On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather see the Shale community grow this library and the Shale project.
However, if the communities feel that the only way we can find volunteers to
contribute to its ongoing growth (seems a bit snobbish) is to
Hi Greb,
My problem isn't that Shale Test is linked to JSF, it's that MyFaces API is
linked to Shale-Test (while not to any other module). The part of Shale-test
we're using to test MyFaces isn't even linked to Shale other than for
historical reason (no harm intended here, it's merely factual).
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Simon Lessard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the base
test classes don't get moved to MyFaces, then we're more or less condemning
MyFaces API to wait for RI to be released so that Shale-test can depend on
it to be updated to 2.0 API, or forcing MyFaces API to
Hi Greg,
See inline.
~ Simon
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Simon Lessard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the base
test classes don't get moved to MyFaces, then we're more or less
condemning
MyFaces API to wait
-- Original message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Simon,
I don't think this has been officially decided. Check out the recent
thread on this topic.
However, if
Hi Craig,
The difference is the test framework, or at least a part of it, is linked
exclusively to JSF. More practically, what this mean is that we have a
cyclic reference between the API and the test. For example, the test
framework depends on FacesContext. However, since we like Shale test
Oups, I meant Gary sorry... Dunno why I confused you with Craig...
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Simon Lessard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Craig,
The difference is the test framework, or at least a part of it, is linked
exclusively to JSF. More practically, what this mean is that we have
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
I personally only have interest in test, that's what I use on my projects.
But if don't
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Paul Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main reason for not advocating moving Shale Test into MyFaces is because
it is implementation agnostic. 1.1-SNAPSHOT is even able to load the
I don't get that.
It would be a separate module, not part of myfaces impl, of
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving releases :-). What's
the problem with letting Shale Test move somewhere else?
The problem,
Hello,
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
I personally only have interest in test, that's what I use on my projects.
But if don't care about the rest.
So, could an only 1.1 release of test work ?
+1
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-465
-- Original message --
From: Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
I personally only have interest in test, that's what I use on my projects.
But if don't care about the rest.
So, could an only 1.1 release of test work ?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving releases :-). What's
the problem with letting Shale Test move somewhere else?
The
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving releases :-). What's
the problem with letting Shale Test move somewhere else?
The problem, though, is that Shale Test is part of a project that has
stagnated. So,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving releases :-). What's
the problem with letting Shale Test move somewhere else?
The problem,
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
At JSFOne we
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-- Original message
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
At JSFOne we were discussing Shale Test, and again the idea of moving it
out
of Shale popped up. With so
-- Original message --
From: Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
At JSFOne we were discussing Shale Test, and again the idea of moving it out
of Shale popped up. With so little activity in the Shale project, I'd like
to bring up the issue of
My main reason for not advocating moving Shale Test into MyFaces is
because it is implementation agnostic. 1.1-SNAPSHOT is even able to
load the implementation's configuration files!. That said, their has not
been a release in an while and a supported Shale Test under MyFaces is
better then the
My main reason for not advocating moving Shale Test into MyFaces is
because it is implementation agnostic. 1.1-SNAPSHOT is even able to
load the implementation's configuration files!. That said, their has not
been a release in an while and a supported Shale Test under MyFaces is
better then
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
At JSFOne we were discussing Shale Test, and again the idea of moving it out
of Shale popped up. With so little activity in the Shale project, I'd like
to bring up the issue of migrating it
There is no shale zone yet. For now we can use either Struts or
MyFaces zone. MyFaces zone might make sense b/c it also has its own
repo for newly released artifacts (before they make it to ibiblio?)
Should we make inquiries on the myfaces-dev list asking if its ok to
piggy back on the MyFaces
Yes,
I am +1 on using MyFaces zone. I'd like to volunteer to put Shale there.
MyFaces zone is used by Trinidad as well.
-Matthias
On 7/14/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no shale zone yet. For now we can use either Struts or
MyFaces zone. MyFaces zone might make sense
26 matches
Mail list logo
