--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When someone claims to know more about TM than MMY,
the conversation screeches to an immediate halt and
one politely excuses oneself because they left
something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must chat
Although your last two paragraphs get a bit flaky, Richard, I have to
say this is one of the best damn posts you've ever done.
Well said!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
When someone claims to know more about TM than MMY,
Curtis wrote:
Ya gotta love the theater of the absurd performed
by Nabby, Richard and me arguing about which one
of us mad hatters understands MMY's teacher BETTER!
Excuse me, Curtis, it has not been established that
you understand anything about the teaching of TM. The
evidence is right
Peter wrote:
When someone claims to know more about TM than MMY,
the conversation screeches to an immediate halt and
one politely excuses oneself because they left
something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must
chat later, yes, indeed.
Well, yes, while the Maharishi was acting like a
v I never claimed to understand Maharishi fully.
Only fools like you do.
And I never said fully. By ranking my understanding you certainly
did imply better.
Resorting to name calling like referring to me as a fool is not just
obnoxious, it reflects an overgeneralized view of me. Each of us
Curtis wrote:
Richard didn't need it,he just knows!
Don't be a fool, Curtis, - there's not a single thing
you can learn at a TTC, CCP, or ATC, that you can't
learn right where you are sitting. Some of you TM
teachers get all puffed up with pride at all your
vaulted learning. Keep it simple -
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis wrote:
Richard didn't need it,he just knows!
Don't be a fool, Curtis, - there's not a single
thing
you can learn at a TTC, CCP, or ATC, that you can't
learn right where you are sitting. Some of you TM
teachers get all puffed up
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shemp wrote:
Although your last two paragraphs get a bit flaky,
Richard, I have to say this is one of the best
damn
posts you've ever done.
Thanks Shemp, but the last paragraph still stands.
Franky, Peter, I'm surprised that
Shemp wrote:
Although your last two paragraphs get a bit flaky,
Richard, I have to say this is one of the best damn
posts you've ever done.
Thanks Shemp, but the last paragraph still stands.
Franky, Peter, I'm surprised that I'm having to explain
this to you, you being an educated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk about
demons?
Curtis wrote:
What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard?
That almost all of the Maharishi trained TM teachers are
idiots
So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk about
demons?
Curtis wrote:
What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard?
That almost all of the Maharishi trained TM teachers are
idiots and stoopid schmucks who all failed to understand
the process of effortless transcending?
Judy wrote:
You went on to quote me, apparently as one of the
trolls, yet I went on to point out what you do,
that anybody who doesn't think there's a lot about
God in SBAL has never actually read it.
Well, I never said that Maharishi didn't mention God
in SBAL. What I was trying to point out
What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard? You are
talking with people who know his complete teaching. If you are
trying
to argue that this one book doesn't discuss all of his teaching,
fine.
But if you are trying to run the PR party line on a bunch of
trained
Nice post Edg. It captures the nudge nudge wink wink environment of
our first exposure to TM. In my personal interview I alarmed the
teachers also by telling them that I had read Meditations of MMY
before my intro, so I was taking TM for God realization. I was only
16 but I caught the body
Edg wrote:
When Richard the War Monger says, Which just goes to
prove that, contrary to what Edg implied, Maharishi
didn't talk much about religion, gods, angels or
demons when he composed SBAL, he reveals exactly
that he's a troll and not a person involved in a
dialog.
So, where,
Richard,
My point was only concerning certain specific content. Plenty of
sidhas who are into the teaching can understand MMY's teaching better
than some teacher who isn't intellectual or very into it. I was a
case in point as an MIU grad who was super into the teaching before
going to TTC.
Good call, Judy -- I was not at my best in the earlier posts about
this issue, and I am guilty of wanting to be on both sides.
I do like shaming the TMO for its pose of secularity, yet I was one of
those very posers for decades.
I haven't looked, but believe me, whatever I did post, I never once
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This discussion is so twisted by trollism.
Ya know, Edg, you *could* have explained to start
with what you tell us in this post. If you were
just going to let people guess what your motivations
in cornering your intro TM
Curtis wrote:
So Richard claims to know more about TM
than MMY, but I claim to know more about
his teaching than people who haven't gone
through TTC.
Maybe so, but you don't know more about TM
than I do regardless of your TTC claims. The
proof is here for anyone to read.
So, what,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not uncommon to come across people who never took TTC who claim
to understand MMY's teaching better than the teachers. And sometimes
they love to argue about what it contains with from the perspective
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edg wrote:
When Richard the War Monger says, Which just goes to
prove that, contrary to what Edg implied, Maharishi
didn't talk much about religion, gods, angels or
demons when he composed SBAL, he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk about
demons?
Curtis wrote:
What kind of line are you trying to draw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Edg wrote:
When Richard the War Monger says, Which just goes to
prove that, contrary to what Edg implied, Maharishi
didn't
Curtis wrote:
It is not uncommon to come across people who never
took TTC who claim to understand MMY's teaching better
than the teachers.
Maybe so, but I run across people who make claims to be
TM teachers, Governors, and Ministers all the time, who
never attended a single TTC, CCP, or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk
Richard, are you a TM teacher? A Governor?
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk
about
demons?
Curtis wrote:
What kind of line are you trying to draw here
Richard?
That almost all of the Maharishi trained TM teachers
Nabby:
From your posts here your knowledge of Maharishis teaching is rather
limited, to say the least. Your claim to be a TM-teacher means
nothing whatsoever. Just because you have taken TTC obviously does
not mean that you understood what he said there. Compared to many
Sidhas I know your level
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never was myself a TM teacher and personally I WAS interested in
MMY's commentary on the Gita and his SBAL - as an underlying
universal spiritual perspective to the practice of TM, but one which
was not forced down your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis wrote:
So Richard claims to know more about TM
than MMY, but I claim to know more about
his teaching than people who haven't gone
through TTC.
Maybe so, but you don't know more about TM
than
Never was myself a TM teacher and personally I WAS interested in
MMY's commentary on the Gita and his SBAL - as an underlying
universal spiritual perspective to the practice of TM, but one which
was not forced down your throat (unless perhaps you became a
teacher?). Because of that it WAS OK
My point was that I can't find any reference in SBAL
where the Maharishi talks about the demons of Hindu
mythology. Did he mention this at your TTC? According
to Ed, Maharishi mentions demons in SBAL.
Vaj wrote:
He probably was thinking of M's 1/3 of the Gita
translation.
Probably,
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Vaj wrote:
Most westerners would do well, for the sake of perspective, to look
at what political movements these Vedic Fundies are associated with.
I think they'd be downright shocked.
Unless of course Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Anally or some
other
Edg wrote:
But it was a big fat lie and every teacher knew that
the mantras were the names and attributes of Gods
that the Holy Tradition ADORED, and today, we openly
SELL PRAYERS TO THESE GODS and call them yagyas.
TM has nothing to do with Gods and a Holy Tradition and
nothing to do with
On Feb 4, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Curtis wrote:
My point was only concerning certain specific content.
My point was that I can't find any reference in SBAL
where the Maharishi talks about the demons of Hindu
mythology. Did he mention this at your TTC? According
to Ed,
Curtis wrote:
My point was only concerning certain specific content.
My point was that I can't find any reference in SBAL
where the Maharishi talks about the demons of Hindu
mythology. Did he mention this at your TTC? According
to Ed, Maharishi mentions demons in SBAL.
Is anyone else besides the WAR MONGER thinking that I ever mentioned
demons being in the SBAL?
He was overwhelmingly answered by several other posters with several
quotations from the SBAL with my exact words, but after such, this
massively brain damaged person's query having been satisfied
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of line are you trying to draw here Richard? You are
talking with people who know his complete teaching. If you are
trying
to argue that this one book doesn't discuss all of his
teaching,
Rick Archer wrote:
Congratulations, Edg. You finally got WillyTex.
Heh.
I would have and have used the word demons not devils; - Edg
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163071
Is anyone else besides the WAR MONGER thinking that
I ever mentioned demons being in the SBAL?
I would have and have used the word demons not devils;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/163071
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edg wrote:
But it was a big fat lie and every teacher knew that
the mantras were the names and attributes of Gods
that the Holy Tradition ADORED, and today, we openly
SELL PRAYERS TO THESE GODS and call
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:25 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization
to teach TM)
Is anyone else besides the WAR MONGER
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Never was myself a TM teacher and personally I WAS interested in
MMY's commentary on the Gita and his SBAL - as an underlying
universal spiritual perspective to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I believe we would agree 100% about the SBAL angels and gods
issues.
I suspect so. Thanks for the kind words!
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When someone claims to know more about TM than
MMY,
the conversation screeches to an immediate halt
and
one politely excuses oneself because they left
something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must
chat
later, yes, indeed.
Ya
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J.
Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis wrote:
So Richard claims to know more about TM
than MMY, but I claim to know more about
his teaching than people who haven't gone
through
When someone claims to know more about TM than MMY,
the conversation screeches to an immediate halt and
one politely excuses oneself because they left
something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must chat
later, yes, indeed.
Ya gotta love the theater of the absurd performed by Nabby,
It is pretty funny! Are Richard and Nabby even TM
teachers?
I think Nabby was. Richard didn't need it,he just knows! And me, 18
year drop out that I am, in there swinging! A Monty Python moment.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- curtisdeltablues
47 matches
Mail list logo
