Hi,
Le jeu. 17 mars 2022 à 18:13, Joseph Spanier a écrit :
> Hey Guys,
> I am close to Tormach and actively working with them on their ROS driven
> robot.
Great!
They also use machinekit-hal for it, right?
If someone can concisely frame the situation and detail what you
> need I'd be happy
Hey Guys,
I am close to Tormach and actively working with them on their ROS driven
robot. If someone can concisely frame the situation and detail what you
need I'd be happy to make an intro with Rogge. I tried to find a clear
thread of this discussion on sourceforge that I could just forward to
Le ven. 4 mars 2022 à 02:13, Rod Webster a écrit :
> > Anyone close to ROS?
> Tormach. Anyone close to Tormach?
>
Maybe open a friendly issue/discussion there
https://github.com/tormach/hal_ros_control
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On Thursday, 3 March 2022 19:55:07 EST Rod Webster wrote:
> >Some of us remember when the EMC corporation sent their lawyers
> >calling because we had a similar name to them. No matter that we had
> >it first.
>
I'm one of them. And I was pissed at the audacity of a bookkeeper who was
a johnny
Below is Daniel Rogge ( Tormach CEO) email. He seems happy to correspond via
email to people who have questions about their products. I have spoken to him
about the software for their new ZA6 robot and he was happy to answer questions.
dro...@tormach.com
From:
> Anyone close to ROS?
Tormach. Anyone close to Tormach?
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 11:07, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Rod,
>
> I wish some of our LinuxCNC Gurus would know some of the ROS Gurus and
>
Rod,
I wish some of our LinuxCNC Gurus would know some of the ROS Gurus and
jointly meditate over this. We should possibly not discuss this too much
as a sole CNC/robotics problem. This tech is useful whenever you need to
synchronize something between multiple machines/devices.
I truly don't
>Some of us remember when the EMC corporation sent their lawyers
>calling because we had a similar name to them. No matter that we had
>it first.
Before my time.
There are plenty of examples where the user of an untrademarked name has
had to cease and desist after another organization trademarks
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 16:17, gene heskett wrote:
> I don't see the future risk as zero...
Some of us remember when the EMC corporation sent their lawyers
calling because we had a similar name to them. No matter that we had
it first.
Beckhof have been very clear that they own the word EtherCAT,
Le jeu. 3 mars 2022 à 16:14, Steffen Möller a
écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> I had a phone conversation with the EtherCAT Technology Group's
> president, Martin Rostan, this morning.
Thanks a lot for taking care of this
ETG's statutes (Satzung in German) do not allow non-legal entities to
>
Steffen
You have done some amazing work and we now know what we are dealing with
rather than just guessing as we've done before.
I think its not about the last 20 years but about the next 20. I think we
will see an increasing number of ethercat capable devices in use as more
vendors adopt the
Hi Marc,
yes, something like http://wiki.ros.org/soem ? I have not followed that up.
Best,
Steffen
On 03.03.22 16:54, Marc Wang wrote:
Hi Steffen,
By ROS, are you referring to Robotic Operating System (https://www.ros.org/)?
Regards,
Marc
From: andy pugh
On Thursday, 3 March 2022 10:49:53 EST andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 15:14, Steffen Möller
wrote:
> > But he took the freedom to point out that there are others who
> > are already shipping EtherCAT drivers and have not experienced any
> > legal problem at all - he just cannot make
Hi Steffen,
By ROS, are you referring to Robotic Operating System (https://www.ros.org/)?
Regards,
Marc
From: andy pugh
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 10:49 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] EtherCAT - would not be a prob with free
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 15:14, Steffen Möller wrote:
> But he took the freedom to point out that there are others who
> are already shipping EtherCAT drivers and have not experienced any legal
> problem at all - he just cannot make any promises of any sorts about the
> future
There is quite a gap
Dear all,
I had a phone conversation with the EtherCAT Technology Group's
president, Martin Rostan, this morning. To get an impression, you find
him in this PodCast https://www.sps-magazin.de/podcasts/ (German). Mr
Rostan sends his regards, expresses that he has a heart for all the
mills and
Den 2022-03-02 kl. 20:56, skrev Nicklas SB Karlsson:
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 22:06, skrev Jérémie Tarot:
Le mar. 1 mars 2022 à 21:40, Bari a écrit :
https://github.com/OpenEtherCATsociety/SOEM/blob/master/LICENSE
I don't understand how the last sentences could be compatible with GPL?
lhH
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 22:06, skrev Jérémie Tarot:
Le mar. 1 mars 2022 à 21:40, Bari a écrit :
https://github.com/OpenEtherCATsociety/SOEM/blob/master/LICENSE
I don't understand how the last sentences could be compatible with GPL?
lhH EtherCat https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/ I think is
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 23:35, skrev Rod Webster:
The reason why I put this on the agenda is that I observed that the debian
project uncovered a number of licenses which we had to include in our
copyright statement that deviated from the standard GPL licence. I was
quite surprised at this. I would
On 01.03.22 23:35, Rod Webster wrote:
The reason why I put this on the agenda is that I observed that the debian
project uncovered a number of licenses which we had to include in our
copyright statement that deviated from the standard GPL licence. I was
quite surprised at this. I would defer
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 4:20:42 PM EST Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
> Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:39, skrev Bari:
> > On 3/1/22 14:25, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
> >> Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:17, skrev Bari:
> >>> On 3/1/22 13:20, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
> Already have a simple implementation of an
The reason why I put this on the agenda is that I observed that the debian
project uncovered a number of licenses which we had to include in our
copyright statement that deviated from the standard GPL licence. I was
quite surprised at this. I would defer to Steffen on license issues and
Le mar. 1 mars 2022 à 22:22, Nicklas SB Karlsson a écrit :
>
> >
> > https://github.com/OpenEtherCATsociety/SOEM/blob/master/LICENSE
>
>
> Line below seems like a problem.
>
Exactly
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:39, skrev Bari:
On 3/1/22 14:25, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:17, skrev Bari:
On 3/1/22 13:20, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Already have a simple implementation of an Ethercat driver with
hardcoded configuration but read something about the license
Le mar. 1 mars 2022 à 21:40, Bari a écrit :
>
>
> https://github.com/OpenEtherCATsociety/SOEM/blob/master/LICENSE
I don't understand how the last sentences could be compatible with GPL?
>
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On 3/1/22 14:25, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:17, skrev Bari:
On 3/1/22 13:20, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Already have a simple implementation of an Ethercat driver with
hardcoded configuration but read something about the license problem
and have kept it for myself.
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 21:17, skrev Bari:
On 3/1/22 13:20, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Already have a simple implementation of an Ethercat driver with
hardcoded configuration but read something about the license problem
and have kept it for myself.
If you developed this yourself without being
On 3/1/22 13:20, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Already have a simple implementation of an Ethercat driver with
hardcoded configuration but read something about the license problem
and have kept it for myself.
If you developed this yourself without being under an NDA or some
contract with
On 01.03.22 20:15, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 13:27, skrev Rod Webster:
So I shared Steffen's post on the Ethercat section of the forum
calling for
technical volunteers. Maybe some of them are in this group already.
Den 2022-02-28 kl. 15:47, skrev Steffen Möller:
Hello again,
On 28.02.22 14:28, andy pugh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:22, Steffen Möller
wrote:
Personally I know nothing about EtherCAT. I have always been a little
afraid of the licensing complexities mentioned here:
Den 2022-03-01 kl. 13:27, skrev Rod Webster:
So I shared Steffen's post on the Ethercat section of the forum calling for
technical volunteers. Maybe some of them are in this group already.
So I shared Steffen's post on the Ethercat section of the forum calling for
technical volunteers. Maybe some of them are in this group already.
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/ethercat/45239-lets-get-ethercat-into-the-linuxcnc-distribution-need-technical-people-to-help
Lets hope the right people come
One could argue we are already in breach of their license by mentioning
Ethercat in our Debian package :)
There is no point suggesting something without being willing to contribute.
Therefore I am happy to be an admin contact using the email
ether...@vmn.com.au
There are others who are more
33 matches
Mail list logo
