Yes, I uploaded it with no fanfare to the 1.4 branch of wicket-stuff and
intended to port it to 1.5 then make an announcement.
But since you asked here is the code:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/core-1.4.x/jdk-1.5-parent/spring-webflow-parent
You can see an example app in the
Jeremy,
Will Git development mimic the current subversion workflow, or will we see
we see a more Git-ish way like 'git flow'? See-
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
I realize that likely the answer is 'we don't know yet', so I'd like to get
the conversation going.
-Clint
I was wondering the other day if there were any Wicket developers in
various European countries. Long ago while contributing to TiddlyWiki we
had used frappr for that purpose. It appears that there had been a similar
one for Wicket:
Please grant commit access to user name 'checketts' and 'fbraun'
We'll be uploading the Wicket and Spring WebFlow integration code.
I'd second 'rework examples into proper tutorial app', and aim for it a
beginning section to be a step by step intro to new concepts, like an 'intro
to wicket' app that has a sequential setup (ie #1 getting started, #2
navigating between pages, #3 pageparameters) etc.
* rework examples into a
Instead of dropping it would you prefer I submit a patch that re-enables it?
-Clint
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Yes. This setting is ignored in current trunk.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com
wrote:
We use
So AttributeAppender and SimpleAttributeModifier will not be deprecated?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I've committed the rework for 1.5, which doesn't completely rework
AttirubteModifier and friends, but sets the stage for 1.6. I didn't
I have a FormComponentPanel that contains multiple child formcomponent. The
purpose of this panel is to be able to add in several cihldren dynamically.
The end model is supposed to be the list from all the children component. I
get the value in my convertInput() method by iterating over all the
The magic is calling setVariable on the ConversionException. Thanks to Igor's
new book https://www.packtpub.com/apache-wicket-cookbook/book for teaching
me that. ;)
So in your page's property file you'd have (you had the wrong case on
*IC*onverter
in your last email):
So in theory a behavior implementing this could add additional
components to the page? Or is the hierarchy frozen at this point?
On Friday, February 18, 2011, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
What does everyone think about the following patch [1] to add two methods to
that is why its 'final'
add(new MyPanel());
}*
}
class MyPanel {
MyPanel() {
log.debug(getPage() = + getPage()); = null
add(new Label(id, getString(resKey)); = does not resolve
}
}
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hans Lesmeister 2
hans.lesmeis...@lessy-software.de wrote:
Hi,
Clint
I don't believe the goal of onInitiallize is to move all component creation
from the constructor to onInitialize, since if you are adding the component
to the parent in the onInitialize method then you are back to the problem of
not being able to call getPage() in your components.
I say keep
I believe the wicket-examples attached jetty jar was upgraded which
required the servlet update.
On Saturday, January 22, 2011, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Er... why was servlet API dependency version upgraded to 2.5? I can't
remember the discussion. Searched for it, but only found a
I made the following observation when working with a form today.
When using an AjaxSubmitLink or AjaxButton you override the onSubmit and the
onError methods. However normal non-ajax ones (SubmitLink and Button) have
the onSubmit() method, but don't have the onError() method. Is that
I'd like to see it in core!
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
I had encountered this issue and for one of my training classes, I threw
together a
I don't know if I've any pull in voting, but +1 for github from me. It also
would help in cases when a Wicket-Stuff idea may want to fork Wicket core to
try new stuff.
-Clint
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 for github
biggest drag on managing
Yesterday a friend following this thread pointed out that we should rethink
our overriding of onVisible and use onConfigure. I've used
LoadabledDetachableModels to cache the value used in my isVisible/isEnabled
overriding so changing values mid request aren't a problem. That is its
whole purpose.
Jeremy,
If possible you may try color coding the different sections of the file
name:
filename_variation_style_es_MX.xml
That way as the pieces are removed the pattern will be obvious to the
reader. Just be cautious in your color choices: you wouldn't want a double
rainbow clear across your
eliminated!
-Clint Checketts
through the Wicket codebase locating the
pieces that need to change to make it fully compatible. Does it make sense
to have a master Jira that tracks the overall 'compatible with GAE' state
while making individual issues for the specific changes that reference back
to the master issue?
Thanks,
-Clint
with something like
[GAE] problem description
?
This should be easy to filter or lookup
Am 20.09.2010 um 14:43 schrieb Clint Checketts:
There is a 'Will it play in app engine' page that tracks libraries that
are
compatible with Google App Engine (aka GAE):
http://groups.google.com
Ha ha. You make them sound like a sort of candy.
Sorry to pull the newbie card. But any tips on how to create a patch?
Unfortunately the page on the Wicket site is blank (
http://wicket.apache.org/contribute/patch.html) Maybe its written in
Whitespace and I need a decoder ring.
I'm guessing I
? Or is there some simpler, less nagging way?
-Clint
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. I forgot to mention that I am also using the proper HttpSessionStore
and it still isn't doing the right post/redirect behavior. Still it makes me
wonder if there is some
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3036
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote:
Could you file an JIRA issue on that?
Am 07.09.2010 um 05:54 schrieb Clint Checketts:
I've been playing around with Wicket on Google App Engine here
Where can I find out how this voting works? Who can vote? What is a
binding/non-binding vote?
Thanks,
-Clint
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:54 AM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] Yes, release
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Jan Kriesten [via Apache Wicket]
Graphics2D stuff for another thread.)
Thanks,
-Clint Checketts
26 matches
Mail list logo
