Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-firstimpressions

> On 28 Dec 2023, at 12:55, gene heskett wrote: > > Any chance of updating the buildbots page yellow table? I can’t. I have no access to the buildbot. Anyway, the buildbot doesn’t build anything for arm64. ___ Emc-developers mailing list

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests - first impressions

Vom: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 01:55:44 +0100 > Then I installed a regular arm64-rt kernel but that then ruined the RPi > setup, so after a reboot I had no more Wifi and (worse) the ventilator was a > max I encountered similar problems and decided to build my own kernel. I created a "fire & forget"

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

The old buildbot ran on a pi but it was not robust and often pulled the whole system down. Rob M built a cross compiled buildbot solution using what we use for the official images but there was no response. To fix the buildbot somebody in charge of it actually has to want to fix it. Its really

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

On 12/28/23 09:05, Andy Pugh wrote: On 28 Dec 2023, at 12:55, gene heskett wrote: Any chance of updating the buildbots page yellow table? I can’t. I have no access to the buildbot. Anyway, the buildbot doesn’t build anything for arm64. Is that a lack of hardware? I have offered some in

[Emc-developers] linuxcnc REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the linuxcnc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.9.0~pre1+git20230208.f1270d6ed7-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 1056440,1058031,1058308 in

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 20:35, Rod Webster wrote: > Its really too late to offer solutions now, get behind the current build > process and work with it. You mean where I build the images by hand over the course of weeks? I don't think that's the ideal solution. -- atp "A motorcycle is a

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNClatencytests-firstimpressions

On 12/28/23 15:34, Rod Webster wrote: The old buildbot ran on a pi but it was not robust and often pulled the whole system down. Mine is the exact opposite. With a good psu. they run from forced reboot to forced reboot, A year at a time or more, ditto the bananpi-m5's. I haven't tried on the

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests - first impressions

Vom: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 23:02:26 + > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 14:07, Daniel Hiepler > wrote:oot I had no more Wifi and (worse) > the ventilator was a max > > > > I encountered similar problems and decided to build my own kernel. I > > created a "fire & forget" bash script to build an image from

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-first impressions

The odroid has been running fine all year, no need to do anything. Maybe I wasn't clear, the J was retired a while ago when I started using the Odroid. I now have 2 options for the "roll my own" EPP board, the HP T610 plus or the retired J. There is no issue with Odroid. It is fine. On

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests -first impressions

On 12/28/23 18:03, andy pugh wrote: On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 14:07, Daniel Hiepler wrote:oot I had no more Wifi and (worse) the ventilator was a max I encountered similar problems and decided to build my own kernel. I created a "fire & forget" bash script to build an image from the ground up

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests - first impressions

Linuxcnc only really needs one image, it's not really meant to be a General Purpose Distro, that is the image that has all that is required to get up and going. Anything else may cause confusion, as I've noticed some people can be a bit adverse to reading information or there can be a language

[Emc-developers] [PATCH] building-linuxcnc.adoc: Add gentoo instructions.

From: "Gary E. Miller" It should make sense to any gentoo user. --- docs/src/code/building-linuxcnc.adoc | 47 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/src/code/building-linuxcnc.adoc b/docs/src/code/building-linuxcnc.adoc index fe9ae27c22..2196d2d2ba

[Emc-developers] (no subject)

>From 5e664a9cd479df5b986d7b981ac09203b269965f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gary E. Miller" Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 17:30:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] building-linuxcnc.adoc: Add gentoo instructions. It should make sense to any gentoo user. --- docs/src/code/building-linuxcnc.adoc | 47

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latencytests-firstimpressions

Whilst I do have a cross compile setup, I did no such thing regarding a buildbot. I did offer my hardware for use, to which I received no reply, so I didn't bother with putting together a buildbot. On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 7:35 AM Rod Webster wrote: > The old buildbot ran on a pi but it was not

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests - first impressions

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 14:07, Daniel Hiepler wrote:oot I had no more Wifi and (worse) the ventilator was a max > > I encountered similar problems and decided to build my own kernel. I created > a "fire & forget" bash script to build an image from the ground up and > compiles linuxcnc+rt kernel

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests - first impressions

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 10:05 AM andy pugh wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 14:07, Daniel Hiepler > wrote:oot I had no more Wifi and (worse) > the ventilator was a max > > > > I encountered similar problems and decided to build my own kernel. I > created a "fire & forget" bash script to build an

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-first impressions

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 03:24, gene heskett wrote: > All packages are up to date. > W: Skipping acquire of configured file '2.9-rt/source/Sources' as > repository 'https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm InRelease' does not seem > to provide it (sources.list entry misspelt?) There isn't a 2.9-rt for

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-firstimpressions

On 12/28/23 02:34, Rod Webster wrote: The Pi image is forked from here https://github.com/pyavitz/rpi-img-builder It is based on the official Raspberry Pi kernel https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux (rpi-6.1-y branch ) with Debian Bookworm wrapped around it. It uses a cross compilation

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-firstimpressions

Ahhh I've given up on anything happening for the RPi5 regarding the SPI stuff. Going my own way with a "roll my own" EPP card, got a little HP T610 Plus that should be fine for running the '53 based Myford ML7\Super 7 abomination. Or a J dual core celeron board that gathering dust after

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-first impressions

>Or a J dual core celeron >board that gathering dust after jumping onto >the Odroid bandwagon. I don't think this is insurmountable. I would build the 6.6 kernel and install the R8125-dkms network driver. It should be fine. I do have a happy Odroid except its running ethercat (on Bullseye)

Re: [Emc-developers] RPi5 + Raspbian + LinuxCNC latency tests-firstimpressions

On 12/28/23 06:46, andy pugh wrote: On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 03:24, gene heskett wrote: All packages are up to date. W: Skipping acquire of configured file '2.9-rt/source/Sources' as repository 'https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm InRelease' does not seem to provide it (sources.list entry