RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kevin Bilbee
 I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.

That is great then I know the latest interim.

 But that won't help someone
 who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new
 feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

Correct but they will know they do not have the latest interim and can then
search teh archives for features they did not know about.

 I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post
 that something
 is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
 what the latest interim is.

 That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just
 fixed in a new
 interim 1.79i7.

Can you change most of the time to all of the time so even when looking at
the archives we know what interim you are refering to. We also will know
which features go with which interim.


Kevin Bilbee




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kami Razvan
 and the latest interim will decode encoded subjects

Scott:

It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim
number- for one big reason...

It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know
other than downloading it and seeing if a new version shows up.  If we know
the latest interim is the one we have then we won't download it again.

I know you have to remember it but how else can we know the new interim
number and if we have it or not..

Regards,
Kami

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim
number- for one big reason...
It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know
other than downloading it and seeing if a new version shows up.  If we know
the latest interim is the one we have then we won't download it again.
I know you have to remember it but how else can we know the new interim
number and if we have it or not..
For this, you can search the archives.  The decoding of the subject was 
done quite some time ago, and was covered in the archives.  If people would 
prefer not to do that, the other option would be for us to instead say 
will be available in the next release.  :)

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Scott Fisher
The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number displayed in 
some manner would be very useful.

As for searching the archives, since they haven't been updated for over two weeks, 
won't this start being an incomplete information source?

Perhaps having the release notes current to the latest interim and having  interim 
version listed for each release line would be a good solution.
i.e. Something like this in the release notes.
JM FIX 177i16 IPBYPASS limit increased from 20 to 100 entries. 
Sometimes it is easier to find information in the release notes, rather than hoping to 
catch the right word in a search of the mail-archive.

Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/11/04 12:13PM 

It would be a great help if you can indicate what is the latest interim
number- for one big reason...

It will reduce the load on your server since we really have no way to know
other than downloading it and seeing if a new version shows up.  If we know
the latest interim is the one we have then we won't download it again.

I know you have to remember it but how else can we know the new interim
number and if we have it or not..

For this, you can search the archives.  The decoding of the subject was 
done quite some time ago, and was covered in the archives.  If people would 
prefer not to do that, the other option would be for us to instead say 
will be available in the next release.  :)

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number 
displayed in some manner would be very useful.
We can do that, but then it is back to just releases/betas.

I think the final answer really should be If you don't like the way that 
interim releases work, pretend that there are only releases and 
betas.  While we appreciate input, the procedure for interims *must* be as 
simple as possible.  Add too much to the process, and it takes almost as 
much time as new betas, and there is no need for interims anymore.

As for searching the archives, since they haven't been updated for over 
two weeks, won't this start being an incomplete information source?
Unfortunately, mail-archive.com occasionally has hiccups like 
this.  We'll have to wait to see if they get the newer E-mails or not.

Perhaps having the release notes current to the latest interim and 
having  interim version listed for each release line would be a good solution.
This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming 
parts of the interims.

Remember, if interims take as long to get out as betas, there is no need 
for interims.  The interims often allow for new features/fixes to be 
accessed quickly (which is very nice with anti-spam/anti-virus software), 
but they can only work if there steps for the beta process that are skipped.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Kami Razvan
:)

This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming
parts of the interims.

Scott...

All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails..

...  This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6)  Blah blah blah

That is it.. :)

I know we have 1.79i6- so I won't be downloading it- right now when I see
your emails I say Oh.. May be I should download it- so I go to the site and
put a load on your server and download it- then I see that it is the same
version that I had.

I am sure others do the same...

This requires no change in what you do and how you do it.. But every so
often let us know what is the latest interim number.. 

Thanks

Kami

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Andy Schmidt
Kami:

The management of interim releases comes up in regular intervals. I agree,
it is a waste of resources of time that email messages refer to a mysterious
latest interim - instead of simply qualifying, interim 1.76i6.  I just
can't see how that can possible take more time to the author - but it will
help every customer who is running interim releases.

Like you and myself, I'm sure that many people end up downloading an interim
release to find out WHICH version the latest is - just to discover that
they are running THAT number already.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206

http://www.HM-Software.com/


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 02:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim


:)

This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming
parts of the interims.

Scott...

All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails..

...  This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6)  Blah blah blah

That is it.. :)

I know we have 1.79i6- so I won't be downloading it- right now when I see
your emails I say Oh.. May be I should download it- so I go to the site and
put a load on your server and download it- then I see that it is the same
version that I had.

I am sure others do the same...

This requires no change in what you do and how you do it.. But every so
often let us know what is the latest interim number.. 

Thanks

Kami

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

The management of interim releases comes up in regular intervals. I agree,
it is a waste of resources of time that email messages refer to a mysterious
latest interim - instead of simply qualifying, interim 1.76i6.  I just
can't see how that can possible take more time to the author - but it will
This is just one of those cases where you can't have it both ways -- you 
can either choose fast fixes with minimal documentation and related 
services, or standard betas.  The thing that is especially good here, 
though, is that you *do* have a choice.  If you don't like the way that 
interims work, just stick with the betas.

Yes, this does keep coming up.  And yes, it would be nice if we could 
enhance the documentation/services regarding interims.  But I just don't 
see that happening.  That's just part of the nature of interims, and why 
they were introduced.  If the drawbacks outweigh the benefits, feel free to 
stick to betas.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Nick Hayer
On 11 May 2004 at 14:38, Darin Cox wrote:
Boys,

Scott is very knowledgeable, helpful, and quick to assist. He is also 
as stuborn as an old dog. He is not going to change the way he tags 
his releases, or writes his manual. No biggie. I suggest the good 
outweighs the bad...

-Nick Hayer
 

 I agree...this would be an immense help.
 
 Darin.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:26 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim
 
 
 :)
 
 This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more
 time-consuming parts of the interims.
 
 Scott...
 
 All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails..
 
 ...  This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6)  Blah blah blah
 
 That is it.. :)
 
 I know we have 1.79i6- so I won't be downloading it- right now when I
 see your emails I say Oh.. May be I should download it- so I go to the
 site and put a load on your server and download it- then I see that it
 is the same version that I had.
 
 I am sure others do the same...
 
 This requires no change in what you do and how you do it.. But every
 so often let us know what is the latest interim number..
 
 Thanks
 
 Kami
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Darin Cox
Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin

Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list
that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?

I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that something
is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
what the latest interim is.  This is not asking for additional
documentation, just tell everyone what the latest is when you post these
statements.  That way those that use the interims know whether or not
they're on the latest without having to download and run it to find out.

This would go a long way to quelling these discussions, simply by adding the
last interim number to the email...doesn't have to be the interim that
actually fixed it, just the last one.

Either that or just name the files according to the interim rather than just
declude.exe.

I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort and
quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mild
frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight
adaptation...

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim



All I asked for was the inclusion of this in your emails..

...  This is added in our latest interim (1.76i6)  Blah blah blah

That is it.. :)

True.  But that means that we need to add extra record keeping as to what
was added to each specific interim.  And it means that when people ask
about features that are available in the latest interim, we have to go back
to our records to see which interim it was added to, which also take up
some extra time.

For the interims, I think that the burden needs to be on the customers to
search the archives to find out which specific interim a feature was added
to.

This requires no change in what you do and how you do it..

Ah, but it does.  :)

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin

Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list
that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?
I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.  But that won't help someone 
who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new 
feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that something
is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
what the latest interim is.
That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just fixed in a new 
interim 1.79i7.

However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added 
to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a 
lot of time to find it.

This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...
I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled.  :)

I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort and
quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mild
frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight
adaptation...
If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would.  But I don't think 
there is such a way.  Different people are asking for different things 
(labelling the current interim version on the website, including the 
version number in posts for new features (which is normally already done), 
including the version in posts where the archives already contain the 
version needed for the feature, adding the information to the release 
notes, etc.).  And that's just from *this* go-around.  Previous times, 
other issues have come up, too.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Scott Fisher
I just wish a little more info was available on what the interim release 
added/fixed/removed.

Frankly, I'm sometimes amazed you get any work done, considering the number of posts 
you have on the Declude and Imail forums. Add to that the number of e-mails that 
arrive at the support and virus trap addresses

I guess in my dreamland, I am hoping that Computerized Horizons being acquired will 
bring more resources for you, so you would be freed of the documentation and light 
support (busy?)work to concentrate on improving Declude.

Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/11/04 01:07PM 

The file date does display on the webpage. But I agree the version number 
displayed in some manner would be very useful.

We can do that, but then it is back to just releases/betas.

I think the final answer really should be If you don't like the way that 
interim releases work, pretend that there are only releases and 
betas.  While we appreciate input, the procedure for interims *must* be as 
simple as possible.  Add too much to the process, and it takes almost as 
much time as new betas, and there is no need for interims anymore.

As for searching the archives, since they haven't been updated for over 
two weeks, won't this start being an incomplete information source?

Unfortunately, mail-archive.com occasionally has hiccups like 
this.  We'll have to wait to see if they get the newer E-mails or not.

Perhaps having the release notes current to the latest interim and 
having  interim version listed for each release line would be a good solution.

This definitely will not happen -- that's one of the more time-consuming 
parts of the interims.

Remember, if interims take as long to get out as betas, there is no need 
for interims.  The interims often allow for new features/fixes to be 
accessed quickly (which is very nice with anti-spam/anti-virus software), 
but they can only work if there steps for the beta process that are skipped.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Darin Cox
hehe...he said do do.

Understood on old features...just saying that was fixed previously (thus
contained in the newest interim) *and* including the number of the latest
interim will go a long ways.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim



Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin

Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list
that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?

I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.  But that won't help someone
who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new
feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that
something
is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
what the latest interim is.

That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just fixed in a new
interim 1.79i7.

However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added
to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a
lot of time to find it.

This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...

I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled.  :)

I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort and
quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mild
frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight
adaptation...

If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would.  But I don't think
there is such a way.  Different people are asking for different things
(labelling the current interim version on the website, including the
version number in posts for new features (which is normally already done),
including the version in posts where the archives already contain the
version needed for the feature, adding the information to the release
notes, etc.).  And that's just from *this* go-around.  Previous times,
other issues have come up, too.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Dermot Keenan
OK, I give up.  Where can I download the interim release?  I haven't been
able to find it since the website was updated.  It used to be at
http://www.declude.com/interim but not any more.  I have searched the
archives and even tried using the search tool on the site.  Nothing.


Dermot


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim



Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin

Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list
that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?

I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.  But that won't help someone
who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new
feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that
something
is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
what the latest interim is.

That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just fixed in a new
interim 1.79i7.

However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added
to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a
lot of time to find it.

This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...

I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled.  :)

I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort and
quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mild
frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight
adaptation...

If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would.  But I don't think
there is such a way.  Different people are asking for different things
(labelling the current interim version on the website, including the
version number in posts for new features (which is normally already done),
including the version in posts where the archives already contain the
version needed for the feature, adding the information to the release
notes, etc.).  And that's just from *this* go-around.  Previous times,
other issues have come up, too.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Serge
BTW, what is the new link for interims ?


- Original Message - 
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim


 hehe...he said do do.

 Understood on old features...just saying that was fixed previously (thus
 contained in the newest interim) *and* including the number of the latest
 interim will go a long ways.

 Darin.


 - Original Message - 
 From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim



 Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin
 
 Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the
list
 that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?

 I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.  But that won't help someone
 who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new
 feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

 I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that
 something
 is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates
 what the latest interim is.

 That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just fixed in a
new
 interim 1.79i7.

 However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added
 to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a
 lot of time to find it.

 This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...

 I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled.  :)

 I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort
and
 quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and
mild
 frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight
 adaptation...

 If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would.  But I don't think
 there is such a way.  Different people are asking for different things
 (labelling the current interim version on the website, including the
 version number in posts for new features (which is normally already done),
 including the version in posts where the archives already contain the
 version needed for the feature, adding the information to the release
 notes, etc.).  And that's just from *this* go-around.  Previous times,
 other issues have come up, too.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread nrmathew
http://www.declude.com/version/interim/Neal M.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: "Dermot Keenan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 05/11/2004 03:48PMSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interimOK, I give up. Where can I download the interim release? I haven't beenable to find it since the website was updated. It used to be athttp://www.declude.com/interimbut not any more. I have searched thearchives and even tried using the search tool on the site. Nothing.Dermot-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott PerrySent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."...Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the listthat something is added or fixed in the latest interim?I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7. But that won't help someonewho is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the newfeature was added before or after 1.79i3.I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post thatsomethingis fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicateswhat the latest interim is.That I do do, most of the time. For example, "That was just fixed in a newinterim 1.79i7".However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just addedto the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take alot of time to find it.This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled. :)I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort andquick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mildfrustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slightadaptation...If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would. But I don't thinkthere is such a way. Different people are asking for different things(labelling the current interim version on the website, including theversion number in posts for new features (which is normally already done),including the version in posts where the archives already contain theversion needed for the feature, adding the information to the releasenotes, etc.). And that's just from *this* go-around. Previous times,other issues have come up, too. -Scott---Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailserverssince 2000.Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailservervulnerability detection.Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

BTW, what is the new link for interims ?
The URL for interim releases is http://www.declude.com/version/interim .

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
http://www.declude.com/version/interim/


Sincerely,

Randy Armbrecht
Global Web SolutionsR, Inc.
804-346-5300 ext. 1
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) ext. 1
http://globalweb.net

Richmond's Internet Source since 1996!
WEB HOSTING including EMAIL beginning at $29/month!
Non-Profits - receive a 25% discount!
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dermot Keenan
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

OK, I give up.  Where can I download the interim release?  I haven't been
able to find it since the website was updated.  It used to be at
http://www.declude.com/interim but not any more.  I have searched the
archives and even tried using the search tool on the site.  Nothing.


Dermot


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim



Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..grin

Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the 
list that something is added or fixed in the latest interim?

I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7.  But that won't help someone
who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new
feature was added before or after 1.79i3.

I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that
something
is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that 
indicates what the latest interim is.

That I do do, most of the time.  For example, That was just fixed in a new
interim 1.79i7.

However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added
to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a
lot of time to find it.

This would go a long way to quelling these discussions...

I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled.  :)

I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort 
and quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion 
and mild frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a 
slight adaptation...

If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would.  But I don't think
there is such a way.  Different people are asking for different things
(labelling the current interim version on the website, including the version
number in posts for new features (which is normally already done), including
the version in posts where the archives already contain the version needed
for the feature, adding the information to the release notes, etc.).  And
that's just from *this* go-around.  Previous times, other issues have come
up, too.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread R. Scott Perry

That one is 1.79i6.  Scott just said that the latest interim was v1.79i7?
The latest interim available at the web site is 1.79i6.

Just out of curiosity, how did you come by this valuable piece of
information.  As I said, I found no mention of it in the archives.
http://www.mail-archive.com is having problems; they apparently haven't 
been adding new E-mails to their database for several weeks.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.