Re: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-10 Thread kv9u
And I think that Rick, KN6KB, was being modest about the 80% detection. I did not find that the software would ever transmit on what I, as a human, would have considered a busy frequency. However, there were times that it did not want to transmit because of what it perceived as a busy

Re: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-10 Thread Danny Douglas
: Saturday, March 10, 2007 1:02 AM Subject: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info) As is often the case in engineering, Jose, perfect is the enemy of good. What Rick KN6KB discovered while developing SCAMP's busy detector was that he could detect CW, PSK, Pactor

Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Jose A. Amador
wa8vbx wrote: Jose it might sound absurd, but then again man flying to the moon, satellite communications and cellphones, they all at one time were called absurded, but they are real now. Don't know in Cuba but here, almost everyone has a cellphone. After waiting and watching what is

Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Demetre SV1UY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After waiting and watching what is going on with the larger picture, I see a lot of obstination and fundamentalistic thinking in this thread. The fundamendalistic, blinds on, taliban quarreling going on about

Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Kurt
, Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know, the mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote digital radio at all. 73 de Demetre SV1UY I am not bashing any mode, as I use most of them at one time or another, and trying my hand at ALE right now. But I

Re: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Jose A. Amador
Kurt wrote: Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know, the mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote digital radio at all. 73 de Demetre SV1UY I am not bashing any mode, as I use most of them at one time or another, and trying my hand at ALE

Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Dave Bernstein
AA6YQ comments below --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems I did not make my point. A large portion of Winlinks popping out of nowhere is because some H I D D E N (in the skip zone) user has triggered it. That's exactly right, Jose. But if

Re: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Jose A. Amador
Then, we need a codesmith that does away with those inaccurate assertions. The bona fide attempts of Rick with SCAMP has opened a can of worms... I don't even think he foresaw this, as many think it is simpler than it really is to do it WELL. It is no kids play. Let's wait for the magic code.

Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)

2007-03-09 Thread Dave Bernstein
As is often the case in engineering, Jose, perfect is the enemy of good. What Rick KN6KB discovered while developing SCAMP's busy detector was that he could detect CW, PSK, Pactor, and SSB at an ~80% confidence level without enormous difficulty. SCAMP beta testers were amazed by the