tion, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQue
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can say definitively that the hotfix
worked. My DNS process is averaging less than 1% of CPU now during full
traffic and 12 hours after the last restart with a very heavy config
y,
January 25, 2005 10:25
AM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can say definitively
that the hotfix
worked. My DNS process is averaging less than 1% of CPU now during
full
traffic and 12 hours a
,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 1:24
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow
directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can
: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow
directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Yeah, that's what I meant :)I also screwed up the stat
for what MS DNS 2003 can apparently handle; it is in fact 9,500 per second and
not minute.http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003
-
From:
Matt
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:01 PM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003
DNS
Yeah, that's what I meant :)
I also screwed up the stat for what MS DNS 2003 can
Scott,
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process such messages.
On a side note, I was forced to do a rebuild on a backup server running
Windows 2003. The DNS.exe process is a big-time
, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
Scott,
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process
, January 24, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Windows
2003 DNS
Scott,
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left
in the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process such messages.
The short version is that the situation is handled better than if the
overflow directory isn't used (many people don't get
/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow
directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
My understanding is that this is an issue with just some
firewalls
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreau-Cook
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Windows 2003
DNS
I know I'm not aware, care to expand
Declude Queue is nice and was invaluable before the Queue
Manager service on Imail.
The only problem is this:
RSP than X. At that point, when an E-mail arrives, Declude will start enough
RSP Declude processes to hit the limit of X (each of which scans a single
E-mail).
DQ requires a continues
Scott,
Am I to assume a first in, first out type of scenario in the way that
it handles the overflow?
I have my server set to 60 delivery threads, up from the default 30.
Sandy I believe indicated that 64 was the limit due to the fact that
IMail is not multi-threaded or something to that
David,
We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I use a
batch file.
REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE
declude x:\imail\spool\Qa6da175e02447716.SMD
call x:\imail\cleandq.bat
The Q file I referenced does not exist and it does not matter that it does
not.
Hello Darrell,
Monday, January 24, 2005, 5:38:51 PM, you wrote:
Dsic We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I
use a
Dsic batch file.
Dsic REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE
Thanks we'll give it a shot. This should be a great help.
--
Best regards,
Scott, thanks for the explanations. I still have a few follow-ups
though if you don't mind.
First off, since DNS is acting like such a hog on Windows 2003, I'm
going to guess that this is what is slowing down the processing of
E-mail and why I am suddenly getting steady overflow. I can
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreau-Cook
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Windows 2003
DNS
I know I'm not aware, care to expand
You seemed to indicate that service launched processes count against the
threads...meaning that smtp32.exe launches declude.exe, which launches
F-Prot and McAfee. So would this count for 4 threads (not according to
Declude, but Windows/IMail)? What about Sniffer and each external test
that
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also looked at the issue with MS DNS 2003. After a restart of DNS,
utilization dropped from an average of about 25% to under 1% (I had it
in performance monitor)...but then over the next
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also looked at the issue with MS DNS 2003. After
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also
24, 2005 10:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Thanks Darrell, that definitely sounds like it's the
culprit:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=830381
This didn't come up in my searches because
24 matches
Mail list logo