At 11:46 PM 4/28/2001 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
I rather like the idea of encrypting the logs on the fly and shipping them
offshore. Your offshore partner will be instructed to turn over the
logs only if you are not asking for them under duress. (A reasonable
protocol can probably be worked
there is no requirement for maintaining log files (unless specifically
directed otherwise.) log files contain either marketing value or sysadmin
value -- in both cases specific ip addr info isn't necessary to maintain
that value (except in case of anomalous activity). one could collect info
I rather like the idea of encrypting the logs on the fly and shipping them
offshore. Your offshore partner will be instructed to turn over the
logs only if you are not asking for them under duress. (A reasonable
protocol can probably be worked out. Would a court order instruct you
to lie? If so,
[Note from Matthew Gaylor: Here is a prime example of the Republican
vision of doing more with less FY 2002 budget includes $1.057
billion in program increases. That's a billion more than Janet Reno
spent. What total and complete government reduction frauds the
Republicans are. Also note
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Right, in most circumstances you're not required to keep logs. But there
are some cases, albeit a fairly narrow subset, in which you'd want to have
log files that are available to you but not an adversary using legal process.
-Declan
If you
Will someone at lne.com finally decide that he qualifies as spam and start
filtering? That simple act would improve the signal to noise ratio dramatically.
Internet is a self-service establishment.
Full-service has too much undesirable luggage attached to it.
I haven't seen choatian posts
Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, in most circumstances you're not required to keep logs. But
there are some cases, albeit a fairly narrow subset, in which you'd
want to have log files that are available to you but not an
adversary using legal process.
-Declan
Which
Right, in most circumstances you're not required to keep logs. But there
are some cases, albeit a fairly narrow subset, in which you'd want to have
log files that are available to you but not an adversary using legal process.
-Declan
At 01:15 AM 4/29/01 -0400, Phillip H. Zakas wrote:
there
I think Matt is a bit too quick to conclude a court will charge the
operator with contempt and that the contempt charge will stick on appeal.
Obviously judges have a lot of discretion, but it doesn't seem to me like
the question is such a clear one if a system is set up in the proper
At 01:04 PM 4/29/2001 -0400, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, in most circumstances you're not required to keep logs. But there
are some cases, albeit a fairly narrow subset, in which you'd want to
have log files that are available to you but not an
10 matches
Mail list logo
