Whether or not my intellect was satisfied with this or that superficial thing
about Maharishi or the Movement is irrelevant.
Anybody who has experienced that magic moment of surrender and engagement just
before liftoff in the flying sutra, how can they fret over such little things?
Power,
I am surprised that the news media chose to report that the Vice President had
a stroke rather than report on this beautiful gesture by the incoming Colombian
President.
It is a GREAT post - the photos are amazing! Just a month ago when Bolivia's
President Evo Morales took power for his second
Tu me acostumbraste led me to an awesome favorite by Rey Ruiz, No Me
Acostumbro!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
He sings bolero music, Tu Me Acostumbraste.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUVDPe7bDT4feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Y73sPHKxw
Ahead of His Time: Roger McGuinn of the Byrds wrote these lyrics in 1966 for a
song called `5D'. The words hint at some pretty genuine experiences...
Oh, how is it that I could come out to here
And be still floating
And never hit bottom
And keep falling through
Just relaxed and paying attention
When all has fallen away and Dissolved all the distracting
complication which is a hallmark of mind goes as well. What one
*thought* they knew which was a benchmark of ego wisdom (?) blows
away as dust in the wind. hahahahahahahahah Over and done.
Entering into the Unknowing Beyond
Namaste Guruji and all,
Namaste and Beauty FILLED evening,
*Guruji, I wanted to thank you for your responses to my most recent
posts.
S The satsang videos are a wonderful blessing for all.
*Also, I have had two other questions that keep coming up all
the time. I think I have addressed them
This is a profound question Ron. I hope others weigh it.
I think you have given a false choice here,
Response:
It is not my choice- it is for each to choose - I was addressing the
ones that are not happy with TM, for the ones that are, you are all set
For the ones that are not, what' s
Here is the definite spelling- Padamalai
It was first published in 2004
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by
David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana. The
difference in this book compard
Since this thread is one of many where there are some that are happy
to be where they are with TM and then some indicating they would
have nothing to do with TM, my question to the latter is what is it
you have decided to do now?
Have you continued seeking another path that can bring about
Hello,
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana. The
difference in this book compard with other acountings is the real
essence of what the path is there without sugar
I think this book title is Padamali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana
The short explanation of this which will be easily understood is
enlightened are not performing Sidhis because there is no one to be
the performer, no desires for such things but they do occur around
the enlightened, it just happens
A performer of sidhis is not enlightened
--- In
Sat Guru:
0- Inner Guru is that which resonates with Truth, that
the Sat Guru ignites with Living Expression and methdologies
that pull away the layers of untruth, until simply the Reality
rather than a projection remains.
Sage:
Go Guru, Go Guru, get your Groove on, Go Guru!!
Sat Guru:
Om Namo Narayan -
Great Day
This is not a chat list but rather an working
online Ashram. As such there are some rules
and regulations. The following are Musts and
not simply suggestions.
1. Post an introduction as per the instructions
sent via the automatically generated mail.
2. Post
OM Namo Narayan,
Attempted to write something this morning about this one's
background, but fell Silent. Only thing that came to 'mind'
was: insignificantly significant. Once there was a me that
beleived in True Peace, now there remains no *one* that Lives AS
True Peace. This, sweet friends,
This looks good from what they write:
http://www.siddhyog.org/shaktipat_diksha_-_initiation.htm
The world is as you are. Develop unbounded consciousness and the Universe is
yours
OM Namo Narayan -
0- The Miracle is when all falls away and simply the Extraordinary
Ordinary of 0 point balance remains. Then One begins to Live -
when the illusion is laid bare then an even Greater Mystery is
Entered. Hahahahahahahahahah
Maha Shanti
Comment:
Also, I realized that I no longer care what people think of my
experience. I'm no longer guarding it. It is what it is. Opinions and
perceptions are barely fazing me. I'm delighting in this liberation.
Go ahead, think me crazy, no problem! If the nut bus is headed to
Realization,
0
Namaste - Siddhis come as a matter of course - but development of Siddhis is
not what
the path is about - it is about entering the Best of the Siddhis which is
Realization where all conditioned knowledge is at an end. Siddhis are signposts
along the
way. Maha Shanti OM
(Reply)
ater all these years of doing tm and if regular and sincere with it, I would
submit there is a
good chance that one would move rapidly by taking diksha under the terms
specified
below.
my experience dictates that it is different to have the initiation by the
diciple compared
with the sat
Namaste Guru G and Amy,
G :the *you* that you speak of is no more. When *you* is used by
One that is Realized it is only used as a manner of speaking.
The *you* is no more - it belongs to the illusion of maya.
In Lila what dances is that One Singular Essense which is One.
Udit: That's right.
Actually, the guru is only a guide and it has been stated here that one must
walk the path
alone ultimately. This is no way means that while one is with the Guru, the
evolution is not in
full force until one is walking the path on their own but just the opposite.
From that well known verse-
Om Namo Narayan
Sahaja means effortless and continuous -
(not simply the result of being in sitting meditation)
This is rather a continous state of Consciousness versus
an experience that comes and goes.
Sarvikalpa - is still having an identity but it is merged
in Oneness. Being One
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Om Namo Narayan
Sahaja means effortless and continuous -
(not simply the result of being in sitting meditation)
This is rather a continous state
in actuality by now, all the stances of all
the members in
this forum are known and it is not going to change any time soon most likely,
so now what
- do you want a medal?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote
Namaste all,
Namaste and Grace-filled Evening,
* While reading through the posts a question popped up. In the
realized
state how do you feel about your loved ones?
S There is no sense that the loved one is different than the self
and within this purity, love and compassion flow
. They repeat the
stuff they've been told (and, more often than not, *sold*)
by teachers who told them that they *needed* a teacher to
realize who they are. They go on and on like Ron does
about how a guru is essential, and how doing exactly what
he or she says is essential to become enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
That moment often is referred to by the enlightened as
the pivotal moment in their lives in which the seed of
realization was planted. It may not have actually been
*doing* the Something Else that
It is not possible to have a useful discussion with Ron as long as
you cannot even read and understand the simplest of statements.
HP: Well Nabby, we know in advance that there is not going to be a discussion
between us
did not write what you claim, it's not useful for me with
another
I'm happy that you found reality with a guru that suggest reading
material and meetings for the enlightened to stay enlightened
Ron. Now that's real enlightenment, right ? ;-)
The update in my path here is My Guru said there are 5 that have unfolded in
Realization.
Maybe it is even 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives boo_lives@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
There are wild things
taking place with Gurus these days.
The claim from your guru to have brought 5 into enlightenment probably
is the wildest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I'm happy that you found reality with a guru that suggest
reading
material and meetings for the enlightened to
stay enlightened
Ron. Now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion, 5 or 8 people enlightened in 8 years isn't an extraordinary
track record. I'm sure there are many gurus who could claim that, but I'm
not sure that there are many who would.
I think it is an area of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:08 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for Nabby
As far
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, andrasayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the source of Nityananda saying that none of his diciples
were enlightened?
My Guru knows someone that was there at the time of his passing. He had said
not one came
that was there for a bigger Me. My guru
HP : Well lemme think, what would be the purpose in knowing or
believeing that my Guru has
brought 5 to enlightenment since 1999. For those interested in a
Guru who may be
available to work with, it would be most useful I would guess.
Nabby: Of course, if it was true. But since it is just a
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Amy Hard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namaste GuruJ.
OM Namo Narayan -
In response to your post below: Why does the veil of illusion even exist? I
realize it's a
joke, but it seems like a cruel one. :(
0- one got lost in the story and the projections and this is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the soul expands and overshadows the body,
Then you realize you are the energy of the soul,
And you no longer experience yourself, as the body,
But you experience yourself as an energy called 'The Soul'.
In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote
This is for those who never tasted ice cream:
It is sweet, really really creamy, cold, and melts when warmed up -
ok, now do you fully get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first, I was very annoyed about the announcement that they intended
to build hundreds of these towers of invincibility around the world, at
several mil a pop, which seemed only to designed to tell Bevan et al
Namaste
Thankyou Jeff for your post -
Jyoti took Diksha and was ripe
this was the first time that someone
actually transcended and imploded into
Realization at Diksha. It was great. hahahahahaha
Just gave the last of the mantras and her new name
and said now nyingje no longer remains
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/2/07 12:17:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Namaste
Thankyou Jeff for your post -
Jyoti took Diksha and was ripe
this was the first time that someone
actually
Note: 0 = Swami G, The question here is answered by two of the enlightened :
Another question: Not to burst anyone's bubble, but I was just#8232;
wondering if Diksha can
wear off? Or if it is possible to slip back#8232; into an ego after one
reaches realization?
#8232;#8232;0- As long as
Note: 0 = Swami G, The question here is answered by two of the enlightened :
Another question: Not to burst anyone's bubble, but I was just
wondering if Diksha can
wear off? Or if it is possible to slip back into an ego after one
reaches realization?
0- As long as mind does not re-root it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge no_reply@
wrote:
Yes, the rudrabhisek is a yagya for peace
Seems like we have been in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The fallacy is
I haven't been hanging around FFL long enough ( 3- 4 year pause) to know if
that one
known as peter reveals where the consciousness is resting. In the short time
span of my
return, I have noticed questions directed that way towards Peter and they went
unanswered. This post is the first one I
,
the first man said -- I don't need a teacher. Fool you are, said the second
man. I'm sure
you'll drop dead any moment.
-Bronte
Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namaste Beautiful ones,
Here's a parable:
There was a man who had heard of this great thing called
Well it certainly sounds hilarious!
0- it IS - it is the great cosmic joke - as there is no one there
to be Enlightened. What remains is Reality. There is Bliss but
not a someone to be blissful. The past is over as if it never was.
The Divine Essence which is Life is what is paramount and
Om Namo Narayan 0 -
why is it that ego has the egotisitcal mindset that through
lurking one has no obligations to support what is given
here, and that if one just remains under the radar that they
will hear Just the Right thing and then they can do it ALL
on their own.
If ego could do it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
Gimminee critters, Ron. Here you go again. You are a nice, sincere
guy, but this proselytizing is a drag. Isn't it an edifice of the
ego
Note From Hridaya- I pick out interesting comments from the enlightened in my
Path- 0=
Swami G, S= Swami Fisshananda, and then Sarojini. These short comments coming
from
the three have similar or the same air to them because it is that One essence
from which
they speak. Maybe some enjoy
Title says it all
Namaste Beautiful ones,
Here's a parable:
There was a man who had heard of this great thing called air. He
had never seen air before, experienced air before or even knew that
air existed. So, he went to a local teacher of air to teach him all
about it.
What is air? Where is it? How can I
.
Hridaya Puri
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
**Here is one excerpt from my gurus writtings:
As Ramana melted within Arunachala
obedient and surrendered and never did
he leave his Guru's
I think I have run into more than 20 people in the last 1.5 years claiming
enlightenment,
most are self declared in one form or another ( the other is some confusingh
thing where I
think they are claiming enlightenment but I have to guess at what it is they
are claiming).
Often it is their
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, oneradiantbeing
oneradiantbeing@ wrote:
DS: No, that was not written to Rick. I thought I was responding
to Hridaya Puri or Ron (I believe they are the same person),
whose
name appeared at the bottom of the post (see below). Please
Ok, lemme explain something- I had experiences meeting many that claimed
enlightenment but it wasn't the case. My experiences were not good. Too many
and too
much stuff to write in this post now. As a result of the meetings for example,
I was
depressed at times, bummed out, and confusion was
OK Rick,
Now asking in public so all can participate. I suspect that all of those that
you know that
you say are realized have proclaimed this on their own without their Guru
declaring this,
or they did not or currently do not have a guru, or they have their own inner
Guru- either
in some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you about premature claims to enlightenment. I think they are
common. If the people I'm referring to were saying I have reached the
pinnacle of human evolution or if they displayed egotism or even if they
Amy: Will we become mindless and not be able to write, speak, and
thus work, take care of ourselves, etc. in the midst of this
process?
Sarojini: Oh no, dear, dear one. This will not be the case what-so-
ever. The body/mind will continue on, for the most part, as it
always has. The
**Note- G = Swami Ganaga Puri ( my Guru), the asteric is a disciple of
Christine Breese,
who has videos up on your tube:
As for the real question about whether this is true, RAMANA
contradicted his own teaching that the guru is necessary (and he would
be tickled to see that this has come
HERE IS WHAT RAMANA SAID: THE SELF, OR THE ATMAN, IS THE GURU. HE
ALSO SAYS THAT THE SELF - OR GRACE - MAY GUIDE THE SEEKER TO FIND AN
OUTER (LIVING) GURU.
I'VE NOT HEARD ABOUT RAMANA HAVING AN EXTERNAL GURU. PLEASE HAVE YOUR
GURU SEND YOU THE SOURCE OF HIS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THIS GURU
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron (or shoud we call you by your new name?), what's
the name of the guru commissioned by Poonjaji?
-Peter
Well, I took sanyas- it is more karma sanya, the name Hridaya Puri means
something like
living in the city
If my posts are pissing you off, you may consider hitting the delete button
whenever you see
a post from me
All this mix of gurus is probably the reason for your profound
confusion, IMO.
i have had this come up a lot with people telling me this and i found my Guru's
words and
guidance comforting in the middle of the last incident. It was with one
claiming
enlightenment. Something came up like so and so was stealing and then my
inclination
was to point that this is not a good
Comment from post:--But Shakti comes from the teacher, igniting the student's
Shakti.
HR: Again, the central issue is that the fallacy is that a me gains
enlightenment. As long
as there is a me that is there, there is further to go. Cognitions belong to
those having
them, absolute IS all
is that a
me becomes enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, purushaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron---You don't understand, how many times do we have to go over
this? In Muktananda's tradition, there's a transfer of Shakti from
the BODY(s) of Muktananda to the BODY(s) of the disciple
and his father was an enlightened being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
The use of words may be frustrating in this case. Often My Guru
will say this one
Right, but Ramana Maharshi and others say I'. Saying this one all
the time is ridiculous!..
HP: My guru
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
george.deforest@ wrote:
Ron, is the reason you mentioned 'cognizing the vedas' because
of
the rumor spread by TB's (probably purushoids) that Mahesh
www.kundalinisupport.com
if there is further interest, you may want to join the yahoo group, it is
active, not for
lurkers, participation is required
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nayakanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ron!
As a rare visitor to this group (though very
Response:
I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not enlightened. I
can only
provide some intellectual response. Such as, the vedas is not what is cognized,
it was
relative things cognizesd- vedic math is relative, so it jyotish, and
scripture. when all
relative is gone,
Comment:
Personally, I get the feeling that the vast maj-
ority of gurus who claim that their followers
need them to get enlightened in reality need
their followers far more than the followers need
them. If the followers weren't there hanging off
every word and paying the bills, these gurus
would
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Response:
I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not
enlightened. snip
Comment: If you or anyone else can explain to me how the Vedas can be
cognized *before* enlightenment, I owe you a nickel
Oh well, maybe he did, and certainly from my POV lives the Reality
of the Vedas. And no doubt ime he has the ability to cognize them--
I'm not disputing that. But he sure hasn't had the time to
*document* his cognition.:
Hridaya Puri: One doesn't live the reality of the vedas and at the same time
I suppose the paradox is there- maybe in thinking of the snake and string it
clears it up-
The significant thing is a process of ilimination for what is transcient and
what is eternal.
All that which is transcient has a reality to it but short lived and therefore
no reality so a
paradox
, and the time frame is favorable- eternity.
Again, intuition says that the following statement from my Guru is correct- it
is never
what one thought it was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron, unfortuanately you're wasting your breath on
these mala covered
.
Of course, the Me can't gain realization but that's another
topic,
closely related.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I suppose the paradox is there- maybe in thinking of the snake
and
string it clears it up-
The significant thing
--Nope, you're wrong. There is an I after realization but it's not
the delusional I as before.
Response: what happens to that I when you die? ( drop the body?)- and what
happens to
the eternal Being?
By process of illimination- whatever is left after everything else is gone-
this is not
I am not enlightened and can not say from direct experience - I can only pass
along what
3 people here say in my path- then again, the honesty of the situation is
unless it is
known from direct experience, then it is a belief system- so you have my
beliefs
presented.
I will let you know
1. I had felt caged in all these years from not living in a proper vastu
Response from my Guru when I asked is anything had ever caged her in- no
2. cognitions of vedas
Response from my Guru- cognitions, discoveries, knowing what needs to be known
about
anything, sidhis, cognizing all of
That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it... :-)
Response: A spontaneous thought that came is yes, as long as there is a me, you
may stick
with that but it is inevitable that when the time is right, you won't be
sticking with the me as
it will only Be, and the Me will be as stciky as if being
to express
the inexpressible. It also cuts through the crap
of the intellect, in that one doesn't have to
try to imagine what is being discussed; it is
here and now, part of one's experience.
In a way, it's the thing that Ron keeps harping
on, but never seems to understand
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron
sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt
qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an
incomplete
description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the
reality
.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron
sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt
qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an
incomplete
description
of existence.
Of course, any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--Thanks, this is quite obvious if one defines the me = I; the
notion of a delusional self associated with the mind as an identity
separate from Pure Consciousness.
Hridaya puri:I suppose getting the definitions matching
This is a very complicated post - my opinion is it serves to get the mind
engaged- where
as enlightenment is very simple- the me falls away, then there only IS
They say that then it was known that there never was a me, it was Maya- ego
is the
maya- so no cosmic ego's in my path
--- In
I just read this to swami G and she said yea, that's what happens
It might be quite complicated , but it does/can lead
the mind towards transcending itself. I agree that
enlightenment is simple, but it can come as quite a
shock when the mind attempts to reference itself, to
feel itself as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
interactions by virtue of
ongoing bodily impulses and the capacity to engage in entirely new,
creative, and original enterprises.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@ wrote:
--The statement
Namaste Sajani and Holly,
When one comes upon That which IS, all else - every little
experience (vision, dream, sounds, Samadhi, etc) that ever happened
is absolutely burned to dust. Visions, experiences, dreams,
insights are all wonderful in that they can help to keep one
motivated to
The enlightened say that there is no change when the body drops.
People are drawn to very complicated explainations. My Guru's comments is that
people
hear it and dont understand it and think wow he is great. The complexity in all
ways adds
to keeping one from unfolding enlightenment which IS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance. It's the nature of the
human spirit
to wake up.
My comments, coming from my path will mirror that of Ramana Maharishi's
admonisions.
Regarding a mentor or
Well Bronte,
The honesty of this situation is I have presented my beliefs. Your beliefs are
otherwise.
That's fine- so this is how it stands.
[Bronte: The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance.
It's the nature of the human spirit to wake up.]
Ron:
My comments
Namaste Guru G and all
G:Having things stripped bare is not an attractive offer. hahahahahah
people want to have *thier* lives but to have them Enhanced. And
Surrender doesn't equate with the idea that *I* can get *Realization* .
N: Being striped isn't attractive ether all the slobber and bed
postings in the past, your guru is of the traditional variety. I read the
interchange you
published on FFL between her and your friend and was appalled. I intend no
insult to you
personally, but Ron, I have to be frank. I just don't go for that stuff.
So I have no desire to communicate
1 - 100 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
