Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Dr. Werner Furlan
hi Simon, On 14 Feb 2008 at 11:30, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote: Taking things a step further - it would not be at all difficult to allow other programs to send K3 commands to / from the K3 through another program. This program (server) controls the serial comms and supports an unlimited

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
Actually I gave some thought to this project this morning, specifically allowing many programs simultaneous and transparent access to a K3 where the programs talk K3 CAT. My conclusion is that it's easy, the hard part having been written already by Phil N8VB, specifically his virtual serial

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Tom AK2B
Software that interfaces to rigs over the single RS-232 port need to learn to play with each other. Developers have to stop writing code assuming there isn't a need for other software to also simultaneously interface with the rig. Standards have to be developed and quickly adopted that will

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Barry N1EU
I doubt that any of the popular contest logging programs (e.g. N1MM Logger, Writelog) are going to work with Omni-Rig. Omni-Rig does not expose a transparent serial port interface that would make all of a rig's CAT commands accessible to multiple (unmodified) programs. Omni-Rig requires using a

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Jerry Flanders
At 04:35 AM 2/15/2008, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote: Actually I gave some thought to this project this morning, specifically allowing many programs simultaneous and transparent access to a K3 where the programs talk K3 CAT. My conclusion is that it's easy, the hard part having been written

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-15 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
If I can make good enough progress with my current SSTV / HamDRM work then I'll put this together late March 2008. This is the only approach that will work properly, initially it will be for CAT support only, that is it will not be designed for DTR / RTS toggling etc. which we don't need with

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-14 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
Taking things a step further - it would not be at all difficult to allow other programs to send K3 commands to / from the K3 through another program. This program (server) controls the serial comms and supports an unlimited number of clients. The clients speak to the radio using the radio's

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-14 Thread Barry N1EU
Yes, Simon is describing what I had in mind - a software solution that can be implemented in the near future. Lacking such an RS-232 server program, we're left only able to run one CAT-capable program at a time. Unless your contest logging program implements its own version of cw skimmer or

RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-14 Thread VR2BrettGraham
W4TV continued: CI-V also allows for multiple controllers, though I have yet to see any other application that appears to properly implement its CSMA/CD protocol. There is no carrier switching or collision detection in the CI-V protocol. The data packets do not carry any checksum or

RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-14 Thread VR2BrettGraham
, February 14, 2008 7:39 PM To: 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence W4TV continued: CI-V also allows for multiple controllers, though I have yet to see any other application that appears to properly implement its CSMA/CD protocol. There is no carrier switching

RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
servers for every new (and old) radio to come along. 73, ... Joe, W4TV -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:02 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
The way to do this is to allow one program to talk to the K3 and support other programs via virtual serial ports. I do this with Ham Radio Deluxe, other programs talk to HRD via DDE, serial comms and soon via TCP/IP. HRD talks Kenwood via the virtual serial port. Simon Brown, HB9DRV

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread Augie Hansen
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: ... That is not an application software matter - it is something the radio manufacturers will need to fix in their CAT implementations. There is not a single radio that is capable- in either hardware or software - of reliably servicing two different radio control

RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:36 PM To: Joe Subich, W4TV; 'Barry N1EU'; 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence The way to do this is to allow one program to talk to the K3 and support other programs via virtual serial ports. I do

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread VR2BrettGraham
W4TV suggested to N1EU: I'd add one more development that I feel is necessary. Software that interfaces to rigs over the single RS-232 port need to learn to play with each other. That is not an application software matter - it is something the radio manufacturers will need to fix in their

RE: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-13 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Of VR2BrettGraham Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:41 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence W4TV suggested to N1EU: I'd add one more development that I feel is necessary. Software that interfaces to rigs over the single RS-232 port need to learn to play

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-12 Thread Barry N1EU
I heartily agree with Bill. The K3 is uniquely positioned to ride this new wave wherever it does or doesn't go. I'd add one more development that I feel is necessary. Software that interfaces to rigs over the single RS-232 port need to learn to play with each other. Developers have to stop

Re: [Elecraft] K3 Convergence

2008-02-12 Thread Michael E. Dobson
I was typing fast from memory Bill so got the $$ amount wrong but you included the computer as part of the total price I believe, I did not. Did you estimate kit or factory built prices for the contest configured K3? I think a kit version of a full contest K3 can be had for just under $3k