Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-02 Thread Mark Graber
Life gets even more complicated. As Burke, Magliococca (the best source, a recent article in Pittsburg) and I ("Federalists or Friends of Adams") have pointed out, there was nothing to enforce until the Georgia court deliberately refused to obey the order in Worcester. What would happen

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Keith E. Whittington
That would be Andrew Jackson in response to Worcester v. Georgia, and it is generally regarded as apocryphal (though somewhat consistent with other things that he did say, predicting that such a decision would be unenforceable). He did write in a letter, the decision of the supreme court has

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Fred Shapiro
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Eastman, John wrote: I seem to recall a colorful claim by some president or other, opposed to a particular court ruling, along the lines of: The Court has issued its ruling, now let it enforce it. Can anyone point me to the specific President, case, and citation for

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Matthew J. Franck
A line like this is usually attributed to Andrew Jackson in connection with Worcester v. Georgia: John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it. R. Kent Newmyer, in John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court (LSU, 2001), says: As it turns out, these famous words were

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Trevor Morrison
In response to the Court's decision (per Marshall, C.J.) in Worcester v. Georgia, Andrew Jackson supposedly said John Marshall has made his ruling, now let him enforce it. Whether he actually said this remains unclear, I think. Trevor Morrison From: Eastman, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread William Araiza
I had always thought this quote was from Andrew Jackson, in response to a decision, maybe by Marshall, regarding Native American treaty rights. But I don't know that for a fact. Bill Araiza Loyola (L.A.) Eastman, John wrote: I seem to recall a colorful claim by some president or other,

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Eastman, John
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court That would be Andrew Jackson in response to Worcester v. Georgia, and it is generally regarded as apocryphal (though somewhat consistent with other things that he did say

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Bryan Wildenthal
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court In response to the Court's decision (per Marshall, C.J.) in Worcester v. Georgia, Andrew Jackson supposedly said John Marshall has made his ruling, now let him enforce it. Whether he

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Eastman, John
PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court That would be Andrew Jackson in response to Worcester v. Georgia, and it is generally regarded as apocryphal (though somewhat consistent with other things that he did say, predicting

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Ilya Somin
This was Andrew Jackson in response to one of the Indian removal cases (Worcester v. Georgia). On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Eastman, John wrote: I seem to recall a colorful claim by some president or other, opposed to a particular court ruling, along the lines of: The Court has issued its ruling,

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Ilya Somin
-Original Message- From: Keith E. Whittington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 10/1/2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court That would be Andrew Jackson in response to Worcester v. Georgia, and it is generally

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Conkle, Daniel O.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court I love the collaberations made possible by this list. I now have to expand my acknowledgement footnote significantly. Many thanks to all who responded. I have one more

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Paul Finkelman
, I think -- its online). keith - Original Message - From: Eastman, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2003 4:58 pm Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court Thanks, Keith. I almost sent the note just to you! But I needed it quickly, so on the chance you were

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread kewhitt
My apologies. That more-than-usual self-promotion was intended as a private email to John Eastman rather than a public posting to the listserv. Keith - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2003 6:27 pm Subject: Re: Presidents and the Court

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Earl Maltz
The quotation is attributed Andrew Jackson in the wake of the decision in Worcester v. Georgia. It may be mythical. At 02:33 PM 10/1/2003 -0700, you wrote: I seem to recall a colorful claim by some president or other, opposed to a particular court ruling, along the lines of: The Court has issued

Re: Presidents and the Court

2003-10-01 Thread Richard Dougherty
Others have suggested even if the quote is apocryphal (it's hard not to think so) that it accurately describes Jackson's position. I am not certain that is the case. Robert Remini suggests, with some authority, that Jackson never would have said it because he would not have accepted the