On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 03.03.2012 15:22, Eric Covener wrote:
But it would have to be clear that inclusion into trunk would not by
default mean that they would be included in the next major release.
Especially for mod_ftp, I think that it requires many more eyeballs
and a
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 29 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4,
mod_ftp and perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of
the
But it would have to be clear that inclusion into trunk would not by
default mean that they would be included in the next major release.
Especially for mod_ftp, I think that it requires many more eyeballs
and a comprehensive test suite before it should be part of a stable
release.
On 03.03.2012 15:22, Eric Covener wrote:
But it would have to be clear that inclusion into trunk would not by
default mean that they would be included in the next major release.
Especially for mod_ftp, I think that it requires many more eyeballs
and a comprehensive test suite before it should
On Wednesday 29 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4,
mod_ftp and perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of
the project as it is, unless more committers
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently demonstrated.
I always thought, you'd
On 2/29/2012 8:59 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as it is,
unless
more committers participate in those subprojects.
The other way to
+1
- Original Message -
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4,
mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as
it is, unless
more committers participate in
On 2/29/2012 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as it is,
unless
more committers participate in
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the
On 12/14/2011 2:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/13/2011 12:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/13/2011 10:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
mod_policy is a set of httpd filters that detect and implement a set of
HTTP protocol checks, the idea being
On 13 Dec 2011, at 6:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
Based on the support expressed, and the expressed preference that the module be
part of httpd, I have written appropriate documentation for the module, as well
as documentation targeted at developers affected
On 12/21/2011 4:35 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 13 Dec 2011, at 6:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
Based on the support expressed, and the expressed preference that the module
be part of httpd, I have written appropriate documentation for the module, as
+1!
On Dec 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
As with mod_firehose, I have concluded negotiation with the BBC to open
source some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the BBC have very
kindly agreed to donate the code to the ASF[1], which I believe would fit
On 12/13/2011 12:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/13/2011 10:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
mod_policy is a set of httpd filters that detect and implement a set of HTTP
protocol checks, the idea being you declare a policy for your development
and
On 14 Dec 2011, at 10:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Very interesting, sounds generally useful to developers, and rounds out that
large gap in modules/test/ that we essentially offer very little for
'testing'
in terms of functional test modules.
To clarify, I'm +1 for directly
Hi all,
As with mod_firehose, I have concluded negotiation with the BBC to open source
some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the BBC have very kindly
agreed to donate the code to the ASF[1], which I believe would fit well as a
subproject of httpd, and would like to know whether
On 12/13/2011 10:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
mod_policy is a set of httpd filters that detect and implement a set of HTTP
protocol checks, the idea being you declare a policy for your development and
testing environments, and requests/responses that
On 13 Dec 2011, at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The set of policies to apply is as follows, but is expected to change with
time:
o Content-Type: check that it's present and valid
o Content-Length: check that it is present and valid (used to ensure that
keepalive requests between
20 matches
Mail list logo
