RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Release Tool

2007-05-10 Thread David Barker
Hi Richard, Thanks for the post. To clear the IP's you still need to stop/start the decludeproc service. David Barker VP Operations | Declude Your Email Security is our business O: 978.499.2933 x7007 F: 978.988.1311 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack with latest Declude 4.2.23 Imail

2007-02-05 Thread John T \(lists\)
Deccon.exe is a Declude file no longer used. You restart the DecludeProc.exe. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 8:25 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread David Barker
Mike, The operation of Hijack is under review, thank you for your suggestions. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Mike, on problem 2, have you verified this? Decludeproc does indeed create a file in the Imail\Declude directory for use with Hijack. As for clearing an IP, I wonder if editing that file by removing the IP would clear it. Declude? John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find!

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread David Barker
: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Mike, on problem 2, have you verified this? Decludeproc does indeed create a file in the Imail\Declude directory for use with Hijack. As for clearing an IP, I wonder if editing that file by removing the IP would clear it. Declude? John T eServices

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread tical
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Mike, The operation of Hijack is under review, thank you for your suggestions. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread Mike N
The file Console.txt seems to be write-only; it is useful for finding out what's going on, but I don't think it's possible to edit and have DecludeProc reread it unless it is just not documented some how. [Console.txt is displayed by the WebConfiguration GUI] - Original Message -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John Doyle
PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request Also it would be nice for it to optionally send an email to the postmaster (or whoever) when hold1 level reached

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack: Blocklist feature request

2006-07-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Responding to 2 posts. When Decludeproc is restart the list of IP's maintained my hijack are reset. I thought the purpose of the file was to retain IPs even when Decludeproc was restarted or stopped and then started. If not, I would like to suggest this. The file Console.txt seems to be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack and gateways (WAS compatibility question)

2006-06-20 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Notice the change in the subject line. I am using Imail 8.15 HF2 with declude 4.2 as a gateway, no users on the server. That is the issue you are experience, using Imail/Declude as a blind gateway. This configuration is no longer recommended do to the proliferation of dictionary type spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Don Brown
Thanks, Craig. I don't have the FileFunctions object installed (the script errors on it). Where do I get it? Also, shouldn't the last line of the script be Set FFunc = Nothing ? Thanks, Sunday, May 28, 2006, 11:20:41 AM, Craig Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CE CE Hi Don, CE Try this.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-30 Thread Craig Edmonds
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:01 AM To: Craig Edmonds Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier Thanks, Craig. I don't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Held Notifier

2006-05-28 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi Don, Try this. Set up a scheduled task to run every 15 minutes I do it on the hold1 folder too. If there is nothing in the hold queue then nothing happens. You might need to install the FileFunctions object but that takes allof two seconds. ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Todd Richards
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi John,John Doyle wrote: this guy suggested this.I'm not sure exactly how. looks like if a count is some value send themail. I was just suggesting that the number of files in the spool dir exceed some number

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Darin Cox
. With it we can see indications of high volumes of both outgoing and incoming traffic. Darin. - Original Message - From: Todd Richards To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Nick - I like this. Do I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Todd, I run it every 30 min with the Windows scheduler - -Nick - Original Message - From: Todd Richards To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Nick - I like

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-07 Thread Todd Richards
Thanks Nick and Darin for both of your respones! Todd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick HayerSent: Friday, April 07, 2006 9:32 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Todd,I run it every 30 min

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Dean - Dean Lawrence wrote: First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal screaming phone calls from client? 8-) RELAYTHRESHOLD11020 RELAYTHRESHOLD23040 Secondly, how are you handling non-fixed IP users that may send large (over the thresholds),

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi Nick, Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything related to ALLOWADDR in the manual, are there other commands available? Thanks, Dean On 4/5/06, Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dean -Dean Lawrence wrote: First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal screaming

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean LawrenceSent: MiƩrcoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 12:57 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Hi Nick, Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything related to ALLOWADDR

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Unfortunately it is not in the manual. Too bad.. but it is in the release notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 1.69 [Beta, 16 Apr 2003] ADDED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2006-04-05 Thread Dean Lawrence
: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: MiƩrcoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 04:48 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Unfortunately it is not in the manual. Too bad.. but it is in therelease

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
Thank you for the input. I'll give it a try this week. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 7:42 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Importance

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Craig, Although you may already do this figured I mention it anyway - this technique works well to monitor spool traffic eg when a threshold is reached I get an email - so for example in your code below IF FFunc.Count 100 [altered path for the spool dir

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Nick Hayer
shShell.Run(mCmd , 1, TRUE) End Function -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 7:59 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi Craig, Although yo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread John Doyle
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:03 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi John, John Doyle wrote: this guy suggested this.I'm not sure exactly how. looks like if a count

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Nick Hayer
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:03 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification Hi John, John Doyle wrote: this guy suggested this. I'm not sure exactly how. looks like if a count

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-03 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
: Monday, April 03, 2006 4:51 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification I think I understand, I'm not a programmer and it's semi Greek to me. I like the idea of getting notified if the spool file begins to fill up, I check it now and then and if would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-02 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi John, Not sure if this is any help but I found a basic way to handle this as I had problems with clients ringing up saying I sent out some mails and they have not gone...etc etc etc, and of course when I check the hold2 directory there are 500 emails in there. What I do is have a basic setup

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-04-02 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Craig, Although you may already do this figured I mention it anyway - this technique works well to monitor spool traffic eg when a threshold is reached I get an email - so for example in your code below IF FFunc.Count 100 [altered path for the spool dir] send me an email... -Nick

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Notification

2006-03-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
There is a scheduled script that I use that was created by another user a couple years ago. I will post it to the list later tonight if desired. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Todd, Todd Richards wrote: I have adjusted the thresholds in the Hijack.cfg file (this is a common practice by our members-only clients) You can do anALLOWIPxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and that ip will be whitelisted. but how do I release his IP address? well it used to be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-03 Thread Todd Richards
Hayer Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:52 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help Hi Todd, Todd Richards wrote: I have adjusted the thresholds in the Hijack.cfg file (this is a common practice by our members-only clients) You can do anALLOWIP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread Matt
Todd, I have a script on my site that will handle the renaming of all of the files. The instructions are inside of the script if you open it with a text editor, but in essence, all you do is call it like so: C:\HijackReprocess.vbs IP=204.94.24.45 SF=D:\Spool\ You have to customize it for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack help

2006-03-02 Thread Todd Richards
Matt - Wonderful - it worked like a champ! Thank you so much for sharing this! Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
Title: Message I had some mail stuck in HOLD2 that I want to let go..I copied it and put it into the spool on Saturday and it is still there...it has the IP it came from in front of the ID of the emailhow do I makethe systemsend out this email... Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Richard, You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir. -Nick Richard Farris wrote: Message I had some mail stuck in HOLD2 that I want to let go..I copied it and put it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
y, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard,You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir.-NickRichard Farris wrote: I had

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread David Barker
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard,You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in the spool dir.-NickRichard Farris wrote:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Nick Hayer
ernet" - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Hi Richard, You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each f

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Farris
2005 7:58 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help Yes, use a renamer application http://www.snapfiles.com/freeware/system/fwfilerename.html David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard FarrisSent: Monday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-13 Thread Nick Hayer
Thanks John! -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: A clarification on how to reset Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-13 Thread Dave Doherty
Thanks. -d - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:41 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question A clarification on how to reset Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Nick Hayer
Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.exe That wil reset the counter so to speak. Question to Declude support - How does this work with Declude 3x? Thanks! -Nick Dave Doherty wrote: Hi all, Running Declude version 1.82 with Hijack... One of my customers go caught by Hijack a couple of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Dave Doherty
That was it! The one thing I didn't try. (Of course!) -d - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.exe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread David Barker
Stop/restart the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:53 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread Nick Hayer
: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question Dave, You need to stop/start deccon.exe That wil reset the counter so to speak. Question to Declude support - How does this work with Declude 3x? Thanks! -Nick Dave Doherty wrote: Hi all, Running Declude version 1.82 with Hijack... One of my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2005-10-12 Thread John T \(Lists\)
A clarification on how to reset Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no process will try to call Deccon.exe during the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Hi, Just upgraded to Declude version 3.0.5 today (from 1.8!) and I'm a little unsure of how to monitor HiJack. Can't get the deccon.exe to open although I know declude now runs as a service. Had a look at the HiJack manual but can't find anything and done a quick search in the archives too.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5 Hi, Just upgraded to Declude version 3.0.5 today (from 1.8!) and I'm a little unsure of how to monitor HiJack. Can't get the deccon.exe to open although I know declude now runs as a service. Had a look at the HiJack manual

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:47 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5 My understanding is Deccon is no longer used. A new GUI is in the works. John T eServices For You -Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Deccon in 3.0.5

2005-09-27 Thread Lyndon Eaton
OK thanks for confirming. Regards, Lyndon Eaton John is correct we are replacing the Console with new functionality. This is currently in design and we will update you just as soon as we have a clearer picture of the delivery date. Email

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-31 Thread Evans Martin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: Dave Doherty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-31 Thread Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: Dave Doherty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Richard Farris
, August 27, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbound mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Matt
, August 27, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbound

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Doherty
: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: Dave Doherty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-29 Thread Richard Farris
] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Can you give me instructions on finding the nobody aliases.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack webmail

2005-08-29 Thread Matt
Absolutely. Declude uses this IP when it has none to go by, and Webmail along with NDR's will appear this way. Matt Serge wrote: been having problems with some webmails not beiing delivered just noticed that hijack is holding many mails from 127.0.0.1 should we allow ip

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack webmail

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Serge- This has pros and cons. If you have a lot of legit volume through webmail, then you should increase your limits in Hijack. If that doesn't work for you, then perhaps you should allow the IP. I have it in my config file, but I generally keep it rem'd out because we get a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack

2005-08-27 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Richard- Hijack is for outbound mail from your IMail server. It prevents your users from sending too many outbound messages. It works really well for that, but I do not know of any function in Hijack that looks at inbound mail volume by IP. That is a very good idea, though! As for your

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Also, I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only run on the console session? I read that when the threshhold2 value is reached, deccon is opened and once it is closed the flag will be reset?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does Hijack work with WHITELIST AUTH that Junkmail sees in allowing email to passthru? No. The Declude products do not share configuration files. For example, one of our customers AUTH to our server via their account, it will then not be scanned by Junkmail nor Hijack? It will not be scanned by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4 and terminal service into the server for remote admin. Does deccon.exe only run on the console session? Yes, it does -- otherwise, it would not be able to keep track of data properly (since the user sessions normally only last

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
instances to disappear, then Stop and Restart SMTP. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:24 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question I see where Hijack requires Deccon.exe. We run Win2000 SP4

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-10-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Scott, (I apologize for the questions, just learning product, since no trial) With the below said, there is really no reason to login and close the deccon.exe via the Desktop unless there is an issue with it or something needs to be hard reset? Some of our customers have had DHA's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 11:44, Richard Farris wrote: Hi Richard, You need to whitelist your ip, regretfully there is no way to config by domain - -Nick Now that I have HiJack, I found out yesterday when sending a mass email to all my customers that they were held...how do I take myself out of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Mike Wiegers
In the hijack.cfg file add: # An ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send unlimited E-mail. ALLOWIP x.x.x.x -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
The current version of HiJack supports 'whitelisting' by sending address in hijack.cfg. ALLOWADDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mike Wiegers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:57 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mike Wiegers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:57 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack In the hijack.cfg file add: # An ALLOWIP line will let an IP address send unlimited E-mail. ALLOWIP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:15, R. Scott Perry wrote: That was added to v1.69, per http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm . Thanks. It may make a nice addition to the manual as well. :) -Nick -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2004-09-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
We currently have 6 versions of Declude (3 Servers with Junkmail and Virus), can I run a Hijack demo on each of the servers? If so, what is the term of the demo? Thanks for the aid. Unfortunately, we do not have a demo version of Declude Hijack.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Hayer
On 22 Jun 2004 at 7:07, Jeffrey M Donley wrote: Hi Jeff, So in your hijack.cfg file you have ALLOWIP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and in the HOLDx dir hijack is retaining emails from the allowip addresses? If that is the case I suggest stopping and restarting declude console to reset hijack; if that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after Declude JunkMail, which also

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after Declude JunkMail, which also forces

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after Declude JunkMail,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Eventhough the poster was talking about HiJack, I forgot to mention I was asking about JunkMail. When using this option will a message held by Junkmail and returned to the queue ever be scannen for virusses? I remember reading JM would move it to the hold before VIR could scan it for virusses.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - Thanks -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON option to force Declude Virus to run after Declude JunkMail, which also forces

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
On 17 Jun 2004 at 17:47, R. Scott Perry wrote: Perfect. Thanks! -Nick Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack OT Windows IP question

2004-05-26 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott, I have a colo that I gateway to. The colo box is Windows 2000 running Exchange ; Hijack monitors his traffic which runs on my server. All had been fine now however they are running on their server a moderated list(s). List software is SVList. The largest list has ~ 300 members. So

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack OT Windows IP question

2004-05-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there *any* way to allow a different HIJACK setting based on IP and or MAILFROM? No. It's either unlimited E-mail, or the standard settings. Any thoughts on how I can make this work without whitelisting? I also have DJMPro. The only other option I can think of would be to increase the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP

2004-05-21 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Did you close Deccon to reset? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP

2004-05-21 Thread Jeffrey M Donley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack ALLOWIP Did you close Deccon to reset? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley Sent: Friday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thanks for the response. I was able to take a quick look at the Imail logs today and I have an R for the message received but that is where it stops, I never receive the D for delivery. I do not have hold1 or hold2 Directories, I am assuming these are auto created and deleted, if not then it is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-22 Thread Lyndon Eaton
Hi Jeffrey, You'll need to provide a little more information than that. All that log snippet shows is that domain.com isn't local, which in itself is not an issue or a reason to not deliver an email (providing you are allowing relay for the sender). Declude HiJack will only block emails based on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs

2004-04-22 Thread Jeffrey M Donley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Logs Could you clarify one thing for me: The emails that are not being delivered to the recipients - are they inbound or outbound? IE is your client the recipient your is your client the sender? -Original Message- From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-07 Thread Lyndon Eaton
So that makes it unusable for dial up connections. Still can be usefull for our wireless clients, those are assigned fixed IPs. But we will have to hijack white list all the Dial up IPs, correct ? No it still works for dialups - We have dynamic static users and have not had this problem.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-07 Thread Glenn \\\\ WCNet
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions 1. Hijack is IP based, so IP is time tracked, irregardless of who is behind it. So that makes it unusable for dial up connections. Still can be usefull for our wireless clients, those

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
1. Hijack is IP based, so IP is time tracked, irregardless of who is behind it. 2. All 25 will be released at once. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of serge

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-06 Thread serge
Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:04 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions 1. Hijack is IP based, so IP is time tracked, irregardless of who is behind it. 2. All 25 will be released at once. John

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
So that makes it unusable for dial up connections. Still can be useful for our wireless clients, those are assigned fixed IPs. But we will have to hijack white list all the Dial up IPs, correct ? No, it makes it still usable for dial up connections. If user A sends out enough messages to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack questions

2004-04-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
1. It counts the number of recipients by received from IP address, so one message with 20 recipients will be counted the same as 20 messages with one recipient. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2003-12-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
OK, I have an idea. Scott, can we disable HOLD1, and if so would that affect HOLD2 operation? 99.5% of messages held by HOLD1 end up passing. Yes -- if you set the HOLD1 threshold to be greater than the HOLD2 threshold, then only HOLD2 will apply.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2003-12-07 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Kulman Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 1:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question John, This is probably more than you wanted but I didn't want to post Scott's explanation out of context. I had a HiJack / Junkmail situation

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question

2003-12-06 Thread George Kulman
John, This is probably more than you wanted but I didn't want to post Scott's explanation out of context. I had a HiJack / Junkmail situation in August. This related to mail where I am the secondary MX. HiJack was doing a very effective job of trapping volume SPAM but I noticed that SPAM was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2003-12-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
If an IP is caught and held by HOLD2, but a sender who is listed by ALLOWADDR sends a e-mail from the IP, will that message be held or passed? ALLOWADDR and ALLOWIP override all other settings, so their mail should be allowed through. Example, IP 10.10.10.1 is held. Joe using [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack CIDR?

2003-09-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Searching the archives, I could not find out if Hijack accepts CIDR format for ALLOW IP? Does any one here know if it does? The documentation does not indicate this. No, it does not. Only single IPs can be listed in the ALLOWIP option. -Scott

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack log question

2003-06-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
I notice this kind of entry on either web messaging messages or auto notices created by Declude or Imail: 06/25/2003 14:55:17 Q05fba2a0764 Warning: Could not find IP3 end on first line of datafile (bound)? 06/25/2003 14:55:18 Q05fba2a0764 is not local. 06/25/2003 14:55:18 Q05fba2a0764 Outgoing

  1   2   >