RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Release Tool

2007-05-10 Thread David Barker
Hi Richard, Thanks for the post. To clear the IP's you still need to stop/start the decludeproc service. David Barker VP Operations | Declude Your Email Security is our business O: 978.499.2933 x7007 F: 978.988.1311 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack with latest Declude 4.2.23 & Imail

2007-02-05 Thread John T \(lists\)
Deccon.exe is a Declude file no longer used. You restart the DecludeProc.exe. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 8:25 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Responding to 2 posts. > When Decludeproc is restart the list of IP's maintained my hijack are reset. I thought the purpose of the file was to retain IPs even when Decludeproc was restarted or stopped and then started. If not, I would like to suggest this. > The file Console.txt seems to be wri

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John Doyle
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Also it would be nice for it to optionally send an email to the postmaster (or whoever) when hold1 level r

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Mike N
The file Console.txt seems to be write-only; it is useful for finding out what's going on, but I don't think it's possible to edit and have DecludeProc reread it unless it is just not documented some how. [Console.txt is displayed by the WebConfiguration GUI] - Original Message - Fr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread tical
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Mike, The operation of Hijack is under review, thank you for your suggestions. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread David Barker
t: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Mike, on problem 2, have you verified this? Decludeproc does indeed create a file in the Imail\Declude directory for use with Hijack. As for clearing an IP, I wonder if editing that file by removing the IP would clear it. Declude? John T eSer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Mike, on problem 2, have you verified this? Decludeproc does indeed create a file in the Imail\Declude directory for use with Hijack. As for clearing an IP, I wonder if editing that file by removing the IP would clear it. Declude? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Origi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread David Barker
Mike, The operation of Hijack is under review, thank you for your suggestions. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack and gateways (WAS compatibility question)

2006-06-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Notice the change in the subject line. > I am using Imail 8.15 HF2 with declude 4.2 as a gateway, no users on the > server. That is the issue you are experience, using Imail/Declude as a blind gateway. This configuration is no longer recommended do to the proliferation of dictionary type spam ca

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Craig Edmonds
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:01 AM To: Craig Edmonds Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier Thanks, Craig. I don&#

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Don Brown
Thanks, Craig. I don't have the FileFunctions object installed (the script errors on it). Where do I get it? Also, shouldn't the last line of the script be Set FFunc = Nothing ? Thanks, Sunday, May 28, 2006, 11:20:41 AM, Craig Edmonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CE> CE> Hi Don, CE> Try this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-28 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi Don, Try this. Set up a scheduled task to run every 15 minutes I do it on the hold1 folder too. If there is nothing in the hold queue then nothing happens. You might need to install the FileFunctions object but that takes allof two seconds. <--- filepath="C:\IMAIL\spool\spam\hol

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Todd Richards
Thanks Nick and Darin for both of your respones!   Todd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick HayerSent: Friday, April 07, 2006 9:32 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi  Todd,I run it every 30 min with the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi  Todd, I run it every 30 min with the Windows scheduler - -Nick   - Original Message - From: Todd Richards To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Nick -   I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Darin Cox
.  With it we can see indications of high volumes of both outgoing and incoming traffic. Darin.     - Original Message - From: Todd Richards To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Nick -   I like this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Todd Richards
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi John,>John Doyle wrote: >this guy suggested this.>I'm not sure exactly how. looks like if a count is > some value send the>mail. I was just suggesting that the number of files in the s

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Dean Lawrence
___    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango   Sent: Miércoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 04:48 p.m.   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question    Unfortunately it is not in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
kMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Unfortunately it is not in the manual. Too bad.. but it is in the release notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 1.69 [Beta, 16 Apr 2003]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean LawrenceSent: Miércoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 12:57 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Hi Nick,   Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything relat

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi Nick,   Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything related to ALLOWADDR in the manual, are there other commands available?   Thanks,   Dean  On 4/5/06, Nick Hayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dean -Dean Lawrence wrote:>> First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal > scre

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Dean - Dean Lawrence wrote: First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal screaming phone calls from client? 8-) RELAYTHRESHOLD11020 RELAYTHRESHOLD23040 Secondly, how are you handling non-fixed IP users that may send large (over the thresholds), bu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-04 Thread John Doyle
] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification   John Doyle wrote: I think I understand, I’m not a programmer and it’s semi Greek to me. I like the idea of getting notified if the spool file be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 4:51 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification I think I understand, I'm not a programmer and it's semi Greek to me. I like the idea of getting notified if the spool file begins to fill up, I check it now and then

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Nick Hayer
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:03 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification   Hi John, >John Doyle wrote: >this guy suggested this. >I'm not sure exactly how. l

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
.       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:03 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification   Hi John, >John Doyle wrote: >this guy suggested this.>I'm not sure exactly how. l

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Nick Hayer
; fcount & "' "     mCmd = aMail & mFrom & mTo & mSubj & "-f placeholder.txt"     Return = WshShell.Run(mCmd , 1, TRUE) End Function -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Sunday, April 02,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
ject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Craig, Although you may already do this figured I mention it anyway - this technique works well to monitor spool traffic eg when a threshold is reached I get an email - so for example in your code below IF FFunc.Count > 100 [altered path for th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
Thank you for the input. I'll give it a try this week. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 7:42 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Impor

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-02 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Craig, Although you may already do this figured I mention it anyway - this technique works well to monitor spool traffic eg when a threshold is reached I get an email - so for example in your code below IF FFunc.Count > 100 [altered path for the spool dir] > send me an email... -Nick Cr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-02 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi John, Not sure if this is any help but I found a basic way to handle this as I had problems with clients ringing up saying "I sent out some mails and they have not gone"...etc etc etc, and of course when I check the hold2 directory there are 500 emails in there. What I do is have a basic setup

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-03-29 Thread John Doyle
thanks much, I just got killed because I didn't catch a hold for 4 days. john -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:33 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] H

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-03-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
There is a scheduled script that I use that was created by another user a couple years ago. I will post it to the list later tonight if desired. John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-03 Thread Todd Richards
lf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:52 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help Hi Todd, Todd Richards wrote: > I >have adjusted the thresholds in the Hijack.cfg file (this is a common >practice by our members-only clients) > Yo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Todd, Todd Richards wrote: I have adjusted the thresholds in the Hijack.cfg file (this is a common practice by our members-only clients) You can do anALLOWIPxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and that ip will be whitelisted. but how do I release his IP address? well it used to be start/s

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread Matt
Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help Todd, I have a script on my site that will handle the renaming of all of the files. The instructions are inside of the script if you open it with a text editor, but in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread Todd Richards
Matt - Wonderful - it worked like a champ! Thank you so much for sharing this! Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread Matt
Todd, I have a script on my site that will handle the renaming of all of the files. The instructions are inside of the script if you open it with a text editor, but in essence, all you do is call it like so: C:\HijackReprocess.vbs IP=204.94.24.45 SF=D:\Spool\ You have to customize it for th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread John T \(Lists\)
1. Delete the console.txt file to release the IP. 2. Search for a product called PowerRen 2000. Using that will help rename the files. The files names are prepended with the IP then dot then a code then dot then the real Q and D file name. You need to remove everything before that Q and D and the b

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
2005 7:58 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Yes, use a renamer application http://www.snapfiles.com/freeware/system/fwfilerename.html   David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard FarrisSent: Monday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Nick Hayer
leaner Internet" - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard, You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so e

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread David Barker
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard,You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir.-NickRichard Farr

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
y, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard,You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir.-NickRichard Farris wrote:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Richard, You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir. -Nick Richard Farris wrote: Message I had some mail stuck in HOLD2 that I want to let go..I copied it and put it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
Title: Message I had some mail stuck in HOLD2 that I want to let go..I copied it and put it into the spool on Saturday and it is still there...it has the IP it came from in front of the ID of the emailhow do I make the system send out this email... Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247.555

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-13 Thread Dave Doherty
Thanks. -d - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:41 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question A clarification on how to "reset" Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-13 Thread Nick Hayer
Thanks John! -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: A clarification on how to "reset" Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no pr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread John T \(Lists\)
A clarification on how to "reset" Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no process will try to call Deccon.exe during the t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Nick Hayer
: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.exe That wil reset the counter so to speak. Question to Declude support - How does this work with Declude 3x? Thanks! -Nick Dave Doherty wrote: Hi all, Running Declude version 1.82 with Hijack... One of my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread David Barker
Stop/restart the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:53 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Dave Doherty
That was it! The one thing I didn't try. (Of course!) -d - Original Message - From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.ex

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Nick Hayer
Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.exe That wil reset the counter so to speak. Question to Declude support - How does this work with Declude 3x? Thanks! -Nick Dave Doherty wrote: Hi all, Running Declude version 1.82 with Hijack... One of my customers go caught by Hijack a couple of d

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
OK thanks for confirming. Regards, Lyndon Eaton > John is correct we are replacing the Console with new > functionality. This is currently in design and we will update > you just as soon as we have a clearer picture of the delivery date. Email

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:47 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5 My understanding is Deccon is no longer used. A new GUI is in the works. John T eServices For You > -Original Mess

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
eclude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5 > > Hi, > > Just upgraded to Declude version 3.0.5 today (from 1.8!) and I'm a > little unsure of how to monitor HiJack. > > Can't get the deccon.exe to open although I know declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Hi, Just upgraded to Declude version 3.0.5 today (from 1.8!) and I'm a little unsure of how to monitor HiJack. Can't get the deccon.exe to open although I know declude now runs as a service. Had a look at the HiJack manual but can't find anything and done a quick search in the archives too. Wha

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-31 Thread Darin Cox
I also posted a VBS script a couple of months ago that could be easily modified to do this. It's in the archives. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Evans Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] H

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-31 Thread Evans Martin
0:46 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack > > Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. > > Richard Farris > Ethixs Online > 1.270.247. Office > 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support > "Crossroads to a Cleaner Int

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack & webmail

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Serge-   This has pros and cons.   If you have a lot of legit volume through webmail, then you should increase your limits in Hijack. If that doesn't work for you, then perhaps you should allow the IP. I have it in my config file, but I generally keep it rem'd out because we get a relative

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack & webmail

2005-08-29 Thread Matt
Absolutely.  Declude uses this IP when it has none to go by, and Webmail along with NDR's will appear this way. Matt Serge wrote: been having problems with some webmails not beiing delivered just noticed that hijack is holding many mails from 127.0.0.1 should we allow ip 127

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Richard Farris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support "Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet&quo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Doherty
: Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support "Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet" - Original Message - Fr

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Matt
rday, August 27, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbou

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Richard Farris
y, August 27, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbound mai

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-27 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbound mail volume by IP. That is a very good idea, though! As for your se

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Scott, (I apologize for the questions, just learning product, since no trial) With the below said, there is really no reason to login and close the deccon.exe via the Desktop unless there is an issue with it or something needs to be hard reset? Some of our customers have had DHA's latel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
e.exe instances to disappear, then Stop and Restart SMTP. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:24 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question > > > I see where

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only run on the console session? Yes, it does -- otherwise, it would not be able to keep track of data properly (since the user sessions normally only last a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does Hijack work with WHITELIST AUTH that Junkmail sees in allowing email to passthru? No. The Declude products do not share configuration files. For example, one of our customers AUTH to our server via their account, it will then not be scanned by Junkmail nor Hijack? It will not be scanned by D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Also, I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only run on the console session? I read that when the threshhold2 value is reached, deccon is opened and once it is closed the flag will be reset? Howev

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:15, R. Scott Perry wrote: > That was added to v1.69, per http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm . Thanks. It may make a nice addition to the manual as well. :) -Nick > >-Scott > --- > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Now when did that occur? I see no reference of this anywhere. Are there any other switches? That was added to v1.69, per http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm . -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers sinc

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
The current version of HiJack supports 'whitelisting' by sending address in hijack.cfg. ALLOWADDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Mike Wiegers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:57 AM Subjec

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
; > ALLOWADDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Wiegers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:57 AM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack > > > > In

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Richard Farris
- Original Message - From: "Mike Wiegers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:57 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack > In the "hijack.cfg" file add: > > # An ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send un

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Mike Wiegers
In the "hijack.cfg" file add: # An ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send unlimited E-mail. ALLOWIP x.x.x.x -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declud

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 11:44, Richard Farris wrote: Hi Richard, You need to whitelist your ip, regretfully there is no way to config by domain - -Nick > Now that I have HiJack, I found out yesterday when sending a mass > email to all my customers that they were held...how do I take myself > out of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-09-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
We currently have 6 versions of Declude (3 Servers with Junkmail and Virus), can I run a Hijack demo on each of the servers? If so, what is the term of the demo? Thanks for the aid. Unfortunately, we do not have a demo version of Declude Hijack.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
If you are going to allow all of your outgoing ranges, what is the purpose of having Hijack? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley > Sent: Tuesd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain n

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Hayer
On 22 Jun 2004 at 7:07, Jeffrey M Donley wrote: Hi Jeff, So in your hijack.cfg file you have ALLOWIP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and in the HOLDx dir hijack is retaining emails from the allowip addresses? If that is the case I suggest stopping and restarting declude console to reset hijack; if that doesn'

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Eventhough the poster was talking about HiJack, I forgot to mention I was asking about JunkMail. When using this option will a message held by Junkmail and returned to the queue ever be scannen for virusses? I remember reading JM would move it to the hold before VIR could scan it for virusses. Whe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, > > > >Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me > > > >to better manage my backup mailserver - > > > > > > The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you > > > could use the "AVAFTERJM ON" option to force Declude Virus to run after > > >

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
> >Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me > >to better manage my backup mailserver - > > The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you > could use the "AVAFTERJM ON" option to force Declude Virus to run after > Declude JunkMail, which also

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-20 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, > > >Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me > >to better manage my backup mailserver - > > The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you > could use the "AVAFTERJM ON" option to force Declude Virus to run after > Declude JunkMail, whi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
On 17 Jun 2004 at 17:47, R. Scott Perry wrote: Perfect. Thanks! -Nick > > >Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me > >to better manage my backup mailserver - > > The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude > Virus, you could use the "AVAFTERJM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the "AVAFTERJM ON" option to force Declude Virus to run after Declude JunkMail, which also forces Decl

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - Thanks -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack & OT Windows IP question

2004-05-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there *any* way to allow a different HIJACK setting based on IP and or MAILFROM? No. It's either unlimited E-mail, or the standard settings. Any thoughts on how I can make this work without whitelisting? I also have DJMPro. The only other option I can think of would be to increase the standard

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack & OT Windows IP question

2004-05-26 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott, I have a colo that I gateway to. The colo box is Windows 2000 running Exchange ; Hijack monitors his traffic which runs on my server. All had been fine now however they are running on their server a moderated list(s). List software is SVList. The largest list has ~ 300 members. So whe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP

2004-05-21 Thread Jeffrey M Donley
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP Did you close Deccon to reset? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP

2004-05-21 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Did you close Deccon to reset? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [De

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thanks for the response. I was able to take a quick look at the Imail logs today and I have an R for the message received but that is where it stops, I never receive the D for delivery. I do not have hold1 or hold2 Directories, I am assuming these are auto created and deleted, if not then it is sa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-22 Thread Jeffrey M Donley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs Could you clarify one thing for me: The emails that are not being delivered to the recipients - are they inbound or outbound? IE is your client the recipient your is your client the sender? > -Original Message- >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-22 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Hi Jeffrey, You'll need to provide a little more information than that. All that log snippet shows is that domain.com isn't local, which in itself is not an issue or a reason to not deliver an email (providing you are allowing relay for the sender). Declude HiJack will only block emails based on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-22 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Could you clarify one thing for me: The emails that are not being delivered to the recipients - are they inbound or outbound? IE is your client the recipient your is your client the sender? > -Original Message- > From: Jeffrey M Donley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 April 2004 13:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-07 Thread Glenn \\\\ WCNet
e - From: "serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions > <1. Hijack is IP based, so IP is time tracked, irregardless of who is behind > it.> > > So that makes it u

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-07 Thread Lyndon Eaton
> So that makes it unusable for dial up connections. > Still can be usefull for our wireless clients, those are > assigned fixed IPs. But we will have to "hijack white list" > all the Dial up IPs, correct ? No it still works for dialups - We have dynamic & static users and have not had this prob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> So that makes it unusable for dial up connections. > Still can be useful for our wireless clients, those are assigned fixed IPs. > But we will have to "hijack white list" all the Dial up IPs, correct ? No, it makes it still usable for dial up connections. If user A sends out enough messages to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-06 Thread serge
- Original Message - From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:04 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions 1. Hijack is IP based, so IP is time tracked, irregardless of who is behind i

  1   2   >