On 06/04/2010 04:52 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
2010/6/4 C. Bergströmcbergst...@pathscale.com:
Portability is interesting to us, but we're also very much interested in
performance. So previous to the upcoming release we only supported Linux,
but now we're looking to add OpenSolaris, FreeBSD,
Martin Sebor wrote:
On 06/04/2010 03:17 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
...
The biggest but possibly the only reason that occurs to me
is portability. The target platform of libc++ is gcc/clang
on Apple OS X. stdcxx on the other hand has been ported to
dozens of compilers and
Stefan Teleman wrote:
2010/6/4 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
Portability is interesting to us, but we're also very much interested in
performance. So previous to the upcoming release we only supported Linux,
but now we're looking to add OpenSolaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Mac and
2010/6/4 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
Hi Stefan,
Does that mean the suncc team will be helping to improve it? If neither
please don't hijack threads. I removed maybe too much context from the
email, but it was in reference to C++0x + OpenSolaris.
You should ask the compiler team
Stefan Teleman wrote:
2010/6/4 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
Hi Stefan,
Does that mean the suncc team will be helping to improve it? If neither
please don't hijack threads. I removed maybe too much context from the
email, but it was in reference to C++0x + OpenSolaris.
2010/6/4 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
I checked my email and I think you just assumed sun cc..
Yes I assumed Sun CC when I read OpenSolaris, and I didn't quite see
any reference to PathScale.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.tele...@gmail.com
