenerateDebugInformation always false

2012-03-01 Thread Johannes Sasongko
Can you attach that project? I'll test it out under similar conditions. An even simpler project that gives me the same problem: == CMakeLists.txt == project (cmaketest) cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.8) add_executable (cmaketest test.c) == test.c == int main() { return 0; }

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2974-g90ab2fb

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 90ab2fb96596c9a17ff92fe60c683eca5c919317 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2976-g28743fa

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 28743fa6c3ac16b303803661d0d05253b3efc0ac (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2986-g6ccd825

2012-03-01 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 6ccd8254f1c1de685cea1525421f76755f837bcb (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, hooks, updated. 5ebbe2daccbb2fc20aa8a43bf872dd2a722156b6

2012-03-01 Thread cmake-commits
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, hooks has been updated via 5ebbe2daccbb2fc20aa8a43bf872dd2a722156b6 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2988-g6804cf7

2012-03-01 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 6804cf7b60653d5c3e5c339e2674233789498610 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2990-gdd6710e

2012-03-01 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via dd6710e8d11bae9f595162c7583a81c97afdbe5e (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.7-2994-g0ea9866

2012-03-01 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 0ea9866815c7b9e8fc9665c696c69b39f1f3c6b5 (commit) via