Well,
it's not the usage I'm not clear on but rather architecture.
Would anyone be able to comment on the issues raised?
Thanks
On Jan 2, 2:20 pm, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> Artem Skvira wrote:
> > Is it worth asking this question is dev group?
>
> No. Your usage
By product name :
By date approval :
views.py
import Q
def proreport(request):
query = request.GET.get('q', '')
query1 = request.GET.get('p', '')
print query
print query1
if query and query1 :
qset = (
I'm not sure what you're passing to the template, but when you iterate
over a form it doesn't yield the actual fields, it yields BoundField
instances.
Alex
On Jan 1, 11:57 pm, Keyton Weissinger wrote:
> OK. I changed the code below to (note .items):
>
> {% for key, value_list
OK. I changed the code below to (note .items):
{% for key, value_list in my_dict.items %}
{{ key }}
{% for item in value_list %}
{{ item }}
{% endfor %}
{% endfor %}
Now I get the full key value but for each item (which again is a form
field) I get something like this
I'm passing a dictionary of values that look something like this:
{'name1':[field1, field2, field3], 'name2':[field4, field5,field6]..}
Each key is a simple string and each value is a list of form fields.
I should be able to do something like this in the template to render
same:
{% for key,
On Jan 2, 2:17 pm, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> vernon wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> > When I was first experimenting with Django on my local machine with
> > the bundled webserver, one of the things I was really impressed by was
> > the speed — everything was instantaneous.
Artem Skvira wrote:
> Is it worth asking this question is dev group?
>
No. Your usage question does not belong on the dev group. It belongs
here, on the user group.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vernon wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> When I was first experimenting with Django on my local machine with
> the bundled webserver, one of the things I was really impressed by was
> the speed — everything was instantaneous. Listing things in the DB,
> modifying and saving changes etc...
>
> I finally
Hi everyone,
When I was first experimenting with Django on my local machine with
the bundled webserver, one of the things I was really impressed by was
the speed — everything was instantaneous. Listing things in the DB,
modifying and saving changes etc...
I finally decided to deploy the
On Jan 1, 3:23 pm, waltbrad wrote:
>
> Okay, I'm getting closer. By using this code:
>
Okay, again. I think I'm getting closer yet. After looking into the
documentation, I changed the code to use the (% url %} template tag.
I previously thought you could only use that
Thanks a lot!
- Jan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Alan wrote:
> Hi Russell
> Thank you very much for your explanation.
> I understand that being an apps reusable, should it be so its templatetags
> and so, probably, the best place is in apps folder.
> However, in my case, where all my apps
I have a webapp that is accessed by the following urls (among others):
example.com/foobar-page-23
example.com/preferences
example.com/barfoo
etc.
When these URL's are access, the page is displayed using data from the
user who is logged in via request.user.
I also want it so the user can link
On Jan 1, 2:42 pm, waltbrad wrote:
> Let me try this again, I'm not sure my other post was understood very
> well.
>
> In Bennett's book he wants the Coltrane blog to allow browsing of
> entries and links by tag. So, I'm trying to write the tag templates
> to that end.
Let me try this again, I'm not sure my other post was understood very
well.
In Bennett's book he wants the Coltrane blog to allow browsing of
entries and links by tag. So, I'm trying to write the tag templates
to that end. But I don't see how this can be done with the code from
the book.
I've
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2009-01-01, o godz. 19:07, przez Michał Moroz:
> I don't think this is optimal - after some looking at code there would
> be a get_template() called 30 times. On the other hand, writing
> ifequal tags for each type of message in main template should be
> faster, but the
Hello, Djangoists!
I'm wondering how fast is the include tag. Currently I have a Message
model, which takes role of site messaging system with two ways of
delivering - through a dashboard page and through Jabber. Via Jabber,
each type of message has dedicated template and that template is then
Your suggestion about iterator is just what I was looking for!
values_list() is also good to know about.
Many thanks!
On Dec 28 2008, 10:39 pm, "join.toget...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Three things:
>
> 1:http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/querysets/#iterator
>
Hi
For the organisation matter you could create an app called "core" or
whatever, in it you can place all the general stuff.
CU,
Fatrix
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post
Hi,
The next Iowa Python Users Group meeting is Monday, January 5th, 2009,
barring bad weather. We will be meeting from 7-9 p.m. at the following
location:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office
2369 Jessup Ave
Marshalltown, IA 50158
Currently we have one tentative speaker scheduled and a workshop
Hi Russell
Thank you very much for your explanation.
I understand that being an apps reusable, should it be so its templatetags
and so, probably, the best place is in apps folder.
However, in my case, where all my apps needs the same templatetags, I would
like to have the option of defining
They don't want to make it too easy now do they!
I'd love to try it out but it will have to wait until there's an
idiot's installer :)
On Jan 1, 3:16 am, urlwolf wrote:
> actually, it looks like one has to build netbeans from source... not
> being a java person, how dif
I'm also using Django 1.0 [1.0-final-SVN-unknown] and I was getting
Invalid block tag errors while using both:
* {% comment_form %} and
* {% free_comment_form %}
The solution that works for me is: {% render_comment_form %} with the
syntax:
* {% render_comment_form for [object] %}
* {%
On Dec 31 2008, 11:58 pm, gkelly wrote:
> I am having the following error sent to my email from a live site. I
> haven't been able to reproduce the error myself, but was hoping
> someone could point me in the right direction as to how to solve this.
>
> First of all, is it
Is it worth asking this question is dev group?
On Dec 31 2008, 1:56 am, Artem Skvira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some issues with djangopermissionsmodel. Please bear in mind
> that I have just started learning django so feel free to correct me if
> I'm wrong :)
>
> First
Is it worth asking this question is dev group?
On Dec 31 2008, 1:56 am, Artem Skvira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some issues with djangopermissionsmodel. Please bear in mind
> that I have just started learning django so feel free to correct me if
> I'm wrong :)
>
> First
26 matches
Mail list logo