kd4e wrote:
It is now a closed issue at the FCC - *every* station
*must* prevent QRM of other stations. Period. No exceptions.
I guess that's the end of DX contesting in USA?
Bonnie KQ6XA
The ARRL has come under criticism in the past because it did not provide
enough input from the membership and I suspect that they are opening up
this line of communication from the members to even ask the questions to
determine what it is that we want (or not want), before they start
making
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot design is 144.2 MHz, as it is
specifically intended for SSB operation. The Jaybeam was a commercial
implementation of the skeleton-slot which it used as a driver with rows of
reflectors and directors aligned with the top and bottom driven
Conventional wisdom has it that the horizontal polarization of
television signals was established to prevent having a net on top of
every house that would trap and injure birds.
Here is another theory from:
http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/technology/2001/horizontal_bol.html
The only
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stacked 7 elm cushcrafts back
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce,
When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about
wide band HSMM on 6-meters?
You are worried about 100 kHz when the band maybe opens in a few
years out of a 4,000 kHz wide band. Get real! Attach brain to keyboard.
I am getting very tired of reading about something you know
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date:
John Champa wrote:
Bruce,
When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about wide
band HSMM on 6-meters?
You are worried about 100 kHz when the band maybe opens in a few
years out of a 4,000 kHz wide band. Get real! Attach brain to
keyboard.
I am getting very tired of
Roger,
Thanks for the feedback, but it wasn't intended to be CIVIL,
just as Bruce's uninformed rants about a mode he has never
experienced are not intended to be anything but bothersome.
I like Bruce when he sticks to something he knows about, but
when he starts rambling on and on about some
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was used by 17
stations is't usless to all others ...
IM DONE
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce
Brucey boy. HSMM is NETWORKED radio. Do you know what
that means? It means that ALL stations...
All stations are on the SAME 100 kHz segment, just as in APRS
packet radio...all stations are on ONE frequency.
Get it yet? So it's still 2.5% of the band, OK?
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original
Very cute, Bonnie!
Obviously there are AT LEAST two sets of regulations
1. What is written in the books (CFR, etc.)
2. What is actually ENFORCED.
Reference: The Sociology of Regulations by Bonnie Crystal, KQ6XA,
as published in the Summer Issue, CQ-VHF Magazine.
Thanks,
John - K8OCL
John,
It is you who are the offensive one. And you have done this a number of
times on this group. Reasonable people do not win friends and influence
people with that approach.
No one with your vitriol should have remained in a leadership position
with the ARRL Digital HSMM group and I wonder
Bruce,
You are just one big lovable DINOSAUR.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun
I support efforts for new 100kHz bandwidth digital on 6 meters.
It's about time hams do something interesting and new with 6 meters.
In California and most of the western part of North America, 6 meters
is 4MHz of Wasteland. 99% of the time, it is largely a vacant band
of valuable VHF spectrum.
Rick,
Unless you have had the opportunity to lead such an effort, it
is you who should knock it off. Obviously you have never stepped
into the heat. Lack the courage to lead, Rick? So you too are writing from
a non-experienced position, non-leadership situation, just like my old
friend Bruce?
John,
Look at your continued choice of language! You just do not have a clue
about leadership or you would never talk like that. You are
intentionally polarizing and increase, rather than decrease opposition
to what you think you are promoting.
Be careful when you start to make claims of what
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you have had the opportunity to lead such an effort, it
is you who should knock it off.
That's wrong, John. A leader must not only accept, but actively
solicit critique from everywhere, not
Dave,
What are you writing about?
Sorry, but I am not leading anything! When I was I used the
approach you suggest. But now I am NOT, so may I have your
permission to speak my mind as I wish?
Also, I am not selling anything either, nor trying to pursuade anybody
of anything. Do it anyway you
Rick,
Go get a life. I am not leading or selling ANYTHING.
I am telling you that from here the 6M band is DEAD.
And, the 100 kHz segment I would like the Plan to set aside for
HSMM testing is up around 53-54 MHz, and NOT on any frequencies that are
set
aside for weak signal, DXing, radio
OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE no rebuttals please..
ONE LAST TIME .
1st when did I EVER state I was a lawyer? As for ill
informed how may receive stations did your 24/7/365
experiment use to show the lack of interference from
your proposed mode ?
ANSWER ONLY ONE and he was
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
What are you writing about?
I was commenting on your post.
Sorry, but I am not leading anything! When I was I used the
approach you suggest. But now I am NOT, so may I have your
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
100 khz wide is now legal abovee 219 so you have lots
of room. You have never been on 6 or you have a junk
station since this is the bottom of the cycle and 10
is not open either so lets take it too lets not
forget 15, 12 and CB on one on them either
EVEN if
Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages
between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth.
If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with
emails to each other, or take it to another forum.
Kurt
K8YZK
Kurt wrote:
Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages
between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth.
If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with
emails to each other, or take it to another forum.
Kurt
K8YZK
Yes
Suggestion?
Don't hold your breath while you are waiting for this to happen (HI).
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] FCC's Riley Cross Clarify
Date:
28 matches
Mail list logo
