On this page: https://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html there is a
reference to "a port to OpenSolaris (Sparc) by Adfinis SyGroup AG
(Nicolas Christener)":
http://adfinis-sygroup.ch/aoo-solaris-sparc/
But that page is 404 and should probably be removed (unless anyone knows
where it went).
Hi Kay,
Am 09.02.20 um 21:02 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> All done ( I think). Some former aspects of the CMS seem to be missing
> but my changes got published.
The staging area isn't working anymore. This is related to the permanent
HTTPS redirection.
But I can see everything online now. Thanks!
All done ( I think). Some former aspects of the CMS seem to be missing
but my changes got published.
HTH
-- Kay
On 2/8/20 12:54 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08.02.20 um 00:13 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 06/02/2020 Kay Schenk wrote:
http://home.apache.org/~kschenk/AOO_project_site/source.html
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 19:54:56 +0100
Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Rory,
>
> Rory O'Farrell schrieb am 09-Feb-20 um 17:29:
> > Is there a document from Oasis giving a synopsis of the changes from 1.2 to
> > 1.3? This would give an idea of how much work was involved in the
> > transition from
Hi Rory,
Rory O'Farrell schrieb am 09-Feb-20 um 17:29:
Is there a document from Oasis giving a synopsis of the changes from 1.2 to
1.3? This would give an idea of how much work was involved in the transition
from 1.2.
No, such synopsis does not exist. The committee candidate has an
Hi Yuri, all
> There ought to be some checking of how unified is the handling of the 1.2
> plain or extended between the LO and AOO.
If I understand correctly only ODF 1.2 is a standard (OASIS and ISO), so
creating a document with the same content on any software should result in
identical
Peter Kovacs-3 wrote
> So I would like to focus on the Todos what we need to do in order to get
> this done.
> ...
> Any more Ideas?
There ought to be some checking of how unified is the handling of the 1.2
plain or extended between the LO and AOO.
I remember seeing some differences already.
Is
Hello Regina,
> -Original Message-
> From: Regina Henschel [mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de]
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Challange ODF 1.3 is out
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Jörg Schmidt schrieb am 09-Feb-20 um 12:28:
> > Hello,
>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:22:12 +0100
Peter Kovacs wrote:
> My personal opinion in this matter is that it does not matter what
> others do. All that counts is that ODF 1.3 is out.
>
> If others want to join the party everyone is welcome. If they do not
> want to that is fine, too.
>
> I am
Small correction:
I am greatfull to all involved for ODF 1.3. I do not want to exclude
anyone. I think this is really Awesome!
And I whish someday, AOO will have also people somehow helping to
develop ODF format further.
I am sure there is still lot of work to do.
All the Best
Peter
On
My personal opinion in this matter is that it does not matter what
others do. All that counts is that ODF 1.3 is out.
If others want to join the party everyone is welcome. If they do not
want to that is fine, too.
I am personal very happy that the TDF has managed to organize this. And
I am
Hi Jörg,
Jörg Schmidt schrieb am 09-Feb-20 um 12:28:
Hello,
[..]
I myself have been following the development of ODF from the very beginning and
I have to underline what you write, or rather I have to take a critical look at
the approach of the TDF, because:
In terms of a free, uniform
Hallo Peter,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2020 10:59 AM
> To: dev-de@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Wie unser Projekt derzeit funktioniert
> Ich finde auch das Attribut frostig falsch.
Es gab hier in den
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2020 11:51 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Challange ODF 1.3 is out
>
> Hi Peter, all
>
> > Just a heads up. On FOSDEM I learned that TDF managed to
>
Hi Peter, all
> Just a heads up. On FOSDEM I learned that TDF managed to raise money and
> do the work for ODF v 1.3.
I believe this is a quite relevant announcement!
If ODF 1.3 is only used by a single Office suite then it will no longer be
"software independent" which IMHO defeats the
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Sounds nice.
>
> Thank you.
It would be great to have a debug output that can be checked to check which
> dependencies have been pulled. For me a declarative output would be cool to
> understand some code.
>
>
You can see within-module
Top zusätzliche Info. Ich mag zwar die Excel Referenz nicht, aber das Video ist
eine nice Ressource.
Wir sollten an sich aufpassen wegen Gebrauchsmuster. Die sind überall geschützt.
Ich finde auch das Attribut frostig falsch. Das ist deine Interpretation. Mit
20% Informations Volumen gegenüber
Sounds nice.
It would be great to have a debug output that can be checked to check which
dependencies have been pulled. For me a declarative output would be cool to
understand some code.
Also do you have an idea how to handle IDLs with scon? That would be awesome.
All the best
Peter
Am 9.
Hallo Peter,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2020 11:18 AM
> To: dev-de@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Wie unser Projekt derzeit funktioniert
> Es wäre stressfreier würdest du einfach im Issue ergänzen was du
I've implemented static libraries, added linker version scripts, and made
some cleanups, and 22 modules can now be converted to SCons (up from 19 a
week ago).
AllLangResTarget is the next big target, and it seems exceptionally
complicated, with 3 layers of intermediate targets: .src
Hello all,
Just a heads up. On FOSDEM I learned that TDF menaged to raise money and
do the work for ODF v 1.3.
https://www.oasis-open.org/news/announcements/open-document-format-for-office-applications-opendocument-v1-3-from-the-opendocum
I have created Bug
21 matches
Mail list logo
