On 1/27/2012 9:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Running into make recursion issues for the first and only time
I've ever observed this on Windows; not sure what is going on
with it. I'll be struggling with this again Sat and post up
the src.zip, once I'm sure this isn't some new regression
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached. This needs
On 1/30/2012 11:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached. This needs
On 1/31/2012 1:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive
Mladen,
It is fixed, r1210449 did the trick. Once that extra Win32 pid check was
removed, the watchdog takes steps, heatbeat beats heartmonitor
monitors. I thought I confirmed this back then, sorry if I didn't.
Regards,
Gregg
On 2/3/2012 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/03/2012 09:22
On 2/3/2012 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Since I have been the most vocal about this watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on
windows ...
I should chime in.
I can tell someone what each do (as far as I have seen). There are, minimal
docvs on all
but
On 2/3/2012 10:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
bb == NULL ??
Looking at his attached screen scrape; no. Which leaves with
something like e == NULL or a broken bb.
The former :-(
Gregg, please
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in
2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows.
PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but
On 2/13/2012 1:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I
On 2/15/2012 10:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
When any one of these were incorrectly implemented by a network stack
driver, DisableWin32AcceptEx (and now AcceptFilter none) was necessary
to work around the broken driver. That feature has always been a gross
hack around what should just
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP Vista x86.
Builds fine in IDE (without crypto)
On 2/15/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17,
On 2/26/2012 10:11 AM, Steffen wrote:
When I recall on the list is stated that .dsw and .dsp files cannot
directly be used by VC10, so we should drop them.
Correct me if I have read/understood wrong.
I will not state that the Express version doesn't, because by the time
it came out, I had
Hi,
First, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1236319
The patch in PR 51078 was never commited. However, I am -1 on committing
this right now because I believe the root cause of this orphan described
in PR 51078 is what has been fixed now by the commit of PR 50309.
Without
On 3/8/2012 12:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I hadn't worked out yet the right
approach to the windows .mak files, what with the separation of httpd and
its dependencies. Let me spend my weekend messing with the details.
Hasn't this already been done? Or, am I missing something? Granted I
Bill,
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users,
then there's the silent masses :)
Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory.
I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also, crypto not building for static lib throws a
decent sized monkey wrench into the httpd build. Then maybe we
? If not,
then these lines of code simply need to be dodged for AcceptFilter none.
On 3/15/2012 6:06 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Bill,
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then
there's the
silent masses :)
Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory.
I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also
Graham,
Current APU 1.4 head builds fine.
It looks like your fix for this is the only thing in changes.
On 3/15/2012 4:13 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 15 Mar 2012, at 1:06 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then
there's the silent
+1 as well
On 3/16/2012 3:39 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
+1
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:33, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
During development of mod_cache, mod_disk_cache was renamed to mod_cache_disk
to make it possible to have a sensible name for this module, mod_cache_socache,
Gün,
It Works!
On 3/20/2012 4:18 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Gregg, can you please run a Windows build?
Gün.
I found this to be an interesting error message:
[Fri Mar 30 18:07:41.019600 2012] [session_crypto:error] [pid 4236:tid
700] (15)Error string not specified yet: AH01845: (null)
very informative :)
Gregg
to say here yet, as I embarrassingly did.
Regards,
Gregg
On 3/31/2012 5:33 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Mar 2012, at 3:10 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
I found this to be an interesting error message:
[Fri Mar 30 18:07:41.019600 2012] [session_crypto:error] [pid 4236:tid 700]
(15)Error string
On 3/31/2012 12:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Mar 2012, at 7:25 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
It was nss and I was pulling away nss dll files to see just what was needed and
what wasn't. Interesting was that the error was different for most but that
error came up for some. The other was
[Fri
To Start there is the bugzilla report;
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
Then it's scattered all over the dev@ list, possibly the most relevant;
http://marc.info/?t=13250010075r=1w=2
http://marc.info/?t=13291414997r=1w=2
Have missed some I'm sure, but it's a
Bill, Jeff,
I agree 2.3.7 needs to be released for the stated reasons, I was +1 to
that back a few weeks ago.
On 4/10/2012 9:11 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/9/2012 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The
On 4/17/2012 7:20 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
I'd like to finish testing/voting by Friday, let the mirrors sync over
the weekend, and announce on Monday. Thanks!
[+/-1] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.7
+1
On 4/19/2012 3:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
On 4/17/2012 7:20 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
I'd like to finish testing/voting by Friday, let the mirrors sync over
the
On 4/17/2012 5:34 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/17/2012 7:20 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
I'd like to finish testing/voting by Friday, let the mirrors sync over
the weekend, and announce on Monday. Thanks!
[+/-1] Release mod_fcgid
On 5/14/2012 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 13, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
No news from here too. Complaints from the Win community are growing.
I know that I've pinged MS for help and that we rec'd some
offers from MS engineers to assist us. Have we taken advantage
of that?
On 5/27/2012 3:20 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
We could insist that all comments be made in English unless they are
related to a specific translations, and as long as we keep the
translations up to date with the suggestions and delete comments as they
are implemented, there shouldn't be much clutter.
On 7/13/2012 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
I dont care about EOL'ed XP users needing to provision it, but what
is the group concensus about having 2008 (original release) users pre
provision it?
Neither XP or 2003 are EOL'd, not till April 2014 IIRC.
On 7/14/2012 9:35 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 7/13/2012 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
I dont care about EOL'ed XP users needing to provision it, but what
is the group concensus about having 2008 (original release) users pre
provision it?
Neither XP or 2003 are EOL'd, not till April 2014
On 8/4/2012 12:20 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Gregg,
On 03.08.2012 22:13, gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Fri Aug 3 20:13:38 2012
New Revision: 1369191
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1369191view=rev
Log:
r1364253 forces the build to find mod_ssl.h
This should be CTR, feel
On 8/17/2012 10:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
Looks good on Windows, the AcceptFilter none+ssl is working very well
(thanks Jeff).
Gregg
Hi Joe,
There seems to be a problem with this commit.
mod_ssl.c
.\mod_ssl.c(288) : error C2491: 'modssl_run_npn_advertise_protos_hook' :
definition of dllimport function not allowed
.\mod_ssl.c(294) : error C2491: 'modssl_run_npn_proto_negotiated_hook' :
definition of dllimport function not
On 9/20/2012 4:36 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 20.09.2012 16:56, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 20.09.2012 16:16, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 20.09.2012 16:02, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
We shouldn't have scripts which, out of the box, leak information
about the system or configuration.
ok, I change the
On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing.
If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif
images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg
version. Or if the original author still has the original
On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Righto, ASL getting in the way ;)
I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff:
Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL
Apache is done with Syncopate, which is also using ASL.
Take a look and see if the
On 10/3/2012 1:31 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions
and
commit them to trunk later today.
go
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
What about Apache HTTPD?
+1
httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked.
Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right.
Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too
On 11/14/2012 3:56 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 14.11.2012 12:53, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
I know that Gregg has 'something' which is not MSI but an EXE installer,
but it works, and I asked already a while back if we should push this
out, but there was no further interest / agreement here :-(
On 11/16/2012 12:08 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 11/14/2012 3:56 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 14.11.2012 12:53, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
I know that Gregg has 'something' which is not MSI but an EXE
installer,
but it works, and I asked already a while back if we should push this
out
Hi Elmar,
I did not build the ASF binaries but;
apr_ldap.h(136) : fatal error C1189: #Fehler : Support for LDAP v2.0
toolkits has been removed from apr-util. Please use an LDAP v3.0
toolkit.
If I remember correctly, this goes away if you use Windows Server 2003
R2 SDK.
In VC6, move these
On 11/27/2012 5:11 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hey folks,
Am 27.11.2012 19:13, schrieb Eric Covener:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Igor Galići.ga...@brainsware.org
wrote:
just to revive this thread again, here's a current comment
thread to our documentation on:
On 11/28/2012 1:26 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
I believe there's a couple of things we all sort of agree on:
* current state is not welcomed by users and early adopters
I'm not sure what you mean by current state. Regardless, early adopters
know no better.
* we (the ASF) should provide an official
On 11/28/2012 8:10 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 17:02:30 Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malon...@perlig.de wrote:
You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
they have no use for source code.
The discussion is moot. The ASF
On 11/28/2012 7:20 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
There is far far far more httpd users on other operating systems than
windows, what next, do binaries for all maintained RH, Suse, Gentoo,
BSD, debian.. and so on as well... I mean surely nobody wants
to be seen as catering for the minority
On 11/29/2012 7:42 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
Has anyone consider that in the meanwhile we update our
website to officially endorse ApacheLounge?
Not endorse any, just list the possibilities, there are a few.
On 12/14/2012 2:17 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 12/14/2012 10:48 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 12.12.2012 22:44, schrieb Marion Christophe JAILLET:
Here are a few things triggered by cppcheck.
Le 11/12/2012 21:08, humbed...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: humbedooh
Date: Tue Dec 11 20:08:24 2012
Hi Daniel,
On 12/14/2012 12:46 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Bloody Windows ;)
I know, but what can you do? :)
I have added an #ifdef for the tms stuff, as I saw mod_status did the
same. If there is another way of making it work, I will change it as
soon as I find a proper way to deal with it.
On 12/18/2012 9:00 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Andy Wang aw...@ptc.com
mailto:aw...@ptc.com wrote:
This was brought up a while ago that the Apache 2.4.x and 2.2.23
builds were lacking the win32 source bundle. There was some
discussion about how to
On 12/18/2012 1:32 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
On 12/18/2012 02:45 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
The difference between the win32 and unix sources are the line
endings (Win's vs. Unix's) and the .mak .dep files. These make
dependency files have been exported from Visual C++ 6, which was the
last
On 12/25/2012 4:33 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
Gregg -- can you capture some of the info from this thread in e.g.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/platform/win_compiling.html
(numbered list starting at unix sources)
Eric,
Is this what you're looking for?
On 1/2/2013 6:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote
thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here
so I can link to it.
Pending IP clearance...
[+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility for
Hi Daniel,
On 1/10/2013 4:55 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 01/10/2013 01:52 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am 10.01.2013 10:34, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how
I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I
On 1/10/2013 1:33 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Your 2.4 patch seems to be missing this part of r1430225
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/lua/mod_lua.dsp?r1=1430225r2=1430224pathrev=1430225
This is also needed
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1431681
On 1/25/2013 5:21 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Vote
[X] +1: I support this proposal
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
On 1/26/2013 8:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Doesn't that mean the address needs to be 0x6F85 to provide ample
space before the mod_sed.so address? And then all addresses below
mod_lua need to be lowered by 0x1 as well?
Yes, thanks for the catch. Fixed in r1439027.
Regards,
Gregg
Hello,
Since the Next Protocol Negotiation addition, mod_ssl cannot be compiled on
Windows since the AP namespace is for imports.
Are there any objections to this which allows the NPN hooks to be
exported in
Windows.
If there are no objection I'll commit this in a few days.
Regards,
Gregg
On 2/5/2013 2:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
In catching up with building 2.2.23 and getting somewhere with 2.4.3
(soon to be .24 and .4 from today's email notes), I'm left with one
quandary.
The 2.2 builds all used OpenSSL 0.9.8 and that's where I would leave
it, while 2.4 builds aught to
On 2/6/2013 8:14 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
That may or may not be an issue. On Windows we can load both the PHP
and mod_ssl flavors of OpenSSL at the same time if their dll names are
unique. Unless msvc resources opened in httpd are closed by mod_php
or visa versa, two flavors of msvc can
On 2/15/2013 12:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:26:33 -0800
Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
mod_fcgid alleviates both compiler/OpenSSL problems since it's
running php in it's own process true, but at the cost of speed. I'm
not sure I would consider that optimal, but
On 2/18/2013 4:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The tarball candidates for Apache httpd 2.2.24 can be found at
the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please VOTE for releasing this Apache httpd 2.2.24 candidate as GA.
[ ] +1 for GA: Happy Birthday, 2.2.24.
[ ] -1:
On 2/18/2013 4:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The tarball candidates for Apache httpd 2.2.24 can be found at
the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please VOTE for releasing this Apache httpd 2.2.24 candidate as GA.
[ ] +1 for GA: Happy Birthday, 2.2.24.
[ ] -1:
On 2/18/2013 12:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.4 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.4 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 3/11/2013 9:38 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Mar 11 16:38:39 2013
New Revision: 1455225
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1455225
Log:
Merge r1442865, r1442759, r1442326, r1442309, r1448171, r1418556, r1448453,
r1425771, r1425772, r1425775 from trunk:
...
Add some
On 3/12/2013 11:10 AM, Dwayne Miller wrote:
My apologies for the Disclaimer at the bottom. I had forgotten that it
was appended to all outgoing email. I've asked that it be not appended to
dev-http email address, so this is basically my test to see if that work
was done correctly.
2 questions
Hi Daniel,
I'm seeing segfaults on that dreadful Windows OS when using
LuaMapHandler LuaRoot together.
Not to worry, I'm seeing seeing this on trunk as well, so it's not your
backport per se.
Some likely useless info:
On 3/13/2013 4:44 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 03/13/2013 02:50 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I'm seeing segfaults on that dreadful Windows OS when using
LuaMapHandler LuaRoot together.
The backtrace was actually quite helpful :) It would appear that the bug
(perhaps) pre-dates my work
On 3/13/2013 1:12 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 03/13/2013 08:39 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/13/2013 4:44 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 03/13/2013 02:50 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I'm seeing segfaults on that dreadful Windows OS when using
LuaMapHandler LuaRoot together.
The backtrace
On 4/11/2013 9:05 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
I just tried the script you attached on my Windows box, as well as the
original LuaRoot + LuaMapHandler problem, and I can't find anything
wrong with it, it works flawlessly with httpd 2.4.4 + mod_lua from trunk
(using Lua 5.1.4). There appears to be
On 4/12/2013 10:43 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Bill,
On 12.04.2013 18:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
I've now tested on Windows, and I can see all previously mentioned
issues there too; in addition the attached script
On 4/12/2013 10:43 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
I know; but I dont know if Gregg did a release or debug build;
I've heard a couple of times in the past that folks were not able to
re-create crash with debug builds but which happen with release builds;
that could f.e. explain why Daniel doesnt see
On 5/7/2013 3:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi all,
I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
late to get something like this
On 5/24/2013 12:53 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
yeah ...; and from what I see our project files are already broken
even when not converted and used directly with MSVC6, f.e. when doing
a release build a bunch of files land in the debug folder, and finally
at linking stage it breaks ...
On 5/24/2013 2:03 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
ATM I think this is not needed - from what I tested during past weeks
the current trunk code is at least as good / bad as what is already in
2.4.x branch - so copying over trunk to 2.4.x seems an improvement to
me due to various bug fixes beside the
On 5/29/2013 10:52 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 29.05.2013 18:06, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:37:14AM -0400, Matthew Steele wrote:
Oops, yes, RUN_ALL semantics are desired; the misleading API
description is
my fault, sorry. (I confess I never really understood why
Hi folks,
The more eyes the better I've been told. Sorry that it's lengthy.
x86 VC9 *Release* Build
httpd version : 2.4.5-r1489105
mod_lua from trunk at r1487956
Odd results:
ServerRoot C:/Apache24A
1. Running scripts fortune.lua or example.lua via URL works.
2. With
LuaMapHandler
On 6/28/2013 2:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
VC9 x64 Server 2003 R2 x64
VC9 x86 Vista x86
On 7/11/2013 11:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.5 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 7/15/2013 9:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
x86 x64 on various Windows versions
Works for me
VC9 x86 x64
VC12 x86 x64
XP, Server 2003, Vista Server 2012
[+1] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.9 as GA
On 11/13/2013 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
VC9 x86 x64
XP Vista x86
Server 2003 R2 x64
APR 1.4.8/APU 1.5.2
APR 1.5.0/APU 1.5.3
Looks good!
On 11/19/2013 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.7 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
APR 1.5.0 APU 1.5.3 OpenSSL 1.0.1e latest libxml2/lua/pcre/zlib
VC 2008 x86 on XP Vista
VC 2008 x64 on Server 2003 R2
VC2012 x86x64 on Server 2012
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to
On 3/13/2014 9:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.9 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 7/15/2014 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.10 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.10 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
That pesky intptr_t,
On 9/3/2014 9:27 AM, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote
In terms of providing dist/httpd/binaries/win32 httpd 2.2.29 based on
msvcrt,dll, I have a couple of options;
[+1] Ship with r1563992 applied (and document this? where?)
[ +/-0] Drop apr_dbd_odbc.dll from the distribution
[
On 9/4/2014 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I overlooked 2 other viable options
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.2 (pre-breakage) and
corresponding binaries
[ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.4 (upon release) and
corresponding binaries
Assumes a much quicker path
On 11/23/2014 7:58 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
2.2.25 binaries still show up under the binaries link on mirrors.
Shouldn't they be zapped?
+1
Hi Yann,
Commit the newly generated files please.
Regards,
Gregg
On 12/8/2014 9:18 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Hi,
commit r1642154 modified server/util_expr_parse.y, hence
server/util_expr_parse.c and server/util_expr_parse.h are re-generated
by bison during make.
However these .[ch] are also
ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
Reverted in r1643901.
Someone with a bison version above 2.7.12-4996 should do this (mine
is 2.5).
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, thanks.
Done in r1643900.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net
On 2/18/2015 6:12 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
I have been using mod_macro for some time and always get the following
types of messages on startup (using 2.4.12 now, but this behavior has
been noticed since 2.4.7):
[Wed Feb 18 13:54:55.019032 2015] [core:warn] [pid 970:tid
140069833443200] AH00111:
On 1/22/2015 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.12 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.12 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
Hi,
I've been stalling on the traditional windows build adding apreq because
I never saw any concrete decision on if we were going to add it to the
core libhttpd or keep it a separate library (libapreq) as it has been
for years. I've searched my inbox and looked over all the messages about
This breaks autoindex generated Indexes!
This really should be reverted and rethunk.
I have a testfile and header/readme files in all subdirectories below
/htdocs
There is an index.html file in /htdocs
I have no FallbackResource configured.
DocumentRoot /htdocs
DirectoryIndex index.html
On 5/15/2015 11:42 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Covenercove...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't fully understand your report, but I see there is no
autoindex is bogus since this is a fixup and autoindex is a handler.
Seems like maybe it's broken multiple ways. Probably
On 6/4/2015 10:01 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
This is new, not quite sure how I didn't see it a few weeks ago as it's 9
weeks old.
Who forgot to fill in the number?
mod_deflate.c(1283) : warning C4003: not enough actual
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
