Is there an overview of the 0.7 routing architecture online somewhere?
I'm curious as to how it compares to previous routing schemes Freenet
has used.
Thanks!
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi
Does Freenet report its bandwidth usage?
I show 10-20KB/s usage, with a bandwidth setting of 100K.
It would be interesting to know the bandwidth settings of the nodes
I'm connected to...
Evan
On 4/6/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is your 0.7 node consistently using less
real work
to find people). If I was worried about my annonymity in a more than
passing way I'd do what I suggested above.
Good luck!
Evan Daniel
PS send me a noderef and I'll connect with you! You can trust me, I promise ;)
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juiceman wrote:
What if 2 or more lists have the same user-friendly name but have them
pointing to different keys? How would this be handled?
Keep in mind, unless it's from your list, you don't access Key.. You
access Username\Key, where
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrmm..
For one, keep in mind that these names are for the User's beneifit, not
the node's... In reality, Charles's nodelist is a unique USK, at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So that means that the User might get confused, but the node knows the
difference
out for perfection,
and this seems likely to improve on the status quo.
I would also advocate highly visible security warnings about it.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On 8/15/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because in many cases the network we provide it with is not a single
small world network (which is what it is designed for), but two loosely
connected small world networks of different parameters.
It seems likely to me that interest in
On 8/17/06, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 Aug 2006, at 09:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
I don't believe that the darknet and opennet will be weakly connected
as you suggest, but neither of us can no for sure until we
On 8/25/06, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Can reputations be negative as well as positive?
* If reputations can be negative, how do you prevent nodes from
generating new identities to escape bad reputations (whitewashing)?
* If reputations can only be positive, do new nodes start
On 9/5/06, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
We will be using STS, at least initially. Which means checking a
signature.
Cool, IANAC but I think we should be OK.
As long as we're signing the data, not its hash; in
On Feb 1, 2008 12:00 PM, Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 5:49 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also need an escape-route mechanism - a way to find an entrance
into
another network once regular
think having a ballpark answer to
that question will go a long way in determining how big a problem this
really is, and also what sort of solutions might be appropriate. Of
course, it sounds hard to answer :)
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
soon. Remember, we want to handle an average user's
NAT well, even if they can't / won't change the settings when Freenet
asks them to.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
At least for the near term future, and probably longer, we need an
answer other than TCP because of ugliness like Comcast's Sandvine
hardware. Forged TCP reset packets are non-trivial to deal
data broker...
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
I think flood routing inserts opportunistically is a good idea --
there's no point in sending out a memory card less than full, and
routed requests / inserts may well not be enough to fill
limit?
The major change needed would be a way to request not the specific SSK
block, but the SSK, whatever CHK it happens to redirect to, and any
CHK blocks needed to decode the result -- plus a way to prevent that
being a DoS attack (tit-for-tat?).
Evan Daniel
Fix to plugins/build.xml to correctly specify paths, assuming normal
svn checkout of both plugins/ and freenet/
Evan Daniel
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 19885)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,8
sizes and not the core crypto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijndael#Description_of_the_cipher
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
that there is no
longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
Are the opensource jvm's up to 1.5? If so, I say go for it. :)
IIRC, there are no JVM changes, only compiler changes.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi
, the spider stalls with a
queue full or queries that neither complete nor fail.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Evan Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-01 22:35:07]:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching: Lots of users want searching, and are disappointed when they
don't
get
is important.
Thoughts?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
, something like 1 connection per 2KiB/s of
outbound bandwidth, with a minimum of 15 and a max of 20. I'll
perform some testing with 15 connections, 30KiB/s limit and report
back on that.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
without further testing.
[...]
Tweaking that code based on one's experience is just plain
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 20:55:59 Florent Daignière wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-03-02 15:41:59]:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan
. There is a noticeable performance
improvement in the cache if you are willing to store a result in the
wrong slot when only one of the two is full already.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oskar Sandberg os...@sandbergs.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a technique that would make the store fill more quickly than
it currently does without any drawbacks (aside from a small amount
size.
Is there any reason to make the first n-2 segments full size and the
last 2 balanced and potentially only (slightly over) half size, rather
than make all n segments the same size?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
-level changes. The
other approaches can be implemented at a higher level as a translation
before handing a normal CHK request to the network.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Robert Hailey rob...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
IMPLEMENTING IT:
Main tasks:
- Converting our datastore indexes into a compact, slightly more lossy,
1-bit
filter. (Easy)
- Creating a snapshot once an hour,
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Robert Hailey rob...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
[20:37:16] evanbd You standardize on a size for the bloom filters; say
1MiB.
Then, if your store has 100GB of data, and needs 18MiB of bloom filters,
you
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 22:43:50 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
Yes, that's a question worth considering. There are both performance
and security issues involved, I think
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009 00:53:27 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 22:43:50 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3
implementation, and that reducing the
defaults for slow nodes is as worthy of consideration and testing as
raising it for fast nodes.
Also: do we have any idea what the distribution of available node
bandwidth looks like?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO
by
it. The dual benefits of provable spam resistance and lack of
censorship are, in my opinion, rather compelling.
Evan Daniel
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
Hello,
I am currently refactoring the WoT plugin to allow per-context trust values.
Lets first explain how WoT
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 00:02:11 Evan Daniel wrote:
The WoT documentation claims it is based upon the Advogato trust
metric. (Brief discussion: http://www.advogato.org/trust-metric.html
Full paper: http://www.levien.com/thesis/compact.pdf
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
I don't have any specific ideas for how to choose whether to ignore
identities, but I think you're making the problem much harder than it
needs to be. The problem is that you need to prevent spam
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:23:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 00:02:11 Evan Daniel wrote:
The WoT documentation claims it is based upon the Advogato trust
metric
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21:32:42 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
I don't have any specific ideas for how to choose whether
searched terms won't
be retrievable. However, there's obviously a tradeoff with common
search term latency.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 08 May 2009 02:12:21 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21:32:42 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 15:47:24 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 08 May 2009 02:12:21 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009
the
emergent properties you wanted.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:22 AM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 22:48:53 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:28 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:01:31 Luke771 wrote:
Thomas Sachau wrote:
Luke771 schrieb:
I can't comment on the technical
as well, possibly something like only 1
identity gets removed from the recent list per time period, rather
than a fixed window during which any removed id counts as recently
removed.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 17:33:29 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
IMHO these are not solutions to the contexts problem -- it merely
shifts
It's not all that interesting. It has been discussed to death many
times. The Advogato algorithm (or something like it) solves this
problem (not perfectly, but far, far better than the current FMS / WoT
alchemy), as I have explained in great detail.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM
board
consisting only of Hi, can anyone see this? -- they can do that
automatically. I think there should be a pair of buttons, mark
spammer and mark non-spammer.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi
list but inform them of the
problem. If they don't want to fix the problem, you probably don't
want to continue using their trust list.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his point that the users just
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 15:39:06 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his
might be non-trivial, possibly to the point of changing the running
time. Again, I could look at this in detail if it's interesting
enough to warrant it.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
time. Again, I could look at this in detail if it's interesting
enough to warrant it.
Worth investigating IMHO.
OK, I'll examine it further.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
is more effective than This is crap, they will click the former, no?
I would assume that's the normal case. OTOH, there isn't much harm in
implementing it, and if some people use it, that would help
somewhat... Perhaps implement, but not required for initial release?
Evan Daniel
a desire
to be made more anonymous, especially as regards potentially illegal
software usage, that we should support them.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:02 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:23:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
Why exactly? Your post is nice but I do not see how it answers my
question. The general problem my post is about: New identities are
obtained by taking them from trust lists
2009/5/26 xor x...@gmx.li:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 22:02:37 xor wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:23:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
Why exactly? Your post is nice but I do not see how it answers my
question. The general problem my post is about: New identities are
obtained by taking them from
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:45 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 16:39:06 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his point that the users just
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 23:19:53 Evan Daniel wrote:
2009/5/26 xor x...@gmx.li:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 22:02:37 xor wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:23:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
Why exactly? Your post is nice but I do not see how
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
That is fundamentally a hard problem.
- Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some amount of
spam getting through; hopefully it will be a small amount.
- With Advogato, the amount
significant numbers of captchas, but still is capable of making use of
the information that solving a captcha does provide.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
That is fundamentally a hard problem.
- Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
A small number could still be rather large. Having thousands see it
ought to suffice. For the current network, I see
of unstable.
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_14
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_14-b08)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
Freenet seems to be functioning normally.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
it would be only trivially larger. (I have a patch that I
thought did that, but it has a bug; I'll test once my indexwriter is
finished writing, since I don't want to interrupt it by reloading the
plugin.)
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
approximately the same time.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
for about 99.5% of the whole index,
and therefore (I'm assuming) 99.5% of the disk io. And that 99.5%
happens twice.
The shortcut only functions properly when the largest term accounts
for a modest fraction of the total work, which is exactly what isn't
happening here.
Evan Daniel
index_b7f.xml
2009-06-10 03:45 index_b80.xml
2009-06-10 03:47 index_b81.xml
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
doesn't include words
under 4 letters at all.
If you read my previous mails, you'll see that the the spider is in
fact indexing the word the.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
probably
can't share it with our neighbors without giving away our salt value.
For that, we probably want to continue planning to use Bloom filters.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/ how much bw it is before that becomes a concern.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
that new users are likely to see it. Buried
under a submenu as it presently is, I feel that effort spent improving
it would be wasted because no one who needs the info would ever see
it.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Now that 0.7.5 has shipped, we can start making disruptive changes again
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:01:18 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have
it
manage that? but What sorts of communication? In the current
version, a new user has to get to the fourth paragraph before they get
any hint about what they can do with it, rather than how it works.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian
to improve the wording?
Leave it the same, but make node reference a link to an explanation
(perhaps even a wiki page...) instead of in quotes?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
below that would be good.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Are you doing more testing?
On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Now that 0.7.5 has shipped, we can start
file indicated above]
EndMessage
TestDDAComplete
ReadDirectoryAllowed=false
Directory=/data/freenet
EndMessage
Third, if I didn't want to use DDA to insert my data, how would I do
that? The documentation on ClientPut doesn't say how to actually send
data in the direct mode.
Evan Daniel
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:50 AM, bo-lebo...@web.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 03:08:13 schrieb Evan Daniel:
I'm trying to test out SSK inserts with FCP, and running into problems.
First, the Disconnect command does not work:
Disconnect
EndMessage
Where did you get this info? I have
keys per filter on average. From the
preceding formula, standard deviation is 408 keys.
Size variation is only a serious concern if the hash function is not
distributing the keys at random. To be safe, we could slightly
underfill the filters.
Evan Daniel
is not
distributing the keys at random. To be safe, we could slightly
underfill the filters.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Perhaps this is what you
/firefox/firefox.html
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
to connect properly (the update over mandatory code should let it
update itself and then start working, but it's less than ideal).
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
understanding of why
Freenet has so little software that makes use of it, despite the fact
that Freenet itself seems to work fairly well.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:09 AM, David ‘Bombe’
Rodenbo...@pterodactylus.net wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2009 01:12:15 Evan Daniel wrote:
The method HTMLEncoder.encode() sounds like it ought to do that. Let's take
a look at the Javadoc:
encode
public static java.lang.String encode
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Zero3ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
Evan Daniel skrev:
Having not written much actual Freenet code before, I'm learning a lot
about how Freenet works in the process -- which is harder than it has
any reason to be. Why? NOTHING IS DOCUMENTED.
[snip
for Freenet is that the API
isn't perfect, but that I could work with it if I knew what it did.
However, figuring out what it does requires reading significant
quantities of Freenet source code as often as not.
On Thursday 23 July 2009 00:12:15 Evan Daniel wrote:
I've been slowly working
interferes).
The second thing would be to address
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3338
Right now I see latencies in testing of typically 15-40 seconds, with
30 seconds as a typical number. I suspect it could be much better.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl
has.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Evan Danieleva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Are you doing more testing?
On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:05:36 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew
Toselandt
to the current software, and no
objection to changing to something else if would improve things.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
another developer willing and able to write such a plugin if the
interface was actually documented.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
standpoint; it seems possible that someone could be
talked into doing it on a volunteer basis. Even if it wasn't
volunteer, it might be worth seeing how much a proper review would
cost. Cryptographic review seems appropriate for a program which
relies so strongly on the strength of its cryptography.
Evan
, but that's not where I would think to look for
Freenet-related applications.
Is Thingamablog maintained?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
a peer comes online, and tell whether a
message I've sent arrived successfully.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
file from the translations
page and email it to this list.
I'm not certain how you specify the language name / country code in
this process (I haven't actually done a translation myself). Just be
sure to say what language it is in your email.
Evan Daniel
1 - 100 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
