Couldn't resist
https://twitter.com/alanparsons/status/1178469148751466496?s=19
...no idea how it appeared in my timeline...
- - -
Vice President Marketing & Publicity
Vice President Sponsor Relations
The Apache Software Foundation
Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org
On Thu, Sep 19,
> Cheers,
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > Forwarded Message
> > Subject: Re: Advice on project logo
> > Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:02:14 -0600
> > From: Kenneth Paskett <mailto:k...@apache.org>
> > To: Ro
adding to the
> Jirathoughts?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> ---- Forwarded Message
> Subject: Re: Advice on project logo
> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:02:14 -0600
> From: Kenneth Paskett <mailto:k...@apache.org>
> To:
Rob: I've had "Eye In The Sky" in my head for the past 5 days ...
Thanks for the ear worm --it's a sign :^)
But I concur: no "Project" is needed in the logo here.
- - -
Vice President Marketing & Publicity
Vice President Sponsor Relations
The Apache Software Foundation
Tel +1 617 921 8656 |
Hi.
2019-09-16 3:02 UTC+02:00, Gary Gregory :
> I for one appreciate Rob's efforts
We should all appreciate each others' efforts.
> and would also be happy to turn the task
> over to Services with our input which IMO is just our project name "Apache
> Commons".
This step has been taken
> On Sep 15, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I for one appreciate Rob's efforts and would also be happy to turn the task
> over to Services with our input which IMO is just our project name "Apache
> Commons".
>
Sounds good to me.
> Gary
>
>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:39 PM
I for one appreciate Rob's efforts and would also be happy to turn the task
over to Services with our input which IMO is just our project name "Apache
Commons".
Gary
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:39 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Pardon to cause a stir here, but that was just a mock-up that I sent to
>
Pardon to cause a stir here, but that was just a mock-up that I sent to
“Central Services” as an idea from which to work. I had no intentions of
suggesting that we vote on it or even use is as I think that there are spacing
and font issues with it. I thought that my email with the mock-up made
Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 23:40, sebb a écrit :
>
> Surely it would be better to use the JIRA
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-86
I don't get it: We agreed to let "Central Services" provide the logo
and now we are again presenting homegrown ones...
Do we really want to
Surely it would be better to use the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-86
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 21:13, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Could we please use *one* (and the original) thread to collect ideas?
>
> Gilles
>
> Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 19:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
> >
Could we please use *one* (and the original) thread to collect ideas?
Gilles
Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 19:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 2019, at 8:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
>
> I like the Alan Parsons
> On Sep 15, 2019, at 8:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
I like the Alan Parsons Project, a little :-P
>
>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does
That said, it is nice to look at :-)
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 08:10 Gary Gregory wrote:
> I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does anyone
>> have
I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does anyone
> have any opinions on this? I felt like something similar to the one that
> Sally sent across for the
Sure I’d be happy to talk at some time tomorrow. Let me know when you’re free.
I’ll likely be in the hackathon room for a good portion of the day.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 2:47 PM, Kenneth Paskett wrote:
>
> Hi Rob -
>
> I'm here at ApacheCon this week, and would be happy to sit
Hi Rob -
I'm here at ApacheCon this week, and would be happy to sit down with you
and others from the Commons group to talk about your logo update. Let me
know what time works best for your group.
~Kenneth
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 9, 2019, at 11:31
Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 21:17, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> The KISS solution would be to get "Central" to produce not just the Commons
> logo but one for each component and be done.
+1
Especially if the future is that "Central Services" will provide logos
for all the projects.
> The even simpler
The KISS solution would be to get "Central" to produce not just the Commons
logo but one for each component and be done. The even simpler path is to
forgo component specific logos, especially since Commons is just one Apache
project. I like simpler...
Gary
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019, 15:08 Rob Tompkins
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 12:35, Sally Khudairi a écrit :
>>
>> Thank you, Gilles.
>>
>> I'm copying Kenneth Paskett, creative lead from Central Services. I was
>> talking to him about this opportunity yesterday: we will be
Hi.
Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 12:35, Sally Khudairi a écrit :
>
> Thank you, Gilles.
>
> I'm copying Kenneth Paskett, creative lead from Central Services. I was
> talking to him about this opportunity yesterday: we will be happy to explore
> options for a future design.
>
> I'm not saying "don't
Thank you, Gilles.
I'm copying Kenneth Paskett, creative lead from Central Services. I was talking
to him about this opportunity yesterday: we will be happy to explore options
for a future design.
I'm not saying "don't use anything that remotely looks like the feather". It's
important that
Hello.
Le sam. 7 sept. 2019 à 13:29, Sally Khudairi a écrit :
>
> Thank you, Gilles. I appreciate you reaching out.
>
> Normally I encourage PMCs to not re-orient or "spindle" the feather where
> possible, but I understand that some legacy logos have a bit of a problem
> with positioning. For
Thank you, Gilles. I appreciate you reaching out.
Normally I encourage PMCs to not re-orient or "spindle" the feather where
possible, but I understand that some legacy logos have a bit of a problem with
positioning. For example, the Apache HTTP Server logo:
- original logo
Hello.
We, at Apache Commons, would like to know whether an Apache
project is authorized to extract graphical elements from the
foundation's logo, apply some transformation to them, and use
the result in order to compose its own logo.
Case in point is here:
24 matches
Mail list logo
